Selkirk School District Levy Replacement (April 2012): Difference between revisions
From Ballotpedia
m (Text replace - "ategory:School property tax,(.*)]]" to "ategory:Local property tax,$1]] Category:Local school tax,$1 ") |
m (Replaced ==References== with ==Footnotes==.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This measure sought to replace the current levy with one set at a rate of $2.11 per $1,000 of assessed value for a period of two years in order to help pay for maintenance and operational costs in the district. This will be the second attempt to pass this levy.<ref>[http://m-o-levy.selkirkschools.schoolfusion.us/modules/locker/files/get_group_file.phtml?fid=15864429&gid=2978829&sessionid=14b68673d4bad1a8c8a67b028cf5ac18 ''Selkirk School District'', Levy Brochure Information]</ref> | This measure sought to replace the current levy with one set at a rate of $2.11 per $1,000 of assessed value for a period of two years in order to help pay for maintenance and operational costs in the district. This will be the second attempt to pass this levy.<ref>[http://m-o-levy.selkirkschools.schoolfusion.us/modules/locker/files/get_group_file.phtml?fid=15864429&gid=2978829&sessionid=14b68673d4bad1a8c8a67b028cf5ac18 ''Selkirk School District'', Levy Brochure Information]</ref> | ||
== | ==Footnotes== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 17:43, 4 June 2016
| Bond elections |
|---|
| 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
| Property tax elections |
| 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
| See also |
| State comparisons How voting works Approval rates |
A Selkirk School District Levy Replacement measure was on the April 17, 2012 ballot in the Selkirk school district area which is in Pend Oreille County.
This measure was approved
- YES 389 (52.21%)
- NO 356 (47.79%)[1]
This measure sought to replace the current levy with one set at a rate of $2.11 per $1,000 of assessed value for a period of two years in order to help pay for maintenance and operational costs in the district. This will be the second attempt to pass this levy.[2]
Footnotes
| ||||||||||
