Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Richard Schrock

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Richard Schrock
Image of Richard Schrock
Prior offices
South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue Commissioner Board District 1

Education

Bachelor's

St. Martin's College

Personal
Profession
Communications consultant

Richard Schrock was a Republican candidate for Washington commissioner of insurance in the 2016 election.[1] Schrock placed second in the primary election and therefore faced incumbent commissioner Mike Kreidler in the November general election.

Schrock was defeated by the incumbent commissioner, Mike Kreidler (D), who was re-elected to a fifth term.

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Schrock is a communications and public relations consultant who has advised government agencies, businesses, and not-for-profit organizations. He served as the director of the Washington State Department of Commerce from 1981 to 1985 under former Governor John Spellman (R). Schrock was elected to the board of commissioners of the Snohomish Co. Fire District 1 and is serving his second term.

Schlock lives in the Lake Stickney area of Washington state.[2][3]

Education

  • B.A., political science, St. Martins College

Elections

2016

Main article: Washington Insurance Commissioner election, 2016

Schrock filed to run as a Republican candidate in the 2016 election for Washington commissioner of insurance. He was the only Republican to do so.[1]

General election

Incumbent Mike Kreidler defeated Richard Schrock in the Washington insurance commissioner election.

Washington Insurance Commissioner, 2016
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Democratic Green check mark transparent.png Mike Kreidler Incumbent 58.34% 1,763,134
     Republican Richard Schrock 41.66% 1,258,827
Total Votes 3,021,961
Source: Washington Secretary of State

Primary election

Incumbent Mike Kreidler and Richard Schrock defeated Justin Murta in the Washington primary for insurance commissioner.

Washington primary for insurance commissioner, 2016
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Democratic Green check mark transparent.png Mike Kreidler Incumbent 58.41% 772,569
     Republican Green check mark transparent.png Richard Schrock 34.09% 450,830
     Libertarian Justin Murta 7.50% 99,181
Total Votes 1,322,580
Source: Washington Secretary of State

Campaign finance

Campaign themes

2016

Schrock submitted the following campaign statement to the secretary of state:[3]

Paying too much for insurance? Do you want four more years of the same 16-year policy direction that governs the state agency that regulates insurance companies?

Washington’s health insurance rates are proposed to rise another 19% next year. Richard Schrock, as Washington’s next Insurance Commissioner, will fight unjustified premium increases, hold down deductibles and limit co-pays.

In 2013, highly respected Seattle Children’s Hospital waged a successful legal battle with the Insurance Commissioner’s Office and three major insurers. Children’s, the region’s premier pediatric hospital, took legal action to get their insured child patients covered by Commissioner-approved insurance plans that had excluded Children’s from service provider networks. In 2014, newspapers reported that a whistleblower compliant revealed scandalous conduct within the Office of the Insurance Commissioner involving “major systemic problems”. Our state’s largest newspaper subsequently called for “major reforms” that have not happened.

Obviously, policy changes are long overdue to broaden access to affordable coverage. If elected Commissioner, Richard Schrock will institute reforms that prevent powerful special interests from influencing agency decisions, vigorously enforce consumer protection laws, and mandate expanding healthcare service- provider networks. Future appeals of Commissioner decisions must be fairly and transparently decided by independent, impartial judges.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes