File: Supreme Court US 2010.jpg
From Ballotpedia
Size of this preview: 800 × 533 pixels. Other resolution: 1,500 × 1,000 pixels.
Original file (1,500 × 1,000 pixels, file size: 1.04 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Summary
| Description |
English: The United States Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States, in 2010. Top row (left to right): Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Bottom row (left to right): Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, and Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Español: Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos en 2010. Fila superior (izquierda a derecha): Juez Asociada Sonia Sotomayor, Juez Asociado Stephen G. Breyer, Juez Asociado Samuel A. Alito, y Juez Asociada Elena Kagan. Fila inferior (izquierda a derecha): Juez Asociado Clarence Thomas, Juez Asociado Antonin Scalia, Juez presidente John G. Roberts, Juez Asociado Anthony Kennedy, y Juez Asociada Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Deutsch: Das Oberste Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika 2010. Hintere Reihe (von links nach rechts): Beigeordnete Richterin Sonia Sotomayor, Beigeordneter Richter Stephen Breyer, Beigeordneter Richter Samuel Alito, und Beigeordnete Richterin Elena Kagan. Vordere Reihe (von links nach rechts): Beigeordneter Richter Clarence Thomas, Beigeordneter Richter Antonin Scalia, Vorsitzender und Oberster Richter John Roberts, Beigeordneter Richter Anthony Kennedy, und Beigeordnete Richterin Ruth Bader Ginsburg. |
| Date | |
| Source | Roberts Court (2010-) - The Oyez Project |
| Author | Steve Petteway, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States |
Licensing
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
 |
| This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. | ||
|
Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 10:12, 23 October 2012 | | 1,500 × 1,000 (1.04 MB) | wikimediacommons>Illegitimate Barrister | Higher resolution! |
File usage
The following 54 pages use this file:
- Advocate Health Care v. Stapleton
- Amgen v. Sandoz
- BNSF Railway v. Tyrrell
- Bank of America v. Miami
- Beckles v. United States
- Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California
- Buck v. Davis
- County of Los Angeles v. Mendez
- Dignity Health v. Rollins
- Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District
- Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions
- Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
- Fact check/Do all the Republican presidential candidates support the repeal of Dodd-Frank
- Fact check/Do congressional incumbents rarely face challengers and almost always win despite low approval ratings
- Fact check/Does half of the U.S. live "in or near poverty"
- Fact check/Will three Supreme Court justices be past the court's average retirement age on election day
- Federal fact checks
- Gloucester County School Board v. G.G.
- Henson v. Santander Consumer USA
- Hernandez v. Mesa (2016)
- Honeycutt v. United States
- Howell v. Howell
- Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark
- Lee v. United States
- Lewis v. Clarke
- Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp.
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Group
- Manrique v. United States
- Manuel v. City of Joliet
- Maslenjak v. United States
- Matal v. Tam
- McComish v. Bennett
- McLane Company v. EEOC
- McWilliams v. Dunn
- Microsoft Corp. v. Baker
- Musnuff v. Haeger
- NLRB v. SW General Inc.
- Nelson v. Colorado
- Packingham v. North Carolina
- Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado
- SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products
- Samsung Electronics v. Apple
- Sandoz v. Amgen
- Sessions v. Morales-Santana
- Shaw v. United States
- TC Heartland v. Kraft
- Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates
- Turner v. United States
- Visa v. Stoumbos
- Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon
- Ziglar v. Abbasi
- User:Adam Vaughn/Finance Portal Sandbox
- User:Adam Vaughn/Finance Portal Sandbox Alternate
- Template:Verbatim Federal news stories
