California No Tuition for California Residents (2012): Difference between revisions

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Replaced ==References== with ==Footnotes==.)
m (add categories for inventory (via BP-MassEdit WEB))
Tag: bp-massedit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
'''Fiscal impact statement:'''  
'''Fiscal impact statement:'''  


''(Note: The [[fiscal impact statement]] for a [[laws governing the initiative process in California|California ballot initiative]] authorized for circulation is jointly prepared by the [[California Legislative Analyst's Office|state's legislative analyst]] and its director of finance.)''
''Note: The [[fiscal impact statement]] for a [[laws governing the initiative process in California|California ballot initiative]] authorized for circulation is jointly prepared by the [[California Legislative Analyst's Office|state's legislative analyst]] and its director of finance.''


:"Annual loss of state tuition revenue of about $2.8 billion per year beginning in 2013-14, backfilled by additional state personal income tax revenue that is likely to total $2 billion or more per year. Potential shortfalls in university resources in some fiscal years would have to be addressed through some combination of cost reductions and alternative funding sources, which could create pressure on the state General Fund. "
:"Annual loss of state tuition revenue of about $2.8 billion per year beginning in 2013-14, backfilled by additional state personal income tax revenue that is likely to total $2 billion or more per year. Potential shortfalls in university resources in some fiscal years would have to be addressed through some combination of cost reductions and alternative funding sources, which could create pressure on the state General Fund. "
Line 33: Line 33:
:: ''See also: [[California signature requirements]]''
:: ''See also: [[California signature requirements]]''
* Suneal Kolluri, Richard Boettner and Kara Duros submitted a letter requesting a [[ballot title]] on November 28, 2011.
* Suneal Kolluri, Richard Boettner and Kara Duros submitted a letter requesting a [[ballot title]] on November 28, 2011.
* The [[ballot title]] and [[ballot summary (California)|ballot summary]] were issued by the [[Attorney General of California]]'s office on January 23, 2012.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/2/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/cleared-for-circulation.htm ''California Secretary of State'', "2012 Initiatives and Referenda Cleared for Circulation," accessed January 27, 2012]</ref>  
* The [[ballot title]] and [[ballot summary (California)|ballot summary]] were issued by [[Attorney General of California|California's attorney general]]'s office on January 23, 2012.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/2/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/cleared-for-circulation.htm ''California Secretary of State'', "2012 Initiatives and Referenda Cleared for Circulation," accessed January 27, 2012]</ref>  
* The 150-day circulation deadline for #11-0086 is June 21, 2012.
* The 150-day circulation deadline for #11-0086 is June 21, 2012.
* [[California signature requirements|807,615 valid signatures]] are required for qualification purposes.
* [[California signature requirements|807,615 valid signatures]] are required for qualification purposes.
Line 50: Line 50:
[[Category:Did not make ballot, education]]
[[Category:Did not make ballot, education]]
[[Category:Did not make ballot, taxes]]
[[Category:Did not make ballot, taxes]]
[[Category:Did not make ballot, state and local government budgets, spending and finance]]
[[Category:Did not make ballot, state and local government budgets, spending and finance]][[Category:Not on the ballot past date statewide ballot measures]]

Latest revision as of 20:25, 3 February 2026

Not on Ballot
Proposed ballot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure was not put
on an election ballot

A California No Tuition for California Residents Initiative (#11-0086) was approved for circulation in California as a contender for the November 6, 2012 ballot.

Its sponsors, however, did not submit any signatures to election officials by the deadline.

If the initiative had qualified for the ballot and been approved by the state's voters, it would have:

  • Added .7% to California's personal income tax rate for those with a taxable income over $250,000 (over $342,465 if filing as head of household).
  • Added 1.7% to the state's personal income tax rate for those with a taxable income over $500,000 (over $684,930 if filing as head of household).
  • Allocated the new revenue to pay up to four years' tuition and fees for full-time undergraduate California residents attending University of California or California State University who maintain minimum 2.7 grade point average or perform 70 hours of annual community service.

Its sponsors called the measure the ""Tax to Fund Free State Resident Tuition at UC and CSU." The idea was hatched as part of a senior class project at Life Academy and Oakland Unity High School.[1]

Text of measure

See also: Ballot titles, summaries and fiscal statements for California's 2012 ballot propositions

Ballot title:

Tax to Pay Tuition and Fees at California Public Universities. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

Official summary:

"Adds .7 percent to personal income tax rate applied to taxable income over $250,000 (over $342,465 if filing as head of household), and adds 1.7 percent to personal income tax rate applied to taxable income over $500,000 (over $684,930 if filing as head of household). Allocates new revenue to pay up to four years' tuition and fees for full-time undergraduate California residents attending University of California or California State University who maintain minimum 2.7 grade point average or perform 70 hours of annual community service."

Fiscal impact statement:

Note: The fiscal impact statement for a California ballot initiative authorized for circulation is jointly prepared by the state's legislative analyst and its director of finance.

"Annual loss of state tuition revenue of about $2.8 billion per year beginning in 2013-14, backfilled by additional state personal income tax revenue that is likely to total $2 billion or more per year. Potential shortfalls in university resources in some fiscal years would have to be addressed through some combination of cost reductions and alternative funding sources, which could create pressure on the state General Fund. "

Path to the ballot

See also: California signature requirements

External links

Footnotes