Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Scott Rasmussen's Number of the Day for April 25, 2017

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
NOTD 4-25-17.png

By Scott Rasmussen

The Number of the Day columns published on Ballotpedia reflect the views of the author.

April 25, 2017: Ten U.S. counties voted for the losing presidential candidate in each of the last three presidential elections. They voted for John McCain in 2008, Mitt Romney in 2012, and Hillary Clinton in 2016. Four are tiny counties in Alaska, three are in Georgia, and the others are found in California, Maryland, and Texas.

The voting pattern in these counties is the exact opposite of the 206 Pivot Counties that voted for the winning candidate in each of the last three elections (President Obama twice, then President Trump). The first Number of the Day column looked at those Pivot Counties.

The most distinguishing characteristic of these counties is that they have been reliably Republican for half a century. With just two exceptions, these 10 counties voted for every Republican candidate since 1980. (One small Alaska county voted for Michael Dukakis in 1988, and one Georgia county voted for the favorite son candidate Jimmy Carter in 1980.)

It’s also worth noting that none of these 10 counties were from contested states in the 2016 election. The Trump campaign, focused on the Midwestern states, largely ignored these areas in terms of campaign advertising down the stretch. They were confident of victory in Texas, Alaska, and Georgia and recognized that they had no chance in California or Maryland. On the other hand, Clinton’s team ran advertising in both California and Texas.

However, the larger story is that while reliably Republican for a long time, these 10 counties have been trending towards the Democratic Party over the past generation. From 1964 to 1988, the victory margins in these counties averaged 26.1 percentage points more Republican than the nation at large. The gap would have been even larger except for the Georgia counties support for Carter in the 1976 and 1980 elections.

From 1992 to 2004, these counties were still very Republican, but they averaged just 20.3 percentage points more Republican than the nation at large. That fell to 12 percentage points in 2008, 11 percentage points in 2012, and finally to 4 percentage points less Republican than the nation at large in 2016.

Presidential election results for the 10 counties that voted for the losing presidential candidate in last three presidential elections
Ten counties20162012200820042000199619921988198419801976197219681964
Rep44%52%52%60%57%53%46%68%74%63%58%70%58%53%
Dem50%46%47%39%39%38%32%31%26%28%40%26%29%47%
Margin6%-7%-5%-22%-18%-15%-14%-37%-48%-36%-18%-44%-28%-7%
National Margin2%4%7%-3%1%9%6%-8%-18%-10%2%-23%-1%23%
Sources: Ballotpedia, Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential elections

The largest of these 10 counties—Orange County, California—had voted for a Republican in every presidential election since 1936 before Hillary Clinton won the county in 2016.

One of these formerly Republican counties that voted for Clinton—Cobb County, Georgia—has been in the news due to a special election in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District. While many have viewed the election as an early referendum on Donald Trump, it might be hard to draw too many conclusions from a county that bucked the national trend in Election 2016.

The other eight counties that voted for a losing presidential candidate in each of the last three elections are:



  • To see other recent numbers, check out the archive.

Scott Rasmussen’s Number of the Day is published by Ballotpedia weekdays at 8:00 a.m. Eastern. Click here to check out the latest update.

The Number of the Day is broadcast on local stations across the country. An archive of these broadcasts can be found here.

Columns published on Ballotpedia reflect the views of the author.

Ballotpedia is the nonprofit, nonpartisan Encyclopedia of American Politics.

Get the Number of the Day in your inbox


See also


Footnotes