Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Brenda Saiz

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 17:33, 6 August 2024 by Kirsten Corrao (contribs) (Add PersonCategories widget; remove some hard-coded categories)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Brenda Saiz
Image of Brenda Saiz

Education

Bachelor's

University of New Mexico, 1993

Law

University of New Mexico School of Law, 2003

Brenda M. Saiz is a director at Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin, & Robb, P.A., in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

On June 18, 2020, President Donald Trump (R) nominated Saiz to a seat on the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. Saiz's nomination was returned to the president at the sine die adjournment of the U.S. Senate on January 3, 2021. Click here for more information on Saiz's federal judicial nomination.

The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico is one of 94 U.S. District Courts. They are the general trial courts of the United States federal courts. To learn more about the court, click here.

Judicial nominations and appointments

United States District Court for the District of New Mexico

See also: Federal judges nominated by Donald Trump

On June 18, 2020, President Donald Trump (R) nominated Saiz to a seat on the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.[1] To read more about the federal nominations process, click here.

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Brenda Saiz
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
Progress
Returned 199 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: June 18, 2020
ApprovedAABA Rating: Well qualified
Questionnaire:
DefeatedAHearing:
QFRs: (Hover over QFRs to read more)
DefeatedAReported:  
DefeatedAConfirmed:
DefeatedAReturned: January 3, 2021

Opposition from home-state senators

See also: Blue slip (federal judicial nominations)

President Donald Trump (R) nominated Fred Federici and Brenda Saiz to seats on the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico on June 18, 2020.

New Mexico Sens. Tom Udall (D) and Martin Heinrich (D) said in a joint statement in September that they were withholding their blue slips because "the President insisted on politicizing the judicial appointment process." They said they would pause the process "given the close proximity to the election, and will continue to work expeditiously to fill these vacancies once the American people have spoken."[2]

The Albuquerque Journal Editorial Board defended Federici and Saiz, arguing they had "excellent backgrounds and reputations." The board also pointed to the vacancies on the District of New Mexico and the number of cases per judge: "The district now has only five of seven authorized full-time judges, and before the confirmation of Judge Kea Riggs last year, each judge had more than 900 cases."[3]

Nomination

On May 28, 2020, President Donald Trump (R) announced his intent to nominate Saiz to a seat on the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.[4] The president officially submitted the nomination on June 18. Saiz's nomination was returned to the president at the sine die adjournment of the U.S. Senate on January 3, 2021.[5]

Saiz was nominated to replace Judge Judith Herrera, who assumed senior status on July 1, 2019.

The American Bar Association rated Saiz well qualified for the position.[6] To read more about ABA ratings, click here.

Education

Saiz obtained her B.A. in English from the University of New Mexico in 1993 and her J.D. from the University of New Mexico School of Law in 2003. During her legal studies, Saiz was a manuscript editor for the New Mexico Law Review, a member of the UNMSOL National Mock Trial Team, and the recipient of the Jerry Roehl Award for Outstanding Advocacy and the Lewis Powell Medal for Excellence in Advocacy.[7]

Professional career

Saiz is a director at Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin, & Robb, P.A., in Albuquerque, New Mexico.[4]

Associations

  • Member, New Mexico Defense Lawyers Association
  • Member, Trucking Industry Defense Association
  • Member, Transportation Lawyers Association
  • Former member, Magistrate Judge Merit Selection Panel, United States District Court
  • Albuquerque Bar Association[7]

About the court

District of New Mexico
Tenth Circuit
Great seal of the United States.png
Judgeships
Posts: 7
Judges: 7
Vacancies: 0
Judges
Chief: William P. Johnson
Active judges: James O. Browning, Sarah Davenport, Matthew Garcia, Kenneth John Gonzales, David Herrera Urias, Kea Riggs, Margaret Strickland

Senior judges:
Christina Armijo, Robert Brack, Curtis Hansen, Judith Herrera, William P. Johnson, Martha Vazquez


The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico is one of 94 United States district courts. The district operates out of courtrooms in Albuquerque, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, and Roswell, N.M. When decisions of the court are appealed, they are appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit based in downtown Denver, Colorado at the Byron White Federal Courthouse.

The District of New Mexico has original jurisdiction over cases filed within its jurisdiction. These cases can include civil and criminal matters that fall under federal law.

The jurisdiction of the District of New Mexico consists of all the counties in the state of New Mexico.

Court is held in Albuquerque, Las Cruces, Roswell, Santa Fe, and Silver City.

To read opinions published by this court, click here.

The federal nomination process

Federal judges are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. There are multiple steps to the process:

  • The president nominates an individual for a judicial seat.
  • The nominee fills out a questionnaire and is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing with the nominee, questioning them about things like their judicial philosophy, past rulings or opinions, etc.
  • As part of this process, the committee sends a blue slip to senators from the home state in which the judicial nomination was received, allowing them to express their approval or disapproval of the nominee.
  • After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to approve or return the nominee.
  • If approved, the nominee is voted on by the full Senate.
  • If the Committee votes to return the nominee to the president, the president has the opportunity to re-nominate the individual.
  • The Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
  • If the Senate confirms the nomination, the nominee receives a commission to serve a lifelong position as a federal judge.
  • If the Senate does not confirm the nomination, that nominee does not become a judge.


See also

External links

Footnotes