Missouri Amendment 6, Levying of Fees to Support Salaries of Law Enforcement Personnel Amendment (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

U.S. Senate • U.S. House • Governor • Lt. Gov • Attorney General • Secretary of State • State executive offices • State Senate • State House • Supreme court • Appellate courts • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • Recalls • How to run for office
Flag of Missouri.png


Missouri Amendment 6
Flag of Missouri.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Pension and Administration of government
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Missouri Amendment 6, the Levying of Fees to Support Salaries of Law Enforcement Personnel Amendment, was on the ballot in Missouri as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024. The ballot measure was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported amending the Missouri Constitution to define the administration of justice to include the levying of costs and fees to support the salaries and benefits of sheriffs, former sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, former prosecuting attorneys, circuit attorneys, and former circuit attorneys.

A "no" vote opposed amending the Missouri Constitution to define the administration of justice to include the levying of costs and fees to support the salaries and benefits of sheriffs, former sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, former prosecuting attorneys, circuit attorneys, and former circuit attorneys.


Election results

Missouri Amendment 6

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 1,112,081 39.39%

Defeated No

1,711,527 60.61%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What would Amendment 6 have done?

See also: Text of measure

Amendment 6 would have included a provision in the Missouri Constitution to include the levying of fees to support salaries and benefits for law enforcement personnel, including sheriffs, former sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, former prosecuting attorneys, circuit attorneys, and former circuit attorneys.[1]

What were arguments for and against the measure?

See also: Support and opposition

State Sen. Rusty Black (R), who supported the measure, said, "Senate Joint Resolution 71, a resolution that I filed, would ask voters to enshrine into the state’s constitution that sheriffs play a crucial role in the administration of justice, which would ensure a robust retirement fund for sheriffs as they approach the end of their careers."[2]

The Reason Foundation, who opposed the measure, said, "Senate Joint Resolution 71 would reinstate a set of perverse incentives that tie pension contributions to the volume of arrests, prosecutions, and other aspects of the criminal justice system."[3]

How did this measure get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

In Missouri, to put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on the ballot, a simple majority vote is required in both the Missouri State Senate and the Missouri House of Representatives. The amendment, Senate Joint Resolution 71 (SJR 71), was introduced to the Missouri State Senate on December 1, 2023. The measure passed the Senate by 25-7 on March 7, 2024. The Missouri House of Representatives voted to pass SJR 71 on May 17, 2024.[4]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[5]

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to preserve funding of law enforcement personnel for the administration of justice?

State and local governmental entities estimate an unknown fiscal impact.

[6]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was as follows:[5]

A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to levy costs and fees to support salaries and benefits for current and former sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, and circuit attorneys to ensure all Missourians have access to the courts of justice.

A “no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution to levy costs and fees related to current or former sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys and circuit attorneys.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes. [6]

Constitutional changes

The ballot measure would have amended Section 14 of Article I of the Missouri Constitution. The following underlined text would have been added:[1]

1. That the courts of justice shall be open to every person, and certain remedy afforded for every injury to person, property or character, and that right and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay.

2. In order to ensure that all Missourians have access to the courts of justice as guaranteed by this Constitution, the administration of justice shall include the levying of costs and fees to support salaries and benefits for sheriffs, former sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, former prosecuting attorneys, circuit attorneys, and former circuit attorneys.[6]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The secretary of state wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 14, and the FRE is 20. The word count for the ballot title is 28.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 14, and the FRE is 38. The word count for the ballot summary is 74.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Arguments

  • State Sen. Rusty Black (R): "Senate Joint Resolution 71, a resolution that I filed, would ask voters to enshrine into the state’s constitution that sheriffs play a crucial role in the administration of justice, which would ensure a robust retirement fund for sheriffs as they approach the end of their careers."

Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • Missouri AFL-CIO
  • Reason Foundation

Arguments

  • The Reason Foundation: "Senate Joint Resolution 71 would reinstate a set of perverse incentives that tie pension contributions to the volume of arrests, prosecutions, and other aspects of the criminal justice system."
  • Priya Sarathy Jones, deputy executive director at the Fines and Fees Justice Center: "When fines and fees go unpaid, judges may issue arrest warrants for failing to pay, leading to law enforcement arresting people for not paying financial obligations — most often because they are too poor to pay. The time spent on these debt collection and enforcement efforts diverts law enforcement and courts from their core responsibilities … In fact, the collection of fines and fees by law enforcement has been found to be associated with lower clearance rates for more serious crimes."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Missouri ballot measures

Ballotpedia did not identify any committees registered in support or opposition to the amendment. If you are aware of any committees, send information to editor@ballotpedia.org.[7]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Background

Retirement of Missouri sheriffs

In Missouri, prior to 2023, sheriffs were able to enroll in the Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System, LAGERS, or the Sheriffs’ Retirement System (SRS). After the passing of Senate Bill 75 (SB 75) and Senate Bill 20 (SB 20) in 2023, all new county sheriffs were required to enroll in SRS. County sheriffs were required to complete eight years of service in SRS in order to earn a benefit. If a sheriff loses the election after their first four-year term, they do not receive a benefit from SRS.[8][9]

Path to the ballot

Amending the Missouri Constitution

See also: Amending the Missouri Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a simple majority vote is required in both the Missouri State Senate and the Missouri House of Representatives.

Amendment in the state Legislature

The amendment was introduced on December 1, 2023. The Missouri State Senate voted 25-7 to pass the measure on March 7, 2024. The Missouri House of Representatives voted to pass the measure on May 17, 2024.[4]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Missouri

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Missouri.

How to vote in Missouri


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Missouri State Senate, "SJR 71," accessed March 13, 2024
  2. Missouri State Senate, "Senator Rusty Black's Legislative Column for the Week of April 22, 2024," accessed August 28, 2024
  3. Missouri State Senate, "SJR 71," accessed August 28, 2024
  4. 4.0 4.1 Missouri State Senate, "SJR 71," accessed May 20, 2024
  5. 5.0 5.1 Missouri Secretary of State, "2024 Ballot Measures," accessed August 28, 2024
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  7. Missouri Ethics Commission, "Ballot Measures by Election Search," accessed May 21, 2024
  8. Missouri State Senate, "SB 20," accessed July 26, 2024
  9. Missouri State Senate, "SB 75," accessed July 26, 2024
  10. Missouri Secretary of State - Elections and Voting, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed April 4, 2023
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Missouri Secretary of State, "Register to Vote," accessed April 4, 2023
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 27, 2024
  13. BillTrack50, "MO HB1878," accessed April 4, 2023
  14. Missouri Secretary of State, "FAQs Voter Registration," accessed August 27, 2024
  15. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  16. Missouri Secretary of State, "How To Vote," accessed August 27, 2024
  17. Missouri Secretary of State, "Do I need an ID to vote?" accessed April 3, 2023