Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Washington Initiative 158, Revenues for Elderly and Disabled Measure (1944)
Washington Initiative 158 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Public assistance programs and Taxes |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiated state statute |
Origin |
Washington Initiative 158 was on the ballot as an initiated state statute in Washington on November 7, 1944. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported establishing a three percent income tax to fund $60 monthly payments to the elderly, blind, disabled and widowed. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a three percent income tax to fund $60 monthly payments to the elderly, blind, disabled and widowed. |
Election results
Washington Initiative 158 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 184,405 | 29.65% | ||
437,502 | 70.35% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Initiative 158 was as follows:
“ | An act relating to revenue and taxation; providing for the levy and collection of a three per cent tax on gross income; providing for certain exemptions and deductions; providing for the disposition of revenue derived hereunder; prescribing monthly payments of not less than sixty dollars to certain aged, blind, disabled or widowed persons from an Employment and Retirement Mutual Insurance Fund, herein created; prescribing duties of officers and procedure in relation hereto; regulating disposition of payments by beneficiaries; defining terms and prescribing penalties. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
In Washington, proponents needed to collect a number of signatures for an Initiative to the People.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Washington Olympia (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |