Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Clark County, Washington, Amendment 10, Ranked-Choice Voting Measure (November 2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Clark County Amendment 10

Flag of Washington.png

Election date

November 8, 2022

Topic
Local elections and campaigns and Local electoral systems
Status

DefeatedDefeated

Type
Referral


Clark County Amendment 10 was on the ballot as a referral in Clark County on November 8, 2022. It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported enacting ranked-choice voting for elections of Clark County officials beginning on January 1, 2026.

A "no" vote opposed enacting ranked-choice voting for elections of Clark County officials beginning on January 1, 2026.


Election results

Clark County Amendment 10

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 80,772 41.94%

Defeated No

111,812 58.06%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Amendment 10 was as follows:

Concerning Ranked-Choice Voting for County Elected Positions

The Clark County Charter Review Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-8 proposing an amendment to the Clark County Home Rule Charter, concerning County Elected Offices. If approved, this amendment would make the County Elected Offices determined by ranked choice voting as of January 1, 2026.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Support

FairVote Washington led the campaign in support of the measure.[1]

Supporters

Officials


Arguments

  • State Rep. Monica Stonier: "I’m somebody who’s been elected in a very partisan role in a very partisan swing district with very tough conversations to have across the aisle and then in a very strong Democratic district … would have benefited from having a cleaner conversation — in both those race—when it comes to just making sure voters know who they are supporting and taking the politics out of it."
  • Former U.S. Rep. Brian Baird: "The issue has to be about, is this good for our democratic republic form of government. Will it lead to more citizen engagement? Will it help elect people who can work together, who can solve problems? Will it reduce the tone of antagonism and hatred, even, and bring people together? I think ranked choice voting will do that."


Opposition

Opponents

Political Parties


Arguments

  • Clark County Republican Party: "The average voter needs to know that ranked choice voting increases the cost of an election, will add a number of days, possibly over a week, to learn the winner of some races, and in its complexity would create more concern as to the integrity of our election process. NAACP members along the East Coast have raised concerns that this type of voting is discriminatory. Pierce County tried it, and quickly got rid of it. This is the last thing Clark County voters need."


Background

Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures
Pages:
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
History of RCV ballot measures
Electoral systems on the ballot
Local electoral systems on the ballot
Electoral systems by state
See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.

Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.

RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.

Local RCV ballot measures

See also: History of ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures

Between 1965 and 2024, 79 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 58 jurisdictions in 19 states.

  • Ballotpedia has located 71 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 52 (78.9%) and rejected 15 (21.1%).
  • There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
  • The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
  • The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.


The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by topic.

Local ranked-choice vote measures by topic and outcome, 1965 - April 2025
Topic Total Approved Approved (%) Defeated Defeated (%)
  Adopt RCV 72 57 79.2% 15 20.08%
  Repeal RCV 8 4 50.0% 4 50.0%
Total 80 61 76.3% 19 23.7%


Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Washington

In December 2021, the Clark County Charter Review Commission voted 11-4 to place the measure on the November ballot.[2]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Washington

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Washington.

How to vote in Washington


See also

Footnotes

  1. The Columbian Blogs, "Clark County GOP says ranked choice voting not what county needs," July 29, 2022
  2. The Columbian Blogs, "Clark County GOP says ranked choice voting not what county needs," July 29, 2022
  3. Washington Secretary of State, “Frequently Asked Questions on Voting by Mail,” accessed April 20, 2023
  4. 4.0 4.1 Washington Secretary of State, "Voter Eligibility," accessed April 20, 2023
  5. Washington State Legislature, "Voter registration deadlines," accessed April 20, 2023
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 The Hill, "Wash. gov signs universal voter registration law," March 20, 2018
  7. Washington Secretary of State, "Washington State Voter Registration Form," accessed November 2, 2024
  8. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  9. Washington State Legislature, "RCW 29A.40.160," accessed October 9, 2025