Unfunded mandates

Federalism


•Key terms • Court cases •Major arguments • State responses to federal mandates • Federalism by the numbers • Index of articles about federalism

State responses to federal mandates

Unfunded mandates are laws or regulations imposed by the federal or state government on lower levels of government without providing funding for implementation. They can include regulatory mandates, service requirements, or reporting obligations.

These mandates raise federalism concerns by shifting costs and administrative burdens without shifting authority. They test the balance between the Supremacy Clause, which gives federal law priority, and the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers to the states.

The issue gained prominence in the 1990s, leading to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. The Act sought to limit federal mandates lacking cost estimates or state input, but debates over intergovernmental responsibilities continue.

Examples of unfunded mandates

Commonly cited examples include:

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which required states to implement standardized student testing and accountability systems as a condition for receiving certain federal education funds.
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002, which mandated updates to voting systems and election procedures. While some funding was provided, states and localities reported costs exceeding the available support.
The REAL ID Act of 2005, which imposed federal security standards for state-issued driver’s licenses. Implementation costs led many states to describe the law as an unfunded mandate.

Some states and local governments also point to broader programs—such as Medicaid or the Clean Air Act—as examples of underfunded federal requirements, though these programs are not classified as unfunded mandates under federal law.

Legislation related to unfunded mandates