News and analysis right to your inbox. Click to get Ballotpedia’s newsletters!

California Childhood Sexual Abuse Initiative (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 19:26, 21 April 2023 by Ryan Byrne (contribs) (Text replacement - "| topic = " to "| topic =")
Jump to: navigation, search

{{Expansion depth limit exceeded| name = California Childhood Sexual Abuse Initiative | election date = November 8, 2016 | state = California | year = 2016 | status = Not on the ballot | status image = | type = Initiated state statute | topic =Law enforcement | ballot language = }}{{Expansion depth limit exceeded}}{{Expansion depth limit exceeded}} The Childhood Sexual Abuse Initiative (#15-0059) was not put on the November 8, 2016 ballot as an {{Expansion depth limit exceeded}} in California.

The measure would have eliminated the statute of limitations for civil actions and felony prosecutions for sexual crimes against children.Expansion depth limit exceeded

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was:Expansion depth limit exceeded {{Expansion depth limit exceeded|Childhood Sexual Abuse. Statutes of Limitations. Initiative Statute.}}

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was:Expansion depth limit exceeded {{Expansion depth limit exceeded|Eliminates statute of limitations for civil actions based on childhood sexual abuse committed on or after the effective date of the measure. Eliminates statute of limitations for felony prosecutions for certain sexual crimes committed against children on or after the effective date of the measure, and for such crimes committed before the effective date of the measure for which the statute of limitations has not yet expired.}}

Full text

The full text of the measure can be found here.

Fiscal impact

Note: The fiscal impact statement for a California ballot initiative authorized for circulation is jointly prepared by the state's legislative analyst and its director of finance. The statement reads:Expansion depth limit exceeded {{Expansion depth limit exceeded|Probably minor increase in costs to the state courts, as well as the state and local criminal justice system, from an increase in cases filed and individuals convicted. The fiscal impact on local governments related to civil claims is not likely to be significant on a statewide basis, but the effect on individual local government entities could vary substantially.}}

Path to the ballot

See also: California signature requirements
  • William Lynch submitted a letter requesting a title and summary on September 3, 2015.Expansion depth limit exceeded
  • A title and summary were issued by California's attorney general's office on November 9, 2015.Expansion depth limit exceeded
  • 365,880 valid signatures are required for qualification purposes.
  • Supporters {{Expansion depth limit exceeded|start=05/09/2016 12:00am CST|before=have|after=had}} until May 9, 2016, to collect the required signatures.

{{Expansion depth limit exceeded}} {{Expansion depth limit exceeded}}

See also

{{Expansion depth limit exceeded}}

Footnotes

{{Expansion depth limit exceeded}} {{Expansion depth limit exceeded}} {{Expansion depth limit exceeded}}