Philip Martin (Nebraska): Difference between revisions
m (Replaced Polinfobox / Judge Infobox with APIWidget) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
< | <BPW widget='profile/infobox' person='85226'/>{{tnr}} | ||
'''Philip Martin''' was a judge in the [[9th County Court Judicial District, Nebraska|9th County Court Judicial District]] in [[Nebraska]]. He joined the court in 1991 and {{Greener|start=1/31/2017|before=will retire|after=retired}} on January 31, 2017.<ref>[http://www.1011now.com/content/news/County-judge-set-to-retire-410779035.html ''10 11'', "County judge set to retire," January 15, 2017]</ref> | '''Philip Martin''' was a judge in the [[9th County Court Judicial District, Nebraska|9th County Court Judicial District]] in [[Nebraska]]. He joined the court in 1991 and {{Greener|start=1/31/2017|before=will retire|after=retired}} on January 31, 2017.<ref>[http://www.1011now.com/content/news/County-judge-set-to-retire-410779035.html ''10 11'', "County judge set to retire," January 15, 2017]</ref> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
[[category:Nebraska retention 2012]] | [[category:Nebraska retention 2012]] | ||
[[category:{{Greener|start=1/31/2017|before=Retiring|after=Retired}} judges, January 2017]] | [[category:{{Greener|start=1/31/2017|before=Retiring|after=Retired}} judges, January 2017]] | ||
<APIWidget where="people.id=85226" template="PersonCategories"/> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:52, 9 November 2025
Philip Martin was a judge in the 9th County Court Judicial District in Nebraska. He joined the court in 1991 and retired on January 31, 2017.[1]
2012 election
- See also: Nebraska judicial elections, 2012
Martin was retained in the general election on November 6, winning 80.10 percent of the vote.[2][3]
2012 judicial performance evaluation
Every two years, the Nebraska State Bar Association compiles responses from lawyers to evaluate judges in the state. Subjects are rated in seven categories, then a determination is made for whether the judge should be retained. The seven categories considered are: legal analysis; impartiality; attentiveness; opinions; judicial temperament and demeanor; appropriate communication; and timeliness.
87.5 percent of respondents stated that Judge Martin should be retained in office. To read the full evaluation, see: Nebraska State Bar Association, 2012 Evaluation Results.
See also
External links
Footnotes
Federal courts:
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: District of Nebraska • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of Nebraska
State courts:
Nebraska Supreme Court • Nebraska Court of Appeals • Nebraska District Courts • Nebraska County Courts • Nebraska Separate Juvenile Courts • Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court • Nebraska Problem-Solving Courts
State resources:
Courts in Nebraska • Nebraska judicial elections • Judicial selection in Nebraska
