Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Yes on 67 (California)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This article is outside of Ballotpedia's coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates. If you would like to help our coverage scope grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.

Yes on 67
Yes on 67.jpg
Basic facts
Location:Sacramento, California
Type:Ballot measure committee
Top official:Louis Brown, Principal Officer
Website:Official website

Yes on 67, also known as Yes on 67 - Protect the Plastic Bag Ban, Sponsored by Environmental and Ocean Protection Organizations, Businesses Including Grocers and Reusable Bag Makers, and Other Nonprofit Organizations, was a ballot measure committee based in Sacramento, California.

In 2016, the committee supported a yes vote on California's Plastic Bag Ban Veto Referendum, which upheld legislation banning plastic bags that was enacted by the California State Legislature as Senate Bill 270. The measure appeared on the ballot on November 8, 2016.[1]

Background

Yes on 67 was a ballot measure committee that previously went under the name of California vs. Big Plastic, Protect The Plastic Bag Ban, Sponsored by Environmental, Ocean Protection, Grocery Store, Reusable Bag Manufacturer, Business and Other Nonprofit Organizations. The group's listed principal officer was Louis Brown.[2] Brown was a partner at the Sacramento-based Kahn, Soares and Conway, LLP, and led the firm's Government Relations Group.[3]

The group was supported by a number of organizations, businesses, and individuals. For a full list of supporters click here.

Below is a list of some of the political supporters of the Yes on 67 committee:[4]

Political activity

Ballot measure activity

2016 activity

See also: California Proposition 67, Plastic Bag Ban Veto Referendum (2016)

Yes on 67 supported a yes vote on California's Plastic Bag Ban Veto Referendum, which upheld legislation banning plastic bags that was enacted by the California State Legislature as Senate Bill 270.[1] According to the committee, maintaining the ban on plastic bags protects wildlife and generates less litter in rivers, lakes, streams, and the ocean; it would also reduce litter clean-up costs.[1]

Overview of ballot measure support and opposition

The following table details Yes on 67's ballot measure stances available on Ballotpedia:

Ballot measure support and opposition for Yes on 67
Ballot measure Year Position Status
California Proposition 67, Plastic Bag Ban Veto Referendum (2016) 2016 Opposed a veto  ApprovedaApproved

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms 'Yes on 67 - Protect the Plastic Bag Ban, Sponsored by Environmental and Ocean Protection Organizations, Businesses Including Grocers and Reusable Bag Makers, and Other Nonprofit Organizations'. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes