2025 polls →

← 2023 polls

For 2024, 159 statewide ballot measures were certified for the ballot in 41 states.

On November 5, voters in 41 states decided on 146 statewide ballot measures. Voters approved 93 and rejected 53.
On December 7, voters in Louisiana approved four constitutional amendments.
Earlier in 2024, voters in five states decided on nine ballot measures. Voters approved five and rejected four of these measures.

This page aggregates the polls released for statewide ballot measures that were on the ballot in 2024. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Click the tabs below to see available polls for statewide ballot measures in each state.

Alabama

2024 U.S. state; ballot measures
	2025 » « 2023
	Overview
	Scorecard
	Tuesday Count
	Deadlines
	Requirements
	Lawsuits
	Readability
	Voter guides
	Election results
	Campaigns
	Polls
	Media editorials
	Filed initiatives
	Finances
	Contributions
	Signature costs
	Ballot Measure Monthly
	Signature requirements
	Have you subscribed yet? Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew. ; Click here to learn more.

See also: Alabama 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Alabama. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Alaska

See also: Alaska 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Alaska. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona

See also: Arizona 2024 ballot measures

Arizona Proposition 314, Immigration and Border Law Enforcement Measure (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona Proposition 314, Immigration and Border Law Enforcement Measure (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Noble Predictive Insights	8/12/24-8/16/24	1003 RV	± 3.09%	63%	16%	16%
Noble Predictive Insights	Question: "Proposition 314, the Immigration and Border Law Enforcement Measure, would require employers to verify the immigration status of their workers, determine how migrants obtain public benefits, and make the seller of a drug containing fentanyl legally responsible for the death of any person who consumes it. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this ballot measure?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Arizona Proposition 137, End Term Limits and Retention Elections for Supreme Court Justices and Superior Court Judges Amendment (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona Proposition 137, End Term Limits and Retention Elections for Supreme Court Justices and Superior Court Judges Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Noble Predictive Insights	8/12/24-8/16/24	1003 RV	± 3.09%	31%	38%	24%
Noble Predictive Insights	Question: "Prop 137, the End Term Limits and Retention Elections for Supreme Court Justices and Superior Court Judges Amendment, will appear on the ballot in 2024. If passed, this measure will end term limits for Supreme Court and Superior Court justices, replacing them with terms of good behavior. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this ballot measure?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Arizona Proposition 139, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Noble Predictive Insights	10/28/24-10/30/24	755 LV	± 3.5%	57%	33%	7%
Noble Predictive Insights	Question: "There is a ballot initiative for the 2024 general election ballot called "The Arizona Abortion Access Act” or Prop 139. This initiative would amend the state's constitution to create a fundamental right to abortion and limit the state's ability to interfere with that right before fetal viability. After viability, abortions would be allowed when necessary to protect the life or health of the mother. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this amendment?"

New York Times/Siena College	9/17/24-9/21/24	713 RV	± 4.4%	58%	35%	7%
New York Times/Siena College	Question: "If the 2024 election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Arizona Proposition 139, a constitutional amendment that would provide a fundamental right to abortion up until fetal viability, or about the 24th week of pregnancy?"

USA Today/Suffolk University	9/21/24-9/24/24	500 LV	± 4.8%	58%	32%	9%
USA Today/Suffolk University	Question: "Proposition 139, the Right to Abortion Initiative, is on the ballot in Arizona as an initiated constitutional amendment. A “yes” vote supports amending the state constitution to provide for the fundamental right to abortion that the state of Arizona may not interfere with before the point of fetal viability. A “no” vote opposes amending the state constitution to provide for the fundamental right to an abortion. At this point, will you vote yes or no on Proposition 139?"

SSRS/CNN	8/23/24-8/29/24	682 RV	± 4.8%	62%	35%	2%
SSRS/CNN	Question: "In the upcoming election, Arizona voters will consider Proposition 139, which would amend the state constitution to create a fundamental right to abortion. If the election were held today, would you be more likely to vote:"

Fox News	8/23/24-8/26/24	1014 RV	± 3%	73%	23%	4%
Fox News	Question: "How would you vote on the proposed state constitutional amendment that would establish the right to an abortion up until fetal viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health?"

KFF	5/23/24-6/5/24	3102 female RV	± 5%	67%	32%	0%
KFF	Question: "As you may know, the Arizona Right to Abortion Initiative is a ballot initiative that would establish a fundamental right to abortion that the state may not interfere with before the point of fetal viability, typically around 23 to 25 weeks of pregnancy. Do you support or oppose the Arizona Right to Abortion Initiative?"

CBS News/YouGov	5/10/24-5/16/24	1510 LV	± 3.3%	65%	21%	14%
CBS News/YouGov	Question: "In the election were held today, and there was an amendment on the ballot to establish the constitutional right to an abortion in Arizona, would you vote:"

Noble Predictive Insights	5/7/24-5/14/24	1003 RV	± 3.09%	41%	41%	18%
Noble Predictive Insights	Question: "In 2024, there may be a ballot measure that establishes the fundamental right to an abortion within the point of fetal viability (between 24 and 28 weeks). Would you support or oppose this measure?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Arizona Proposition 135, Emergency Declarations Amendment (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arizona Proposition 137, End Term Limits and Retention Elections for Supreme Court Justices and Superior Court Judges Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Noble Predictive Insights	8/12/24-8/16/24	1003 RV	± 3.09%	29%	32%	29%
Noble Predictive Insights	Question: "Prop 135, the Emergency Declarations Amendment, will appear on the ballot in 2024. If passed, this measure will give the state legislature the power to terminate or alter emergency powers held by the governor during a state of emergency and automatically terminate any state of emergency after 30 days in all cases besides a war emergency, floods, or fires. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this ballot measure?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Arkansas

See also: Arkansas 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Arkansas. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California

See also: California 2024 ballot measures

California Proposition 1, Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure (March 2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 1, Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure (March 2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	2/6/2024-2/13/2024	1,075 LV	± 3.9%	59%	38%	2%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 1 is called the “Authorizes $6.38 Billion in Bonds to Build Mental Health Treatment Facilities for Those With Mental Health and Substance Use Challenges; Provides Housing for the Homeless. Legislative Statute.” It amends the Health Services Act to provide additional behavioral health services. The fiscal impacts are to shift roughly $140 million annually of existing tax revenue for mental health, drug, and alcohol treatment from counties to the state and increase state bond repayment costs of $310 million annually for 30 years. Supporters include California Professional Firefighters; CA Assoc. of Veteran Service Agencies; National Alliance on Mental Illness—CA Opponents include Mental Health America of California; Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association; CalVoices. If the election were today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 1?"

University of Southern California Dornsife/Price, Center for Urban Politics and Policy, CSU Long Beach, and Cal Poly Pomona	1/21/2024-1/29/2024	1,416 LV	± 2.6%	66%	21%	14%
	Question: "Proposition 1 is the Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure. This ballot proposition authorizes $6.4 billion in bonds to build mental health treatment facilities for those with mental health and substance use challenges; and provides housing for the homeless by changing how existing spending is allocated. Would you support or oppose Proposition 1?"

Morning Consult + Politico	12/15/2023-12/19/2023	1,005 RV	± 3.0%	72%	28%	0%
Morning Consult + Politico	Question: "As you may know, the March 5, 2024 primary ballot will include a vote on Proposition 1, which would authorize $6.38 billion in bonds to build mental health treatment facilities for those with mental health and substance use challenges, and would create housing for homeless people who have mental health or addiction challenges. Proposition 1 would shift roughly $140 million annually of existing tax revenue for mental health, drug, and alcohol treatment from counties to the state. Increased state bond repayment would cost $310 million annually for 30 years. A YES vote on this measure means: Counties would need to change some of the mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment services provided currently to focus more on housing and personalized support services. The state could borrow up to $6.4 billion to build (1) more places where people could get mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment and (2) more housing for people with mental health, drug, or alcohol challenges. A NO vote on this measure means: Counties would not need to change the mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment services provided currently. The state could not borrow up to $6.4 billion to build more places where people could get mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment and more housing for people with mental health, drug, or alcohol challenges. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 1?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 36, Drug and Theft Crime Penalties and Treatment-Mandated Felonies Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 36, Drug and Theft Crime Penalties and Treatment-Mandated Felonies Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	73.0%	25.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 36 is called “Allows Felony Charges and Increases Sentences for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes.” Initiative Statute. Allows felony charges for possessing certain drugs and for thefts under $950, if defendant has two prior drug or theft convictions. The fiscal impact is state criminal justice costs likely ranging from several tens of millions of dollars to the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Local criminal justice costs likely in the tens of millions of dollars annually. Supporters include Crime Victims United of California; California District Attorneys Association; Family Business Association of California. Opponents include Diana Becton, District Attorney Contra Costa County; Crime Survivors for Safety and Justice. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

University of California, Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies	9/25/2024 - 10/1/2024	3,045 LV	± 2.5%	60.0%	21.0%	19.0%
	Question: "PROPOSITION 36. ALLOWS FELONY CHARGES AND INCREASES SENTENCES FOR CERTAIN DRUG AND THEFT CRIMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Allows felony charges for possessing certain drugs, including fentanyl, and for thefts under$950—both currently chargeable only as misdemeanors—with two prior drug or two prior theft convictions, as applicable. Defendants who plead guilty to felony drug possession and complete treatment can have charges dismissed. Increases sentences for other specified drug and theft crimes. Increased prison sentences may reduce savings that currently fund mental health and drug treatment programs, K-12 schools, and crime victims; any remaining savings may be used for new felony treatment program. Fiscal impact: Increased local criminal justice system costs potentially in the tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 36?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	71.0%	26.0%	3.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 36 is called “Allows Felony Charges and Increases Sentences for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes”. Initiative Statute. Allows felony charges for possessing certain drugs and for thefts under $950, if defendant has two prior drug or theft convictions. The fiscal impact is state criminal justice costs likely ranging from several tens of millions of dollars to the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Local criminal justice costs likely in the tens of millions of dollars annually. Supporters include Crime Victims United of California; California District Attorneys Association; Family Business Association of California. Opponents include Diana Becton, District Attorney Contra Costa County; Crime Survivors for Safety and Justice. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

University of California, Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies	7/31/2024 - 08/11/2024	3,765 LV	± 2.0%	56.0%	23.0%	21.0%
	Question: "PROPOSITION 36. ALLOWS FELONY CHARGES AND INCREASES SENTENCES FOR CERTAIN DRUG AND THEFT CRIMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Allows felony charges for possessing certain drugs, including fentanyl, and for thefts under$950—both currently chargeable only as misdemeanors—with two prior drug or two prior theft convictions, as applicable. Defendants who plead guilty to felony drug possession and complete treatment can have charges dismissed. Increases sentences for other specified drug and theft crimes. Increased prison sentences may reduce savings that currently fund mental health and drug treatment programs, K-12 schools, and crime victims; any remaining savings may be used for new felony treatment program. Fiscal impact: Increased local criminal justice system costs potentially in the tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 36?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 5, Lower Supermajority Requirement to 55% for Local Bond Measures to Fund Housing and Public Infrastructure Amendment (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 5, Lower Supermajority Requirement to 55% for Local Bond Measures to Fund Housing and Public Infrastructure Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	48.0%	50.0%	3.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 5 is called “Allows Local Bonds for Affordable Housing and Public Infrastructure With 55% Voter Approval.” Legislative Constitutional Amendment. Allows approval of local infrastructure and housing bonds for low- and middle-income Californians with 55% vote. Accountability requirements. Fiscal Impact: Increased local borrowing to fund affordable housing, supportive housing, and public infrastructure. The amount would depend on decisions by local governments and voters. Borrowing would be repaid with higher property taxes. Supporters include California Professional Firefighters; League of Women Voters in California; Habitat for Humanity California. Opponents include the California Taxpayers Association; California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce; Women Veterans Alliance. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	49.0%	50.0%	1.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 5 is called “Allows Local Bonds for Affordable Housing and Public Infrastructure With 55% Voter Approval”. Legislative Constitutional Amendment. Allows approval of local infrastructure and housing bonds for low- and middle-income Californians with 55% vote. Accountability requirements. Fiscal Impact: Increased local borrowing to fund affordable housing, supportive housing, and public infrastructure. The amount would depend on decisions by local governments and voters. Borrowing would be repaid with higher property taxes. The fiscal impact is increased local borrowing to fund affordable housing, supportive housing, and public infrastructure. The amount would depend on decisions by local governments and voters. Borrowing would be repaid with higher property taxes. Supporters include California Professional Firefighters; League of Women Voters in California; Habitat for Humanity California. Opponents include the California Taxpayers Association; California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce; Women Veterans Alliance. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 35, Managed Care Organization Tax Authorization Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 35, Managed Care Organization Tax Authorization Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	62.0%	36.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 35 is called “Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal Health Care Services.” Initiative Statute. Makes permanent the existing tax on managed health care insurance plans, which, if approved by the federal government, provides revenues to pay for Medi-Cal health care services. The fiscal impact is short-term state costs between roughly $1 billion and $2 billion annually to increase funding for certain health programs. Total funding increase between roughly $2 billion and $5 billion annually. Unknown long-term fiscal effects. Supporters include Planned Parenthood Affiliates of CA; American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists; American Academy of Pediatrics, CA. No opponents submitted. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	63.0%	34.0%	3.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 35 is called “Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal Health Care Services”. Initiative Statute. Makes permanent the existing tax on managed health care insurance plans, which, if approved by the federal government, provides revenues to pay for Medi-Cal health care services. The fiscal impact is short-term state costs between roughly $1 billion and $2 billion annually to increase funding for certain health programs. Total funding increase between roughly $2 billion and $5 billion annually. Unknown long-term fiscal effects. Supporters include Planned Parenthood Affiliates of CA; American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists; American Academy of Pediatrics, CA. No opponents submitted. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	60.0%	38.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 4 is called “Authorizes Bonds for Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, and Protecting Communities and Natural Lands From Climate Risks.” Legislative Statute. Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for water, wildfire prevention, and protection of communities and lands. Requires annual audits. The fiscal impact is increased state costs of about $400 million annually for 40 years to repay the bond. Supporters include Clean Water Action; CAL FIRE Firefighters; National Wildlife Federation; The Nature Conservancy. Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	65.0%	33.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 4 is called “Authorizes Bonds for Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, and Protecting Communities and Natural Lands From Climate Risks”. Legislative Statute. Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for water, wildfire prevention, and protection of communities and lands. Requires annual audits. The fiscal impact is increased state costs of about $400 million annually for 40 years to repay the bond. Supporters include Clean Water Action; CALFIRE Firefighters; National Wildlife Federation; The Nature Conservancy. Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 3, Right to Marry and Repeal Proposition 8 Amendment (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 3, Right to Marry and Repeal Proposition 8 Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	67.0%	32.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 3 is called “Constitutional Right to Marriage.” Legislative Constitutional Amendment. Amends California Constitution to recognize fundamental right to marry, regardless of sex or race. Removes language in California Constitution stating that marriage is only between a man and a woman. The fiscal impact is no change in revenues or costs for state and local governments. Supporters include the Sierra Pacific Synod of The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; Dolores Huerta Foundation; Equality California. Opponents include Jonathan Keller, California Family Council; Rev. Tanner DiBella. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	68.0%	31.0%	1.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 3 is called “Constitutional Right to Marriage”. Legislative Constitutional Amendment. Amends California Constitution to recognize fundamental right to marry, regardless of sex or race. Removes language in California Constitution stating that marriage is only between a man and a woman. The fiscal impact is no change in revenues or costs for state and local governments. Supporters include the Sierra Pacific Synod of The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; Dolores Huerta Foundation; Equality California. Opponents include Jonathan Keller, California Family Council; Rev. Tanner DiBella. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

University of Southern California Dornsife/Price Center for Urban Politics and Policy/CSU Long Beach/ Cal Poly Pomona	1/21/2023-1/29/2024	1,416 LV	± 2.6%	73%	20%	7%
	Question: "California voters in 2024 will vote on a change to the California constitution called the 'Marriage Equality amendment.' Currently, the California Constitution provides that only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California, and federal law permanently enjoins the state from enforcing this constitutional provision. This measure would repeal this unenforceable constitutional provision and would instead provide that the right to marry is a fundamental right between those of the same gender as well as between a man and a woman. Do you support or oppose the Marriage Equality amendment?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 2, Public Education Facilities Bond Measure (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 2, Public Education Facilities Bond Measure (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	52.0%	46.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 2 is called “Authorizes Bonds for Public School and Community College Facilities.” Legislative Statute. Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for repair, upgrade, and construction of facilities at K–12 public schools (including charter schools), community colleges, and career technical education programs, including for improvement of health and safety conditions and classroom upgrades. Requires annual audits. The fiscal impact is increased state costs of about $500 million annually for 35 years to repay the bond. Supporters include the California Teachers Association; California School Nurses Organization; Community College League of California. Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	54.0%	44.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 2 is called “Authorizes Bonds for Public School and Community College Facilities”. Legislative Statute. Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for repair, upgrade, and construction of facilities at K-12 public schools (including charter schools), community colleges, and career technical education programs, including for improvement of health and safety conditions and classroom upgrades. Requires annual audits. The fiscal impact is increased state costs of about $500 million annually for 35 years to repay the bond. Supporters include the California Teachers Association; California School Nurses Organization; Community College League of California. Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 33, Prohibit State Limitations on Local Rent Control Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 33, Prohibit State Limitations on Local Rent Control Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	42.0%	54.0%	4.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 33 is called “Expands Local Governments’ Authority to Enact Rent Control on Residential Property.” Initiative Statute. Repeals Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995, which currently prohibits local ordinances limiting initial residential rental rates for new tenants or rent increases for existing tenants in certain residential properties. The fiscal impact is reduction in local property tax revenues of at least tens of millions of dollars annually due to likely expansion of rent control in some communities. Supporters include CA Nurses Assoc.; CA Alliance for Retired Americans; Mental Health Advocacy; Coalition for Economic Survival; Tenants Together. Opponents include the California Council for Affordable Housing; Women Veterans Alliance; California Chamber of Commerce. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

University of California, Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies	9/25/2024 - 10/01/2024	3,045 LV	± 2.5%	37%	36%	27.0%
	Question: "PROPOSITION 33. EXPANDS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS’ AUTHORITY TO ENACT RENT CONTROL ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. INITIATIVE STATUTE: Current state law generally prevents cities and counties from limiting the initial rental rate that landlords may charge to new tenants in all types of housing, and from limiting rent increases for existing tenants in (1) residential properties that were first occupied after February 1, 1995; (2) single-family homes; and (3) condominiums. This measure would repeal that state law and would prohibit the state from limiting the right of cities and counties to maintain, enact or expand residential rent-control ordinances. Fiscal impact: Overall, a potential reduction in state and local revenues in the high tens of millions of dollars per year over time. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 33?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	51.0%	46.0%	3.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 33 is called “Expands Local Governments’ Authority to Enact Rent Control on Residential Property”. Initiative Statute. Repeals Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995, which currently prohibits local ordinances limiting initial residential rental rates for new tenants or rent increases for existing tenants in certain residential properties. The fiscal impact is reduction in local property tax revenues of at least tens of millions of dollars annually due to likely expansion of rent control in some communities. Supporters include CA Nurses Assoc.; CA Alliance for Retired Americans; Mental Health Advocacy; Coalition for Economic Survival; TenantsTogether. Opponents include the California Council for Affordable Housing; Women Veterans Alliance; California Chamber of Commerce. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

University of California, Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies	07/31/2024 - 08/11/2024	3,765 LV	± 2.0%	40.0%	34.0%	26.0%
	Question: "PROPOSITION 33. EXPANDS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS’ AUTHORITY TO ENACT RENT CONTROL ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. INITIATIVE STATUTE: Current state law generally prevents cities and counties from limiting the initial rental rate that landlords may charge to new tenants in all types of housing, and from limiting rent increases for existing tenants in (1) residential properties that were first occupied after February 1, 1995; (2) single-family homes; and (3) condominiums. This measure would repeal that state law and would prohibit the state from limiting the right of cities and counties to maintain, enact or expand residential rent-control ordinances. Fiscal impact: Overall, a potential reduction in state and local revenues in the high tens of millions of dollars per year over time. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 33?"

University of Southern California Dornsife/Price, Center for Urban Politics and Policy, CSU Long Beach, and Cal Poly Pomona	1/21/2023-1/29/2024	1,416 LV	± 2.6%	39%	41%	20%
	Question: "In 2024, California voters will vote on a ballot initiative asking for the repeal of a bill called Costa-Hawkins. The current Costa-Hawkins law only allows rent control in certain apartments, and it does not apply to single-family homes that are rented. Repeal of the Costa-Hawkins law would allow rent control to be put in place for both apartment rentals and single-family home rentals, instead of only for apartment rentals. Would you support or oppose repeal of this law? Supporting repeal favors adding single-family homes to rent control regulations, and opposing repeal favors keeping rent control for apartments only and not expanding to single-family homes."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 6, Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 6, Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	41.0%	56.0%	4.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 6 is called “Eliminates Constitutional Provision Allowing Involuntary Servitude for Incarcerated Persons.” Legislative Constitutional Amendment. Amends the California Constitution to remove current provision that allows jails and prisons to impose involuntary servitude to punish crime (i.e., forcing incarcerated persons to work). The fiscal impact is potential increase or decrease in state and local costs, depending on how work for people in state prison and county jail changes. Any effect likely would not exceed the tens of millions of dollars annually. Supporters include Assemblymember Lori Wilson. No opponents submitted. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	46.0%	50.0%	3.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 6 is called “Eliminates Constitutional Provision Allowing Involuntary Servitude for Incarcerated Persons”. Legislative Constitutional Amendment. Amends the California Constitution to remove current provision that allows jails and prisons to impose involuntary servitude to punish crime (i.e., forcing incarcerated persons to work). The fiscal impact is potential increase or decrease in state and local costs, depending on how work for people in state prison and county jail changes. Any effect likely would not exceed the tens of millions of dollars annually. Supporters include Assemblymember Lori Wilson. No opponents submitted. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 32, $18 Minimum Wage Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 32, $18 Minimum Wage Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	44.0%	54.0%	2.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 32 is called “Raises Minimum Wage. Initiative Statute.” Raises minimum wage as follows: for employers with 26 or more employees, to $17 immediately, $18 on January 1, 2025. For employers with 25 or fewer employees, to $17 on January 1, 2025, $18 on January 1, 2026. The fiscal impact is state and local government costs could increase or decrease by up to hundreds of millions of dollars annually. State and local revenues likely would decrease by no more than a few hundred million dollars annually. No supporters submitted. Opponents include California Chamber of Commerce; California Restaurant Association; California Grocers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

University of California, Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies	9/25/2024 - 10/01/2024	3,045 LV	± 2.5%	46.0%	36.0%	18.0%
	Question: "PROPOSITION 32. RAISES MINIMUM WAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE: This measure increases the minimum wage in California—currently, $15 per hour for businesses with 26 or more employees, and $14 per hour for smaller businesses—by $1 per year until it reaches$18 per hour. Thereafter, the minimum wage will annually adjust for inflation. In periods of decreased economic activity, or General Fund deficit, the Governor may suspend annual increase up to two times, thereby extending timeline for reaching $18 per hour. Fiscal impact: Unclear change in annual state and local tax revenues. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 32?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	50.0%	49.0%	1.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 32 is called “Raises Minimum Wage. Initiative Statute”. Raises minimum wage as follows: For employers with 26 or more employees, to $17 immediately, $18 on January 1, 2025. For employers with 25 or fewer employees, to $17 on January 1, 2025, $18 on January 1, 2026. The fiscal impact is state and local government costs could increase or decrease by up to hundreds of millions of dollars annually. State and local revenues likely would decrease by no more than a few hundred million dollars annually. No supporters submitted. Opponents include California Chamber of Commerce; California Restaurant Association; California Grocers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

University of California, BerkeleyInstitute of Governmental Studies	07/31/2024 - 08/11/2024	3,765 LV	± 2.0%	52.0%	34.0%	14.0%
	Question: "PROPOSITION 32. RAISES MINIMUM WAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE: This measure increases the minimum wage in California—currently, $15 per hour for businesses with 26 or more employees, and $14 per hour for smaller businesses—by $1 per year until it reaches$18 per hour. Thereafter, the minimum wage will annually adjust for inflation. In periods of decreased economic activity, or General Fund deficit, the Governor may suspend annual increase up to two times, thereby extending timeline for reaching $18 per hour. Fiscal impact: Unclear change in annual state and local tax revenues. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 32?"

University of Southern California Dornsife/Price Center for Urban Politics and Policy/CSU Long Beach/Cal Poly Pomona	1/21/2023-1/29/2024	1,416 LV	± 2.6%	59%	34%	8%
	Question: "Would you support or oppose a ballot initiative to increase the state minimum wage to $18/hour?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

California Proposition 34, Require Certain Participants in Medi-Cal Rx Program to Spend 98% of Revenues on Patient Care Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

California Proposition 34, Require Certain Participants in Medi-Cal Rx Program to Spend 98% of Revenues on Patient Care Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Policy Institute of California	10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024	1,137 LV	± 3.1%	47.0%	49.0%	4.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 34 is called “Restricts Spending of Prescription Drug Revenues by Certain Health Care Providers.” Initiative Statute. Requires certain providers to spend 98% of revenues from federal discount prescription drug program on direct patient care. Authorizes statewide negotiation of Medi-Cal drug prices. The fiscal impact is increased state costs, likely in the millions of dollars annually, to enforce new rules on certain health care entities. Affected entities would pay fees to cover these costs. Supporters include The ALS Association; California Chronic Care Coalition; Latino Heritage Los Angeles. Opponents include the National Org. for Women; Consumer Watchdog; Coalition for Economic Survival; AIDS Healthcare Foundation; Dolores Huerta. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Public Policy Institute of California	8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024	1,071 LV	± 3.7%	53.0%	43.0%	4.0%
Public Policy Institute of California	Question: "Proposition 34 is called “Restricts Spending of Prescription Drug Revenues by Certain Health Care Providers”. Initiative Statute. Requires certain providers to spend 98% of revenues from federal discount prescription drug program on direct patient care. Authorizes statewide negotiation of Medi-Cal drug prices. The fiscal impact is increased state costs, likely in the millions of dollars annually, to enforce new rules on certain health care entities. Affected entities would pay fees to cover these costs. Supporters include The ALS Association; California Chronic Care Coalition; Latino Heritage Los Angeles. Opponents include the National Org. for Women; Consumer Watchdog; Coalition for Economic Survival; AIDS Healthcare Foundation; Dolores Huerta. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Colorado

See also: Colorado 2024 ballot measures

Colorado Proposition 131, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Colorado Proposition 131, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Keating Research	08/28/2024-09/01/2024	800 LV	± 3.5%	56%	21%	23%
Keating Research	Question: "Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes creating new election processes for certain federal and state offices, and, in connection therewith, creating a new all-candidate primary election for U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, governor, attorney general, secretary of state, treasurer, CU board of regents, state board of education, and the Colorado state legislature; allowing voters to vote for any one candidate per office, regardless of the voter’s or candidate’s political party affiliation; providing that the four candidates for each office who receive the most votes advance to the general election; and in the general election, allowing voters to rank candidates for each office on their ballot, adopting a process for how the ranked votes are tallied, and determining the winner to be the candidate with the highest number of votes in the final tally. Will you vote yes or no on Proposition 131?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Connecticut

See also: Connecticut 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Connecticut. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida

See also: Florida 2024 ballot measures

Florida Amendment 1, Partisan School Board Elections Amendment (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida Amendment 1, Partisan School Board Elections Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Suffolk University Poll	8/7/2024-8/11/2024	500 LV	± 4.6%	33.20%	48.40%	18.40%
Suffolk University Poll	Question: "Florida Amendment 1, the Partisan School Board Elections Amendment, is on the ballot this November. A YES vote supports making school board elections partisan beginning in the 2026 elections. A NO vote opposes making school board elections partisan and would keep current procedures where school board members are elected in a nonpartisan election. At this point, will you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Florida Amendment 3, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Mainstreet Research	10/19/2024-10/27/2024	913 RV	± 3.2%	60%	34%	6%
Mainstreet Research	Question: "On the upcoming ballot amendment 3, which would legalize marijuana for adults 21 years and older, which way are you considering voting?"

Emerson College Polling/The Hill	10/18/2024-10/20/2024	860 LV	± 3.3%	60%	34%	6%
Emerson College Polling/The Hill	Question: "This November, a ballot measure will appear to legalize marijuana for adults 21 years old and older and allow individuals to possess up to three ounces of marijuana. Would you vote yes or no on this measure?"

Public Opinion Research Lab (PORL) at the University of North Florida	10/7/2024-10/18/2024	865 LV	± 3.5%	66%	30%	4%
	Question: "Amendment 3 titled “Adult Personal Use of Marijuana” states: Allows adults 21 years or older to possess, purchase, or use marijuana products and marijuana accessories for non-medical personal consumption by smoking, ingestion, or otherwise; allows Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers, and other state licensed entities, to acquire, cultivate, process, manufacture, sell, and distribute such products and accessories. Applies to Florida law; does not change, or immunize violations of, federal law. Establishes possession limits for personal use. Allows consistent legislation. Defines terms. Provides effective date. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no for this proposition?"

Public Policy Polling	8/25/2024-8/26/2024	808 RV	± 3.5%	58%	35%	7%
Public Policy Polling	Question: "Amendment 3, titled “Adult personal use of marijuana,” will appear on the ballot in Florida this November. It would allow adults 21 years or older to possess, purchase, or use marijuana products and marijuana accessories for non-medical personal consumption. If the election was today, would you vote yes or no on Amendment 3?"

Emerson College Polling/The Hill	9/3/2024-9/5/2024	815 LV	± 3.4%	64%	27%	9%
Emerson College Polling/The Hill	Question: "This November, a ballot measure will appear to legalize marijuana for adults 21 years old and older and allow individuals to possess up to three ounces of marijuana. Would you vote yes or no on this measure?"

Public Policy Polling	8/21/2024-8/22/2024	837 RV	± 3.4%	57%	34%	9%
Public Policy Polling	Question: "Amendment 3, titled “Adult personal use of marijuana,” will appear on the ballot in Florida this November. It would allow adults 21 years or older to possess, purchase, or use marijuana products and marijuana accessories for non-medical personal consumption. If the election was today, would you vote yes or no on Amendment 3?"

Florida Atlantic University and Mainstreet Research USA	8/10/2024-8/11/2024	1500 RV	± 3.0%	56%	29%	15%
Florida Atlantic University and Mainstreet Research USA	Question: "On the upcoming ballot amendment 3, which would legalize marijuana for adults 21 years and older, which way are you considering voting?"

Suffolk University Poll	8/7/2024-8/11/2024	500 LV	± 4.6%	63%	33%	4%
Suffolk University Poll	Question: "Amendment 3 is the marijuana legalization question and would allow adults 21 years and over to possess, purchase, or use marijuana. A YES vote supports legalizing marijuana for adults 21 years old and older and allowing individuals to possess up to three ounces of marijuana. A NO vote opposes legalizing marijuana for adult use in Florida. At this point, would you vote yes or no?"

University of North Florida	7/24/2024-7/27/2024	774 LV	± 4.6%	64%	31%	5%
University of North Florida	Question: "Amendment 3 titled “Adult Personal Use of Marijuana” states: Allows adults 21 years or older to possess, purchase, or use marijuana products and marijuana accessories for non-medical personal consumption by smoking, ingestion, or otherwise; allows Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers, and other state licensed entities, to acquire, cultivate, process, manufacture, sell, and distribute such products and accessories. Applies to Florida law; does not change, or immunize violations of, federal law. Establishes possession limits for personal use. Allows consistent legislation. Defines terms. Provides effective date. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no for this proposition?"

Fox News	6/1/2024-6/4/2024	1075 RV	± 3%	66%	32%	2%
Fox News	Question: "As you may know, some state constitutional amendments will be on the Florida ballot this fall. If the election were today, how would you vote on Amendment 3, which would legalize marijuana for adults ages 21 and older?"

USA Today/Ipsos	4/5/2024-4/7/2024	1014 RV	± 4.1%	49%	36%	14%
USA Today/Ipsos	Question: "If there is a ballot measure in Florida to decide recreational cannabis legalization, would you vote for or against making possession and sale of cannabis/marijuana legal?"

University of North Florida	11/6/2023-11/26/2023	716 RV	± 4.37%	67%	28%	5%
University of North Florida	Question: "Another amendment has been proposed to the Florida Constitution, allowing adults 21 years or older to possess, purchase, or use marijuana for non-medical personal consumption. It would also allow state-licensed entities to cultivate and sell such products and accessories. This would apply only to Florida law and does not change, or immunize violations of federal law. It establishes possession limits for personal use, and allows for consistent legislation. If the measure appears on the Florida ballot in 2024, will you vote yes or no on this amendment?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Florida Amendment 4, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Florida Amendment 4, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Opinion Research Lab (PORL) at the University of North Florida	10/7/2024-10/18/2024	853 LV	± 3.5%	60%	32%	8%
	Question: "Amendment 4 titled “Amendment to Limit Government Interference with Abortion” states: No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health, as determined by the patient's healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature's constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no for this proposition?"

New York Times/Siena College	8/29/2024-10/6/2024	622 LV	± 4.8%	46%	38%	16%
New York Times/Siena College	Question: "If the 2024 election were held today, would you vote YES or NO on Amendment 4 that would if passed legalize abortions up to the point of fetal viability, or generally acknowledged to be the 24th week of pregnancy?"

Public Policy Polling	8/25/2024-8/26/2024	808 RV	± 3.5%	58%	31%	11%
Public Policy Polling	Question: "Amendment 4, titled an “Amendment to limit government interference with abortion,” will appear on the ballot in Florida this November. It reads: “No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion.” If the election was today, would you vote yes or no on Amendment 4?"

Emerson College Polling/The Hill	9/3/2024-9/5/2024	815 LV	± 3.4%	55%	26%	20%
Emerson College Polling/The Hill	Question: "This November, a ballot measure will appear to provide a constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability. Would you vote yes or no on this measure?"

Public Policy Polling	8/21/2024-8/22/2024	837 RV	± 3.4%	61%	25%	14%
Public Policy Polling	Question: "Amendment 4, titled an “Amendment to limit government interference with abortion,” will appear on the ballot in Florida this November. It reads: “No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion.” If the election was today, would you vote yes or no on Amendment 4?"

Florida Atlantic University and Mainstreet Research USA	8/10/2024-8/11/2024	1500 RV	± 3.0%	56%	21%	23%
Florida Atlantic University and Mainstreet Research USA	Question: "On the upcoming ballot amendment 4, which reads: No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion. Which way are you considering voting?"

Suffolk University Poll	8/7/2024-8/11/2024	500 LV	± 4.6%	58.20%	35.20%	6.80%
Suffolk University Poll	Question: "Amendment 4 would allow first and second trimester abortions (before the fetus could survive outside the womb) or when necessary to protect the health of the patient as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. A YES vote supports establishing a constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability. A NO vote opposes establishing a constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability. At this point, would you vote yes or no?"

University of North Florida	7/24/2024-7/27/2024	774 LV	± 4.6%	69%	23%	8%
University of North Florida	Question: "Amendment 4 titled “Amendment to Limit Government Interference with Abortion” states: No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health, as determined by the patient's healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature's constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no for this proposition?"

Fox News	6/1/2024-6/4/2024	1075 RV	± 3%	69%	27%	4%
Fox News	Question: "If the election were today, how would you vote on Amendment 4, which would establish the right to an abortion up until fetal viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health?"

USA Today/Ipsos	4/5/2024-4/7/2024	1014 RV	± 4.1%	57%	36%	6%
USA Today/Ipsos	Question: "If there is a ballot measures in Florida to decide abortion rights, would you vote for or against making abortion legal up until fetal viability, which is at about 24 weeks?"

Emerson College Polling	4/9/2024-4/10/2024	1000 RV	± 3.00%	42%	25%	32%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "This November, a ballot measure will appear to provide a constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability. Would you vote yes or no on this measure?"

University of North Florida	11/6/2023-11/26/2023	716 RV	± 4.37%	62%	29%	9%
University of North Florida	Question: "An amendment has been proposed to the Florida Constitution that states, “no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion.” If the measure appears on the Florida ballot in 2024, will you vote yes or no on this amendment?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Georgia

See also: Georgia 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Georgia. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Hawaii

See also: Hawaii 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Hawaii. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Idaho

See also: Idaho 2024 ballot measures

Idaho Proposition 1, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Idaho Proposition 1, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Zoldak Research	10/02/2024-10/06/2024	400 LV	± 4.9%	39.5%	45.3%	15.2%
Zoldak Research	Question: "Given what you just learned and what you may already know about Proposition 1, would you vote for or against it?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Illinois

See also: Illinois 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Illinois. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Indiana

See also: Indiana 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Indiana. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Iowa

See also: Iowa 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Iowa. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Kansas

See also: Kansas 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Kansas. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Kentucky

See also: Kentucky 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Kentucky. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Louisiana

See also: Louisiana 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Louisiana. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Maine

See also: Maine 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Maine. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Maryland

See also: Maryland 2024 ballot measures

Maryland Question 1, Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Maryland Question 1, Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Institute of Politics at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County	09/23/24-09/28/24	863 LV	± 3.3%	69%	21%	9%
	Question: "This November, voters will also decide on Question 1, a ballot question that would amend the state constitution to include an individual’s right to reproductive freedom, which includes access to abortion. Do you plan to [vote for or vote against] adding an individual’s right to reproductive freedom to the Maryland state constitution?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Massachusetts

See also: Massachusetts 2024 ballot measures

Massachusetts Question 5, Minimum Wage for Tipped Employees Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Massachusetts Question 5, Minimum Wage for Tipped Employees Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling/WHDH	10/24/2024-10/26/2024	1,000 RV	± 3.0%	42%	51%	7%
Emerson College Polling/WHDH	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on Massachusetts Question 5, which would gradually increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay a tipped worker over the course of five years?"

University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	10/03/2024-10/10/2024	700 RV	± 4.8%	61%	27%	13%
University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	Question: "Question 5 - would gradually increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay a tipped worker over the next five years, so that tipped workers would be paid the full state minimum wage by January 1, 2029."

WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	09/12/2024-09/18/2024	800 LV	± 4.1%	43%	40%	16%
WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	Question: "There will be a question on the November 2024 ballot in Massachusetts regarding the minimum wage for tipped workers. A yes vote would increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay a tipped worker to the full state minimum wage implemented over five years, at which point employers could pool all tips and distribute them to all non-management workers. A no vote would make no change to existing law. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this proposal?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Massachusetts Question 3, Unionization and Collective Bargaining for Transportation Network Drivers Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Massachusetts Question 3, Unionization and Collective Bargaining for Transportation Network Drivers Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling/WHDH	10/24/2024-10/26/2024	1,000 RV	± 3.0%	57%	33%	10%
Emerson College Polling/WHDH	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on Massachusetts Question 3, which would provide transportation network drivers the option to form unions to collectively bargain with transportation network companies regarding wages, benefits, and terms and conditions of work?"

University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	10/03/2024-10/10/2024	700 RV	± 4.8%	58%	27%	15%
University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	Question: "Question 3 - would provide transportation network drivers (Uber, Lyft, etc.) the option to form unions to collectively bargain for wages, benefits, and working conditions with transportation network companies."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Massachusetts Question 1, Authorization of State Auditor to Audit General Court Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Massachusetts Question 1, Authorization of State Auditor to Audit General Court Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling/WHDH	10/24/2024-10/26/2024	1,000 RV	± 3.0%	67%	13%	20%
Emerson College Polling/WHDH	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on Massachusetts Question 1, which expressly authorizes the State Auditor to audit the Massachusetts Legislature?"

University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	10/03/2024-10/10/2024	700 RV	± 4.8%	63%	11%	26%
University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	Question: "Question 1 - would specify that the State Auditor has the authority to audit the legislature."

WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	09/12/2024-09/18/2024	800 LV	± 4.1%	70%	8%	22%
WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	Question: "There will be a question on the November 2024 ballot in Massachusetts regarding auditing the state legislature. A yes vote would specify that the State Auditor has the authority to audit the State Legislature. A no vote would make no change to existing law. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this proposal?"

Emerson College Polling/ Pioneer Institute	8/15/2024-8/17/2024	1,000 RV	± 3.0%	80%	6%	14%
Emerson College Polling/ Pioneer Institute	Question: "The job of the State Auditor is to audit state agencies, report on how well they are functioning and make recommendations for improvement. In Massachusetts, the legislature is exempt from these audits. The current State Auditor is seeking to gain the ability to audit the legislature. Do you approve of this?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Massachusetts Question 2, Repeal Competency Assessment Requirement for High School Graduation Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Massachusetts Question 2, Repeal Competency Assessment Requirement for High School Graduation Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling/WHDH	10/24/2024-10/26/2024	1,000 RV	± 3.0%	54%	41%	5%
Emerson College Polling/WHDH	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on Massachusetts Question 2, which would eliminate the requirement that a student pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) tests (or other statewide or district-wide assessments) in mathematics, science and technology, and English in order to receive a high school diploma?"

University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	10/03/2024-10/10/2024	700 RV	± 4.8%	53%	36%	11%
University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	Question: "Question 2 - would eliminate the requirement that a student pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) tests in Mathematics, Science and Technology, and English in order to receive a high school diploma."

WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	09/12/2024-09/18/2024	800 LV	± 4.1%	51%	34%	15%
WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	Question: "There will be a question on the November 2024 ballot in Massachusetts regarding standardized testing. A yes vote would eliminate the requirement that students pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) in order to graduate high school but still require students to complete coursework that meets state standards. A no vote would make no change to existing law. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this proposal?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Massachusetts Question 4, Legalization and Regulation of Psychedelic Substances Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Massachusetts Question 4, Legalization and Regulation of Psychedelic Substances Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling/WHDH	10/24/2024-10/26/2024	1,000 RV	± 3.0%	50%	44%	6%
Emerson College Polling/WHDH	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on Massachusetts Question 4, which would allow persons over age 21 to use certain natural psychedelic substances under licensed supervision and to grow and possess limited quantities of those substances in their home, and would create a commission to regulate those substances?"

University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	10/03/2024-10/10/2024	700 RV	± 4.8%	43%	43%	14%
University of Massachusetts Amherst/WCVB	Question: "Question 4 - would allow persons 21 and older to purchase and use natural psychedelic substances found in mushrooms and plants (i.e. psilocybin, mescaline, ibogaine, etc.) at approved locations under the supervision of a licensed facilitator; would allow persons 21 and older to grow and possess a limited quantity of these substances in their homes; and would create a state commission to regulate the use and distribution of these substances. The measure would establish a 15% state excise tax for the sale of these substances and would also allow local governments to impose a sales tax on these substances."

WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	09/12/2024-09/18/2024	800 LV	± 4.1%	42%	44%	14%
WBUR & CommonWealth Beacon Poll	Question: "There will be a question on the November 2024 ballot in Massachusetts regarding natural psychedelic substances. A yes vote would allow persons over age 21 to use certain natural psychedelic substances under licensed supervision and to grow and possess limited quantities of those substances in their home, and would create a commission to regulate those substances. A no vote would make no change to existing law. If the election were held today, how would you vote on this proposal?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Michigan

See also: Michigan 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Michigan. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Minnesota

See also: Minnesota 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Minnesota. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Mississippi

See also: Mississippi 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Mississippi. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri

See also: Missouri 2024 ballot measures

Missouri Amendment 4, Allow Legislature to Require a City to Increase Funding without State Reimbursement for a Police Force Established by State Board Measure (August 2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri Allow Legislature to Require a City to Increase Funding without State Reimbursement for a Police Force Established by State Board Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling/The Hill	10/26/22-10/28/22	1,000 LV	± 3.0%	44%	22%	33%
Emerson College Polling/The Hill	Question: "Amendment 4 would increase the amount of police force funding to 25% of a municipality’s general revenue. How do you plan to vote on Amendment 4?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Missouri Amendment 7, Require Citizenship to Vote and Prohibit Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri Amendment 7, Require Citizenship to Vote and Prohibit Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Public Opinion Strategies	09/04/2024-09/09/2024	600 RV	± 4.0%	62%	29%	N/A%
Public Opinion Strategies	Question: "The following is a ballot measure that voters in Missouri will be asked to vote on in the upcoming November election. The measure reads: Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to; Make the Constitution consistent with state law by only allowing citizens of the United States to vote; Prohibit the ranking of candidates by limiting voters to a single vote per candidate or issue; and Require the plurality winner of a political party primary to be the single candidate at a general election. Now, if the election were being held today, would you vote Yes to approve or No to reject this ballot measure?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Missouri Amendment 3, Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri Amendment 3, Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling	9/12/24-9/13/24	850 LV	± 3.3%	57.7%	30%	12.3%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "How would you vote on the ballot measure that would amend the Missouri Constitution to provide the right for reproductive freedom, defined as "the right to make and carry out decisions about all matters relating to reproductive health care, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, birth control, abortion care, miscarriage care, and respectful birthing conditions"?"

SLU/YouGov	8/8/24-8/16/24	900 LV	± 3.79%	52%	34%	14%
SLU/YouGov	Question: "In an upcoming election, Missouri voters may be asked to amend the state constitution to address the issue of abortion. The bolded text below is language proposed to appear on the ballot. Respondents saw Ballot Proposition Language Amendment 3 Would you support the above ballot proposition?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Missouri Proposition A, Minimum Wage and Earned Paid Sick Time Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri Proposition A, Minimum Wage and Earned Paid Sick Time Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

SLU/YouGov	8/8/24-8/16/24	900 LV	± 3.79%	57%	30%	14%
SLU/YouGov	Question: "In an upcoming election, Missouri voters may be asked to raise the state's minimum wage. The bolded text below is the language proposed to appear on the ballot. Respondents saw Ballot Language Proposition A. Would you support the above ballot proposition?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Missouri Amendment 2, Sports Betting Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Missouri Sports Betting Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling	9/26/24-10/2/24	1000 RV	± 3%	36%	39%	25%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "This year, an amendment to legalize sports betting for individuals over 21 will appear on the ballot. Do you think this is a good or bad thing for Missouri?"

Emerson College Polling	9/12/24-9/13/24	850 LV	± 3.3%	52%	25.3%	22.7%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "How would you vote on the ballot measure that would legalize sports wagering for individuals over 21?"

SLU/YouGov	8/8/24-8/16/24	900 LV	± 3.79%	50%	30%	21%
SLU/YouGov	Question: "In an upcoming election, Missouri voters may be asked to amend the state constitution to address the issue of sports betting. The bolded text below is language proposed to appear on the ballot. Respondents saw Ballot Proposition Language Amendment 2. Would you support the above ballot proposition?"

Emerson College Polling	6/17/24-6/19/24	1,000 RV	± 3%	38.3%	35.4%	26.3%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "If there was a measure on the ballot to legalize sports betting this November, how would you vote?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Montana

See also: Montana 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Montana. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nebraska

See also: Nebraska 2024 ballot measures

Nebraska Initiative 439, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nebraska Initiative 439, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling	9/26/24-10/2/24	1000 RV	± 3%	44%	40%	16%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "On the ballot measure to provide for a state constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability, would you vote yes, in favor of the constitutional right to abortion or no, in opposition?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Nebraska Initiative 434, Prohibit Abortions After the First Trimester Amendment (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nebraska Initiative 434, Prohibit Abortions After the First Trimester Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling	9/26/24-10/2/24	1000 RV	± 3%	46%	41%	13%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "On the ballot measure to prohibit abortion after the first trimester, except in cases of medical emergencies or if the pregnancy is the result of sexual assault or incest, would you vote yes, to ban abortion after the first trimester, or no, in opposition?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Nebraska Initiative 437, Medical Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nebraska Initiative 437, Medical Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling	09/26/2024-10/02/2024	1,000 RV	± 3.0%	59%	33%	8%
Emerson College Polling	Question: "On the ballot measure to legalize medical marijuana, would you vote yes to legalize the medical use of marijuana, or no, in opposition?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Nevada

See also: Nevada 2024 ballot measures

Nevada Question 6, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nevada Question 6, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Fox News	8/23/24-8/26/24	1026 RV	± 3%	75%	21%	4%
Fox News	Question: "How would you vote on the proposed state constitutional amendment that would establish the right to an abortion up until fetal viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Nevada Question 3, Top-Five Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

2024 polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Ballotpedia has not located polls for the 2024 initiative.

2022 polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Nevada Top-Five Ranked Choice Voting Initiative (2022)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Suffolk University	8/14/22-8/17/22	500 LV	± 4.4%	51.6%	44%	13.8%
Suffolk University	Question: "There is a ballot initiative to open up Nevada’s top party primary races to all voters regardless of party, and to allow the ranking of your five top choices instead of voting for one. At this point, do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this ballot initiative?"

OH Predictive Insights	7/20/22-7/29/22	741 LV	± 3.6%	38%	42%	20%
OH Predictive Insights	Question: "Changing the current method of elections so that anyone can vote in a party's primary and where choices for general elections will use ranked-choice voting, whereby voters rank their preferences."

OH Predictive Insights	7/8/22-7/19/22	924 RV	± 3.22%	42%	27%	32%
OH Predictive Insights	Question: "There will be a question on the ballot in November to change elections so that anyone can vote in a party's primary and where choices for general elections will use ranked-choice voting, whereby voters rank their preferences. Do you support this change to Nevada's elections?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

New Hampshire

See also: New Hampshire 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in New Hampshire. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

New Jersey

See also: New Jersey 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in New Jersey. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

New Mexico

See also: New Mexico 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in New Mexico. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

New York

See also: New York 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in New York. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Carolina

See also: North Carolina 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in North Carolina. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota

See also: North Dakota 2024 ballot measures

North Dakota Initiated Measure 5, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota Initiated Measure 5, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	09/28/2024-9/30/2024	500 RV	± 4.4%	45%	40%	15%
North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	Question: "An initiated measure that would legalize marijuana use, production and sales by anyone at least 21 years old."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

North Dakota Initiated Measure 4, Prohibit Taxes on Assessed Value of Real Property Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota Initiated Measure 4, Prohibit Taxes on Assessed Value of Real Property Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	09/28/2024-9/30/2024	500 RV	± 4.4%	28%	40%	33%
North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	Question: "An initiated measure that would eliminate property taxes."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

North Dakota Constitutional Measure 2, Single-Subject Requirement for Initiatives and Require Constitutional Initiatives to be Passed Twice Amendment (2024) Defeated

See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota Constitutional Measure 2, Single-Subject Requirement for Initiatives and Require Constitutional Initiatives to be Passed Twice Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	09/28/2024-9/30/2024	500 RV	± 4.4%	38%	28%	34%
North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	Question: "A Constitutional measure that would require initiated measures to be limited to one subject, measure sponsors and petition circulators to be qualified electors and petition signers to provide a complete residential address. It would also require voters to approve measures in two separate elections."

North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	11/5/2023-11/7/2023	517 LV	± 4.3%	36%	48%	18%
North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	Question: "Do you support or oppose changing the North Dakota Constitution to require constitutional amendments to pass twice — in consecutive elections — to become law?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

North Dakota Constitutional Measure 1, Language Describing State Institutions Amendment (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota Constitutional Measure 1, Language Describing State Institutions Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	09/28/2024-9/30/2024	500 RV	± 4.4%	75%	9%	16%
North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	Question: "A Constitutional question that would change outdated terminology that describes public institutions in North Dakota."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

North Dakota Constitutional Measure 3, Legacy Fund Transfers Amendment (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

North Dakota Constitutional Measure 3, Legacy Fund Transfers Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	09/28/2024-9/30/2024	500 RV	± 4.4%	33%	20%	47%
North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence	Question: "A Constitutional measure that would decrease the amount of principal that the state could spend from the Legacy Fund."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Ohio

See also: Ohio 2024 ballot measures

Ohio Issue 1, Establish the Citizens Redistricting Commission Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Ohio Issue 1, Establish the Citizens Redistricting Commission Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Bowling Green State University/YouGov Survey	10/10/2024 - 10/21/2024	500 LV	± 5.14%	57.0%	34.0%	9.0%
Bowling Green State University/YouGov Survey	Question: "This November, voters will be asked whether they approve or reject Issue 1. Issue 1 is an amendment to the Ohio Constitution to change the redistricting process in the state. A ‘Yes’ vote would establish a new bipartisan redistricting commission composed of 15 members equally divided between Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. All members and family members of the Commission will not have held a local, state, or federal elected position for the previous six years. Commissioners cannot have been registered as a lobbyist in Ohio or the federal government for the preceding six years as well. The amendment seeks to ban partisan gerrymandering that favors one political party and disfavors others. If the election were held today, would you vote ‘Yes’ in favor of Issue 1 or ‘No’ to reject Issue 1 — the Citizens Redistricting Commission Initiative."

Bowling Green State University/YouGov Survey	9/18/2024 - 9/27/2024	1,000 LV	± 3.6%	60%	20%	20%
Bowling Green State University/YouGov Survey	Question: "This November, voters will be asked whether they approve or reject Issue 1."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Oklahoma

See also: Oklahoma 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Oklahoma. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Oregon

See also: Oregon 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Oregon. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Pennsylvania

See also: Pennsylvania 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Pennsylvania. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Rhode Island

See also: Rhode Island 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Rhode Island. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Carolina

See also: South Carolina 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in South Carolina. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota

See also: South Dakota 2024 ballot measures

South Dakota Referred Law 21, Regulation of Carbon Dioxide Pipelines Referendum (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota Referred Law 21, Regulation of Carbon Dioxide Pipelines Referendum (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	10/19/24-10/22/24	825 LV	± 3.3%	36.3%	40.3%	23.5%
Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on South Dakota Referred Law 21, A Referred Act to Provide New Statutory Requirements for Regulating Linear Transmission Facilities, to Allow Counties to Impose a Surcharge on Certain Pipeline Companies, and to Establish a Landowner Bill of Rights? A yes vote would allow the act to become law. A no vote would reject the act of the legislature."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

South Dakota Initiated Measure 29, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota Initiated Measure 29, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

South Dakota News Watch	10/12/24-10/26/24	500 RV	± 3.3%	44%	51.4%	4.6%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "How will you vote on recreational marijuana measure?"

Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	10/19/24-10/22/24	825 LV	± 3.3%	45.3%	50.2%	4.5%
Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on South Dakota Initiated Measure 29, An Initiated Measure Legalizing the Recreational Use, Possession, and Distribution of Marijuana? A yes vote adopt the measure to allow individuals 21 years of age or older to possess, grow, ingest, and distribute marijuana or marijuana paraphernalia. A no vote would leave the law as is."

South Dakota News Watch/Chiesman Center for Democracy	05/10/24-5/13/24	500 RV	± 4.5%	41.6%	51.8%	6.6%
South Dakota News Watch/Chiesman Center for Democracy	Question: "Do you support the recreational marijuana initiative?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

South Dakota Constitutional Amendment G, Right to Abortion Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota Right to Abortion Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

South Dakota News Watch	10/12/24-10/26/24	500 RV	± 3.3%	49.8%	46.8%	3.4%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "How will you vote on abortion measure?"

Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	10/19/24-10/22/24	825 LV	± 3.3%	45%	48.4%	6.6%
Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on South Dakota Constitutional Amendment G, an initiated amendment establishing a right to abortion in the state constitution? A yes vote would adopt the amendment so during the first trimester a pregnant woman's decision to obtain an abortion may not be regulated. A no vote would leave the constitution as is."

South Dakota News Watch	5/10/24-5/13/24	500 RV	± 4.5%	53.4%	35.4%	11.2%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "Do you support the abortion amendment?"

South Dakota News Watch	11/27/23-11/29/23	500 RV	± 4.5%	45.6%	43.6%	10.8%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "Do you support or oppose a constitutional amendment that would allow for abortions during the first trimester?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

South Dakota Initiated Measure 28, Prohibit Food and Grocery Taxes Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota Initiated Measure 28, Prohibit Food and Grocery Taxes Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

South Dakota News Watch	10/12/24-10/26/24	500 RV	± 3.3%	49%	45%	6%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "How will you vote on grocery tax repeal?"

Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	10/19/24-10/22/24	825 LV	± 3.3%	36.2%	48.3%	15.5%
Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on South Dakota Initiated Measure 28, An Initiated Measure Prohibiting Taxes on Anything Sold for Human Consumption? A yes vote would prohibits the State from collecting sales or use tax on anything sold for human consumption. A no vote would leave the South Dakota law as is."

South Dakota News Watch and the Chiesman Center for Democracy at USD	5/10/24-5/13/24	500 RV	± 4.5%	66.4%	26.4%	7.2%
	Question: "Do you support the grocery tax appeal?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

South Dakota Constitutional Amendment H, Top-Two Primary Elections Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota Constitutional Amendment H, Top-Two Primary Elections Initiative
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

South Dakota News Watch	10/12/24-10/26/24	500 RV	± 3.3%	39.8%	55.8%	4.4%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "How will you vote on open primaries measure?"

Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	10/19/24-10/22/24	825 LV	± 3.3%	40.1%	48.1%	11.9%
Emerson College Polling/KELO-TV/The Hill	Question: "Would you vote yes or no on Constitutional Amendment H, An Amendment to the South Dakota Constitution Establishing Top-Two Primary Elections? A yes vote would adopt the amendment to require one primary election wherein all candidates run against each other in their respective races, the two candidates receiving the most votes advance to the general election. A no vote would leave the constitution as is."

South Dakota News Watch/Chiesman Center for Democracy	5/10/24-5/13/24	500 RV	± 4.5%	54.6%	33.2%	12.2%
South Dakota News Watch/Chiesman Center for Democracy	Question: "Do you support open primaries?"

South Dakota News Watch	11/27/23-11/29/23	500 RV	± 4.5%	49.4%	34%	16.6%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "Do you support or oppose the proposed open primaries amendment to South Dakota's constitution?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

South Dakota Constitutional Amendment E, Gender-Neutral Constitutional Language Amendment (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

South Dakota Constitutional Amendment E, Gender-Neutral Constitutional Language Amendment (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

South Dakota News Watch	10/12/24-10/26/24	500 RV	± 3.3%	30%	66.6%	3.4%
South Dakota News Watch	Question: "How will you vote on removing male-only references in constitution?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Tennessee

See also: Tennessee 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Tennessee. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Texas

See also: Texas 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Texas. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Utah

See also: Utah 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Utah. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Vermont

See also: Vermont 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Vermont. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Virginia

See also: Virginia 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Virginia. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington

See also: Washington 2024 ballot measures

Washington Initiative 2109, Repeal Capital Gains Tax Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Initiative 2109, Repeal Capital Gains Tax Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	10/8/2024-10/12/2024	401 LV	± 5%	29%	56%	15%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2109 concerns taxes. This measure would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. This measure would decrease funding for K-12 education, higher education, school construction, early learning, and childcare. As things stand today, do you intend to vote Yes to repeal the capital gains tax, No to keep the capital gains tax, or UNDECIDED?"

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	9/3/2024-9/6/2024	403 RV	± 5%	30%	52%	18%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2109 concerns taxes. This measure would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. This measure would decrease funding for K-12 education, higher education, school construction, early learning, and childcare. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote?"

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	5/13/2024-5/16/2024	403 RV	± 5%	47%	36%	17%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2019 concerns the state’s new capital gains tax. If passed, it would repeal an excise tax imposed on the sale or exchange of certain long-term capital assets by individuals who have annual capital gains of over $250,000. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote?"

Crosscut Elway	12/26/2023-12/28/2023	403 RV	± 5%	57%	29%	15%
Crosscut Elway	Question: "The following are some proposals that the legislature is expected to discuss in the coming weeks. As I read each of these items, please indicate whether you Favor, Strongly Favor, Oppose or Strongly oppose each one. ... Repeal the state’s new capital gains tax."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Washington Initiative 2124, Opt-Out of Long-Term Services Insurance Program Initiative (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Initiative 2124, Opt-Out of Long-Term Services Insurance Program Initiative (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	10/8/2024-10/12/2024	401 LV	± 5%	45%	33%	22%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2124 concerns state long-term care insurance. This measure would provide that employees and self-employed people must elect to keep coverage under state law and could opt-out any time. It would also repeal a law governing an exemption for employees. This measure would decrease finding for Washinton’s public insurance program providing long-term care benefits and services. As things stand today, do you intend to vote: Yes to make the program optional, No to keep the program as it is, and UNDECIDED?"

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	9/3/2024-9/6/2024	403 RV	± 5%	39%	33%	27%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2124 concerns state long-term care insurance. This measure would provide that employees and self-employed people must elect to keep coverage under state law and could opt-out any time. It would also repeal a law governing an exemption for employees. This measure would decrease finding for Washinton’s public insurance program providing long-term care benefits and services. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote on Initiative 2124?"

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	5/13/2024-5/16/2024	403 RV	± 5%	47%	25%	28%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2124 concerns the state’s new long-term care insurance program. It would provide that employees and self-employed people must elect to keep coverage and could opt-out any time. It would also repeal a law governing an exemption for employees. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote on Initiative 2124?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Washington Initiative 2117, Prohibit Carbon Tax Credit Trading and Repeal Carbon Cap-and-Invest Program Measure (2024) Defeated

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Initiative 2117, Prohibit Carbon Tax Credit Trading and Repeal Carbon Cap-and-Invest Program Measure (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	10/8/2024-10/12/2024	401 LV	± 5%	31%	46%	23%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2117 concerns carbon tax credit trading. This measure would prohibit state agencies from imposing any type of carbon tax credit trading, and repeal legislation establishing a cap and invest program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This measure would decrease funding for investments in transportation, clean air, renewable energy, conservation, and emissions-reduction. As things stand today, do you intend to vote: Yes to repeal the cap-and-trade program, No to keep the cap-and-trade program, or UNDECIDED?"

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	9/3/2024-9/6/2024	403 RV	± 5%	30%	46%	24%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2117 concerns carbon tax credit trading. This measure would prohibit state agencies from imposing any type of carbon tax credit trading, and repeal legislation establishing a cap and invest program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This measure would decrease funding for investments in transportation, clean air, renewable energy, conservation, and emissions-reduction. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote?"

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	5/13/2024-5/16/2024	403 RV	± 5%	41%	31%	28%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2117 would prohibit state agencies from imposing any type of carbon tax credit trading, including “cap and trade” or “cap and tax” programs, regardless of whether the resulting increased costs are imposed on fuel recipients or fuel suppliers. It would repeal sections of the 2021 Washington Climate Commitment Act, including repealing the “cap and invest” program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by specific entities. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Washington Initiative 2066, Natural Gas Policies Measure (2024) Approved

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Washington Initiative 2066, Natural Gas Policies Measure (2024)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	10/8/2024-10/12/2024	401 LV	± 5%	51%	28%	20%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2066 concerns regulating energy services, including natural gas and electrification. This measure would repeal or prohibit certain laws and regulations that discourage natural gas use and/or promote electrification, and require certain utilities and local governments to provide natural gas to eligible customers. As things stand today, do you intend to vote: Yes - to require local governments and utilities to provide natural gas to eligible customers, No - to allow local governments to continue to discourage natural gas use, or UNDECIDED?"

Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	9/3/2024-9/6/2024	403 RV	± 5%	47%	29%	24%
Cascade PBS/Elway Poll	Question: "Initiative 2066 concerns regulating energy services, including natural gas and electrification. This measure would repeal or prohibit certain laws and regulations that discourage natural gas use and/or promote electrification, and require certain utilities and local governments to provide natural gas to eligible customers. As things stand today, how are you inclined to vote?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

West Virginia

See also: West Virginia 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in West Virginia. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Wisconsin

See also: Wisconsin 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Wisconsin. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Wyoming

See also: Wyoming 2024 ballot measures

Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in Wyoming. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Footnotes

2024 U.S. state ballot measures
2025 » « 2023

Overview
Scorecard
Tuesday Count
Deadlines
Requirements
Lawsuits
Readability
Voter guides
Election results
Campaigns
Polls
Media editorials
Filed initiatives
Finances
Contributions
Signature costs
Ballot Measure Monthly
Signature requirements
Have you subscribed yet? Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew. Click here to learn more.

2024 ballot measure polls

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

2024 polls

2022 polls

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

See also

Footnotes

Information about voting

2025 Elections

2026 Elections

2024 Election analysis

Trending

Public Policy

Information for candidates

Get Engaged

Services

Additional analysis

SITE NAVIGATION