Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Arizona Racino Amendment (2010): Difference between revisions

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Replaced ==References== with ==Footnotes==.)
m (add categories for inventory (via BP-MassEdit WEB))
Tag: bp-massedit
 
Line 21: Line 21:
{{2010 ballot measures}}
{{2010 ballot measures}}
{{Arizona}}
{{Arizona}}
[[Category:Did not make ballot, gambling]]
[[Category:Did not make ballot, gambling]][[Category:Not on the ballot past date statewide ballot measures]]

Latest revision as of 20:24, 3 February 2026

Not on Ballot
Proposed ballot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure was not put
on an election ballot

An Arizona Racino Amendment did not appear on the November 2010 ballot in the state of Arizona as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment. It was being pushed by Andy Tobin, a Republican member of the Arizona House of Representatives. The amendment would have asked voters to allow "racetrack casinos" or "racinos" in the state as a way of making up for tax revenues that were fast declining in the state's economic recession.[1]

Tobin stated that allowing racinos in Arizona might have been a way to mend the state's $3 billion budget deficit without having to raise taxes. Arizona voters rejected racinos in 2002.

Path to the ballot

A majority vote was required in the Arizona State Legislature to refer a legislatively referred constitutional amendment measure to the ballot. Arizona is one of ten states that allows a referred amendment to go on the ballot after a majority vote in one session of the state's legislature.

See also

External links

Footnotes