Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Lethal injection procedure violates Montana constitution, judge rules

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 16:29, 7 June 2016 by Maintenance script (contribs) (Replaced ==References== with ==Footnotes==.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
The Judicial Update

September 19, 2012

Montana: Judge Jeffrey M. Sherlock ruled last week that Montana's procedure of lethal injection, which has been implemented since 1976, is in violation of the state's constitution. In the beginning of his written decision Judge Sherlock points out that "The case does not challenge the constitutionality of the death penalty - it only concerns the protocol used by the State of Montana."

The ruling went in favor of the two plaintiffs who are inmates on death row for murder. The decision, however, does not prevent them from receiving the death penalty. The inmates only wish that the penalty be administered in a "more humane and painless fashion."[1]

Montana


The protocol

The current execution protocol calls for the administration of sodium pentothal, pancuronuim bromide, and potassium chloride. Each agent serves to lesson or prevent the subject from feeling pain, but if administered incorrectly or in the wrong order it could cause burning and severe pain. Judge Sherlock found there to be to an increase of risk of error or confusion with the three drug process. Considering this and other aspects of the process, Sherlock ruled that the protocol violated Article II, sections 4 and 22 of the Montana Constitution.[1]

Section 4: The dignity of the human being is inviolable. No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws. Neither the state nor any person, firm, corporation, or institution shall discriminate against any person in the exercise of his civil or political rights on account of race, color, sex, culture, social origin or condition, or political or religious ideas.

Section 22: Excessive bail shall not be required, or excessive fines imposed, or cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.[2]

The ruling has put an effective hold on Montana executions until the state can create a new protocol.[3]

See also

Footnotes