Fostoria School District Levy Renewal (May 2011): Difference between revisions
m (Updated dead link with link to Internet Archive's Wayback Machine.) |
m (Inventory category installation for: Certified_past_date_local_ballot_measures) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
This measure sought to renew a levy in the district which is set to expire. The levy is set at a rate of 7.5 mills and would be renewed for a further five years. The money generated from this levy goes towards general school operational costs.<ref>[http://www.wfin.com/localnews201.asp?id=6231&storyno=6 ''WFIN'', "Two Area Schools Will Have Levies On May Ballot," January 12, 2011] ''([[dead link]])''</ref> | This measure sought to renew a levy in the district which is set to expire. The levy is set at a rate of 7.5 mills and would be renewed for a further five years. The money generated from this levy goes towards general school operational costs.<ref>[http://www.wfin.com/localnews201.asp?id=6231&storyno=6 ''WFIN'', "Two Area Schools Will Have Levies On May Ballot," January 12, 2011] ''([[dead link]])''</ref> | ||
== | ==Footnotes== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[[Category:Local property tax, Ohio, 2011]] | [[Category:Local property tax, Ohio, 2011]] | ||
[[Category:Local school tax, Ohio, 2011]] | [[Category:Local school tax, Ohio, 2011]] | ||
[[Category:Certified_past_date_local_ballot_measures]] | |||
Latest revision as of 04:41, 11 August 2021
A Fostoria School District Levy Renewal measure was on the May 3, 2011 ballot in the Fostoria school district area which is in Hancock, Wood and Seneca Counties.
This measure was approved
Hancock
- YES 257 (55.63%)

- NO 205 (44.37%)[1]
Wood
- YES 233 (68.93%)

- NO 105 (31.07%)[2]
Seneca
- YES 665 (56.89%)

- NO 504 (43.11%)[3]
This measure sought to renew a levy in the district which is set to expire. The levy is set at a rate of 7.5 mills and would be renewed for a further five years. The money generated from this levy goes towards general school operational costs.[4]
Footnotes
| ||||||||||