Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
The Federal Judicial Vacancy Count 6/1/2023
June 1, 2023
Welcome to the Federal Vacancy Count for June 1, 2023! The Federal Vacancy Count tracks vacancies, nominations, and confirmations to all United States Article III federal courts.
This month's edition covers activity from May 2, 2023, through June 1, 2023, and compares Article III judicial appointments over time by president and by court type.[1]
What's a vacancy?
A vacancy occurs when a judge resigns, retires, takes senior status, or dies. Article III judges refer to judges who serve on courts authorized by Article III of the Constitution, which created and enumerated the powers of the judiciary. Article III judges are appointed for life terms. Unless a judge is impeached and removed from office—something that has occurred eight times in the history of the federal judiciary—it is the judge's decision how long they remain on the court. When judges decide to leave active duty, they may either retire completely from the court or take senior status.
To take senior status, judges must meet certain age and service requirements. Senior status is a classification for federal judges at all levels who are semi-retired. Senior judges continue to serve on federal courts while hearing a reduced number of cases. Both a decision to retire and a decision to take senior status trigger a vacancy.
The Constitution prescribes the process of filling a vacancy. The president nominates a candidate, who then must be confirmed by the United States Senate. There are multiple steps to the process:
- The president nominates an individual for a judicial seat.
- The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing with the nominee.
- After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee votes to approve or return the nominee.
- If approved, the Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
For more information on this process, click here.
Vacancy count for June 1, 2023
The vacancy level was in May 2023. The total vacancy percentage was 8.4 percent, and there were 73 vacancies out of 870 Article III judicial positions.
A breakdown of the vacancies at each level can be found in the table below. For a more detailed look at the vacancies on the federal courts, click here.
Key: | |
(Numbers indicate % of seats vacant.) | |
0% | 1%-9% |
10%-24% | 25%-40% |
More than 40% |
Though the United States territorial courts are named as district courts, they are not Article III courts. They are created in accordance with the power granted under Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. Click here for more information.
New vacancies
Five judges left active status since the previous vacancy count. As Article III judicial positions, vacancies must be filled by a nomination from the president. Nominations are subject to confirmation on the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
- Judge Barbara Lynn assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
- Judge William Orrick III assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
- Judge Robert Conrad assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina..
- Judge David Guaderrama assumed senior status on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.
- Judge Paul Watford resigned from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
U.S. Court of Appeals vacancies
Chart
The following chart tracks the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals from the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) to June 1, 2023.
Maps
The following maps show the number of vacancies on the United States Court of Appeals at the inauguration of President Joe Biden (D) and as of June 1, 2023.
U.S. District Court vacancies
The following map shows the number of vacancies in the United States District Courts as of June 1, 2023.
New nominations
President Joe Biden (D) announced four new nominations since the previous report. On May 3, 2023, the president announced his intent to nominate the following individuals:
- Susan DeClercq to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
- Loren AliKhan to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- Julia Munley to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
- Vernon D. Oliver to the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
Since taking office in January 2021, Biden has nominated 164 individuals to Article III positions.
New confirmations
There have been 10 new confirmations since the previous report:
- Darrel Papillion to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
- Nancy Gbana Abudu to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jeremy Daniel to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- Bradley Garcia to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- LaShonda A. Hunt to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- Amanda Brailsford to the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho
- Orelia Merchant to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- Wesley Hsu to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- Michael Farbiarz to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
- Robert Kirsch to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
As of June 1, 2023, the Senate has confirmed 130 of President Biden's Article III judicial nominees—95 district court judges, 34 appeals court judges, and one Supreme Court justice—since his inauguration on January 20, 2021. To review a complete list of Biden's confirmed nominees, click here.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president
- Presidents have made an average of 111.1 judicial appointments through June 1 of their third year in office.
- President Bill Clinton (D) made the most appointments through June 1 of his third year with 145. President George H.W. Bush (R) made the fewest with 83.
- President Donald Trump (R) made the most appointments through four years with 234. President Ronald Reagan (R) made the fewest through four years with 166.
- President Ronald Reagan (R) made the most appointments through one year in office with 41. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 13.
- President Bill Clinton (D) made the most appointments through two years with 128. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 62.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president and court type
The chart below shows the number of Article III judges confirmed by the U.S. Senate under each of the last seven presidents as of June 1 of their third year in office. The confirmations are broken up by court type.
- The median number of Supreme Court appointees is one. Three presidents (Reagan, H.W. Bush, and Biden) made one appointment. Three presidents, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, made two. President George W. Bush did not appoint any SCOTUS justices by this point in his presidency.
- The median number of United States Court of Appeals appointees is 23. President Trump had the most appointees with 41. President Obama appointed the fewest with 19.
- The median number of United States District Court appointees is 73. President Clinton had the most appointees with 121. President H.W. Bush appointed the fewest with 58.
See also
- United States federal courts
- Current federal judicial vacancies
- Judicial vacancies during the Biden administration
- The Biden administration on federal courts
Footnotes
|