Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Will County employee salaries, 2008-2011

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 18:18, 18 February 2022 by Cullen Claghorn (contribs) (Cullen Claghorn moved page Will County employee salaries to Will County employee salaries, 2008-2011: Retitling by year)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search



BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article may not adhere to Ballotpedia's current article guidelines. Please email us at editor@ballotpedia.org to suggest an improvement.


Will County employee salaries are public record under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act. Will County employs nearly 1,900 individuals. Will County’s population is approximately 677,000.

Salaries

Sunshine Review filed a public records request for salary information from Will County for the years 2008 to 2011. Sunshine Review was seeking information on the salaries earned by administrative and elected officials, as well as any employee earning more than $150,000 annually.

Will County officials did not respond to Sunshine Review's request. The Will County website does not include compensation for elected officials or county employees.

  • County Executive Lawrence M. Walsh earned $93,116, plus another $6,500 for duties as liquor commissioner.[1]
  • Sheriff Paul Kaupas earned $121,923.
  • Will County Treasurer Steve Weber earned $93,116.[2]
  • County Clerk Nancy Schultz Voots earned $93,116.[3]

In 2010 the Will County Board of Commissioners froze their salaries at $23,000.[4]

District Name City Salary
District 1 Robert Howard Beecher $23,000
District 1 Katrina Deutsche Crete $23,000
District 1 Cory Singer Frankfort $23,000
District 2 Jim Moustis Chairman Frankfort $23,000
District 2 Laurie Smith Majority Whip New Lenox $23,000
District 2 Tom Weigel New Lenox $23,000
District 3 Ann Dralle Lemont $23,000
District 3 Suzanne Hart Naperville $23,000
District 3 Laurie McPhillips Plainfield $23,000
District 4 Edward D. Kusta, Jr. Bolingbrook $23,000
District 4 Charles Maher Naperville $23,000
District 4 Jacqueline Traynere Bolingbrook $23,000
District 5 John Argoudelis Plainfield $23,000
District 5 Lee Ann Goodson Plainfield $23,000
District 5 Brian Smith Plainfield $23,000
District 6 Don Gould Shorewood $23,000
District 6 Sharon May Channahon $23,000
District 6 Deborah Rozak Wilmington $23,000
District 7 Jim Bilotta Majority Leader Lockport $23,000
District 7 Kathleen Konicki Homer Glen $23,000
District 7 Diane Seiler Lockport $23,000
District 8 Herbert Brooks, Jr. Joliet $23,000
District 8 Frank Stewart Minority Whip Joliet $23,000
District 8 Denise Winfrey Joliet $23,000
District 9 Walter Adamic Minority Leader Joliet $23,000
District 9 Joseph Babich Joliet $23,000
District 9 Steve Wilhelmi Joliet $23,000

Benefits

Sunshine Review filed a public records request for the monetary value of benefits for Will County employees for the years 2008-2011.

Will County officials did not respond to Sunshine Review's request.

According to the Will County website, the non-management work force is represented by four labor unions and receives compensation and benefits though bargained labor agreements. Employment benefits vary according to full-time or part-time employment status and between employee groups.

Benefits include but are not limited to the following:[5]

  • County Retirement Plan
  • Choice of Two Health Plans
  • Dental Plan
  • Vision Plan
  • Life Insurance
  • Disability Insurance
  • Employee Assistance Program
  • Tuition Reimbursement
  • Deferred Compensation (IRS Section 457) - Employee Paid

Salary records project

In 2011, Sunshine Review chose 152 local governments as the focus of research on public employee salaries. The editors of Sunshine Review selected eight states with relevant political contexts (listed alphabetically):

1. California
2. Florida
3. Illinois
4. Michigan
5. New Jersey
6. Pennsylvania
7. Texas
8. Wisconsin

Within these states, the editors of Sunshine Review focused on the most populous cities, counties and school districts, as well as the emergency services entities within these governments. The purpose of this selection method was to develop articles on governments affecting the most citizens.

The salary information garnered from these states were a combination of existing online resources and state Freedom of Information Act requests sent out to the governments.

A study published by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia said the city of Philadelphia faced challenges owing to the cost of public employee pensions.[6] The report claimed the amount that Philadelphia paid to pension recipients limited the city’s ability to use its budget effectively.

The report said there were more individuals receiving pension benefits—33,907 claimants in 2006—than workers in the city—28,701.[6] The authors recommended three steps towards addressing the problem of high costs in pensions: improved data collection, expanded transparency initiatives, and reductions to the city's overall budget.[6]

Salary schedules can be published as ranges, not as specific compensation figures, and may leave out compensation received through health and retirement benefits, as well as benefits such as commuter allowances and cell phone reimbursements. This project aimed to close the gap and provide a more accurate picture of public employee salaries for the sake of public education and transparency.

See also

External links


Footnotes