Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

William H. Follett

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
William H. Follett

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Superior Court of Del Norte County
Tenure
Present officeholder

William H. Follett is a judge of the Superior Court of Del Norte County in California. He said in 2017 that he will not run for re-election in 2018.[1][2]

Noteworthy cases

Follett presided over the trial of Nolan Bruder. Bruder was charged with raping his 16-year-old sister in July 2016 after giving her a concentrated form of marijuana, and he pleaded guilty in April 2017.[3][4] Prosecutors recommended Bruder be given six years in prison without probation, but Follett sentenced him to three years of probation and 240 days in county jail.[3][5] The Del Norte Triplicate reported that Follett believed Bruder felt remorse and was unlikely to commit another offense.[6]

The sentence drew criticism for being too lenient, and there were calls for Follett's removal from the bench. U.S. Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas), the founder and cochair of the Congressional Victims' Rights Caucus, said on the House floor, "Sexual assault is never the fault of the victim, contrary to what Judge Follett thinks. Judge Follett got it wrong. He got it wrong in this case, and it’s time for him to pack his toothbrush and leave the bench. And that’s just the way it is."[7] A Change.org petition to remove Follett has also circulated.[8]

California passed a law in 2016 requiring stricter punishments in cases involving sexual assault of an unconscious or severely intoxicated victim.[9] Follett was not bound by that law in the Bruder case because the assault occurred before the new law was in place, although Loyola law professor Laurie Levenson told the Los Angeles Times that the previous law did leave Follett the discretion to hand down a stricter sentence.[3]

See also

External links

Footnotes