Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Court blocks Missouri anti-ESG rules (2024): Difference between revisions

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{ESG banner menu}}{{ESG vnt}} ::See also: ''Opposition to environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) investing'', ''Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG)'' '''August 20, 2024'''<BR> A federal court last week [https://www.barrons.com/advisor/articles/federal-court-blocks-missouri-esg-rules-3058f368 threw out] two 2023 Missouri rules that limited ESG in investment plans. The court argued the rules conflicted wit...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 24: Line 24:


[[Category:August 2024 ESG]]
[[Category:August 2024 ESG]]
[[Category:News]]

Latest revision as of 16:43, 1 March 2026

ESG - Teal - D2.jpg
Environmental, social, and corporate governance
ESG Icon 200x200.png

What is ESG?
Enacted ESG legislation
Arguments for and against ESG
Opposition to ESG
Federal ESG rules
ESG legislation tracker
Economy and Society: Ballotpedia's weekly ESG newsletter
See also: Opposition to environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) investing, Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG)

August 20, 2024

A federal court last week threw out two 2023 Missouri rules that limited ESG in investment plans. The court argued the rules conflicted with federal law:

Investment advisors and brokers have scored an important victory against encroaching regulatory oversight—and additional paperwork—as a federal court struck down a pair of rules Missouri authorities enacted regarding the use of 'nonfinancial factors' in investment decisions, such as environmental, social, and governance (ESG).

The rules, which were adopted June 1, 2023 and took effect July 30 that year, had required wealth managers to have clients sign disclosures acknowledging that they were considering ESG or other nonfinancial issues when advising them on investments.

Sifma, a Wall Street trade group, sued, arguing that state regulators in Missouri lacked the authority to write rules governing the conduct of financial professionals that are already subject to federal regulation.[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.