Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
List of Illinois ballot measures
This page provides a list of ballot measures that have appeared on the statewide ballot in Illinois.
List of ballot measures by year
Measures are listed in reverse-chronological order, with the most recent and upcoming elections appearing first. Tables include brief summaries, relevant topics, and the election results for each measure.
2028
See also: Illinois 2028 ballot measures
November 7
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Constitutional Convention Question | State constitutional conventions | Asks whether or not a state constitutional question shall be held |
2024
See also: Illinois 2024 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assisted Reproductive Healthcare Advisory Question | Private health insurance; Public health insurance | Advise state officials on whether to provide for medically assisted reproductive treatments, including in vitro fertilization, to be covered by any health insurance plan in Illinois that provides full coverage to pregnancy benefits | 3,914,126 (73%) | 1,474,158 (27%) | ||
Income Tax Advisory Question | Property taxes; Income taxes | Advise state officials on whether to amend the Illinois Constitution to create an additional 3% tax on income greater than $1 million for the purpose of dedicating funds to property tax relief | 3,288,462 (61%) | 2,121,507 (39%) | ||
Penalties for Candidate Interference with Election Worker's Duties Advisory Question | Election administration and governance; Ethics rules and commissions | Advise state officials on whether to establish civil penalties if a candidate interferes or attempts to interfere with an election worker's official duties | 4,813,971 (89%) | 595,677 (11%) |
2022
See also: Illinois 2022 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Constitutional rights; Collective bargaining | Provide for a state constitutional right to collective bargaining | 2,212,999 (59%) | 1,555,929 (41%) |
2020
See also: Illinois 2020 ballot measures
November 3
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allow for Graduated Income Tax Amendment | Taxes | Allows for a graduated income tax | ![]() | 2,683,490 (47%) | 3,059,411 (53%) |
2016
See also: Illinois 2016 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Transportation Taxes and Fees Lockbox Amendment | Restricted-use funds; Transportation taxes and fees |
2014
See also: Illinois 2014 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
House Bill 3814 | Minimum wage laws | 2,339,173 (67%) | 1,165,524 (33%) | ||
House Bill 3816 | Taxes | 2,200,033 (64%) | 1,256,642 (36%) | ||
House Bill 5755 | Public health insurance; Private health insurance | 2,312,101 (66%) | 1,186,937 (34%) | ||
Marsy's Law Crime Victims' Bill of Rights Amendment | Criminal trials; Crime victims' rights | 2,653,475 (78%) | 728,991 (22%) | ||
Right to Vote Amendment | Religion-related policy; Voter registration; LGBTQ issues; Race and suffrage; Constitutional rights; Sex and gender issues; Race and ethnicity issues | 2,350,114 (71%) | 960,181 (29%) |
2012
See also: Illinois 2012 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HJRCA 49 | Public employee retirement funds | ![]() | 2,282,862 (56%) | 1,796,983 (44%) |
2010
See also: Illinois 2010 ballot measures
November 2
Type | Title | Subject | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor Recall Amendment | Recall process | 1,639,158 (66%) | 846,966 (34%) |
2008
See also: Illinois 2008 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constitutional Convention Question | State constitutional conventions | ![]() | 1,493,203 (33%) | 3,062,724 (67%) |
1998
See also: Illinois 1998 ballot measures
November 3
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | State judiciary | It proposed modifications to the courts commission. | 1,677,109 (80%) | 407,014 (20%) |
1994
See also: Illinois 1994 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Constitutional rights; Criminal trials | It proposed that criminal defendants be given the right to be confronted by witnesses. | 1,525,525 (63%) | 906,383 (37%) | ||
Amendment 2 | State legislatures measures | It proposed to change the legislative adjournment date to May 31. | 1,476,615 (69%) | 667,585 (31%) |
1992
See also: Illinois 1992 ballot measures
November 3
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Crime victims' rights | It proposed to guarantee crime victims certain rights, including the right to receive information about cases in which they are involved. | 2,964,592 (81%) | 715,602 (19%) | ||
Amendment 2 | Constitutional rights; Education | Provide for a fundamental right to education | ![]() | 1,882,569 (57%) | 1,417,520 (43%) |
1990
See also: Illinois 1990 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Taxes | It proposed to reduce the redemption period on the tax sale of certain delinquent properties. | 1,004,546 (72%) | 385,772 (28%) |
1988
See also: Illinois 1988 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Residency voting requirements; Voting age policy | It proposed to lower the voting age to 18 and the residency requirement to 30 days. | 2,086,744 (64%) | 1,162,258 (36%) | ||
Amendment 2 | Taxes | It proposed to modify the redemption period on the sale of a tax delinquent property.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because Illinois required that an amendment must receive a vote of at least three-fifths of those voting on the question or a majority of those voting in the election. This vote did not meet that standard.’’ | ![]() | 1,497,885 (59%) | 1,035,190 (41%) | |
Constitutional Convention | State constitutional conventions | It proposed that a constitutional convention be convened. | ![]() | 900,109 (25%) | 2,727,144 (75%) |
1986
See also: Illinois 1986 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Bail policy | It proposed to further expand the population that may be denied bail. | 1,368,242 (77%) | 402,891 (23%) | ||
Amendment 2 | Veterans policy; Taxes | It proposed that property used exclusively by veterans' organizations be exempt from property taxes.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because Illinois required that an amendment must receive a vote of at least three-fifths of those voting on the question or a majority of those voting in the election. This vote did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 860,609 (54%) | 727,737 (46%) |
1984
See also: Illinois 1984 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Veterans policy; Taxes | It proposed that property used exclusively by veterans' organizations be exempt from property taxes.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because Illinois required that an amendment must receive a vote of at least three-fifths of those voting on the question or a majority of those voting in the election. This vote did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 1,147,864 (52%) | 1,042,481 (48%) |
1982
See also: Illinois 1982 ballot measures
November 2
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Denial of Bail for Offenses Punishable by Life Imprisonment Amendment | Bail policy | Allow denial of bail for persons charged with offenses punishable by life imprisonment | 1,389,796 (85%) | 239,380 (15%) |
1980
See also: Illinois 1980 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 2 | Taxes | It proposed reducing the redemption period on the sale of tax delinquent property. | 1,857,985 (70%) | 798,422 (30%) | ||
Reduce Size of House of Representatives and Eliminate Cumulative Voting Initiative | Cumulative voting; State legislative structure | 2,112,224 (69%) | 962,325 (31%) |
1978
See also: Illinois 1978 ballot measures
November 7
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Taxes | It proposed to eliminate the provision that required the legislature to abolish the personal property tax by January 1, 1979. Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because Illinois required that an amendment receive a vote of at least three-fifths of those voting on the question or a majority of those voting in the election. This vote did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 952,416 (56%) | 733,845 (44%) | |
Amendment 2 | Taxes | It proposed to exempt veterans' associations from paying property taxes on their meeting halls. | ![]() | 747,907 (48%) | 806,579 (52%) |
1974
See also: Illinois 1974 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | State executive official measures | It proposed to restrict the amendatory veto power given to the governor. This power allows the governor to return bills to the legislature with suggested changes. | ![]() | 1,302,313 (49%) | 1,329,719 (51%) |
1970
See also: Illinois 1970 ballot measures
December 15
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abolition Death Penalty Amendment | Death penalty | It proposed that the death penalty should be abolished. | ![]() | 869,816 (45%) | 1,052,924 (55%) | |
Constitution Revision Measure | State constitution ratification | Ratify the Illinois Constitution of 1970 | 1,122,425 (57%) | 838,168 (43%) | ||
Voting Age Amendment | Voting age policy | It proposed to lower the voting age to 18. | ![]() | 869,816 (45%) | 1,052,924 (55%) |
November 3
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Taxes | It proposed to prohibit the taxation of personal property by valuation. | 2,925,058 (88%) | 410,333 (12%) | ||
Amendment 2 | Bond issues; Environment | It proposed to approve the Anti-pollution Bond Act | 2,291,718 (81%) | 544,116 (19%) | ||
Banking Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed that state chartered banks should have the same powers as national banks. | 2,143,365 (82%) | 462,425 (18%) |
1968
See also: Illinois 1968 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | Banking policy | It proposed that Illinois state banks should be enabled to have foreign branches. | 1,776,492 (62%) | 1,091,116 (38%) | ||
Bond Act | Bond issues | It proposed to approve a $1 billion bond act for the development of natural resources. | 1,656,600 (58%) | 1,216,814 (42%) | ||
Constitutional Convention Question | State constitutional conventions | It proposed to authorize a constitutional convention to review the 1870 Illinois Constitution. | 2,979,972 (72%) | 1,135,440 (28%) |
1966
See also: Illinois 1966 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed modifications to the banking law. | 1,564,746 (66%) | 811,981 (34%) |
1962
See also: Illinois 1962 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed modifications to the banking law. | 1,321,405 (60%) | 875,212 (40%) |
1960
See also: Illinois 1960 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bond Issue | Bond issues; Public education funding | It proposed a bond issue to support improvements in education. | 2,633,869 (68%) | 1,266,490 (32%) | ||
Bond Issue | Bond issues | It proposed a bond issue to support mental health and public welfare improvements. | 2,967,527 (75%) | 973,075 (25%) |
1958
See also: Illinois 1958 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed modifications to the banking law. | 755,622 (66%) | 392,260 (34%) |
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | State judiciary | It proposed major changes to the judicial system. These changes included investing the supreme court with broad powers and establishing an appellate court.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because at the time of the vote, Illinois required that an amendment must receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election or two-thirds of those voting on the amendment to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 1,589,655 (64%) | 893,503 (36%) | |
Amendment 2 | County and municipal governance | It proposed to allow the county sheriff and treasurer to be elected to successive terms.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because at the time of the vote, Illinois required that an amendment must receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election or two-thirds of those voting on the amendment in order to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 1,420,011 (56%) | 1,099,475 (44%) |
1956
See also: Illinois 1956 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed modifications to the banking law. | 1,472,236 (77%) | 443,650 (23%) | ||
Revenue Amendment | Taxes | This measure proposed to give more leeway to the legislature in creating tax policy. However, it specifically forbid the authorization of a graduated income tax. | ![]() | 1,408,132 (40%) | 2,139,150 (60%) |
1954
See also: Illinois 1954 ballot measures
November 2
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | State legislatures measures; Redistricting policy | This measure proposed a number of rules related to the drawing of senatorial districts in Illinois. It proposed that there be 58 districts and that they should be redistricted in 1955, 1963 and every ten years going forward. | 2,085,224 (80%) | 525,502 (20%) | ||
Amendment 2 | State executive official measures | This measure proposed a number of rules related to the election and term in office of the governor, secretary of state, state treasurer and other state officials. | 2,024,483 (79%) | 531,318 (21%) | ||
Amendment 3 | Public land policy | It proposed rules for the sale or lease of the Illinois and Michigan Canal. | 2,011,134 (79%) | 523,572 (21%) |
1952
See also: Illinois 1952 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | County and municipal governance | It proposed rules governing to the compensation of county officers. It stated that the compensation amount will be set by the county board and that the compensation shall not increase or diminish during the term of office. | 2,024,823 (67%) | 979,401 (33%) | ||
Amendment 2 | Banking policy | It proposed that individual stockholders of banking institutions should not be personally liable to the creditors of the corporation. | 2,072,965 (69%) | 944,845 (31%) | ||
Amendment 3 | County and municipal governance | It proposed rules for the election of officers in each county. These rules listed the county officers that should be elected. They also stated when the elections should occur.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because at the time of the vote Illinois required that an amendment must receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election or two-thirds of those voting on the amendment to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 1,953,675 (64%) | 1,084,864 (36%) | |
Amendment 4 | Taxes | This measure proposed a series of modifications regarding the power of the legislature to levy taxes.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because at the time of the vote Illinois required that an amendment must receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election or two-thirds of those voting on the amendment to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 1,838,596 (61%) | 1,157,406 (39%) | |
General Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed modifications to section 13 of the general banking law. | 2,173,425 (83%) | 455,782 (17%) |
1950
See also: Illinois 1950 ballot measures
November 7
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gateway Amendment | State legislatures measures | It proposed that the legislature should be able to propose modifications to up to three articles of the constitution per session. It also proposed that the adoption of an amendment would require a vote of either two-thirds of the voters voting on the question or a majority of voters voting in the election. | 2,512,323 (77%) | 735,903 (23%) |
1946
See also: Illinois 1946 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gateway Amendment | State legislatures measures | It proposed that the legislature should be able to submit amendments to up to three constitutional articles per session.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 1,977,561 voters in this election, requiring at least 988,781 “yes” votes for the measure to pass. | ![]() | 1,273,653 (78%) | 368,108 (22%) | |
Veteran's Compensation | Veterans policy | It proposed a bond issue to compensate veterans of World War II. | 2,173,425 (69%) | 980,346 (31%) |
1944
See also: Illinois 1944 ballot measures
November 7
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed amendments to section 10 of the general banking law. | 973,159 (69%) | 434,767 (31%) | ||
County Officer Term Limits | Local official term limits | It proposed to remove the constitutional provision that required elected county officers to wait for four years after their term expired before they were eligible to hold that office again.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 4,079,024 voters in this election, requiring at least 2,039,513 “yes” votes for the measure to pass. | ![]() | 898,107 (58%) | 653,877 (42%) |
1942
See also: Illinois 1942 ballot measures
November 3
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue Amendment | Taxes | It proposed that the legislature could exempt from certain taxes business that sold food for human consumption. In addition, it proposed that the legislature could define the word "food".Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 3,049,312 voters in this election, requiring at least 1,524,657 “yes” votes for the measure to pass. | ![]() | 979,892 (74%) | 346,232 (26%) |
1940
See also: Illinois 1940 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | This measure proposed amendments to the banking law to make it easier to create a new bank in small municipalities that do not have a bank. | 775,710 (68%) | 363,136 (32%) |
1938
See also: Illinois 1938 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banking Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed modifications to the banking rules to reduce the liability of bank stockholders.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 3,274,814 voters in this election, requiring at least 1,637,408 “yes” votes for the measure to pass. | ![]() | 922,237 (72%) | 352,428 (28%) | |
National Draft | Military-related advisory questions | This measure proposed to instruct the congressional representatives from Illinois to vote against a national draft. | 1,678,352 (64%) | 957,656 (36%) |
1934
See also: Illinois 1934 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bond Issue | Bond issues | It proposed to issue an emergency relief bond. | 2,072,713 (82%) | 445,941 (18%) | ||
Constitutional Convention Proposal | State constitutional conventions | It proposed that a convention should be held to amend the constitution.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because at the time of the vote Illinois required that a measure receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. The necessary number of votes was 1,467,597 votes. | ![]() | 691,021 (54%) | 585,879 (46%) |
1932
See also: Illinois 1932 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed an amendment to the banking law. | 1,176,468 (80%) | 286,102 (20%) | ||
Bond Issue | Bond issues | It proposed to issue a $20 million emergency relief bond. | 2,809,902 (92%) | 237,864 (8%) | ||
Gateway Amendment | State legislatures measures | It proposed that the legislature should have the ability to propose three constitutional amendments in a session.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 3,465,926 voters in this election, requiring at least 1,732,964 “yes” votes for the measure to pass. | ![]() | 1,080,531 (80%) | 275,329 (20%) |
1930
See also: Illinois 1930 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18th Amendment Question | Alcohol laws | This advisory question proposed to repeal the 18th amendment of the United States Constitution. | 1,054,432 (66%) | 551,741 (34%) | ||
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed an amendment to the banking law. | 436,003 (60%) | 286,102 (40%) | ||
Forest Preserve Question | Parks, land, and natural area conservation | This measure proposed the creation of conservation areas and forest preserves.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because, at the time of the vote, Illinois required that a measure receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 886,971 (50%) | 869,434 (50%) | |
Jury Act Amendment | Constitutional rights | It proposed to amend the jury act to permit women to serve on juries. | 741,642 (52%) | 671,959 (48%) | ||
Jury Commissioner Act Amendment | Administration of government | It proposed modifications to the jury commissioner act. | 671,548 (53%) | 594,944 (47%) | ||
Repeal Prohibition Question | Alcohol laws | This question proposed to repeal the Illinois Prohibition Act. | 1,060,004 (67%) | 523,130 (33%) | ||
Revenue Amendment | Taxes | It proposed a number of modifications relating to the power of the legislature and municipalities to levy taxes. | ![]() | 371,812 (42%) | 513,861 (58%) | |
Volstead Act Question | Alcohol laws | This question proposed the modification of the Volstead Act. | 968,652 (66%) | 506,973 (34%) |
1928
See also: Illinois 1928 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hunting and Fishing Ground Proposition | Hunting regulations; Fisheries and fishing regulations | This measure proposed the creation of statewide hunting and fishing areas. | ![]() | 912,144 (40%) | 1,371,673 (60%) |
1926
See also: Illinois 1926 ballot measures
November 2
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18th Amendment Question | Alcohol laws | This advisory measure proposed modifying the federal act enforcing the 18th amendment. | 840,631 (60%) | 556,592 (40%) | ||
Canal Lease Question | Public land policy | It proposed the lease of the Illinois and Michigan Canal.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because, at the time of the vote, Illinois required that a measure receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 808,718 (66%) | 417,039 (34%) | |
Revenue Amendment | Taxes | It proposed to modify the power of the legislature to levy taxes on personal property and income.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 1,912,706 voters in this election, requiring at least 956,354 “yes” votes for the measure to pass. | ![]() | 651,768 (58%) | 476,455 (42%) |
1924
See also: Illinois 1924 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed amendments to sections 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11 and 17 of the banking law. | 1,074,140 (75%) | 354,165 (25%) | ||
Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed an amendment to section 9 of the banking law. | 1,088,153 (68%) | 517,827 (32%) | ||
Canal Lease Question | Public land policy | It proposed the lease of the Illinois and Michigan canal.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because, at the time of the vote, Illinois required that a measure receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 1,030,272 (67%) | 505,024 (33%) | |
Gateway Amendment | State legislatures measures | It proposed to amend the constitution to permit the legislature to propose amendments to two articles of the constitution in a session. It also proposed that no amendments be presented while the United States is at war.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 2,579,860 voters in this election, requiring at least 1,289,931 “yes” votes. | ![]() | 704,665 (64%) | 397,835 (36%) | |
State Bond Issue | Bond issues | This measure proposed a state bond issue for the building of roads. | 1,561,637 (74%) | 544,250 (26%) |
1922
See also: Illinois 1922 ballot measures
December 12
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposed New Constitution | State constitution ratification | It proposed that a new constitution should be adopted. This constitution was the result of the work done in the constitutional convention that was approved by the voters in 1918. | ![]() | 185,298 (17%) | 921,398 (83%) |
November 7
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Light Wine and Beer Question | Alcohol laws | This advisory measure proposed that the Volstead Act be modified to allow the sale of light wines and beer. | 1,065,242 (68%) | 512,111 (32%) | ||
Soldier's Bonus Question | Veterans policy | It proposed to pay a bonus to Illinois residents who served honorably in the military in 1917 and 1918. | 1,220,815 (71%) | 502,372 (29%) |
1920
See also: Illinois 1920 ballot measures
November 2
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed modifications to the general banking law. | 811,873 (79%) | 209,803 (21%) |
1918
See also: Illinois 1918 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constitutional Convention Proposal | State constitutional conventions | It proposed that a convention be held to amend the constitution. | 562,012 (78%) | 162,206 (22%) | ||
General Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | It proposed changes to the general banking law. | 524,171 (86%) | 83,704 (14%) | ||
System of Hard Roads Question | Highways and bridges | It proposed to build a statewide system of hard roads. | 661,815 (81%) | 154,396 (19%) |
1916
See also: Illinois 1916 ballot measures
November 7
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Banking Amendment | Banking policy | This measure proposed amendments to the general banking law. | 421,259 (71%) | 174,494 (29%) | ||
Revenue Amendment | Taxes | It proposed to amend the constitution with regard to the legislature's ability to levy taxes on personal property.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 1,343,381 voters in this election, requiring at least 671,691 “yes” votes. | ![]() | 656,298 (69%) | 295,782 (31%) |
1912
See also: Illinois 1912 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Law Amendment | Elections and campaigns | This advisory measure proposed changes to the law regulating primary elections. | 524,171 (77%) | 158,531 (23%) | ||
Short Ballot Question | Elections and campaigns | This advisory measure called for a short ballot. A short ballot is one that limits the number of elective offices to those that are most important. | 508,780 (75%) | 165,270 (25%) | ||
Tax Amendment | Taxes | This advisory measure called for an amendment to the taxation provisions of the constitution. | 541,189 (77%) | 158,531 (23%) |
1910
See also: Illinois 1910 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corrupt Practices Act | Elections and campaigns | This advisory measure proposed limiting the amount of money spent on a campaign and requiring detailed reporting on the source and use of campaign funds. | 422,437 (77%) | 122,889 (23%) | ||
Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory Question | Initiative and referendum process | Advise the Illinois General Assembly to propose a constitutional amendment at the next state election to establish an initiative and referendum process | 447,908 (78%) | 128,398 (22%) | ||
State Civil Service Question | Civil service | This advisory measure proposed the creation of a state civil service law. | 473,755 (80%) | 121,132 (20%) |
1908
See also: Illinois 1908 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | This measure proposed various amendments to the general banking law. | 473,755 (81%) | 108,533 (19%) |
November 3
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep Waterway Amendment | Bond issues | It proposed a bond issue to fund a waterway project. | 692,522 (78%) | 195,177 (22%) |
1906
See also: Illinois 1906 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sell Canal Lands Proposition | Public land policy | This measure proposed to sell the Illinois and Michigan canal lands to the highest bidder.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it was not adopted because, at the time of the vote, Illinois required that a measure receive approval from a majority of those voting in the election to be adopted. This measure did not meet that standard. | ![]() | 313,297 (53%) | 282,980 (47%) |
1904
See also: Illinois 1904 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago Charter Amendment | County and municipal governance; State legislatures measures | It proposed to give the legislature the power to establish a charter for the governance of the city of Chicago. | 678,393 (88%) | 90,038 (12%) | ||
Local Taxation Question | Taxes | This measure was an advisory measure related to local taxation. | 476,783 (77%) | 140,896 (23%) | ||
Primary Election Law | Elections and campaigns | This measure was an advisory measure that proposed that primary elections replace nominating conventions. | 590,976 (88%) | 78,446 (12%) | ||
Voters' Veto Question | Elections and campaigns | This measure was an advisory measure that proposed a voters' veto. | 535,501 (85%) | 95,420 (15%) |
1902
See also: Illinois 1902 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Election of United States Senators Question | Elections and campaigns | This measure was an advisory measure that proposed the direct election of the United States senators from Illinois. | 451,319 (85%) | 76,975 (15%) | ||
Local Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory Question | County and municipal governance; Initiative and referendum process | Advise the Illinois General Assembly to enact a statute to establish a local initiative and referendum process | 390,972 (82%) | 83,377 (18%) | ||
State Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory Question | Initiative and referendum process | Advise the Illinois General Assembly to propose a constitutional amendment at the next state election to establish an initiative and referendum process | 428,469 (83%) | 87,654 (17%) |
1896
See also: Illinois 1896 ballot measures
November 3
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gateway Amendment | State legislatures measures | It proposed to allow the general assembly to propose amendments to three articles of the constitution in each session instead of just one.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 1,090,869 voters in this election, requiring at least 545,435 “yes” votes. | ![]() | 163,057 (71%) | 66,519 (29%) |
1894
See also: Illinois 1894 ballot measures
November 6
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labor Law Amendment | State legislatures measures; Labor and unions | It proposed an additional amendment to the constitution that would give the legislature power to regulate relations between corporations and their employees.Note: Although this measure gathered more "yes" votes, it did not pass because at the time of the vote Illinois required that amendments receive a vote of more than 50 percent of those voting in the election. There were 574,080 voters in this election, requiring at least 287,041 “yes” votes for passage. | ![]() | 155,393 (72%) | 59,558 (28%) |
1892
See also: Illinois 1892 ballot measures
November 8
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gateway Amendment | State legislatures measures | It proposed to allow the general assembly to propose amendments to two articles of the constitution in each session instead of just one. | ![]() | 84,654 (48%) | 93,420 (52%) |
1890
See also: Illinois 1890 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Banking Law Amendment | Banking policy | This measure related to the general banking law in Illinois. | 480,512 (89%) | 56,737 (11%) | ||
World's Fair Bonds Amendment | Bond issues | It proposed to allow the issuing of bonds to finance the World's Fair to be held in Chicago in 1893. | 500,299 (90%) | 55,073 (10%) |
1886
See also: Illinois 1886 ballot measures
November 2
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-Contract Convict Labor Amendment | Prison work regulations | It proposed that prisons may not contract out, as labor, the convicted individuals residing in the prison. | 306,565 (64%) | 169,327 (36%) |
1884
See also: Illinois 1884 ballot measures
November 4
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment 1 | State legislatures measures; State executive official measures | It proposed that the governor can veto single items in appropriations bills. | 427,821 (88%) | 60,244 (12%) |
1882
See also: Illinois 1882 ballot measures
November 7
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cede Canal | Federal government issues; Ports and harbors; Public land policy | It proposed to cede the Illinois and Michigan Canal to the United States so that the United States would assume responsibility for the completion of the project. | 363,855 (86%) | 59,675 (14%) |
1878
See also: Illinois 1878 ballot measures
November 5
Type | Title | Subject | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drainage and Ditches Amendment | Eminent domain policy; Water irrigation policy; Land use and development policy | It proposed to allow landowners to create districts to construct drains and levees where needed. It allowed the power of eminent domain to be used to secure property for constructing levees or drains. | 295,960 (83%) | 60,081 (17%) |
1870
See also: Illinois 1870 ballot measures
July 2
Type | Title | Subject | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cumulative Voting Amendment | Cumulative voting; State legislatures measures | 99,022 (59%) | 70,080 (41%) |
See also
![]() |
State of Illinois Springfield (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |