Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Kathleen Jansen

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Kathleen Jansen

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals

Education

Bachelor's

Michigan State University

Law

University of Detroit, Mercy School of Law

Kathleen Jansen was a judge of the Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals. She assumed office in 1989. She left office on January 1, 2025.

Jansen ran for re-election for judge of the Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals. She won in the general election on November 6, 2018.

Education

Jansen received her bachelor's degree from Michigan State University and earned her J.D. from the University of Detroit Law School.[1]

Career

Before her appointment to the Michigan Second District Court of Appeals, Jansen served as a judge of the Macomb County Probate Court and the Macomb Circuit Court, and she worked as an attorney in private practice.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: Michigan intermediate appellate court elections, 2024

Kathleen Jansen did not file to run for re-election.

2018

See also: Michigan intermediate appellate court elections, 2018

General election

General election for Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals (3 seats)

Incumbent Kathleen Jansen, incumbent Elizabeth L. Gleicher, and incumbent Deborah Servitto won election in the general election for Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Kathleen Jansen (Nonpartisan)
 
34.2
 
592,091
Elizabeth L. Gleicher (Nonpartisan)
 
33.0
 
570,856
Deborah Servitto (Nonpartisan)
 
32.8
 
566,771

Total votes: 1,729,718
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Selection method

See also: Nonpartisan election of judges

The 28 judges of the Michigan Court of Appeals are chosen in nonpartisan elections and must face re-election if they wish to continue serving. A full term on the court is six years. Candidates are placed on the ballot via nonpartisan primaries or by nominating petitions.[2] The process for filling vacancies on the appeals court is identical to that used by the supreme court. With the assistance of the judicial qualifications committee, the governor names a replacement to serve until the next general election.[2]

Qualifications

To be elected to the court, a judge must:

  • be a qualified elector of his or her district;
  • be licensed to practice law in the state;
  • have at least five years of law practice experience;
  • be under the age of 70.[2]

Sitting judges who reach age 70 are allowed to serve out the remainder of their term.[3]

Selection of the chief judge

The chief judge of the appeals court is selected by supreme court appointment to terms lasting two years.[2]

2012

Jansen was re-elected after running unopposed in the general election on November 6, 2012.[4][5]

See also: Michigan judicial elections, 2012

Noteworthy cases

Court: nonprofit not a public agency; Jansen in dissent

On March 6, 2003, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 3-1 decision that the Michigan High School Athletic Association and public schools "'work in tandem' to achieve mutual benefits and that the association does not 'usurp the schools' money making capacity.'" The MHSAA severed its ties from the state in 1972 when it became a nonprofit organization, and because the association is not supported through a state or local authority, it is not considered a public agency. Because it is not considered a public agency, it therefore is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. According to The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, in dissent, Judge Kathleen Jansen agreed with the trial court that the MHSAA is a public agency. "The schools allow the MHSAA to operate athletic events and to receive funding from the tickets that are sold at those events, making it clear that the funding exists through the school's authority," Jansen wrote.[6]

Doctor can be charged with performing illegal abortion

Dr. Jose Gilberto Higuera performed a 28-week abortion in 1994 in violation of a Michigan law prohibiting abortion beyond the first trimester unless the mother's life is at risk. The Michigan Court of Appeals determined that the law was not unconstitutionally vague and that the state could prosecute the doctor. In dissent, Judge Kathleen Jansen reasoned that the statute was unconstitutionally vague because a doctor could not be expected to discern which abortions would be legal, and which would be illegal--essentially, that the doctor would not be able to determine how far along the woman was if the patient didn't tell the doctor. It is believed that the case against Higuera is the only time that a doctor has been held legally responsible for an illegal abortion since Roe v. Wade.[7]

See also

Michigan Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Michigan.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Michigan
Michigan Court of Appeals
Michigan Supreme Court
Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Michigan
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

Footnotes