Tustin Unified School District bond proposition, Measure L (November 2008)
From Ballotpedia
| Bond elections |
|---|
| 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
| Property tax elections |
| 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
| See also |
| State comparisons How voting works Approval rates |
A Tustin Unified School Facilities Improvement District bond proposition, Measure L ballot question was on the November 4, 2008 ballot for voters in the Tustin Unified School Facilities Improvement District in Orange County, California, where it was approved.
Measure L authorized the school district to borrow $95 million.
A 55 percent supermajority vote was required for approval.
Election results
| Measure L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
 Yes | 18,304 | 58.5% | ||
| No | 12,962 | 41.5% | ||
- These final, certified, results are from the Orange County elections office.
Ballot question
The question on the ballot:
| MEASURE L: "To improve student learning, provide safe and modern schools, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Tustin Unified School District repair/replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, lighting and electrical systems, modernize science labs, upgrade educational technology in classrooms and libraries, improve school safety-security, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, and upgrade inadequate classrooms/school facilities, by issuing $95,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Tustin neighborhood schools?"[1] |
See also
- California 2008 local ballot measures
- School bond elections in California
- California school bond elections, November 2008, ranked by amount requested
External links
- Election results (dead link)
- Higher taxes coming soon to Westminster, Los Alamitos, Anaheim, Tustin and Cypress
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
