Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

Warren Silver

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Warren Silver
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Prior offices:
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Education
Bachelor's
Tufts University, 1970
Law
American University, Washington College of Law, 1973


Warren M. Silver was a justice on the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. He was appointed to the court by former Governor John Baldacci on July 29, 2005.[1][2][3] He retired from the bench on December 31, 2014.[4]

Education

Silver received his undergraduate degree from Tufts University in 1970 and his J.D. degree from the Washington College of Law at American University in 1973.[5][3]

Career

Silver began his legal career working in the General Counsel’s Office of the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare and in the General Counsel’s Office of the Election Authority of the District of Columbia. He then worked as a private practice lawyer from 1977 until 2005. Silver was then appointed to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in 2005.[5][3]

Awards and associations

Silver served on the Board of Governors of the Maine Trial Lawyers Association and previously served as its president. He also previously served as a chairman of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court's Civil Rules Committee and the Governor's Judicial Selection Committee.[5][3]

Political outlook

See also: Political outlook of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Silver received a campaign finance score of -1.07, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of -1.01 that justices received in Maine.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[6]

See also

External links

Footnotes