Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Sarah Beth Landau

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Sarah Beth Landau
Image of Sarah Beth Landau
Prior offices
Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6
Successor: Andrew Johnson

Elections and appointments
Last election

November 5, 2024

Education

High school

Pioneer High School

Bachelor's

University of Minnesota, 1994

Law

Columbia University, 1998

Personal
Profession
Judge
Contact

Sarah Beth Landau (Democratic Party) (also known as Sorcha) was a judge for Place 6 of the Texas First District Court of Appeals. She assumed office in 2019. She left office on December 31, 2024.

Landau (Democratic Party) ran for re-election for the Place 6 judge of the Texas First District Court of Appeals. She lost in the general election on November 5, 2024.

Landau completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Sarah Beth Landau earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities in 1994. She earned a law degree from Columbia University in 1998. Her career experience includes working as a judge.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: Texas intermediate appellate court elections, 2024

General election

General election for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6

Andrew Johnson defeated incumbent Sarah Beth Landau in the general election for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Andrew Johnson
Andrew Johnson (R) Candidate Connection
 
52.8
 
1,182,592
Image of Sarah Beth Landau
Sarah Beth Landau (D) Candidate Connection
 
47.2
 
1,055,265

Total votes: 2,237,857
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6

Incumbent Sarah Beth Landau advanced from the Democratic primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Sarah Beth Landau
Sarah Beth Landau Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
192,530

Total votes: 192,530
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6

Andrew Johnson advanced from the Republican primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Andrew Johnson
Andrew Johnson Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
270,360

Total votes: 270,360
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign finance

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Landau in this election.

2018

See also: Texas intermediate appellate court elections, 2018

General election

General election for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6

Sarah Beth Landau defeated incumbent Harvey Brown in the general election for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6 on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Sarah Beth Landau
Sarah Beth Landau (D)
 
51.8
 
895,562
Image of Harvey Brown
Harvey Brown (R)
 
48.2
 
834,062

Total votes: 1,729,624
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6

Sarah Beth Landau advanced from the Democratic primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6 on March 6, 2018.

Candidate
Image of Sarah Beth Landau
Sarah Beth Landau

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6

Incumbent Harvey Brown advanced from the Republican primary for Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6 on March 6, 2018.

Candidate
Image of Harvey Brown
Harvey Brown

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.


Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Sarah Beth Landau completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Landau's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am the first public defender elected to the court. I have civil, criminal, public, private, trial, appellate, state and federal experience. I've represented Fortune 500 corporations and people who did not have running water. I began my legal career in Texas clerking for a federal judge. On the bench, I have kept up with my case deadlines, written almost all of the en banc opinions, overhauled the law student intern program, opened the court to weddings, and been a frequent speaker on topics ranging from professionalism in the law to the Fourth Amendment to how civil judgments work. I have been honored to have trained civil and criminal trial judges at their continuing education courses. This job is not a job to me, it's a calling. I'm proud to serve my 10-county district every day and I would like the chance to keep doing it.
  • Independence matters. I am the only judicial candidate not to accept special interest money. Like many voters, I am concerned with dark money in our elections and the effect it has on judicial independence. I do not want anyone in my court to think they will not be treated fairly because I am beholden to any other political branch or to any other actors outside the judiciary who influence my decisions with their outsized financial support.
  • Experience matters. I am the only judge with deep experience in civil AND criminal matters on my court, which handles both. (Our court does not set bail or sentence criminal defendants though.)
  • Public service matters. Although deciding cases correctly and timely is the most important part of our job, the court is part of the community and I have proven that I am dedicated to that aspect of the job too. Our intern program that I developed is the best court intern program imaginable and helps first-generation law students excel in practice. I opened the court to public weddings for all and we have more demand than we can accommodate! I am also active on social media, including TikTok, to reach younger members of our community.
Access to the courts. We have so many people who cannot afford lawyers who are forced to represent themselves in cases that affect their lives.

Informed voters. It is hard to find information about judicial races, even as an educated voter. I would like to have a centralized evaluation system where voters can find out if the candidate is qualified, highly qualified, or unqualified. The judicial polls exclude many areas of practicing lawyers and are basically popularity contests.

The next generation. I believe we have a responsibility to law students and young lawyers to mentor and to help shape the practice of law.
I am moved by my son. He approaches every day with joy and tackles everything with enthusiasm. I would like to be more like him.
The New Jim Crow is one I recommend to my interns. There is so much inherent unfairness baked into the system it helps to understand the origins of it and to fight against it so we do not perpetuate unfairness and everyone has their day in court and to minimize the extent to which the courts are another instrumentality of unfairness to those without resources.
For the judiciary: intelligence, collegiality (we work in teams), and hard work.
I am very calm and rational. Getting hollered at by judges as a public defender for 12 years will do that to you. It gives you perspective and makes you hard to rile.

I'm a solid writer and editor. I've handled over 400 appeals and dozens of oral arguments in federal court. I have not seen it all but I've seen a lot in my 20+ years of experience.
To decide cases in a way that is transparent and correct in a reasonable time.
I would like to leave a legacy of approachability and curiosity. I want students to see me and think that the judiciary could be a career for them. And, if they do take the bench, that they give back because they remember that that's what judges are supposed to do.
I was in early elementary school when President Reagan was shot. I remember being confused about what Jodie Foster had to do with it.
I was a cashier at Frank's Nursery and Crafts when I was in high school. I was probably there for about 6 months. I learned I definitely needed a cash register to make accurate change.
I don't really have one but I really liked Infinite Jest. My first instinct when I finished it was to read it again.
Barbie always seemed to have the best life but it would get old walking around on your tiptoes.
I had to pivot pretty quickly to go to college on time because my parents' divorce made it impossible for me to attend the schools I got into when I could not afford the deposit to secure my space. I wound up calling colleges and seeing who would give me a free ride with my grades and scores. I still can't believe someone did.
This office is a member of the community, not just a room in a building, tucked away from the public.
In a nutshell, get it right, keep it tight is how I write opinions. In terms of the contents, I try to get it right without doing harm to the litigants or the law, if I can. Sometimes the law is ridiculous so all you can do is apply it and maybe in a concurrence point that out so that someone with the power to fix it (a higher court, the legislature) can fix it.
I admire how Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought for gender equality before she took the bench and remained principled on that subject her whole career.
Yes. Without empathy, there are cases that could be decided absurdly. Like requiring criminal defendants to personally present their request for new counsel to the judge. There is physically no way for them to do that. Understanding circumstances helps foster correct decisions and avoid needless cruelty.
There is no rating from the Bar Association itself but I did get good marks in the judicial evaluation survey. I got an overall rating of 53.8% Excellent responses and for Works hard and is prepared, I received 55.9% Excellent.
I was born to do this job. I am so grateful to be able to serve the public and make a difference for my community.
Yes. People who have a history of public service are more likely to know what to do when they have more power and less likely to abuse it and to be doing it for the wrong reasons.
Judicial independence from interference from other political branches and from outsiders who want to remove obstacles to their control of the state by electing a friendly, beholden judiciary.
Making the court system accessible to ordinary people and specifically affording representation and conflict resolution to people in high-stakes family law cases.
No, for me it understates it because criminal defense lawyers are rarely Houston Bar Association members and prosecutors have a 100% participation rate for the survey and their boss dislikes the local judiciary.
They say lawyers never die, they just lose their appeal. (Ok, that is really bad. Honestly, I don't really tell jokes.)
I have received all the non-partisan endorsements. The Houston Chronicle, the AFL-CIO, the Caucus, the Mexican American Bar Association of Houston, the Association of Women Attorneys, the Houston Lawyers Association.
I am a big believer in financial transparency and accountability. The United States Supreme Court needs some better rules, for example, to avoid special interests and biases and the appearance that members of the court have been bought and paid for by litigants.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Sarah Beth Landau campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6Lost general$48,814 $61,067
Grand total$48,814 $61,067
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on October 29, 2024

Political offices
Preceded by
-
Texas First District Court of Appeals Place 6
2019-2024
Succeeded by
Andrew Johnson (R)