Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

Marlando Pridgen

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Marlando Pridgen
Image of Marlando Pridgen
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 5, 2024

Education

High school

West Columbus High School

Contact

Marlando Pridgen (Democratic Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent North Carolina's 7th Congressional District. He lost in the general election on November 5, 2024.

Pridgen completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Marlando Pridgen earned a high school diploma from West Columbus High School.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: North Carolina's 7th Congressional District election, 2024

North Carolina's 7th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Republican primary)

North Carolina's 7th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Democratic primary)

General election

General election for U.S. House North Carolina District 7

Incumbent David Rouzer defeated Marlando Pridgen in the general election for U.S. House North Carolina District 7 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of David Rouzer
David Rouzer (R)
 
58.6
 
254,022
Image of Marlando Pridgen
Marlando Pridgen (D) Candidate Connection
 
41.4
 
179,512

Total votes: 433,534
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Marlando Pridgen advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 7.

Republican primary election

The Republican primary election was canceled. Incumbent David Rouzer advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House North Carolina District 7.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Pridgen in this election.

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Marlando Pridgen completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Pridgen's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

Marlando D. Pridgen, a fresh face in grassroots advocacy and community leadership, is stepping forward as a candidate for NC Congressional District 7. Born and raised in scenic Southeastern North Carolina, Pridgen’s early life was shaped by the values of hard work, community service, and integrity. His environment shaped his life's mission: to dedicate himself to helping and serving others. As he steps into the political arena, Pridgen brings these foundational principles and a commitment to represent the voices of his community.

Pridgen's approach to politics is grounded in listening to the needs of his constituents and advocating for policies that promote economic growth, healthcare accessibility, and environmental sustainability. His campaign emphasizes inclusivity, transparency, and accountability, aiming to bridge the gap between the government and the people.

As a congressional candidate, Marlando Pridgen is committed to being a voice for his community, striving to bring about legislative changes that will benefit NC Congressional District 7 and the nation as a whole. His vision is to create a more equitable and prosperous future for all citizens, guided by the principles of justice, fairness, and community collaboration.
  • Dedication to Economic Growth and Job Creation: Marlando Pridgen pledges to prioritize policies that stimulate economic development and job creation within District 7. By fostering a supportive environment for both small businesses and large enterprises, Pridgen aims to ensure that the district becomes a hub for innovation and employment opportunities. His focus on economic revitalization is designed to attract investments, encourage entrepreneurship, and create high-paying jobs for the residents.
  • Commitment to Healthcare Accessibility: Understanding the critical importance of healthcare, Marlando Pridgen is committed to working towards more accessible and affordable healthcare solutions for all constituents. He believes in the need for a healthcare system that is both comprehensive and compassionate, ensuring that no resident of District 7 is left behind. Pridgen advocates for policies that will lower healthcare costs, expand coverage, and improve the quality of healthcare services, making sure that families can receive the care they need without financial strain.
  • Champion for Education and Skills Training: Recognizing education as the cornerstone of personal and community development, Marlando Pridgen is dedicated to advancing educational opportunities and skills training programs. He aims to support public education from K-12 to higher education, ensuring that schools are well-funded and teachers are well-supported. Pridgen's vision includes accessible vocational training and continuous education programs that equip the workforce with the skills necessary to thrive in the evolving job market. By investing in education, Pridgen believes District 7 can lay the foundation for a prosperous future.
Pridgen shows a strong commitment to policies aimed at stimulating the local economy and creating job opportunities. His focus is on making District 7 an attractive place for both small and large businesses through favorable economic policies, infrastructure development, and support for innovation and entrepreneurship.

Pridgen's advocacy includes supporting reforms in healthcare legislation, pushing for the expansion of Medicaid, or introducing new initiatives to make healthcare more equitable.

Pridgen will work towards increasing funding for schools, supporting teacher pay raises, and creating more opportunities for skills training that aligns with the needs of the modern workforce.
I align myself with the perspective of thinkers like Thomas Hobbes, who argued that human nature inherently tends towards self-interest and conflict. In the contemporary social and political landscape, the concept of idolizing role models and mentors seems to be eclipsed by a growing prevalence of personal and ethical shortcomings.

As a candidate for North Carolina Congressional District 7, the example I aspire to emulate in my public service is that of Jesus Christ. His teachings and actions, centered on love, service, compassion, and justice, are principles that I believe are deeply relevant to the responsibilities and challenges of governance today.
The Bible. It provides foundational moral and ethical guidance, influencing concepts of justice, leadership, and the role of the individual within a community.
The principles that are most important are integrity, accountablility, empathy/compassion, leadership, communication, vision/problem-solving, resilience/persistence, commitment to justice/equity and adaptability.

Integrity is foundational. An elected official with integrity stands by their principles, keeps their promises, and remains transparent in their actions and decisions.

Accountability is paramount. Officials must own their decisions and actions, including mistakes. This involves openness to scrutiny, willingness to explain and justify actions, and a readiness to make amends when necessary.

Empathy and compassion allow officials to understand diverse constituent needs and challenges, enabling informed, considerate decisions, especially for the most vulnerable.

Inspiring and uniting people towards common goals, making tough calls, and navigating complex political landscapes require effective leadership. This also demands humility and a willingness to listen and learn.

Clear, honest, and open communication builds trust and understanding between officials and constituents. It involves not just conveying information effectively but actively listening to concerns and feedback.

Having a clear vision for the future and adeptly addressing current issues with innovative solutions is crucial. Officials must be forward-thinking problem-solvers, working towards community and societal betterment.

Resilience and persistence are necessary to navigate political pressures, overcome obstacles, and strive for positive change despite adversity or opposition.

A commitment to promoting fairness, justice, and equity is vital. This means advocating for policies and actions that address inequalities, ensuring all individuals can thrive.

Adaptability is key. Effective officials must be flexible, willing to adjust strategies, policies, and plans as needed to better serve constituents in changing circumstances and with new information.
The core responsibilities are multifaceted and interconnected. They require a balance of leadership, dedication, and a deep commitment to serving the public's best interests. Fulfilling these duties demands a comprehensive understanding of the legislative process, strong communication and negotiation skills, and a steadfast commitment to the principles of democracy. Review below:

Legislation: Crafting, sponsoring, and voting on bills and legislation is a primary responsibility.

Representation: Elected officials are expected to advocate for district priorities, securing funding for local projects, and ensuring that the policies enacted at the federal level benefit their constituents.

Constituent Services: Ensuring that constituents' needs and concerns are addressed.

Oversight: Participating in hearings, investigations, and audits. Oversight is crucial for maintaining transparency, accountability, and effectiveness in government operations.

Policy and Advocacy: Elected officials must engage in policy analysis and advocacy, working on committees and with various stakeholders to shape public policy in areas such as healthcare, education, national security, the economy, and more.

Informing the Public: Keeping constituents informed about legislative developments, policy issues, and the official's stances through town hall meetings, newsletters, social media, and other forms of communication.

Collaboration and Negotiation: Building relationships with other lawmakers, stakeholders, and interest groups is vital for achieving legislative goals which includes collaborating across party lines, negotiating compromises, and working in committees to advance legislation.

Ethical Leadership: Upholding the highest ethical standards and demonstrating integrity, fairness, and respect in all actions. Elected officials should serve as role models, exhibiting conduct that reflects well on their office and promotes public trust in the democratic process.
The House's membership is based on state population, unlike the Senate's equal representation. This ensures more populous states have greater representation, making the House more reflective of the nation's demographic makeup.

House members' two-year terms, the shortest federal office, keep them closely tied to constituent interests and public opinion shifts. The House's exclusive right to initiate revenue bills aligns with being the chamber most directly connected to the people on financial matters affecting them.

The House's sole authority to impeach federal officials is a critical check on the executive and judicial branches. Its detailed committee system allows division of labor and specialized focus across subjects from agriculture to security. Committees draft, amend, and initially vote on bills before full House debate.

Complex House rules and procedures govern the legislative process. The Rules Committee determines terms for considering legislation. This structured approach manages the extensive workload and maintains order during debates.

House leadership like the Speaker significantly influences the legislative agenda and priorities. The Speaker decides which bills get votes.

The House has grown increasingly diverse over time, including representatives across backgrounds, professions, and demographics - contributing a multiplicity of perspectives to policymaking.

These qualities make the House a dynamic, vital component adapting to the changing American populace while maintaining structured legislative processes. Its population-based representation ensures the will of the majority public is reflected, a hallmark of the democratic system.
Electing representatives from non-traditional backgrounds to the U.S. House can inject fresh thinking and perspectives into the policymaking process. Those without prior political experience often bring innovative ideas and new approaches untethered to conventional governmental frameworks. Their diverse professional histories allow them to contribute field-specific insights reflecting a broader range of constituent experiences and needs. This diversity enhances deliberations by amplifying historically underrepresented voices.

Representatives coming directly from private sector careers may have a closer connection to the day-to-day realities and challenges facing the people they aim to serve. This grounding in their constituents' lived experiences can help ensure the legislative process remains centered on addressing real needs rather than becoming divorced from the public's concerns.

Perhaps seeing individuals from diverse backgrounds successfully transition into political roles can inspire greater engagement from the public. When the halls of power reflect the full fabric of American society, more citizens from all walks of life feel represented and empowered to participate - whether through voting, activism, or potentially seeking office themselves one day.

While political experience is valuable, it is not the sole prerequisite for responsible and effective representation. The House of Representatives is intended to be a close reflection of the nation's populace. Incorporating a wide range of backgrounds and real-world experiences enriches the deliberative process and ensures policymaking remains grounded in the needs of all Americans.
The United States faces a myriad of critical challenges that demand urgent attention and collaborative action. Political polarization has deepened, hindering the nation's ability to govern effectively and address pressing issues. Bridging these divides and fostering a more cooperative political environment is crucial for progress.

Economic inequality continues to widen, threatening stability and social cohesion. Creating more equitable opportunities for wealth and education is imperative to address this growing disparity. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in the healthcare system, including accessibility, affordability, and preparedness challenges.

Climate change poses an imminent threat, with disasters becoming more frequent and severe.

Rapid technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence and automation, are transforming the job market. The nation must foster a workforce that is adaptable, skilled, and prepared for the future of work.

The movement for racial justice has highlighted systemic inequalities, demanding comprehensive reforms in policing, criminal justice, education, and other areas to ensure equity and fairness for all Americans.

National security and global leadership face evolving threats, including cybersecurity attacks, terrorism, and the rise of global competitors. Maintaining a balanced approach to foreign policy and defense while nurturing alliances and addressing root causes of conflict is crucial.

Ensuring a robust, equitable, and adaptable education system that prepares future generations is another significant challenge, encompassing K-12, higher education, and vocational training.

Immigration reform is essential, addressing humanitarian and economic aspects through a balanced approach that secures borders while providing a pathway for legal immigration and addressing the status of undocumented immigrants.

These challenges demand collaborative efforts and innovative solutions.
The two-year term for members of the U.S. House of Representatives provides both advantages and challenges. On the positive side, these short terms help ensure representatives remain closely attuned and responsive to the evolving views and needs of their constituents. With re-election always looming, they are compelled to stay engaged with the electorate and quickly adapt their priorities based on public sentiment. This proximity to the people helps foster accountability - every two years, representatives must answer for their records and policy decisions at the ballot box.

Beyond accountability to voters, two-year terms also allow the House to nimbly shift its focus and legislative agenda alongside changes in the political landscape and national priorities. As new issues and concerns emerge, the makeup and direction of the House can rapidly evolve to meet those developing needs through each election cycle.

However, these short terms create challenges as well. The perpetual need to fundraise and campaign can distract representatives from fully focusing on their governance duties and legislating. There is a risk that re-election efforts will take precedence over effective policymaking. Additionally, with their limited window before facing voters again, representatives may be incentivized to pursue short-term populist measures rather than long-term solutions requiring patience to bear fruit.

High turnover from frequent elections raises concerns about political instability as well. A lack of continuity in the House's makeup could undermine major long-term legislative projects and create inconsistencies in policymaking from one Congress to the next.

Ultimately, the two-year House term reflects a balance struck by the framers of the Constitution between ensuring proper responsiveness to the public will and allowing for a reasonably stable and effective governing body.
The debate over term limits is complex and reflects broader discussions about the best ways to ensure effective, responsive, and democratic governance. Whether term limits are beneficial or detrimental can depend on various factors, including the specific political context, the level of government, and the mechanisms in place for ensuring political accountability and transparency.

One perspective is that term limits can restrict the ability of voters to reelect representatives they believe are performing well. This can be seen as undemocratic, as it limits the choice available to the electorate.

On the other hand, term limits are seen as a way to curb the power of career politicians and encourage elected officials to focus on serving the public interest, rather than concentrating on reelection efforts.

Both arguments are valid, but requires additional discussion to solidify thoughts on this debate.
Serving the public good with unwavering dedication, fostering bipartisanship, upholding integrity, championing innovation, communicating effectively, and remaining committed to constituents are hallmarks of esteemed representatives. Luminaries like John Lewis, a civil rights icon and congressman, exemplified lifelong public service. Figures such as John McCain were lauded for their ability to transcend party lines, emphasizing the importance of compromise and collaboration. Margaret Chase Smith's declaration of conscience against McCarthyism showcased principled integrity in the face of opposition. Trailblazers like Shirley Chisholm, the first African American woman elected to Congress, brought visionary ideas and advocated for minority rights and education. Orators like Barbara Jordan used their powerful communication skills to fight for civil rights and justice. Representatives like Elijah Cummings were deeply involved in their communities, tirelessly addressing local and national concerns. I aim to embody these attributes of these leaders to support my constituents.
Compromise is vital for governance and legislative progress in democracies where diverse perspectives must be considered. It prevents domination by any single viewpoint and reflects a balance of priorities. Compromise avoids deadlock on important issues, allowing timely action on societal needs. It builds consensus, increasing public acceptance and policy durability. Compromise promotes cooperation and respect among lawmakers, benefiting democratic institutions.

Many policy matters are complex; compromise yields nuanced solutions better reflecting this complexity, versus simplistic approaches ignoring key aspects. When officials demonstrate willingness to work across party lines through compromise, it can enhance public trust that the focus is the public good, not partisan interests.

However, compromise must not sacrifice core principles or lead to inadequate solutions for critical issues. Finding the right balance between upholding values and openness to compromise is crucial for effective policymaking. Compromise harnesses diverse viewpoints for progress while preventing minority interests being steamrolled.
I would leverage the power to initiate revenue bills as a means to promote fiscal responsibility, fairness in taxation, transparency and accountability, strategic investments for the future, and bipartisan cooperation. These priorities reflect a commitment to using this constitutional power to benefit all Americans and ensure the nation's economic health and prosperity.
The U.S. House of Representatives is entrusted with significant investigative powers to uphold accountability, inform legislation, and protect the public interest. When wielded effectively, these powers serve as essential tools for oversight, transparency, and ensuring the efficient and lawful operation of government.

Foremost, the House's investigative authority should be utilized to hold public officials and agencies accountable for their actions. By probing allegations of misconduct, corruption, or dereliction of duty, the House can safeguard the integrity of government and ensure that those in power act in the nation's best interest.

Moreover, investigations can shed light on gaps in existing laws or areas where new regulations are needed. By thoroughly examining complex issues, the House can gather vital information to craft comprehensive and effective legislation that addresses the nation's evolving needs and challenges.

Protecting the public's well-being is another crucial application of the House's investigative powers. Inquiries into matters such as public health crises, environmental disasters, financial malpractices, and national security threats can pave the way for reforms and policies that safeguard the public from harm and promote the nation's welfare.

Transparency is a cornerstone of democracy, and investigations can play a pivotal role in bringing to light information of public interest that might otherwise remain hidden. Public hearings and published findings can foster transparency in government operations, thereby bolstering public trust and confidence in democratic institutions.

Finally, investigations can serve an educational role, providing both lawmakers and the public with in-depth knowledge about complex issues. Public hearings and reports can foster informed decision-making and enrich public discourse, essential elements of a robust democracy.
Agriculture; Education and Labor; House Administration; Oversight & Reform; Ethics; Small Business; Transportation and Infrastructure; Ways and Means; and Veteran's Affairs
Financial transparency and government accountability are crucial for building and maintaining public trust. When citizens have access to clear information about how government funds are being used and decisions are made, it fosters a sense of inclusion and trust in the political process.

Transparency in financial matters and accountable governance practices are powerful deterrents to corruption. They ensure that government officials are less likely to misuse public funds or engage in unethical behavior when they know their actions are subject to public scrutiny.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Marlando Pridgen campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* U.S. House North Carolina District 7Lost general$0 N/A**
Grand total$0 N/A**
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete
** Data on expenditures is not available for this election cycle
Note: Totals above reflect only available data.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on April 1, 2024


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
Republican Party (12)
Democratic Party (4)