Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Christy Albano

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Christy Albano
Image of Christy Albano
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 3, 2020

Personal
Religion
Lutheran
Profession
Attorney at law
Contact

Christy Albano (Democratic Party) ran for election for judge of the Texas 468th District Court. She lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Albano completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Christy Albano earned a B.A. from Southern Methodist University in 1993 and a J.D. from the University of Missouri, Kansas City in 1996. Her career experience includes working as an attorney.[1][2]

Elections

2020

See also: Municipal elections in Collin County, Texas (2020)

General election

General election for Texas 468th District Court

Incumbent Lindsey Wynne defeated Christy Albano in the general election for Texas 468th District Court on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Lindsey Wynne (R)
 
56.9
 
260,381
Image of Christy Albano
Christy Albano (D) Candidate Connection
 
43.1
 
197,279

Total votes: 457,660
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas 468th District Court

Christy Albano advanced from the Democratic primary for Texas 468th District Court on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Christy Albano
Christy Albano Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
56,532

Total votes: 56,532
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas 468th District Court

Incumbent Lindsey Wynne advanced from the Republican primary for Texas 468th District Court on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Lindsey Wynne
 
100.0
 
56,136

Total votes: 56,136
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Christy Albano completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Albano's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I'm a Board Certified Family Law Specialist running for a Family Court Bench. I've been practicing 23 years. I have the experience, wisdom knowledge and right judicial temperament to protect the best interest of families and children. People appearing in this court are at some of the worst times of their lives, experiencing divorce, child custody disputes, domestic violence disputes and child welfare services disputes. It's important to have a jurist with a strong history and knowledge of the issues that occur in family law disputes. I am a Fellow in the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and Texas Academy of Family Law Specialists. I've been recognized by my peers in the Best Lawyers in America for family law every year since 2014 and Texas Super Lawyers and Rising Stars every year since 2006. I have received numerous awards and recognitions throughout my career such as the prestigious Judge Sam Williams Award, presented by the State Bar of Texas. I'm active in local, state and national bar associations and legal foundations and continues to stay up to date on local and national trends in family law. I've been published in the prestigious Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (JAAML) and the American Bar Association's Family Advocate publication. In 2009 my law school regarding arbitration and child study was cited by the NJ Supreme Court as a portion of "scholarly writing on the subject." . I will follow the law, enforce the law, and protect children.
  • I have the experience, wisdom, knowledge and right judicial temperament to protect the best interest of families and children. People appearing in this court are at some of the worst times of their lives. They are experiencing divorce, child custody disputes, domestic violence disputes and child welfare services disputes. It's important to have a jurist with a strong history and knowledge of the issues that occur in family law disputes. It's important to give every person appearing in court the time and attention each case and each person deserves. I will follow the law, enforce the law, and above all protect the best interests of the children.
  • Political issues should not influence judicial decisions. The judiciary are required to uphold the independence, integrity and impartiality of the office and avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. Decisions should be made after careful consideration of the law applied to the facts and evidence. Political issues are inevitable, but the Court must maintain neutrality despite outside influences, pressures and politics. It's important to remember that what I believe is not important. What I must do is follow the law
  • We need to fully fund staff to help keep the courts efficient. It's also important for the court to maintain a specific and predictable schedule to keep the cases moving. I agree with staggering hearing settings throughout the day and limiting the number of cases set at each time. I also agree with reasonable time limits, submission of requested rulings, cps docket days, advanced scheduling orders and post-trial deadlines for entry of final orders.
I am passionate about voting, women's rights, equal protection and equal rights for all citizens, and equal access to justice.
My father. He was an amazing person and internationally recognized expert attorney and leader in Family Law. He held the highest ethical standards in the legal profession. He loved his family and friends. He was a mentor to so many over his 50 plus years of practice. He defended those who didn't have a voice. He protected children. He was grateful for the opportunity he was given to come from a low income background and become a successful lawyer. I had the great privilege to work in my father's law firm in high school, college and law school. He taught me by example how to be a good, caring, accomplished and ethical lawyer and a mentor and leader in the profession.
I have a good temperament. I am ethical. I am a mentor and a leader.
I admire Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg for her tenacity and inspiration to so many.
I believe my experience and wisdom will be beneficial for the families who come into court in my county.
My primary concern is that the judiciary may be too subject to political pressure. When one party dominates the judiciary at the local and state level, the balance of the perspective of the judiciary may be affected.
I know the committee that does the ABA ratings is a very hard working volunteer committee that spends countless hours vetting the judicial candidates so they can give an accurate rating. It's my understanding that the ratings are "qualified" or "not qualified." I believe there can be an array of scales as to a judge's ability within a "qualified" rating.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on June 6, 2020
  2. Albano Law, PLLC, “About,” accessed June 12, 2020