Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

Barbara Lenk

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Barbara Lenk
Image of Barbara Lenk
Prior offices
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Education

Bachelor's

Fordham University, 1972

Graduate

Yale University, 1978

Law

Harvard Law School, 1979


Barbara A. Lenk is a former justice on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. She served from 2011 to 2020.

Governor Deval Patrick (D) appointed her to the court on April 4, 2011, to replace retired Justice Judith Cowin. She retired on December 1, 2020, a day before she reached the mandatory retirement age of 70.[1][2][3] To learn more about this vacancy, click here.

Supreme Court nomination

On April 4, 2011, Governor Patrick appointed Lenk for a seat on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. She was confirmed by the Governor's Council on May 4, 2011.[2]

Lenk was the first openly gay justice on the court. Lenk said that her nomination "shows that my story is the American story, where anything is possible."[4]

Education

Lenk received a B.A. from Fordham University in 1972 and a Ph.D. in political philosophy from Yale University in 1978. She went on to receive her J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1979.[1]

Career

Political outlook

See also: Political outlook of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Lenk received a campaign finance score of -0.85, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of -0.44 that justices received in Massachusetts.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[5]

Noteworthy cases

Lunn v. Commonwealth

On July 24, 2017, a unanimous Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that Massachusetts law does not authorize state court officials to detain someone based solely on a request by federal immigration authorities.[6] Federal authorities make that request using a civil immigration detainer. As the federal government acknowledged, the court wrote, civil immigration detainers “are simply requests. They are not commands, and they impose no mandatory obligations on the State authorities to which they are directed.” Therefore, the court said, the question was whether state law authorized court officials to detain someone based solely on a civil detainer. Noting the specific circumstances under which state laws empower court officials to arrest or detain someone, the court ruled that “Massachusetts law provides no authority for Massachusetts court officers to arrest and hold an individual solely on the basis of a Federal civil immigration detainer, beyond the time that the individual would otherwise be entitled to be released from State custody.”[6]

See also

Massachusetts Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Massachusetts.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Massachusetts
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Massachusetts
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

Footnotes