Colorado State Senate District 4 candidate surveys, 2022
This article shows responses from candidates in the 2022 election for Colorado State Senate District 4 who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey.
- Click here to see candidates and election results.
- Click here to see Candidate Connection survey responses.
Candidates and election results
General election
General election for Colorado State Senate District 4
Mark Baisley defeated Jeff Ravage in the general election for Colorado State Senate District 4 on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Mark Baisley (R) | 60.8 | 55,595 | |
Jeff Ravage (D) ![]() | 39.2 | 35,789 | ||
| Total votes: 91,384 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Lori Boydston (Independent)
Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses
Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Survey responses from candidates in this race
Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
| Collapse all
Jeff Ravage (D)
2) Our economy is thriving, but the public sector is denied the ability to share in this wealth. The continued upward distribution of wealth is an environmental issue because it ties the hands of the government and holds the people hostage while ice caps melt and rivers dry up.
3) The continued stranglehold exerted by the fossil fuels industry is slowing adaptation to new energies. We're still subsidizing fracking and oil extraction, while throwing hurdles in front of solar, wind and geothermal technologies. Our current energy scenario pollutes our land, rivers and sky.
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Just kidding- had to make sure you hadn't fallen asleep yet.
Look: there is no perfect system. There is no magically fair redistricting formula. One might just as well use county boundaries, or subsections to grab the proper number of citizens. But partisan pick and choosing is definitely not the way. Gaming the system will always come with the risk that your opponent will eventually capture the "sure thing " you built for your preferred party, and use it to punish you. Best leave things as fair as possible and let the chips fall as they may.Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
Jeff Ravage (D)
See also
More about these elections:
Select a district below to read responses from candidates in those races:
