|
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #1
STIPULATED AGREEMENT
In the matter of
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
(Department of Public Safety)
And
Connecticut State Police Union
OLR Case# 05-2980 Inst. Union Code: 33-06
The Office of Labor Relations, on behalf of the State
of Connecticut, Department of Public Safety (“the State”), the
Connecticut State Police Union, (“CSPU”) have reached the
following understanding in full and final resolution of OLR
Case No. 05-2980
1. In accordance with Article 15, Section 7 (b) of the
collective bargaining agreement, notice shall be given
on the written direction for the explanatory as to the
employee’s right to confer with a union representative
prior to responding. A reasonable amount of time shall
be provided to the employee in which to perfect and
submit the written explanatory.
2. The agency will inform all Supervisors and Managers
of the provisions of Article 15, Section 7 (b).
3. In consideration of this Agreement, CSPU hereby
withdraws any and all grievances, prohibited practice
complaints, discrimination (CHRO and EEOC)
complaints, lawsuits and any other legal or
administrative actions filed in relation to OLR No. 05-
2980.
4. This Agreement shall not be considered or construed
as any admission of any contractual violation by the
State or the Department of Public Safety.
5. This settlement is without precedent for any other
present or future matter between the parties.
6. The Grievance filed in this matter (OLR No. 05-2980)
is hereby withdrawn.
Jeremiah McGuire, CSPU Representative
7/19/07
Sgt. David Rosado, Agency
7/13/07
Diane Fitzpatrick, Office of Labor Relations
7/23/07.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #2
THE APRIL ACCORD
The following is a General Understanding and represents
a good faith effort of the parties to address key problems and
to present solutions to issues in the Department of Public
Safety.
1. The parties recognize a mutual interest in assuring
that (a) the internal affairs process is completed effectively,
efficiently, and expeditiously; and (b) assuring that where
internal affairs investigations are sustained, the resulting
disciplinary process is fair, reasoned, and appropriate.
2. Internal Affairs Investigations will be targeted to be
completed within 60 days, and will be completed and the
employee notified of the result within ninety (90) days of the
date that an investigation has commenced, or 120 days from
when the manager at the level of Captain or above of the
Department learned of allegations of misconduct of a nature
which would engender Internal Affairs Investigations. This
period will be frozen during the time in which entities other
than the Department of Public Safety are responsible for the
investigation (e.g. State's Attorney's Office, local law
enforcement departments, etc.), the subject is unavailable
and/or the union fails to cooperate in handling the matter
expeditiously. Such exceptional circumstances are expected
to be few in number. The Union will receive quarterly reports
of the matters which are frozen because they are in the hands
of outside agencies, which shall include the number of such
matters, and the identity of any such matters where the subject
has already been notified of the matter pursuant to the
collective bargaining agreement. To the extent that the
Department remains involved while another agency is
responsible for the investigation, the Department shall
cooperate so that the investigation can be concluded as
expeditiously as possible. In the event that the ninety (90) day
or the 120 day requirement is not met and no exceptional
circumstances exist, the pending investigation will not affect
the subject's eligibility for promotion and/or assignment to a
specialized unit. In the event that discipline is imposed which
is or may be a disability from and/or impediment to promotion
or assignment to a specialized unit under the contract or the
A&O Manual, the time by which the Internal Affairs
investigation exceeds 90 days or 120 days shall be subtracted
from that disability or impediment period.
3. Except in the case of bona fide allegations of
criminal misconduct, the Department shall not commence an
internal affairs investigation of an incident more than 18
months after a Department manager at the level of Captain or
above becomes aware of the incident.
4. The Department shall issue a directive that any
allegations of misconduct against a bargaining unit member
which are of a nature which would be transmitted to a
Lieutenant shall be immediately copied to a Captain or higher.
5. The initial discipline proposed by the Department
for a sustained internal affairs investigation shall be the
Department's comprehensive, reasoned effort to impose
discipline proportional to the offense, the employee's
disciplinary record, and any and all other factors relevant to
just cause.
6. The Labor Relations section of the Department of
Public Safety and those employees within it shall report to Lt.
Col. Peter Terenzi for the purposes of sworn personnel. If Lt.
Colonel Terenzi leaves the Department, the Labor Relations
section shall report to the Lieutenant Colonel in charge of
Field Operations. The state's Office of Labor Relations shall
be available for informal consultation prior to the imposition
of any discipline.
7. Allegations of misconduct of a nature which would
engender Internal Affairs Investigations of bargaining unit
members but which involve Lt. Colonels and above will be
referred to the Office of the Chief State's Attorney for
guidance and/or investigation, as determined by the Chief
State's Attorney.
8. The Department will begin a study of the hiring,
training and promotion process including diversity and career
ladder initiatives of the Division of State Police by July 1,
2008 and complete a preliminary study by not later than
February 15, 2009.
9. The parties will inform the Connecticut General
Assembly (a) that this agreement exists; (b) that ongoing
meetings will continue, including but not limited to meetings
between the CSPU and the Lieutenant Colonel referenced in
paragraph 5 and Linda Yelmini; and (c) that the parties see no
need at this time to address the issues between the Department
and the CSPU through the passage of SB 443.
Steven Rief, President
Connecticut State Police Union
April 24, 2008
John A. Danaher III,
Commissioner of Public Safety
April 24, 2008
Patrick Carozza, Vice President
Connecticut State Police Union
April 24, 2008
Peter Terenzi, Lieutenant Colonel
Connecticut State Police
April 24, 2008
Daniel E. Livingston, Counsel
Connecticut State Police Union
April 24, 2008
Linda J. Yelmini
Labor Relations, State of CT
April 24, 2008
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #3
In full and final resolution of the dispute regarding the
utilization of union business leave hours. The State of
Connecticut (hereinafter referred to as the "State") on behalf
of the Department of Public Safety, Division of State Police
(hereinafter referred to as "DPS" or "the Department") and the
Connecticut State Police Union (hereinafter referred to as
"CSPU" or "the Union) hereby agree as follows:
1. All Union business leave will be authorized by a call
from either the CSPU secretary or the Director of Labor
Relations for the Union. Requests for union business
leave shall be made with as much advance notice as
possible. A call will be made to the Labor Relations
Unit of the Department which will be confirmed in
writing by either facsimile or e-mail from the Union to
the Labor Relations unit. In the event the call is not
made and the confirming email is not sent, the Union
leave bank may be charged double for the time used
without following this procedure.
2. The Union hereby acknowledges that this extinguishes
any claim that the Union president is entitled by virtue
of his/her office to time off for union business that is not
deducted from the Union leave bank.
3. The State will credit an additional l5 days to the union
business leave bank for 2007-2008 contract year. The
parties agree that with the additional 15 days, the
balance had reached zero as of June 14, 2008.
4. The State will increase the present number of union
business leave to 300 days, effective with the 2008-09
contract year. In the event that there are insufficient
days of union business leave in any contract year, the
union can borrow against the balance in the next
contract year. Any hours not used in one year may be
carried over to the next contract year. Said bank shall
expire at the end of the contract, absent an agreement of
the parties.
5. In consideration of this Agreement, all outstanding
issues regarding the issue of union business leave are
considered resolved. Additionally, the Union hereby
withdraws any and all grievances and prohibited practice
complaints filed on the issue of union business leave.
Steven Rief, President 02/18/09
Lt. Colonel Peter Terenzi 2/24/09
Jeremiah McGuire
Linda J. Yelmini 2/22/09.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #4
STIPULATED AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
STATE OF CONNEG'TICUT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
AND
CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE UNION
RE: GRIEVANCE DPS 08-037 and
DPS 08-040
(Union Codes 08-022 and 08-023)
1. As a result of recent negotiations regarding the issues
presented within grievances DPS 08-03 7 (Union Code
08-023) and DPS 08-040 (Union Code 08-022), the
following is agreed to by all parties as a full and final
resolution:
2. That pursuant to this agreement, the Union agrees that
for-purposes of filling vacancies within each of the
specialized units that comprise the Emergency Services
Unit, Master Sergeants shall be excluded from the
application process d:ue to their numerous administrative
responsibilities. The only recognized Master Sergeant
exception within the Emergency Services Unit will be the
position that currently exists as the Executive Officer,
which will continue to be assigned through the Office of
Field Operations.
3. That, the Agency agrees for the purposes of filling
vacancies within only the Tactical Unit, Negotiator, Pilot
and part-time Tactical Flight Officer positions, Sergeants
shall be permitted to apply, and be assigned, along with
Troopers First Class and Troopers
4. The Parties further agree that an applicant's rank shall not
be considered within the grading of the testing process
for these positions. The remainder of the grading and
testing process will continue to conform with Article 25
Section 5 of the NP-1 Contract, using among other
things, state service time in lieu of rank.
5. Additionally it is agreed that either a Trooper or Trooper
First Class, upon promotion to the rank of Sergeant, or a
Sergeant who is promoted to the rank of Master Sergeant,
shall have the ability to remain only as a member of the
Tactical Unit, Negotiator, Pilot or Tactical Flight Officer,
Dive Team or Bomb Technician within the Emergency
Services Unit, if such position is held at the time of
promotion. This does not include those personnel assigned
to Emergency Services with canines.
6. That, the Union, pursuant to this agreement, shall
withdraw grievances DPS 08-037 (Union Code 08-023)
and DPS 08-040 (Union Code 08-022) as soon as
practicable.
7. In signing this Agreement, the Union acknowledges that
they freely and voluntarily enter into this Agreement
without duress, intimidation, undue influence or any
threatened loss of benefit. The Union acknowledges that
they have read it and fully understand its contents,
meaning, intent and implications.
Tfc Steven Rief
CSP Union President
09/25/09
Sgt. James Canon Jr. #240
Commanding Officer
DPS-LaborRelations
Captain Robert Corona
Commanding Officer
Emergency Services Unit 10/2/09
Colonel Thomas Davoren
Deputy Commissioner
10/1/09.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #5
RE: Special Duty Overtime
The following Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is a
result of negotiations that were held between the
Department of Public Safety and the Connecticut State
Police Union regarding the assignment of Special Duty
Overtime and contemplated changes to 4.7.5 of the A&O
Manual. In an attempt to create the most fair and equitable
way in which to distribute Special Duty Overtime, the
below criteria are agreed to by both parties:
1. That, in order to be considered for assignments
administered by the Special Duty Unit, a DPS-692-C,
Request for Overtime Project Assignment must be
submitted to the Special Duty Office by the fifteenth
day of the month prior to the month of the request. (ie:
to be considered for Special Duty assignments in the
month of February, the Request for Overtime Project
Assignment shall be received at the Special Duty
Office no later than the first business day after January
15th, and so on throughout the year.) Faxes are
acceptable, however must be followed by the original
document.
- a. Should the request arrive after the first business day after the fifteenth, the card will not be entered into the system for assignments.
- i. The employee will however, be available to work the following assignments: split jobs, not filled jobs, emergency jobs and/or local jobs.
- ii. Late submissions may be reviewed for extenuating circumstances by a Committee to consist of the Supervisor of the Special Duty Office, a Union Agent and a representative of the Labor Relations Unit.
- a. If it is determined that extenuating circumstances exist, the card will be entered into the system to allow for "Assigned" jobs.
- b. If the Agency creates a scenario which results in the late submission of a DPS-692-C, Request for Overtime Project Assignment, a memorandum from the employee's Commanding Officer shall state the reasons of the delay and the request will be entered into the system to allow for "Assigned" jobs.
2. That each DPS-692-C, Request for Overtime Project
Assignment shall contain a maximum of twelve (12)
X's to be considered as available for assignments, which
may be any twelve days.
- a. Modifications will be allowed to the DPS-692-C,
Request for Overtime Project Assignment in the
following ways:
- i. Prior to the fifteenth of the month preceding the month that the OTisto be assigned
- ii. Days (X's) may be removed at any time, however cannot be added/moved after the fifteenth of the month preceding the month that the OT is to be assigned.
- iii. Agency caused schedule changes for an employee (ie: shift changes, move to an administrative or 5/3 schedule, etc.)
- iv. Any additions or subtractions of Troop Areas in which assignments are requested can be made prior to the fifteenth of the month preceding the month that the OT is to be assigned.
- b. Modifications shall be done in writing by the employee to the Special Duty Office
3. That once receiving an assignment from the Special Duty
Office, the employee has three options:
- i. Work the assignment
- ii. Do a one for one swap with another employee who already has an assignment in hand (no “I owe you one” swaps).
- a. If a one for one swap is to occur, both employees must make notification to the Special Duty Office for purposes of tracking ownership of the assignments. Until the Special Duty Office is notified, the originally assigned employee shall be responsible for the assignment. The Employees may e-mail [specduty.clerk@ct.gov] the Special Duty Office with the information, or contact them via telephone (860)685-8420 during their normal business hours.
- iii. Turn the assignment back in to the Special Duty Office.
4. That, for purposes of splitting the work hours in any
assignment, in any instance, the assigned employee must work
a portion of the assignment. Split assignments will be between
no more than two employees.
5. That should an employee fail to submit a DPS-692-C,
Request for Overtime Project Assignment and work a job in
which they are allowed to do (Ie: split, not filled, emergency,
local) the employee shall submit a card for payment purposes:
- a. It shall be the card showing the job was worked (Form DPS-693-C), to include the appropriate job site and employee signatures, a supervisor’s signature within the employee’s command, hours worked, meal break, etc.
6. That all listed changes shall be incorporated into the A&O
Manual 4.7.5 as soon as practicable.
7. That negotiations will continue between the parties
regarding the remaining issues, to include but not be limited
to: everbridge notifications for last minute assignments, the
possibility of counting opportunities as refusals and hours
worked during split shifts, within 4.7.5 and shall be addressed
in a similar manner as was done in this instance. Periodic
review of the newly implemented procedures will take place
between the parties to ensure they have had the desirable
equitable affect in assignment of overtime.
Andrew Matthews
President-NP-1 Union
4/28/11
Colonel Danny Stebbins
Deputy Commissioner
Dept. of Public Safety
4/28/11
Jeremiah McGuire
Director of Labor Relations
NP-1 Union
4/29/11
Sgt. James Canon, Jr.
Commanding Officer
Labor Relations Unit
4/29/11
Neal Waananen
Labor Agent-NP-1 Union
4/29/11
Diane Benedetto
Director Human Resources
Dept. of Public Safety
4/29/11
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #6
Memorandum of Clarification Re Holiday Pay
During negotiations for the 2012-2015 Collective Bargaining Agreement,
The state and the Union sought to modify the contract language to ensure
that employees, such as those in patrol assignments, who are regularly
scheduled and required to work on a holiday would receive time and one half for all hours they are scheduled to work on certain“premium”
holidays, as well as continuing to receive a compensatory day off. It was
understood that the nature of the job often precluded those employees
from enjoying said holidays with family and friends.The premium pay
was intended to recognize this inconvenience to said employees.
In modifying the language,the parties intended no other change regarding
other employees choosing to work on a holiday, although not required, if
There was a legitimate business reason for working on the holiday, and it
was supported by management. In those instances, they received regular
straight-time pay, plus a compensatory day off.
Notwithstanding the parties’ good faith intentions, a problem has arisen
that appears to be the result of a conflict between the Atlas scheduling
system used by the Department and the statewide CORE-CT time and
attendance computer programming. It has been discovered that any
employee who works on a premium holiday may be receiving premium
holiday pay, although their attendance may not be required. In some
cases, employees who had previously been given the option to work on a
holiday have been recently denied that option, perhaps due to the
computer-generated default payment of premium pay. These
consequences were never intended and they are not supported by the
revised holiday contract language.
To clarify the intent andaddresstheproblemofunintended
consequences, the parties as follows:
1. If an employee is required to work on a non-premium holiday as
part of the employee's regular schedule, and actually works on
the holiday, the employee shall receive the employee’s regular
pay for the scheduled hours worked, plus a compensatory day off
or straight-time pay because the employee did not enjoy
the benefit of having the holiday off. ResidentTroopers are
deemed to be required to work except those on light duty.
2. If an employee is required to work on a premium holiday as part
of the employee's regular schedule, and actually works on the
holiday, the employee shall receive the time and one-half the
employee’s regular pay for the scheduled hours worked, plus
a compensatory day off or straight time pay because the employee
did not enjoy the benefit of having the holiday off.Resident
Troopers are deemed to be required to work except those on light
duty.
3. If an employee was not scheduled to work on any of the twelve
holidays, as part of the employee's regular schedule,but is
ordered into work,the employee shall receive time and one-half
for all mandated hours worked on the premium holiday plus the
employee shall receive a compensatory day off because the
employee did not enjoy the benefit of having the holiday off.
4. If an employee is not scheduled and/or required to work on a
premium or non-premium holiday, as part of the employee’s
regular schedule, but wishes to work on the holiday, the
employee shall express the desire to work on the holiday to the
designated commanding officer. The designated commanding
officer shall permit the employee to work on the holiday, absent
extenuating circumstances (e.g. documented performance issues
or a demonstrated lack of productivity when working on a
previous holiday). Employees making this choice shall receive
straight-time pay for all hours worked on the holiday plus the
employee shall receive a compensatory day off. Absent
extenuating circumstances(e.g. a critical incident or public
emergency) this option is not available for the Thanksgiving,
Christmas or New Years holidays.
5. It is understood and agreed that resolving the computer coding
conflicts may take several months. Manual overrides and/or
adjustments will likely be required during the interregnum.
Therefore, until the computer coding conflicts are resolved,
employees wishing to work on Memorial Day, Independence
Day or Labor Day,under the preceding paragraph, should notify
the designated commanding officer not later than two weeks
prior to the holiday so that payroll will have enough lead time to
make the necessary adjustments.
6. If a holiday falls on an employee's regular day off the employee shall
receive a compensatory day off because the employee did
receive the true benefit of a holiday as provided in the
contract.
7. This agreement constitutes a good-faith effort to clarify the
Holiday provision of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Should either party encounter situations not contemplated herein,
the parties shall meet and discuss said situations and determine
whether further clarification is needed.
FOR THE STATE:
Brian Meraviglia Date: 12/23/14
Colonel
Warren Hyatt Date: 12/23/2014
Lt.Colonel
Fae Brown-Brewton
Office of Labor Relations
FOR THE UNION:
Andrew Matthews Date 12/24/2014
President, Connecticut State Police Union
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #7
In order to address tuition reimbursement applications in the State
Police (NP-1) bargaining unit, the State and the Union agree as
follows:
1. If the employee has timely applied for tuition reimbursement
for a spring or early summer course(s) that is completed
prior to the last day (i.e. June 30) of the contract year and
he/she submits the necessary documentation of, course
costs and payment by the following August 15, the
employee will be eligible for tuition reimbursement from
the fund for the contract year that ended on June 30.
2. This memorandum does not alter the criteria for eligible
coursework or the process for the distribution of available
funds.
3. This memorandum shall be applicable to courses
completed prior to June 30, 2012, for which the required
documentation was submitted by August 15,2012.
Andrew Matthews 8/14/12
For the Union
EllenCarter 8/14/12
For the State
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #8
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, made
this 18th
day of September 2012 by and between the State
of Connecticut, Office of Labor Relations, (hereinafter "the
State") and the Connecticut State Police Union (hereinafter
"the Union") is regarding Article 32, Section 2, Subsection
(b), the replenishment of the Sick Leave Bank. The intent of
this agreement is to specifically address when the Sick Leave
Bank is exhausted and the decision is made to replenish the
Bank and an NP-1 member does not have any sick time
remaining.
This agreement shall not supersede any other sections of the
NP-I bargaining unit contracts.
Pursuant to Article 32, Section 2, of the NP-1 Contract,
the State and the Union mutually agree the Sick Leave
Bank was established to assist members suffering from
a serious continuing illness or non-job related injury. The
bank is only used once the member's personal sick leave
is exhausted and is only provided until the member
reaches maximum medical improvement. The Sick Leave
Bank Committee closely monitors the use of the bank to
avoid abuse and ensures that the bank is not used to
supplement any other compensation payments.
The last time the bank was replenished was in February 2008.
Recently, the State and the Union recognized the Sick Leave
Bank was below 100 days. As a result, the State and the
Union together approved the contribution of (1) sick day
from each NP-member's sick leave accruals to replenish the
sickbank.
To ensure that all members equally contribute, the State and
the Union agree that if any NP-I member has exhausted all
of their sick leave at the time the State replenishes the Sick
Leave Bank, the (1) sick day will be deducted from those
members' sick leave accruals once it has been earned.
In witness whereof, the State and the Union have affixed their
signature as duly authorized collective bargaining agents.
State of Connecticut
S. Fae Brown-Brewton
Assistant Director—OLR
Connecticut State Police Union
Andrew N. Matthews, President
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #9
As a result of discussions at recent Labor Management
Meetings between the parties, specifically those
concerning Master Sergeant eligibility in the Troop
Supervisor non-emergency overtime rotationalsystem,the
following is agreed to by all parties as a full and final
resolution:
1. That pursuant to this agreement, all Master
Sergeants shall be eligible within the Troop
Supervisor non-emergency overtime rotation, as
described within Article 17 Section 1 1 of the
current NP- l contract. By virtue of eligibility
within the non-emergency overtime rotation,
Master Sergeants shall also be subject to order-ins consistent with the Troop Supervisor's order-in rotation. It is further understood that in filling
those overtime assignments, Master Sergeants
shall perform the required duties expected of the
shift Supervisor, as well as their regular Master
Sergeant duties should time allow, with the
emphasis being on shift supervision.
2. In signing this Agreement, the Parties
acknowledge that they have read the Agreement
and fully understand its contents, meaning,
intent and implications.
Andrew Matthews
CSPU-President
03/21/13
Lt.JamesCanon,Jr.
Commanding Officer
DESPP-Labor Relations Unit
03/26/13
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #10
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
REGARDING SPECIAL DUTY OVERTIME
Within 45 days following legislative approval of this
Agreement, the parties shall form a joint labor/management
committee designed for the sole purpose of addressing concerns
regarding the assignment and performance of special duty
overtime.
As a demonstration of the parties' commitment to the success of
the endeavor, the Union President and/or designee and the
State's Chief Negotiator shall be joint chairs of the Committee.
The Committee shall also consist of not more than five (5)
additional members from both sides.
The committee shall convene on a regular bi-weekly basis to
discuss, among other issues,
- Failure to report as scheduled and the consequences thereof;
- Ensuring timely notice of assignments are received by employees;
- Communications regarding assignments given and returned after hours; and a unifo1m protocol regarding the same;
- Discussing the rules for special duty overtime assignments, including the so-called "Hung Rules".
This is not an exhaustive list, as the parties agree there are
multiple issues that should be addressed.
FOR THE STATE:
FaeBrown-Brewton
Matthews 5/2/13
FOR THE UNION:
Andrew
5/2/13
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #11
As a result of recent discussions regarding the selection
process for specialized units, the following is agreed to by
all parties:
1. During the selection process for specialized units,
experience and training obtained while a bargaining
unit member was temporarily assigned to a unit shall
not be considered during the selection process for
vacancies within that unit. This shall include, but is
not limited consideration of experience in a unit while
on Temporary Duty (TDY) assignments or light duty
assignments.
2. The signing of this agreement shall not be construed
as any admission of wrongdoing and/or violation of
the contract by any of the parties.
3. This Memorandum of Agreement supersedes and
cancels any prior agreement. It shall not serve as
precedent in any pending or future dispute between
the parties, and shall not be admissible as evidence in
any proceeding except as may be required to enforce
its terms.
4. The Union agrees not to file or pursue any legal action
against the State of Connecticut or Department of
Emergency Services and Public Protection, their
representatives, or their employees in any forum as a
result of this agreement, except to enforce the terms
of this Agreement.
5. In signing this Agreement, the parties acknowledges
that they freely and voluntarily enters into this
Agreement without duress, intimidation, undue
influence or any threatened loss of benefit.
Andrew N. Matthews, Esq.
President,
Connecticut State
Police Union
08/29/13
Capt.Edwin Henion, Esq.
Commanding Officer
Labor Relations Unit
Dept. of Emergency
Services and Public Protection
8/29/13
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #12
STIPULATED AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
AND
CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE UNION
RE: GRIEVANCE DPS12-041 (Union Code 2012-026)
As a result of recent negotiations regarding the issues presented
within grievances DPS l2-041 (Union Code 2012-026), the
following is agreed to by all parties as a full and final resolution:
1. That pursuant to this agreement, the Department of Emergency
Services and Public Protection (DESPP) agrees that when an
event occurs at the Troop patrol level requiring a billable entity
to respond and perform an emergency repair of a telephone
pole,in lieu of using on-shift personnel for the duration of the
event, the agency shall assign a Trooper through the use of the
rotational overtime card system, consistent with the current
practices. The agreement is meant as a guide for those specific
instances in which the billable entity would have typically gone
through the Special Duty office, but not for it being an
emergency situation.
2. That in cases where there are no volunteers identified, the
appropriate Trooper shall be ordered in to work the
assignment through the use of the order in rotational system.
3. That the assignment shall be coded as OPA and considered
pensionable overtime.
4. That the hiring of additional personnel shall not negatively
impact the minimum staffing structure.
5. That this agreement shall not apply to routine matters at the
Troop level that are commonly handled by the patrol
personnel. This agreement is specific to the occasional
anomaly that will incur a "lengthy service" as defined above.
The interpretation of whether or not the justification was
appropriate to use patrol personnel or hire an overtime
Trooper shall be consistent with Article 5 "Managements
Rights" clause of the NP-1 collective bargaining agreement in
concert with this stipulated agreement, and be subject to the
normal grievance procedure outlined in Article 14 of the
same agreement.
6. That, the Union, pursuant to this agreement, shall withdraw
DPS12-041(UnionCode2012-026).
7. In signing this Agreement, the Union acknowledges that they
freely and voluntarily enter into this Agreement without
duress, intimidation, undue influence or any threatened loss
of benefit. The Union acknowledges that they have read it
and fully understand its contents, meaning, intent and
implications.
Andrew Matthews
President-CSP Union
8//15/13
Colonel Danny Stebbins
Deputy Commissioner
Dept. of Emergency Services and Public
Protection 8/16/13
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #13
As a result of recent disc regarding the administrative
investigations, the following is agreed to by all parties:
1. Union stewards shall not be utilized by the agency to perform
formal administrative investigations, investigations of "C
numbers,” or internal affairsInvestigations of NP-1 bargaining
unit members. This does not preclude Union stewards from
otherwise participating in investigations as witnesses, subject to
any established legal privileges, or in performing purely
ministerial functions related to an investigation, for example,
having a Master Sergeant or Sergeant acknowledging review of
a document or notifying a bargaining unit member of an
investigation.
2. The signing of this agreement shall not be construed as any
admission of wrongdoing and/or violation of the contract by any
of the parties.
3. This Memorandum of Agreement supersedes and cancels any
prior agreement. It shall not serve as precedent in any pending
or future dispute between the parties, and shall not be
admissible as evidence in any proceeding except as may be
required to enforce its terms.
4. TheUnionagreesnottofileorpursue anylegalactionagainst
the State of Connecticut or Department of Emergency Services
and Public Protection, their representatives, or their employees
in any forum as a result of this agreement, except to enforce the
terms of this Agreement.
5. In signing this Agreement, the parties acknowledges that they
hey freely and voluntarily enters into this Agreement without
duress, intimidation, undue Influence or any threatened loss of
benefit.
Andrew Matthews
President-CSP Union
9/6/13
Colonel Danny Stebbins
Deputy Commissioner
Dept. of Emergency Services and Public
Protection 9/6/13
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #14
STIPULATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN
STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE UNION
RE: GRIEVANCE DPS12·056
(Union Code 2012·036)
As a result of recent negotiations regarding the issues
presented within grievances DPS 12-036 (Union Code 2012-
036), the following is agreed to by all parties as a full and
final resolution:
1. That pursuant to this agreement, the Department of
Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP)
agrees that during times of emergency and/or events
involving mobilization of significant DESPP State Police
resources, to include but not be limited to natural
disasters and states of emergency; should a decision be
made to "double up" personnel within patrol vehicles in
order to provide Law Enforcement Officer services,
members of the NP-1 bargaining unit shall be used for
such purposes. In no such instances shall members of
the Department of Corrections be used to replace an NP1 member. It is understood by the parties that members
of the Department of Corrections are distinguishably
different than DESPP State Police personnel and are
outside of the NP-1 bargaining unit.
2. That, this agreement does not preclude the Department
from using non-NP-1 members to "double up" for
functions other than those designated as law
enforcement related.
3. That, the Union, pursuant to this agreement, shall
withdraw DPS12-056 (Union Code 2012-036).
4. In signing this Agreement, the Union acknowledges
that they freely and voluntarily enter into this
Agreement without duress, intimidation, undue
influence or any threatened loss of benefit. The Union
acknowledges that they have read it and fully
understand its contents, meaning, intent and
implications.
Andrew Matthews
President-CSP Union
8//15/13
Colonel Danny Stebbins
Deputy Commissioner
Dept. of Emergency Services and Public
Protection 8/16/13
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING #15
Uniform Pilot Program
- A pilot program regarding outer carrier:
- The Union president and/or his/her designee shall be on the uniform pilot program dedicated committee;
- Subcommittee working group members: 2 management designations; 2 Union designations; Office of Labor Relations and Union Rep Co-Chairs and a DAS purchasing representative will serve as an advisory member when needed.
- A minimum of at least four (4) Troopers at each Troop to a max of sixty (60) total Troopers shall be identified as participants based upon selection criteria of the Uniform committee;
- This sub-committee shall convene within 60 days following Legislative approval or soon thereafter programs shall run for up to twelve months following delivery of the Uniforms to be piloted for one (1) year and may be extended by agreement of the committee;
- Committee will develop an evaluation process for the participants (photographs documenting wash cycles etc.);
- This sub-committee will evaluate and make a recommendation to the Colonel thru the Uniform committee with documentation;
- All costs shall be remunerated by the Union from their carryover stress fund money as indicated in Article 33, Section ten of the collective bargaining agreement and pursuant to state contracting policies;
- Participants are responsible for care and maintenance of uniform;
- This does not replace the Class B Uniforms[3]
|