Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)
PHRMA Logo.png
Basic facts
Location:Washington, D.C.
Type:501(c)(6)
Top official:Steve Ubl, President and CEO
Year founded:1958
Website:Official website

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) is a 501(c)(6) nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. According to its website, they are "working to drive patient-centered progress in innovation, affordability, and access to life saving prescription medicines."[1][2]

Background

PhRMA was founded in 1958 with the intention "to represent America’s biopharmaceutical research companies and seek essential alignment between public policy and medical research to address patient needs." PhRMA has offices in the United States, China, and Japan. PhRMA members spent around $51.2 billion in 2014 developing new medicines.[3][4]

According to its website, PhRMA's mission is "to conduct effective advocacy for public policies that encourage the discovery of important, new medicines for patients by biopharmaceutical research companies.[4]

The full list of companies that are members can be found on its website.


Healthcare Policy Logo.png

Healthcare policy in the U.S.
Obamacare overview
Obamacare lawsuits
Medicare and Medicaid
Healthcare statistics
Public Policy Logo-one line.png

Leadership

The following were listed as part of the company's leadership:[5]

  • Albert Bourla, DVM, Ph.D, Board Chair
  • Paul Hudson, Board Chair-elect
  • Robert M. Davis, Treasurer
  • Miguel Fernández Alcalde,
  • Brad Bailey,
  • Chris Boerner, Ph.D.,
  • Jean-Michel Boers,
  • Robert A. Bradway,
  • Kyle Gano, Ph.D.,
  • Thomas Gibbs,
  • Sebastian Guth, Ph.D.,
  • Alexander Hardy,
  • Ken Keller,
  • Julie Kim,
  • David Loew,
  • Ashley Magargee,
  • Tsutomu Nakagawa, Ph.D,
  • Vasant (Vas) Narasimhan, M.D.,
  • Daniel O'Day,
  • Michael Petroutsas,
  • Richard F. Pops
  • Tarek Rabah
  • David Ricks
  • Steve Schaefer,
  • Pascal Soriot,
  • Jennifer Taubert,
  • Jean-Christophe Tellier, M.D.,
  • Chris Viehbacher,
  • Emma Walmsley,
  • Tatsuyuki Yasuno,
  • Stephen J. Ubl,
  • Lori M. Reilly, Esq.,
  • Robert Zirkelbach,
  • Elizabeth Carpenter,
  • Lucy Vereshchagina, Ph.D.,
  • James C. Stansel,
  • Tracey Merchant,
  • Renuka Iyer,

Work and activities

According to its website, PhRMA says it wants to do the following:[3]

Adopt a pro-innovation regulatory and trade agenda

Preserve the uniquely American system that balances incentives for innovation with affordability by protecting intellectual property at home and abroad, modernizing the FDA to keep pace with innovation, defending American workers and limiting foreign free-riding through strong trade agreements.

Protect the United States from the harms of price setting Protect patients, pharmacists and providers from the harms of price setting policies that undermine innovation and create new access barriers for American patients.

Fix the IRA’s pill penalty to allow all medicines to compete for 13 years before eligibility for government price setting and prevent further expansion of price setting to maintain patient choice of medicines.

Stop the abuse in the 340B hospital markup program Pursue comprehensive reform that prevents abuse and ensures the 340B program lowers medicine costs for low-income patients.

Do not stand in the way of private market solutions that would ensure program compliance and limit illegal activity.

Rein in the middlemen to put patients over PBM profits Stop PBM practices that are driving up costs and limiting access for patients by sharing savings negotiated between manufacturers and PBMs directly to patients, delinking PBM compensation from the list price of medicine, ensuring patients benefit from manufacturer assistance programs and holding health plans accountable for providing patient care.[6]

Policy advocacy

PhRMA's website lists policy issues that they focus on, including the following:[7]

  • Intellectual Property
  • Research & Development
  • Innovative Medicines
  • Government Price Setting
  • International
  • PBMs and Middlemen
  • Hospitals and 340B
  • Insurance Coverage
  • Cost of Medicines
  • Medicare and Medicaid

Ballot measure activity

The following table details PhRMA's ballot measure stances available on Ballotpedia:

Ballot measure support and opposition for PhRMA
Ballot measure Year Position Amount Status
California Proposition 41, Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Bond (June 2014) 2014 Supported $10,000[8] Approveda
California Proposition 93, Amendment to Term Limits Initiative (February 2008) 2008 Supported $500,000[9] Defeatedd
California Proposition 89, Public Campaign Finance Program, Campaign Finance Limits, and Increased Corporate Tax Initiative (2006) 2006 Opposed $200,000[10] Defeatedd
Florida Amendment 3, Supermajority Vote Required to Approve a Constitutional Amendment (2006) 2006 Supported $100,000[11] Approveda
California Proposition 79, Prescription Drug Discount Program Initiative (2005) 2005 Opposed $80,394,902[12] Defeatedd
California Proposition 78, Prescription Drug Discount Program Initiative (2005) 2005 Supported $85,998,683[13] Defeatedd


Finances

The following is a breakdown of PhRMA's revenues and expenses from XXXX to XXXX. The information comes from the Internal Revenue Service

PhRMA's financial data 2015-2022
Year Revenue Expenses
2015 $4.2 million $4.4 million
2016 $4.3 million $3.6 million
2017 $4.7 million $4.0 million
2018 $5.2 million $4.1 million
2019 $4.8 million $5.2 million
2020 $5.1 million $4.8 million
2021 $3.7 million $4.4 million
2022 $3.9 million $4.1 million

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms 'PhRMA'. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes