New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District election, 2020
- Election date: Nov. 3
- Registration deadline(s): Varies by locality
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: Yes
- Recount laws
- Early voting starts: N/A
- Absentee/mail voting deadline(s): Nov. 3 (received)
- Processing, counting, and challenging absentee/mail-in ballots
- Voter ID: Photo ID
- Poll times: Varies by locality
2022 →
← 2018
|
New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: June 12, 2020 |
Primary: September 8, 2020 General: November 3, 2020 Pre-election incumbent: Annie Kuster (Democrat) |
How to vote |
Poll times: Varies by municipality Voting in New Hampshire |
Race ratings |
Inside Elections: Solid Democratic Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2020 |
See also |
U.S. Senate • 1st • 2nd New Hampshire elections, 2020 U.S. Congress elections, 2020 U.S. Senate elections, 2020 U.S. House elections, 2020 |
All U.S. congressional districts, including the 2nd Congressional District of New Hampshire, held elections in 2020.
Incumbent Annie Kuster won election in the general election for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2.
Candidate filing deadline | Primary election | General election |
---|---|---|
Heading into the election the incumbent was Democrat Annie Kuster, who was first elected in 2012. The race was one of 56 U.S. House rematches from 2018.
New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District encompasses most of the state, including the northern, southern and western reaches of the state.It includes all of Chesire, Coos, and Sullivan counties along with areas of Belknap, Grafton, Hillsborough, Merrimack and Rockingham counties.[1]
Post-election analysis
The table below compares the vote totals in the 2020 presidential election and 2020 U.S. House election for this district. The presidential election data was compiled by Daily Kos.
Election procedure changes in 2020
Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.
New Hampshire modified its absentee/mail-in voting and candidate filing procedures for the November 3, 2020, general election as follows:
- Absentee/mail-in voting: Any voter could request an absentee ballot based on concerns related to COVID-19. Voters could submit one absentee ballot application for both the primary and general elections.
- Candidate filing procedures: The nomination petition signature requirements for the Libertarian Party's candidates in New Hampshire's general election was reduced by 35 percent.
For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.
Candidates and election results
General election
General election for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2
Incumbent Annie Kuster defeated Steve Negron and Andrew Olding in the general election for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Annie Kuster (D) | 53.9 | 208,289 |
![]() | Steve Negron (R) | 43.7 | 168,886 | |
![]() | Andrew Olding (L) | 2.4 | 9,119 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.0 | 147 |
Total votes: 386,441 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2
Incumbent Annie Kuster defeated Joseph Mirzoeff in the Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 on September 8, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Annie Kuster | 92.8 | 71,358 |
![]() | Joseph Mirzoeff ![]() | 7.2 | 5,500 |
Total votes: 76,858 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2
Steve Negron defeated Lynne Blankenbeker, Matthew Bjelobrk, and Eli Clemmer in the Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 on September 8, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Steve Negron | 48.1 | 30,503 |
Lynne Blankenbeker | 38.6 | 24,464 | ||
Matthew Bjelobrk ![]() | 6.9 | 4,381 | ||
Eli Clemmer | 6.1 | 3,850 | ||
Other/Write-in votes | 0.2 | 153 |
Total votes: 63,351 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Gilead Towne (R)
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Three of 10 New Hampshire counties—30 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Coos County, New Hampshire | 8.89% | 17.54% | 18.19% | ||||
Hillsborough County, New Hampshire | 0.20% | 1.12% | 3.73% | ||||
Sullivan County, New Hampshire | 2.58% | 13.27% | 17.93% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won New Hampshire with 46.8 percent of the vote. Donald Trump (R) received 46.5 percent. In presidential elections between 1789 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Republican 50 percent of the time and Democratic 31 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, New Hampshire voted Democratic with the exception of the 2000 presidential election.[2]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state Senate districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[3][4]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.3 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 10 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 14.5 points. Clinton won two districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 12 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 5.6 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 14 out of 24 state Senate districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.6 points. Trump won two districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state Senate District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 57.08% | 41.61% | D+15.5 | 44.99% | 49.68% | R+4.7 | D |
2 | 52.51% | 45.89% | D+6.6 | 43.98% | 50.44% | R+6.5 | R |
3 | 49.12% | 49.88% | R+0.8 | 43.80% | 51.18% | R+7.4 | R |
4 | 58.08% | 40.29% | D+17.8 | 54.34% | 39.58% | D+14.8 | D |
5 | 67.21% | 31.61% | D+35.6 | 64.56% | 30.85% | D+33.7 | D |
6 | 48.32% | 50.55% | R+2.2 | 38.68% | 55.72% | R+17 | R |
7 | 51.70% | 47.17% | D+4.5 | 41.20% | 53.79% | R+12.6 | R |
8 | 51.06% | 47.42% | D+3.6 | 43.59% | 50.95% | R+7.4 | R |
9 | 47.73% | 51.10% | R+3.4 | 47.84% | 46.80% | D+1 | R |
10 | 65.04% | 33.59% | D+31.4 | 57.23% | 37.63% | D+19.6 | D |
11 | 47.67% | 50.89% | R+3.2 | 46.41% | 48.12% | R+1.7 | R |
12 | 47.21% | 51.36% | R+4.1 | 45.98% | 48.45% | R+2.5 | R |
13 | 58.98% | 39.69% | D+19.3 | 55.28% | 39.78% | D+15.5 | D |
14 | 43.11% | 55.81% | R+12.7 | 40.93% | 53.97% | R+13 | R |
15 | 63.57% | 35.25% | D+28.3 | 58.03% | 36.71% | D+21.3 | D |
16 | 48.95% | 50.02% | R+1.1 | 47.69% | 47.37% | D+0.3 | D |
17 | 48.55% | 49.99% | R+1.4 | 39.58% | 54.99% | R+15.4 | R |
18 | 51.23% | 47.52% | D+3.7 | 46.10% | 48.85% | R+2.7 | D |
19 | 42.34% | 56.47% | R+14.1 | 39.59% | 55.53% | R+15.9 | R |
20 | 53.77% | 44.65% | D+9.1 | 49.28% | 45.21% | D+4.1 | D |
21 | 65.10% | 33.62% | D+31.5 | 64.73% | 29.61% | D+35.1 | D |
22 | 40.70% | 58.37% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.66% | R+21.3 | R |
23 | 47.62% | 51.11% | R+3.5 | 44.05% | 50.72% | R+6.7 | R |
24 | 48.37% | 50.73% | R+2.4 | 47.82% | 47.78% | D+0 | R |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in New Hampshire. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[5][6]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 145 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.8 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 101 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 17.1 points. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 59 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 9.9 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 103 out of 204 state House districts in New Hampshire with an average margin of victory of 12.9 points. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | |
Belknap 01 | 47.46% | 51.84% | R+4.4 | 41.87% | 52.77% | R+10.9 | |
Belknap 02 | 46.40% | 52.80% | R+6.4 | 42.19% | 53.44% | R+11.3 | |
Belknap 03 | 50.13% | 49.12% | D+1 | 41.17% | 53.63% | R+12.5 | |
Belknap 04 | 50.96% | 47.74% | D+3.2 | 40.81% | 53.63% | R+12.8 | |
Belknap 05 | 39.96% | 59.36% | R+19.4 | 33.77% | 61.51% | R+27.7 | |
Belknap 06 | 48.93% | 49.86% | R+0.9 | 34.78% | 59.94% | R+25.2 | |
Belknap 07 | 46.68% | 52.03% | R+5.4 | 35.69% | 58.71% | R+23 | |
Belknap 08 | 41.99% | 57.14% | R+15.2 | 34.37% | 60.64% | R+26.3 | |
Belknap 09 | 49.75% | 49.36% | D+0.4 | 39.17% | 55.61% | R+16.4 | |
Carroll 01 | 58.26% | 40.88% | D+17.4 | 58.42% | 36.24% | D+22.2 | |
Carroll 02 | 57.17% | 41.74% | D+15.4 | 51.38% | 43.34% | D+8 | |
Carroll 03 | 53.57% | 45.22% | D+8.4 | 47.18% | 47.02% | D+0.2 | |
Carroll 04 | 43.34% | 55.99% | R+12.7 | 41.37% | 54.11% | R+12.7 | |
Carroll 05 | 43.94% | 54.76% | R+10.8 | 34.06% | 60.82% | R+26.8 | |
Carroll 06 | 43.25% | 55.98% | R+12.7 | 44.09% | 51.27% | R+7.2 | |
Carroll 07 | 56.15% | 42.76% | D+13.4 | 51.38% | 43.15% | D+8.2 | |
Carroll 08 | 43.65% | 55.37% | R+11.7 | 37.59% | 57.58% | R+20 | |
Cheshire 01 | 62.12% | 36.66% | D+25.5 | 54.70% | 40.36% | D+14.3 | |
Cheshire 02 | 59.89% | 38.83% | D+21.1 | 49.80% | 45.21% | D+4.6 | |
Cheshire 03 | 57.10% | 41.06% | D+16 | 49.26% | 45.18% | D+4.1 | |
Cheshire 04 | 75.94% | 21.82% | D+54.1 | 65.04% | 28.47% | D+36.6 | |
Cheshire 05 | 74.61% | 23.83% | D+50.8 | 66.72% | 28.02% | D+38.7 | |
Cheshire 06 | 67.57% | 30.51% | D+37.1 | 62.54% | 32.32% | D+30.2 | |
Cheshire 07 | 67.19% | 31.87% | D+35.3 | 63.21% | 31.63% | D+31.6 | |
Cheshire 08 | 63.94% | 35.07% | D+28.9 | 61.89% | 33.11% | D+28.8 | |
Cheshire 09 | 59.26% | 39.39% | D+19.9 | 52.52% | 41.42% | D+11.1 | |
Cheshire 10 | 62.89% | 35.35% | D+27.5 | 52.36% | 42.38% | D+10 | |
Cheshire 11 | 48.01% | 50.30% | R+2.3 | 39.80% | 55.03% | R+15.2 | |
Cheshire 12 | 56.74% | 41.97% | D+14.8 | 46.33% | 48.76% | R+2.4 | |
Cheshire 13 | 62.73% | 35.11% | D+27.6 | 47.48% | 46.86% | D+0.6 | |
Cheshire 14 | 53.77% | 44.72% | D+9.1 | 46.11% | 48.28% | R+2.2 | |
Cheshire 15 | 59.64% | 38.76% | D+20.9 | 48.12% | 46.72% | D+1.4 | |
Cheshire 16 | 69.64% | 28.86% | D+40.8 | 63.80% | 30.82% | D+33 | |
Coos 01 | 45.75% | 53.10% | R+7.4 | 33.24% | 61.94% | R+28.7 | |
Coos 02 | 59.73% | 39.44% | D+20.3 | 38.56% | 56.30% | R+17.7 | |
Coos 03 | 68.97% | 30.07% | D+38.9 | 49.89% | 45.09% | D+4.8 | |
Coos 04 | 52.02% | 46.23% | D+5.8 | 40.86% | 53.95% | R+13.1 | |
Coos 05 | 54.56% | 44.03% | D+10.5 | 43.52% | 51.03% | R+7.5 | |
Coos 06 | 63.76% | 35.20% | D+28.6 | 50.28% | 45.25% | D+5 | |
Coos 07 | 55.43% | 43.24% | D+12.2 | 41.07% | 53.66% | R+12.6 | |
Grafton 01 | 56.23% | 42.31% | D+13.9 | 47.66% | 47.01% | D+0.7 | |
Grafton 02 | 55.51% | 43.14% | D+12.4 | 48.07% | 46.79% | D+1.3 | |
Grafton 03 | 56.47% | 41.99% | D+14.5 | 47.08% | 47.04% | D+0 | |
Grafton 04 | 49.27% | 49.32% | R+0.1 | 37.35% | 56.42% | R+19.1 | |
Grafton 05 | 57.16% | 41.24% | D+15.9 | 50.51% | 43.23% | D+7.3 | |
Grafton 06 | 51.70% | 46.75% | D+4.9 | 45.15% | 48.62% | R+3.5 | |
Grafton 07 | 57.00% | 41.53% | D+15.5 | 47.57% | 46.50% | D+1.1 | |
Grafton 08 | 61.78% | 35.86% | D+25.9 | 54.67% | 39.40% | D+15.3 | |
Grafton 09 | 49.70% | 48.19% | D+1.5 | 39.56% | 54.92% | R+15.4 | |
Grafton 10 | 63.69% | 34.82% | D+28.9 | 57.32% | 36.93% | D+20.4 | |
Grafton 11 | 55.83% | 42.54% | D+13.3 | 44.53% | 50.08% | R+5.5 | |
Grafton 12 | 75.45% | 23.59% | D+51.9 | 83.78% | 13.02% | D+70.8 | |
Grafton 13 | 69.10% | 29.83% | D+39.3 | 69.06% | 25.96% | D+43.1 | |
Grafton 14 | 55.96% | 42.63% | D+13.3 | 47.82% | 46.92% | D+0.9 | |
Grafton 15 | 53.44% | 45.07% | D+8.4 | 42.84% | 51.13% | R+8.3 | |
Grafton 16 | 53.66% | 44.75% | D+8.9 | 44.86% | 49.31% | R+4.5 | |
Grafton 17 | 54.23% | 43.87% | D+10.4 | 45.46% | 48.95% | R+3.5 | |
Hillsborough 01 | 53.91% | 44.52% | D+9.4 | 41.15% | 52.79% | R+11.6 | |
Hillsborough 02 | 45.04% | 53.39% | R+8.3 | 34.84% | 58.30% | R+23.5 | |
Hillsborough 03 | 55.71% | 42.71% | D+13 | 50.65% | 43.64% | D+7 | |
Hillsborough 04 | 52.03% | 45.45% | D+6.6 | 45.21% | 48.16% | R+2.9 | |
Hillsborough 05 | 44.94% | 53.99% | R+9.1 | 43.76% | 50.72% | R+7 | |
Hillsborough 06 | 45.98% | 52.78% | R+6.8 | 43.05% | 52.01% | R+9 | |
Hillsborough 07 | 36.81% | 62.40% | R+25.6 | 44.10% | 51.38% | R+7.3 | |
Hillsborough 08 | 51.56% | 47.69% | D+3.9 | 54.56% | 40.73% | D+13.8 | |
Hillsborough 09 | 53.82% | 44.85% | D+9 | 52.41% | 42.08% | D+10.3 | |
Hillsborough 10 | 64.03% | 33.59% | D+30.4 | 61.46% | 32.94% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 11 | 61.78% | 36.57% | D+25.2 | 54.11% | 39.60% | D+14.5 | |
Hillsborough 12 | 64.39% | 33.48% | D+30.9 | 55.45% | 38.05% | D+17.4 | |
Hillsborough 13 | 48.29% | 50.93% | R+2.6 | 44.88% | 50.40% | R+5.5 | |
Hillsborough 14 | 56.55% | 42.10% | D+14.4 | 50.88% | 44.09% | D+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 15 | 48.02% | 50.96% | R+2.9 | 42.88% | 52.66% | R+9.8 | |
Hillsborough 16 | 55.49% | 43.03% | D+12.5 | 48.76% | 46.48% | D+2.3 | |
Hillsborough 17 | 54.49% | 43.95% | D+10.5 | 49.12% | 45.52% | D+3.6 | |
Hillsborough 18 | 57.60% | 40.55% | D+17.1 | 51.61% | 41.96% | D+9.7 | |
Hillsborough 19 | 52.92% | 45.61% | D+7.3 | 50.14% | 44.56% | D+5.6 | |
Hillsborough 20 | 41.52% | 57.38% | R+15.9 | 39.16% | 55.40% | R+16.2 | |
Hillsborough 21 | 46.21% | 52.42% | R+6.2 | 43.71% | 50.48% | R+6.8 | |
Hillsborough 22 | 46.63% | 52.02% | R+5.4 | 51.38% | 44.50% | D+6.9 | |
Hillsborough 23 | 50.33% | 48.21% | D+2.1 | 46.87% | 47.29% | R+0.4 | |
Hillsborough 24 | 64.73% | 34.18% | D+30.5 | 63.90% | 30.29% | D+33.6 | |
Hillsborough 25 | 38.57% | 59.75% | R+21.2 | 33.32% | 60.92% | R+27.6 | |
Hillsborough 26 | 42.55% | 55.51% | R+13 | 43.31% | 49.72% | R+6.4 | |
Hillsborough 27 | 44.58% | 54.24% | R+9.7 | 49.22% | 44.96% | D+4.3 | |
Hillsborough 28 | 51.78% | 47.12% | D+4.7 | 51.52% | 43.49% | D+8 | |
Hillsborough 29 | 53.71% | 44.69% | D+9 | 52.87% | 42.10% | D+10.8 | |
Hillsborough 30 | 57.36% | 41.22% | D+16.1 | 55.20% | 39.35% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 31 | 70.29% | 28.25% | D+42 | 61.76% | 33.21% | D+28.5 | |
Hillsborough 32 | 50.35% | 48.70% | D+1.7 | 49.00% | 45.82% | D+3.2 | |
Hillsborough 33 | 60.50% | 38.18% | D+22.3 | 54.90% | 40.48% | D+14.4 | |
Hillsborough 34 | 59.45% | 39.25% | D+20.2 | 53.46% | 41.66% | D+11.8 | |
Hillsborough 35 | 56.22% | 42.24% | D+14 | 54.27% | 40.42% | D+13.9 | |
Hillsborough 36 | 54.01% | 45.00% | D+9 | 53.85% | 41.74% | D+12.1 | |
Hillsborough 37 | 42.88% | 56.00% | R+13.1 | 38.52% | 56.84% | R+18.3 | |
Hillsborough 38 | 53.54% | 44.49% | D+9 | 44.99% | 48.80% | R+3.8 | |
Hillsborough 39 | 45.62% | 53.01% | R+7.4 | 39.87% | 54.44% | R+14.6 | |
Hillsborough 40 | 47.23% | 51.49% | R+4.3 | 46.70% | 47.55% | R+0.9 | |
Hillsborough 41 | 40.44% | 58.57% | R+18.1 | 46.70% | 48.92% | R+2.2 | |
Hillsborough 42 | 55.11% | 43.57% | D+11.5 | 55.35% | 39.45% | D+15.9 | |
Hillsborough 43 | 56.66% | 41.95% | D+14.7 | 50.52% | 43.99% | D+6.5 | |
Hillsborough 44 | 48.03% | 50.78% | R+2.8 | 43.34% | 51.77% | R+8.4 | |
Hillsborough 45 | 54.81% | 43.58% | D+11.2 | 50.20% | 44.16% | D+6 | |
Merrimack 01 | 53.02% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.32% | 52.96% | R+10.6 | |
Merrimack 02 | 54.31% | 44.00% | D+10.3 | 36.73% | 57.34% | R+20.6 | |
Merrimack 03 | 55.56% | 43.47% | D+12.1 | 39.58% | 55.04% | R+15.5 | |
Merrimack 04 | 55.42% | 43.81% | D+11.6 | 52.24% | 42.61% | D+9.6 | |
Merrimack 05 | 53.31% | 45.83% | D+7.5 | 55.48% | 40.29% | D+15.2 | |
Merrimack 06 | 57.05% | 41.42% | D+15.6 | 51.32% | 42.38% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 07 | 55.87% | 42.59% | D+13.3 | 46.94% | 47.59% | R+0.6 | |
Merrimack 08 | 55.46% | 42.48% | D+13 | 44.76% | 49.92% | R+5.2 | |
Merrimack 09 | 50.97% | 47.80% | D+3.2 | 40.54% | 54.47% | R+13.9 | |
Merrimack 10 | 63.13% | 36.11% | D+27 | 62.90% | 32.80% | D+30.1 | |
Merrimack 11 | 66.72% | 32.13% | D+34.6 | 53.64% | 39.79% | D+13.9 | |
Merrimack 12 | 64.23% | 34.54% | D+29.7 | 51.69% | 42.78% | D+8.9 | |
Merrimack 13 | 64.82% | 33.92% | D+30.9 | 59.43% | 34.64% | D+24.8 | |
Merrimack 14 | 71.14% | 27.32% | D+43.8 | 64.85% | 29.65% | D+35.2 | |
Merrimack 15 | 71.15% | 26.95% | D+44.2 | 60.00% | 32.93% | D+27.1 | |
Merrimack 16 | 67.43% | 31.63% | D+35.8 | 64.52% | 30.86% | D+33.7 | |
Merrimack 17 | 62.62% | 35.84% | D+26.8 | 52.25% | 43.40% | D+8.8 | |
Merrimack 18 | 60.79% | 37.53% | D+23.3 | 58.77% | 37.30% | D+21.5 | |
Merrimack 19 | 57.25% | 42.28% | D+15 | 55.71% | 39.72% | D+16 | |
Merrimack 20 | 52.29% | 46.38% | D+5.9 | 44.45% | 50.14% | R+5.7 | |
Merrimack 21 | 47.97% | 50.53% | R+2.6 | 35.38% | 58.70% | R+23.3 | |
Merrimack 22 | 53.02% | 45.27% | D+7.8 | 39.89% | 54.91% | R+15 | |
Merrimack 23 | 49.49% | 49.60% | R+0.1 | 48.35% | 46.77% | D+1.6 | |
Merrimack 24 | 45.11% | 53.94% | R+8.8 | 42.90% | 52.75% | R+9.9 | |
Merrimack 25 | 54.44% | 44.00% | D+10.4 | 44.63% | 50.27% | R+5.6 | |
Merrimack 26 | 53.45% | 45.27% | D+8.2 | 40.95% | 53.87% | R+12.9 | |
Merrimack 27 | 67.60% | 31.09% | D+36.5 | 59.08% | 35.11% | D+24 | |
Merrimack 28 | 59.88% | 38.97% | D+20.9 | 55.54% | 40.14% | D+15.4 | |
Merrimack 29 | 49.62% | 48.82% | D+0.8 | 36.85% | 57.47% | R+20.6 | |
Rockingham 01 | 49.30% | 48.93% | D+0.4 | 40.91% | 53.66% | R+12.7 | |
Rockingham 02 | 43.25% | 55.32% | R+12.1 | 39.04% | 55.08% | R+16 | |
Rockingham 03 | 45.86% | 52.73% | R+6.9 | 35.92% | 58.92% | R+23 | |
Rockingham 04 | 38.97% | 59.98% | R+21 | 35.98% | 58.88% | R+22.9 | |
Rockingham 05 | 43.30% | 55.72% | R+12.4 | 42.48% | 52.23% | R+9.8 | |
Rockingham 06 | 47.02% | 51.58% | R+4.6 | 40.35% | 54.61% | R+14.3 | |
Rockingham 07 | 35.86% | 63.20% | R+27.3 | 40.03% | 55.08% | R+15 | |
Rockingham 08 | 41.71% | 57.35% | R+15.6 | 37.96% | 58.25% | R+20.3 | |
Rockingham 09 | 50.52% | 47.82% | D+2.7 | 41.05% | 53.47% | R+12.4 | |
Rockingham 10 | 42.18% | 56.03% | R+13.8 | 35.62% | 58.73% | R+23.1 | |
Rockingham 11 | 44.96% | 53.52% | R+8.6 | 44.81% | 49.59% | R+4.8 | |
Rockingham 12 | 41.51% | 57.26% | R+15.8 | 33.53% | 61.60% | R+28.1 | |
Rockingham 13 | 40.58% | 58.29% | R+17.7 | 37.33% | 58.03% | R+20.7 | |
Rockingham 14 | 39.31% | 59.79% | R+20.5 | 37.74% | 57.86% | R+20.1 | |
Rockingham 15 | 43.64% | 55.14% | R+11.5 | 36.47% | 58.63% | R+22.2 | |
Rockingham 16 | 41.21% | 57.42% | R+16.2 | 42.69% | 51.74% | R+9 | |
Rockingham 17 | 59.63% | 39.06% | D+20.6 | 57.87% | 35.55% | D+22.3 | |
Rockingham 18 | 58.43% | 40.65% | D+17.8 | 59.62% | 35.53% | D+24.1 | |
Rockingham 19 | 49.84% | 49.51% | D+0.3 | 53.39% | 41.28% | D+12.1 | |
Rockingham 20 | 44.63% | 54.16% | R+9.5 | 37.41% | 58.83% | R+21.4 | |
Rockingham 21 | 50.08% | 49.04% | D+1 | 48.75% | 47.26% | D+1.5 | |
Rockingham 22 | 47.95% | 51.10% | R+3.1 | 49.79% | 46.16% | D+3.6 | |
Rockingham 23 | 52.14% | 46.98% | D+5.2 | 52.47% | 43.00% | D+9.5 | |
Rockingham 24 | 50.12% | 49.39% | D+0.7 | 56.35% | 38.89% | D+17.5 | |
Rockingham 25 | 68.89% | 29.87% | D+39 | 66.32% | 28.45% | D+37.9 | |
Rockingham 26 | 72.98% | 25.74% | D+47.2 | 73.61% | 21.74% | D+51.9 | |
Rockingham 27 | 64.85% | 34.27% | D+30.6 | 63.53% | 32.39% | D+31.1 | |
Rockingham 28 | 60.02% | 38.86% | D+21.2 | 59.97% | 35.44% | D+24.5 | |
Rockingham 29 | 69.59% | 29.22% | D+40.4 | 72.61% | 22.24% | D+50.4 | |
Rockingham 30 | 68.27% | 30.52% | D+37.8 | 68.59% | 26.51% | D+42.1 | |
Rockingham 31 | 54.36% | 44.74% | D+9.6 | 54.56% | 41.21% | D+13.4 | |
Rockingham 32 | 44.67% | 53.82% | R+9.2 | 39.48% | 54.75% | R+15.3 | |
Rockingham 33 | 42.89% | 55.59% | R+12.7 | 37.94% | 56.69% | R+18.8 | |
Rockingham 34 | 39.95% | 59.03% | R+19.1 | 37.53% | 57.94% | R+20.4 | |
Rockingham 35 | 42.24% | 56.45% | R+14.2 | 39.98% | 54.75% | R+14.8 | |
Rockingham 36 | 56.73% | 42.29% | D+14.4 | 57.60% | 36.89% | D+20.7 | |
Rockingham 37 | 48.04% | 50.95% | R+2.9 | 44.51% | 51.58% | R+7.1 | |
Strafford 01 | 48.75% | 50.13% | R+1.4 | 35.25% | 60.22% | R+25 | |
Strafford 02 | 51.40% | 47.54% | D+3.9 | 36.35% | 57.58% | R+21.2 | |
Strafford 03 | 47.32% | 51.46% | R+4.1 | 40.59% | 54.50% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 04 | 52.31% | 46.10% | D+6.2 | 45.48% | 47.28% | R+1.8 | |
Strafford 05 | 62.83% | 35.70% | D+27.1 | 62.31% | 31.50% | D+30.8 | |
Strafford 06 | 67.21% | 31.38% | D+35.8 | 66.91% | 26.94% | D+40 | |
Strafford 07 | 50.60% | 48.16% | D+2.4 | 40.65% | 53.40% | R+12.8 | |
Strafford 08 | 55.88% | 42.23% | D+13.6 | 45.29% | 48.25% | R+3 | |
Strafford 09 | 49.30% | 49.18% | D+0.1 | 42.00% | 52.05% | R+10 | |
Strafford 10 | 49.80% | 50.20% | R+0.4 | 39.95% | 53.81% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 11 | 55.46% | 42.81% | D+12.6 | 44.20% | 50.19% | R+6 | |
Strafford 12 | 50.14% | 48.46% | D+1.7 | 40.49% | 54.35% | R+13.9 | |
Strafford 13 | 68.70% | 28.98% | D+39.7 | 66.80% | 26.28% | D+40.5 | |
Strafford 14 | 67.11% | 30.68% | D+36.4 | 64.57% | 29.05% | D+35.5 | |
Strafford 15 | 54.91% | 44.04% | D+10.9 | 57.11% | 37.82% | D+19.3 | |
Strafford 16 | 59.55% | 39.10% | D+20.4 | 57.02% | 37.26% | D+19.8 | |
Strafford 17 | 56.04% | 42.20% | D+13.8 | 52.96% | 41.40% | D+11.6 | |
Strafford 18 | 57.02% | 41.58% | D+15.4 | 49.53% | 44.78% | D+4.7 | |
Strafford 19 | 67.90% | 29.83% | D+38.1 | 65.66% | 27.70% | D+38 | |
Strafford 20 | 57.15% | 41.65% | D+15.5 | 57.07% | 37.55% | D+19.5 | |
Strafford 21 | 56.53% | 41.89% | D+14.6 | 51.26% | 43.07% | D+8.2 | |
Strafford 22 | 53.05% | 45.41% | D+7.6 | 42.70% | 51.12% | R+8.4 | |
Strafford 23 | 49.55% | 49.68% | R+0.1 | 41.01% | 52.90% | R+11.9 | |
Strafford 24 | 52.66% | 45.78% | D+6.9 | 42.27% | 52.35% | R+10.1 | |
Strafford 25 | 55.93% | 42.53% | D+13.4 | 51.10% | 42.01% | D+9.1 | |
Sullivan 01 | 59.33% | 39.57% | D+19.8 | 58.58% | 36.97% | D+21.6 | |
Sullivan 02 | 45.26% | 53.24% | R+8 | 42.16% | 52.60% | R+10.4 | |
Sullivan 03 | 61.19% | 36.84% | D+24.4 | 46.58% | 46.52% | D+0.1 | |
Sullivan 04 | 59.23% | 39.98% | D+19.2 | 45.68% | 48.73% | R+3 | |
Sullivan 05 | 60.21% | 38.24% | D+22 | 45.52% | 50.24% | R+4.7 | |
Sullivan 06 | 51.90% | 46.27% | D+5.6 | 36.91% | 57.77% | R+20.9 | |
Sullivan 07 | 51.89% | 46.60% | D+5.3 | 39.48% | 55.54% | R+16.1 | |
Sullivan 08 | 60.59% | 37.99% | D+22.6 | 44.93% | 50.02% | R+5.1 | |
Sullivan 09 | 53.91% | 44.67% | D+9.2 | 48.09% | 47.01% | D+1.1 | |
Sullivan 10 | 60.11% | 38.50% | D+21.6 | 45.88% | 48.62% | R+2.7 | |
Sullivan 11 | 55.93% | 42.60% | D+13.3 | 41.97% | 53.01% | R+11 | |
Total | 52.17% | 46.57% | D+5.6 | 47.60% | 47.22% | D+0.4 | |
Source: Daily Kos |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was D+2, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 2 percentage point more Democratic than the national average. This made New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District the 188th most Democratic nationally.[7]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.10. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.10 points toward that party.[8]
Campaign finance
This section contains campaign finance figures from the Federal Election Commission covering all candidate fundraising and spending in this election.[9] It does not include information on fundraising before the current campaign cycle or on spending by satellite groups. The numbers in this section are updated as candidates file new campaign finance reports. Candidates for Congress are required to file financial reports on a quarterly basis, as well as two weeks before any primary, runoff, or general election in which they will be on the ballot and upon the termination of any campaign committees.[10] The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annie Kuster | Democratic Party | $3,045,110 | $3,055,351 | $1,073,085 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Steve Negron | Republican Party | $448,759 | $459,542 | $-3,787 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Andrew Olding | Libertarian Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2020. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
Race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[11]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[12][13][14]
Race ratings: New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District election, 2020 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
November 3, 2020 | October 27, 2020 | October 20, 2020 | October 13, 2020 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | Likely Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season. |
District election history
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2
Incumbent Annie Kuster defeated Steve Negron and Justin O'Donnell in the general election for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Annie Kuster (D) ![]() | 55.5 | 155,358 |
![]() | Steve Negron (R) | 42.2 | 117,990 | |
Justin O'Donnell (L) | 2.2 | 6,206 | ||
Other/Write-in votes | 0.1 | 151 |
Total votes: 279,705 (100.00% precincts reporting) | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2
Incumbent Annie Kuster advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 on September 11, 2018.
Candidate | ||
✔ | ![]() | Annie Kuster ![]() |
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2
The following candidates ran in the Republican primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 on September 11, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Steve Negron | 26.0 | 11,166 |
Stewart Levenson | 25.3 | 10,858 | ||
Lynne Blankenbeker | 22.9 | 9,836 | ||
![]() | Bob Burns | 15.9 | 6,811 | |
Brian Belanger | 5.6 | 2,388 | ||
![]() | Jay Mercer | 2.9 | 1,232 | |
Gerard Beloin | 1.5 | 623 |
Total votes: 42,914 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Libertarian primary election
Libertarian primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2
Justin O'Donnell defeated Tom Alciere in the Libertarian primary for U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 on September 11, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Justin O'Donnell | 74.6 | 428 | |
![]() | Tom Alciere ![]() | 25.4 | 146 |
Total votes: 574 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Democratic. Incumbent Annie Kuster (D) won re-election, defeating Jim Lawrence (R) in the general election on November 8, 2016. Lawrence defeated Eric Estevez, Jack Flanagan, Walter Kelly, Andy Martin, Jay Mercer, and Casey Newell in the Republican primary on September 13, 2016.[15][16]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
49.8% | 174,371 | |
Republican | Jim Lawrence | 45.3% | 158,825 | |
Independent | John Babiarz | 4.9% | 17,076 | |
Total Votes | 350,272 | |||
Source: New Hampshire Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
39.9% | 17,180 | ||
Jack Flanagan | 28% | 12,046 | ||
Walter Kelly | 10% | 4,287 | ||
Andy Martin | 7.3% | 3,145 | ||
Eric Estevez | 5.7% | 2,443 | ||
Jay Mercer | 4.9% | 2,113 | ||
Casey Newell | 4.3% | 1,839 | ||
Total Votes | 43,053 | |||
Source: New Hampshire Secretary of State |
2014
The 2nd Congressional District of New Hampshire held an election for the U.S. House of Representatives on November 4, 2014. Incumbent Annie Kuster (D) defeated Marilinda Garcia (R) in the general election.
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
54.9% | 130,700 | |
Republican | Marilinda Garcia | 44.9% | 106,871 | |
N/A | Scatter | 0.3% | 613 | |
Total Votes | 238,184 | |||
Source: New Hampshire Secretary of State |
See also
- United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2020
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2020
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ New Hampshire Redistricting Map, "Map," accessed September 25, 2012
- ↑ 270towin.com, "New Hampshire," accessed June 1, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Fundraising by primary candidates can be found on the race's respective primary election page. Fundraising by general election candidates can be found on the race's general election page.
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "2022 Quarterly Reports," accessed March 2, 2022
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ New Hampshire Secretary of State, "State Primary - September 13, 2016," accessed June 13, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "New Hampshire House Primary Results," September 13, 2016