School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 548: | Line 548: | ||
|OutstandingAver=$2,139,091,810 | |OutstandingAver=$2,139,091,810 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Academic performance== | |||
===Proficiency assessments=== | |||
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the [[U.S. Department of Education]], proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, '''proficiency levels are not comparable between different states''' and '''year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable''' because states may change their proficiency measurements.<ref>[http://www.ed.gov/edfacts ''U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts'', "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 ED''Facts'' Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021]</ref> | |||
====Mathematics==== | |||
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:<ref name=DataNote>''To protect student privacy, percentages were reported as ranges for groups of 300 students or fewer. If five (5) or fewer students were included in a data set, the data was replaced by "PS."''</ref> | |||
{{NCES 4218990 academic performance|Type=Mathematics}} | |||
====Reading/language arts==== | |||
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:<ref name=DataNote/> | |||
{{NCES 4218990 academic performance|Type=Reading}} | |||
===Graduation rates=== | |||
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:<ref name=DataNote/><ref>[http://www.ed.gov/edfacts ''U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts'', "Four-Year Adjusted-Cohort Graduation Rates - School Year 2017-18 ED''Facts'' Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021]</ref> | |||
{{NCES 4218990 academic performance|Type=Graduation}} | |||
==Student enrollment== | |||
{{NCES 4218990 enrollment}} | |||
==About the district== | |||
{{NCES 4218990 about the district|Year=Present}} | |||
==[[Noteworthy events]]== | ==[[Noteworthy events]]== | ||
===2015: Debates over School Reform Commission=== | ===2015: Debates over School Reform Commission=== | ||
Revision as of 22:47, 19 April 2021
| School District of Philadelphia |
|---|
 |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
| District details |
| Superintendent: William R. Hite Jr. |
| # of school board members: 5 |
| Website: Link |
The School District of Philadelphia is a school district in Pennsylvania. In the 2012-2013 school year, the district was the largest school district in Pennsylvania and served 143,898 students.[1]
In December 2001, the district was put under the control of a School Reform Commission (SRC).[2] Learn more about the SRC and the debate over district governance here.
Superintendent
 |
This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates. |
William R. Hite Jr. is the superintendent of the School District of Philadelphia. Hite was appointed superintendent in October 2012.[3]
Budget
From 1993 to 2013, the School District of Philadelphia had an average of $2,067,427,429 in revenue and $2,225,548,286 in expenditures, according to the United States Census Bureau's survey of school system finances. The district had a yearly average of $2,139,091,810 in outstanding debt. The district retired $272,307,048 of its debt and issued $430,354,238 in new debt each year on average.[4]
Revenue
The table below separates the district's revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.
| Revenue by Source | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year |
Local | State | Federal | Revenue Total | |||||||
| Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | ||||||
| Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years. | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | $545,329,000 | 38.08% | $709,341,000 | 49.53% | $177,364,000 | 12.39% | $1,432,034,000 | ||||
| 1994 | $537,613,000 | 37.95% | $715,157,000 | 50.49% | $163,776,000 | 11.56% | $1,416,546,000 | ||||
| 1995 | $541,323,000 | 37.95% | $721,578,000 | 50.59% | $163,445,000 | 11.46% | $1,426,346,000 | ||||
| 1996 | $587,851,000 | 39.06% | $757,631,000 | 50.34% | $159,471,000 | 10.60% | $1,504,953,000 | ||||
| 1997 | $649,732,000 | 40.59% | $775,718,000 | 48.46% | $175,280,000 | 10.95% | $1,600,730,000 | ||||
| 1998 | $600,720,000 | 38.65% | $771,302,000 | 49.63% | $182,186,000 | 11.72% | $1,554,208,000 | ||||
| 1999 | $633,557,000 | 38.69% | $810,100,000 | 49.48% | $193,693,000 | 11.83% | $1,637,350,000 | ||||
| 2000 | $615,170,000 | 36.89% | $831,061,000 | 49.84% | $221,366,000 | 13.27% | $1,667,597,000 | ||||
| 2001 | $639,457,000 | 36.92% | $854,006,000 | 49.30% | $238,677,000 | 13.78% | $1,732,140,000 | ||||
| 2002 | $674,462,000 | 36.45% | $924,052,000 | 49.93% | $252,091,000 | 13.62% | $1,850,605,000 | ||||
| 2003 | $701,504,000 | 34.98% | $1,020,091,000 | 50.87% | $283,834,000 | 14.15% | $2,005,429,000 | ||||
| 2004 | $721,367,000 | 34.16% | $1,057,020,000 | 50.05% | $333,586,000 | 15.79% | $2,111,973,000 | ||||
| 2005 | $794,794,000 | 34.68% | $1,152,984,000 | 50.31% | $343,999,000 | 15.01% | $2,291,777,000 | ||||
| 2006 | $796,963,000 | 33.90% | $1,211,038,000 | 51.51% | $342,845,000 | 14.58% | $2,350,846,000 | ||||
| 2007 | $826,059,000 | 33.83% | $1,303,631,000 | 53.40% | $311,782,000 | 12.77% | $2,441,472,000 | ||||
| 2008 | $887,680,000 | 34.57% | $1,368,208,000 | 53.29% | $311,595,000 | 12.14% | $2,567,483,000 | ||||
| 2009 | $864,614,000 | 32.37% | $1,479,741,000 | 55.40% | $326,710,000 | 12.23% | $2,671,065,000 | ||||
| 2010 | $859,639,000 | 30.36% | $1,415,203,000 | 49.98% | $556,585,000 | 19.66% | $2,831,427,000 |
| 2011 | $848,447,000 | 29.29% | $1,411,582,000 | 48.73% | $636,770,000 | 21.98% | $2,896,799,000 |
| 2012 | $936,603,000 | 34.92% | $1,292,598,000 | 48.20% | $452,562,000 | 16.88% | $2,681,763,000 |
| 2013 | $980,119,000 | 35.73% | $1,333,752,000 | 48.62% | $429,562,000 | 15.66% | $2,743,433,000 |
| Avg. | $725,857,286 | 35.72% | $1,043,609,238 | 50.38% | $297,960,905 | 13.91% | $2,067,427,429 |
Expenditures
The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:
- Instruction: operation expenditures, state payments on behalf of the district for instruction and benefits, and retirement system transfers
- Support Services: support services, food services, and retirement system transfers for support service staff
- Capital Spending: capital outlay expenditures (i.e., construction, land or facilities purchases, and equipment purchases)
- Debt & Gov. Payments: payments to state and local governments and interest on school system debt
- Other: all other non-K-12 programs, except food services
| Expenditures by Category | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year |
Instruction | Support Services | Capital Spending | Debt & Gov. Payments | Other | Budget Total | |||||
| Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | ||
| Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years. | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | $830,498,000 | 55.05% | $472,478,000 | 31.32% | $46,422,000 | 3.08% | $32,307,000 | 2.14% | $126,817,000 | 8.41% | $1,508,522,000 |
| 1994 | $667,970,000 | 45.77% | $456,703,000 | 31.29% | $62,707,000 | 4.30% | $53,297,000 | 3.65% | $218,816,000 | 14.99% | $1,459,493,000 |
| 1995 | $683,068,000 | 50.47% | $419,350,000 | 30.99% | $8,400,000 | 0.62% | $31,857,000 | 2.35% | $210,637,000 | 15.56% | $1,353,312,000 |
| 1996 | $716,376,000 | 49.29% | $457,199,000 | 31.46% | $11,876,000 | 0.82% | $32,261,000 | 2.22% | $235,679,000 | 16.22% | $1,453,391,000 |
| 1997 | $742,685,000 | 48.82% | $474,222,000 | 31.17% | $13,339,000 | 0.88% | $46,279,000 | 3.04% | $244,753,000 | 16.09% | $1,521,278,000 |
| 1998 | $733,824,000 | 48.57% | $479,846,000 | 31.76% | $13,584,000 | 0.90% | $43,776,000 | 2.90% | $239,755,000 | 15.87% | $1,510,785,000 |
| 1999 | $728,268,000 | 41.90% | $524,252,000 | 30.16% | $150,838,000 | 8.68% | $51,231,000 | 2.95% | $283,471,000 | 16.31% | $1,738,060,000 |
| 2000 | $726,001,000 | 39.69% | $584,904,000 | 31.97% | $156,675,000 | 8.56% | $49,624,000 | 2.71% | $312,095,000 | 17.06% | $1,829,299,000 |
| 2001 | $788,137,000 | 40.21% | $609,509,000 | 31.10% | $161,899,000 | 8.26% | $55,004,000 | 2.81% | $345,581,000 | 17.63% | $1,960,130,000 |
| 2002 | $794,278,000 | 39.97% | $613,515,000 | 30.88% | $141,936,000 | 7.14% | $53,476,000 | 2.69% | $383,815,000 | 19.32% | $1,987,020,000 |
| 2003 | $834,962,000 | 40.94% | $620,639,000 | 30.43% | $67,160,000 | 3.29% | $72,219,000 | 3.54% | $444,409,000 | 21.79% | $2,039,389,000 |
| 2004 | $907,007,000 | 37.45% | $715,853,000 | 29.56% | $147,005,000 | 6.07% | $157,514,000 | 6.50% | $494,379,000 | 20.41% | $2,421,758,000 |
| 2005 | $922,485,000 | 36.44% | $733,786,000 | 28.99% | $209,732,000 | 8.29% | $130,817,000 | 5.17% | $534,603,000 | 21.12% | $2,531,423,000 |
| 2006 | $903,805,000 | 34.66% | $749,560,000 | 28.74% | $237,165,000 | 9.09% | $136,140,000 | 5.22% | $581,162,000 | 22.29% | $2,607,832,000 |
| 2007 | $840,547,000 | 31.28% | $760,947,000 | 28.32% | $334,395,000 | 12.44% | $154,819,000 | 5.76% | $596,706,000 | 22.20% | $2,687,414,000 |
| 2008 | $872,336,000 | 30.82% | $750,851,000 | 26.53% | $387,859,000 | 13.70% | $172,100,000 | 6.08% | $647,291,000 | 22.87% | $2,830,437,000 |
| 2009 | $956,638,000 | 34.64% | $774,387,000 | 28.04% | $249,282,000 | 9.03% | $84,701,000 | 3.07% | $697,014,000 | 25.24% | $2,762,022,000 |
| 2010 | $1,082,196,000 | 36.68% | $809,468,000 | 27.43% | $180,847,000 | 6.13% | $135,772,000 | 4.60% | $742,259,000 | 25.16% | $2,950,542,000 |
| 2011 | $1,109,832,000 | 35.31% | $824,572,000 | 26.24% | $203,291,000 | 6.47% | $147,097,000 | 4.68% | $858,187,000 | 27.30% | $3,142,979,000 |
| 2012 | $993,871,000 | 35.32% | $689,868,000 | 24.52% | $89,663,000 | 3.19% | $132,414,000 | 4.71% | $908,096,000 | 32.27% | $2,813,912,000 |
| 2013 | $1,695,669,000 | 46.74% | $688,221,000 | 18.97% | $80,438,000 | 2.22% | $150,225,000 | 4.14% | $1,012,963,000 | 27.92% | $3,627,516,000 |
| Avg. | $882,402,524 | 40.95% | $629,053,810 | 29.04% | $140,691,095 | 5.86% | $91,568,095 | 3.85% | $481,832,762 | 20.29% | $2,225,548,286 |
Debt
The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.
| Debt | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year |
Retired | Issued | Outstanding |
| Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | $236,283,000 | $214,816,000 | $782,436,000 |
| 1994 | $30,686,000 | $184,985,000 | $936,268,000 |
| 1995 | $35,452,000 | $18,484,000 | $690,995,000 |
| 1996 | $89,744,000 | $234,769,000 | $832,000,000 |
| 1997 | $90,722,000 | $166,204,000 | $908,728,000 |
| 1998 | $15,097,000 | $33,417,000 | $915,981,000 |
| 1999 | $146,529,000 | $257,328,000 | $1,021,706,000 |
| 2000 | $115,688,000 | $221,537,000 | $1,118,670,000 |
| 2001 | $47,189,000 | $206,309,000 | $1,261,372,000 |
| 2002 | $35,223,000 | $475,029,000 | $1,974,107,000 |
| 2003 | $100,834,000 | $180,130,000 | $2,053,403,000 |
| 2004 | $1,460,637,000 | $2,396,537,000 | $2,989,303,000 |
| 2005 | $411,733,000 | $454,850,000 | $3,032,421,000 |
| 2006 | $36,691,000 | $141,361,000 | $3,137,091,000 |
| 2007 | $757,616,000 | $1,009,225,000 | $3,336,074,000 |
| 2008 | $749,376,000 | $724,300,000 | $3,275,519,000 |
| 2009 | $284,718,000 | $496,565,000 | $3,496,553,000 |
| 2010 | $429,497,000 | $676,295,000 | $3,738,134,000 |
| 2011 | $439,412,000 | $425,880,000 | $2,980,922,000 |
| 2012 | $91,117,000 | $254,423,000 | $3,144,227,000 |
| 2013 | $114,204,000 | $264,995,000 | $3,295,018,000 |
| Avg. | $272,307,048 | $430,354,238 | $2,139,091,810 |
Academic performance
Proficiency assessments
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[5]
Mathematics
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[6]
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-2019 | 23 | 57 | 13 | 15 | 20-24 | 29 | 44 |
| 2017-2018 | 22 | 55 | 13 | 14 | 15-19 | 30 | 41 |
| 2016-2017 | 20 | 53 | 12 | 13 | 25-29 | 26 | 39 |
| 2015-2016 | 21 | 52 | 13 | 14 | 25-29 | 25 | 39 |
| 2014-2015 | 19 | 51 | 12 | 12 | 20-24 | 24 | 36 |
| 2013-2014 | 44 | 76 | 36 | 38 | 50-54 | 49 | 64 |
| 2012-2013 | 46 | 75 | 38 | 40 | 45-49 | 53 | 66 |
| 2011-2012 | 49 | 79 | 41 | 43 | 55-59 | 59 | 68 |
| 2010-2011 | 57 | 83 | 52 | 53 | 65-69 | 67 | 73 |
Reading/language arts
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[6]
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-2019 | 37 | 65 | 28 | 29 | 35-39 | 41 | 59 |
| 2017-2018 | 37 | 65 | 28 | 28 | 35-39 | 43 | 58 |
| 2016-2017 | 35 | 63 | 27 | 26 | 40-44 | 40 | 55 |
| 2015-2016 | 35 | 61 | 27 | 26 | 35-39 | 39 | 55 |
| 2014-2015 | 34 | 60 | 27 | 26 | 45-49 | 40 | 54 |
| 2013-2014 | 43 | 66 | 38 | 35 | 45-49 | 47 | 62 |
| 2012-2013 | 44 | 66 | 38 | 37 | 50-54 | 50 | 62 |
| 2011-2012 | 44 | 66 | 39 | 38 | 55-59 | 53 | 63 |
| 2010-2011 | 51 | 70 | 47 | 45 | 60-64 | 61 | 69 |
Graduation rates
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[6][7]
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-2018 | 63 | 85 | 61 | 56 | ≥50 | 62 | 68 |
| 2016-2017 | 67 | 85 | 65 | 61 | 60-79 | 74 | 74 |
| 2015-2016 | 69 | 83 | 66 | 63 | 60-79 | 75-79 | 75 |
| 2014-2015 | 65 | 80 | 65 | 53 | 60-79 | 70-74 | 71 |
| 2013-2014 | 68 | 83 | 67 | 60 | 60-79 | 80-84 | 70 |
| 2012-2013 | 70 | 84 | 69 | 62 | 40-59 | 75-79 | 77 |
| 2011-2012 | 62 | 75 | 61 | 53 | 40-59 | 60-64 | 65 |
| 2010-2011 | 55 | 72 | 56 | 44 | 40-59 | ≤5 | 55 |
Student enrollment
| Year[8] | Enrollment | Year-to-year change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-2019 | 128,647 | 1.1 |
| 2017-2018 | 127,202 | -2.9 |
| 2016-2017 | 131,052 | -0.2 |
| 2015-2016 | 131,295 | 0.5 |
| 2014-2015 | 130,664 | -2.3 |
| 2013-2014 | 133,703 | -4.2 |
| 2012-2013 | 139,503 | -4.8 |
| 2011-2012 | 146,482 | -6.0 |
| 2010-2011 | 155,856 | -0.6 |
| 2009-2010 | 156,790 | -1.9 |
| 2008-2009 | 159,867 | -5.1 |
| 2007-2008 | 168,457 | -3.6 |
| 2006-2007 | 174,718 | -4.6 |
| 2005-2006 | 183,188 | -1.5 |
| 2004-2005 | 186,051 | -2.0 |
| 2003-2004 | 189,779 | -1.5 |
| 2002-2003 | 192,683 | -2.2 |
| 2001-2002 | 197,083 | -2.0 |
| 2000-2001 | 201,190 | -2.0 |
| 1999-2000 | 205,199 | -1.1 |
| 1998-1999 | 207,465 | -2.5 |
| 1997-1998 | 212,865 | 0.3 |
| 1996-1997 | 212,150 | 0.8 |
| 1995-1996 | 210,503 | 0.9 |
| 1994-1995 | 208,710 | 0.5 |
| 1993-1994 | 207,667 | 3.1 |
| 1992-1993 | 201,496 | 2.9 |
| 1991-1992 | 195,735 | 2.5 |
| 1990-1991 | 190,978 | 0.8 |
| 1989-1990 | 189,451 | -0.9 |
| 1988-1989 | 191,141 | 1.1 |
| 1987-1988 | 189,031 | -4.5 |
| 1986-1987 | 197,843 | - |
About the district
School District of Philadelphia is located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It is classified as a large city school district by the National Center for Education Statistics. The district served 128,647 students during the 2018-2019 school year and comprised 217 schools.[9]
During the 2018-2019 school year, 99.9% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 12.1% were English language learners, and 18.2% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP).[10]
| Racial Demographics, 2018-2019 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Race | School District of Philadelphia (%) | Pennsylvania K-12 students (%) |
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander | 8.9 | 4.0 |
| Black | 48.6 | 14.8 |
| Hispanic | 21.4 | 12.1 |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Two or More Races | 6.5 | 4.2 |
| White | 14.2 | 64.7 |
Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.
Noteworthy events
2015: Debates over School Reform Commission
The School District of Philadelphia has never been run by an elected school board, a unique situation among Pennsylvania school districts. The board was selected by the city's common pleas judge from 1905 to 1965, when the mayor was given the power to appoint members. In 2001, the mayor consented to the creation of the School Reform Commission (SRC), a five-member board with three members appointed by the governor and two members appointed by the mayor. The SRC was created in the midst of public concerns over district finances and academic performance.[11]
A push for local control gained momentum in 2015 with voter approval of a non-binding ballot question seeking the end of the SRC. Former Mayor Michael Nutter called for the end of the commission before leaving office, and successor James Kenney supports more local control once the district improves its finances.[12] The SRC was also analyzed by The Pew Charitable Trusts in a January 2016 report. The report titled "Governing Urban Schools in the Future: What's Facing Philadelphia and Pennsylvania" concluded with the following statement:
| “ |
Education experts say that state takeovers of local districts have, at least in some cases, cured financial ills created through mismanagement. But there is no indication that any particular system for governing urban school districts is superior to another in improving long-term academic performance. Too many other factors, experts say, help determine what happens in the classroom, including the quality of principals and teachers, funding, and parental expectations. There is broad agreement on at least one conclusion: Governance systems that produce uncertainty, distrust, and ambiguous accountability can impede districts’ progress on any front. [13] |
” |
| —The Pew Charitable Trusts (2016), [11] | ||
Contact information
School District of Philadelphia
440 N. Broad St.
Philadelphia, PA 19130
Phone: (215) 400-4000
See also
| Pennsylvania | School Board Elections | News and Analysis |
|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
External links
- School District of Philadelphia
- Pennsylvania Department of Education
- Pennsylvania School Boards Association
- Philadelphia Federation of Teachers
Footnotes
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "ELSI Table Generator," accessed April 17, 2015
- ↑ School District of Philadelphia, "About Us," accessed July 15, 2015
- ↑ LinkedIn, "Bill Hite," accessed November 1, 2019
- ↑ United States Census Bureau, "Public School System Finances: Historical Data," accessed December 1, 2015
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 To protect student privacy, percentages were reported as ranges for groups of 300 students or fewer. If five (5) or fewer students were included in a data set, the data was replaced by "PS."
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "Four-Year Adjusted-Cohort Graduation Rates - School Year 2017-18 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "ElSi tableGenerator," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Search for Public School Districts," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Governing Urban Schools in the Future: What's Facing Philadelphia and Pennsylvania," January 2016
- ↑ Philly.com, "Pew: No magic from local or state school control," January 14, 2016
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
 |
State of Pennsylvania Harrisburg (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
 |
This school board-related article is a sprout; we plan on making it grow in the future. If you would like to help it grow, please consider donating to Ballotpedia. |
