Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Pennsylvania Supreme Court elections, 2017

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 06:02, 8 November 2017 by Joel Williams (contribs) (→‎Justices facing retention)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

State House • State judges • Local judges • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • How to run for office
Flag of Pennsylvania.png


Three justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court were up for election or retention on November 7, 2017. The supreme court is the court of last resort for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Most of the court's caseload consists of appeals of lower court decisions.

2017 State
Supreme Court Elections
2018 »
« 2016
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Judicial Elections Overview
Supreme Courts Overview
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin
Have you subscribed yet?

Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
Click here to learn more.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Sitting Republican Justice Sallie Mundy defeated Democratic Judge Dwayne D. Woodruff in a state-wide partisan election. Mundy was appointed to the court in 2016 and was required to stand for election in order to remain on the bench for a full term. They were each unopposed in their parties' primary elections and faced each other in the November general election.
  • Chief Justice Thomas Saylor and Justice Debra Todd stood for state-wide retention by voters to remain on the bench. They were both retained. Retention elections are not competitive, and judges do not face other candidates; instead, voters are asked whether or not the judge should be retained on the court. If more than fifty percent of voters vote "yes," the judge retains his or her seat.
  • What was at stake: If Judge Woodruff had defeated Justice Mundy, the court's Democratic majority would have increased to 6-1 from 5-2.
  • Race backgrounds

    In 2017, Pennsylvania voters chose one supreme court justice in a partisan election and chose whether to retain two additional justices. For more information on judicial selection in Pennsylvania, click here.

    In the competitive partisan election, sitting Republican Justice Sallie Mundy defeated Democratic Judge Dwayne D. Woodruff, who currently sits on the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas in Allegheny County.

    Mundy was appointed to the court in 2016 by Democratic Governor Tom Wolf and confirmed by the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania State Senate to replace former Justice Michael Eakin. In Pennsylvania, when a justice is appointed, that seat is up for election in the next election occurring ten months or more after the appointment. By Pennsylvania tradition, interim appointments in that state do not run for election, serving only for the interim period. However, in this case, Governor Wolf stated upon Mundy's appointment that he did not expect her to adhere to this tradition and in fact expected her to run for election to a full term. She filed to do so. Before her appointment to the court, Mundy served for six years on the Pennsylvania Superior Court, volunteered as a public defender, and maintained a private law practice.

    Mundy's challenger was Democrat Dwayne D. Woodruff, a Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas judge from Allegheny County. Woodruff has been on the Court of Common Pleas since 2006. He ran for a seat on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 2015 but was defeated in the Democratic primary. Before he began practicing law, Woodruff played football for the Pittsburgh Steelers.

    Incumbents Republican Chief Justice Thomas Saylor and Democratic Justice Debra Todd filed to stand for retention by voters and were both retained.[1] They stood for retention independently and did not face challengers. Saylor began serving as chief justice in 1998. Todd began serving on the court in 2008.

    Candidates in competitive partisan election

    Mundy Thumb.jpg

    Justice Sallie Mundy Green check mark transparent.png (R)
    On the supreme court bench since 2016. Candidate's website


    Prior to her appointment to the supreme court, Mundy served on the Pennsylvania Superior Court for six years. Before that, Mundy was in private practice for 20 years. She received her undergraduate degree from Washington and Jefferson College in 1984 and her J.D. from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 1987. According to Mundy’s website, at the time of her election to the superior court, she was the only Pennsylvania statewide elected official from Pennsylvania’s Northern Tier.[2]

    Woodruff Thumb.jpg

    Judge Dwayne Woodruff (D)
    On the common pleas bench since 2006. Candidate's website


    Woodruff was first elected to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas in 2005 and retained in 2015. Before his election to the court, Woodruff was in private practice for 15 years. Woodruff earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Louisville and his J.D. from Duquesne University School of Law in 1988. He previously ran for a seat on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 2015, but was defeated in the Democratic primary. Woodruff played football for the Pittsburgh Steelers for eleven years, from 1979 to 1990.



    Candidate forum

    On October 25, 2017, Mundy and Woodruff took part in a candidate forum at Widener Commonwealth Law. The candidates answered questions on judicial ethics and judicial philosophy. The forum was shown on the Pensylvania Cable Network. To watch a recording of the forum, click here.

    Candidate questionnaires

    In advance of judicial elections, the Pennsylvania Bar Associaiton Judicial Evaluation Commission rates potential judicial candidates. There are three potential ratings: "Highly Recommended," "Recommended," and "Not Recommended." The commission rated Justice Mundy "Highly Recommended" and rated Judge Woodruff "Recommended." Each candidate submitted a questionnaire to assist the commission. You can read the questionnaires in full by clicking on each candidate's name below:

    Justice Mundy
    I believe my diverse background and experience has enabled me to better serve the people of this commonwealth as an appellate juris … Becoming a judge is the highest pinnacle of the legal profession. My experience on the appellate bench has only served to reinforce that conviction.[3]
    Judge Woodruff
    I am uniquely qualified to serve as a Justice on the PA Supreme Court and fulfill its foremost duties toward the citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania … I would bring to the bench a diverse perspective, that is currently and has been sorely lacking for some time.[3]



    Endorsements

    The candidates received the following endorsements.[4][5][6][7][8][2][9][10] The lists of endorsements are compiled from the candidates' websites and endorsing groups' websites. The lists may not be complete.

    Endorsements
    Sallie Mundy Dwayne Woodruff
    NRA Political Victory Fund Planned Parenthood of Pennsylvania
    PA State Trooper Association Pennsylvania Democratic Party
    PA Building and Trades Council Pennsylvania AFL-CIO
    Professional Fire Fighters, Local 302 The Northeast Regional Council of Carpenters
    Fraternal Order of Police, Local Lodge 1 PA Conference of Teamsters
    PA Pro Life Association The 14th Ward Independent Democratic Club
    FOAC - Firearm Owners Against Crime Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    The PA Professional Fire Fighters Association

    Campaign finance

    This chart illustrates available campaign finance reports for both candidates through October 10, 2017. The totals include donations and expenditures made by the candidate and by their affiliated committees.

    Justices facing retention

    After a justice has won a partisan election, he or she serves a 10-year term. After the 10-year term expires, a statewide YES/NO vote for retention is conducted. A retention vote is not competitive; the justice does not face any competitors, and the only choice for voters is whether to retain the justice on the court. If the justice is retained, he or she serves another 10-year term. If the judge is not retained, the governor, subject to the approval of the state Senate, appoints a temporary replacement until a special election can be held.

    In 2017, two Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices stood for retention:

    Saylor Thumb.jpg

    Chief Justice Thomas Saylor Green check mark transparent.png (R)
    On the supreme court bench since 1998.



    Todd Thumb.jpg

    Justice Debra Todd Green check mark transparent.png (D)
    On the supreme court bench since 2008.



    Recent elections

    In 2015, there were contested partisan elections for three open seats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Three Democrats, two Republicans, and one Independent competed for the three seats. All three Democrats were elected, shifting the partisan balance of the court to majority-Democrat.

    In 2013, one Republican justice and one Democratic justice stood for retention. Both were retained.

    In 2011, one Republican justice stood for retention. He was retained.

    Noteworthy cases

    This section contains cases where one of the judges up for election authored the opinion, played a prominent role, or dissented from the majority's ruling.

    Pennsylvania v. Myers

    In Myers, the supreme court ruled that, in the absence of a search warrant, a police officer could not order a blood draw for a chemical test on a DUI arrestee who was unconscious. Under Pennsylvania’s implied consent law, the court noted, drivers give implied consent to be tested for chemical substances if a police officer suspects them of driving under the influence. However, drivers arrested for DUI may refuse to submit to testing. Refusing a test has other legal consequences, and an officer is required to warn the arrestee of those consequences if he or she refuses a test.[11][12]

    In this case, officers suspected that Darrell Myers had operated a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. However, Myers was “rendered unconscious by medical personnel before a police officer provided...warnings and before the officer requested the motorist’s submission to a chemical test.” Despite Myers’ unconscious state, the officer ordered a blood draw and chemical test. The supreme court ruled that the officer's order violated the law because Myers did not have the opportunity to refuse. Therefore, any evidence resulting from the chemical test was inadmissible.[11]

    Justice Sallie Mundy dissented from the majority’s opinion.[13] Mundy argued that because the police officer had probable cause to believe Myers was driving under the influence, he could rely on the implied consent law to draw Myers’ blood for testing even though Myers was unable to refuse. Mundy argued that the very nature of a implied consent law meant that affirmative consent was not required, so the fact that Myers was unconscious did not affect the officer’s right to order a blood draw. In other words, “the implied consent statute permits chemical testing without a warrant based on probable cause for DUI, regardless of whether the driver, through no fault of the police, has no opportunity to exercise his or her right of refusal.”[13]

    About the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is the court of last resort for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It was established by the Pennsylvania Provincial Assembly in 1722 as a successor to a Provincial Appellate Court, established in 1684. It is the oldest continually sitting appellate court in North America.

    The court is composed of seven justices who are elected to 10-year terms in partisan elections and must stand for retention by voters for subsequent terms.

    Chief justice

    The justice with the longest continuous service on the court holds the office of chief justice.[14]

    Sitting justices

    A blue dot denotes a Democratic Party affiliation, and a red dot denotes a Republican Party affiliation.

    Selection

    See also: Judicial selection in Pennsylvania

    Election process

    The seven justices of the supreme court are selected in partisan primaries, followed by general elections in which the primary winners from each party compete along with any third-party candidates.[15][16]

    Elected justices serve 10-year terms, after which they must run in yes-no retention elections if they wish to continue serving. A separate part of the ballot is designated for retention elections. When a justice stands for retention, the ballot does not reference party affiliation, and the justice does not face any opponents.[15][17]

    Vacancies

    In the event of a midterm vacancy, the governor appoints a successor who must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the Pennsylvania Senate. Interim judges stand for election at the next municipal election occurring 10 or more months after the vacancy occurred.[15]

    By tradition, appointed interim judges of the supreme court, superior court, or court of appeals do not go on to run for permanent seats. In other words, the governor appoints a judge with the expectation that the judge will only fill the interim vacancy.[15]

    Recent news

    The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Pennsylvania Supreme Court election. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

    See also

    Pennsylvania Judicial Selection More Courts
    Seal of Pennsylvania.png
    Judicialselectionlogo.png
    BP logo.png
    Courts in Pennsylvania
    Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    Pennsylvania Superior Court
    Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
    Gubernatorial appointments
    Judicial selection in Pennsylvania
    Federal courts
    State courts
    Local courts

    External links

    Footnotes

    1. Pennsylvania Department of State, "2017 Municipal Election Information," accessed March 9, 2017
    2. 2.0 2.1 Keep Justice Mundy, "Sallie Mundy," accessed August 23, 2017
    3. 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    4. Vote Smart, "Dwayne Woodruff's Political Summary," accessed August 23, 2017
    5. Politics PA, "Supreme Court Candidate: Dwayne Woodruff," February 15th, 2017
    6. Pennsylvania Democratic Party, "Candidate Spotlight – Dwayne Woodruff – Supreme Court," April 21, 2017
    7. The 14th Ward Independent Democratic Club, "2017 endorsements," April 23, 2017
    8. PA Conference of Teamsters, "PA Conference of Teamsters 2017 Municipal Primary Endorsements," accessed August 23, 2017
    9. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "For Pa. Supreme Court: Judge Dwayne Woodruff has the integrity and experience," October 28, 2017
    10. Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates & PAC, "2017 Voter’s Guide," accessed October 30, 2017
    11. 11.0 11.1 Pennsylvania v. Myers Opinion, filed July 19, 2017
    12. Penn Live, "Cops can't take warrantless blood draws from unconscious DUI suspects, Pa. Supreme Court rules," July 19, 2017
    13. 13.0 13.1 Pennsylvania v. Myers Dissent, filed July 19, 2017
    14. National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Pennsylvania," accessed September 7, 2016
    15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Pennsylvania," accessed September 2, 2016
    16. The Morning Call, "Ban Cross-filing As One Step," January 24, 1985
    17. The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, "In Re: Nomination Papers of Marakay Rogers, Christina Valente and Carl J. Romanelli," November 7, 2006