Fostoria School District Levy Renewal (May 2011): Difference between revisions

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Annotated dead link.)
m (Updated dead link with link to Internet Archive's Wayback Machine.)
Line 12: Line 12:
Seneca
Seneca
* '''YES''' 665 (56.89%){{approved}}
* '''YES''' 665 (56.89%){{approved}}
* '''NO''' 504 (43.11%)<ref>[http://www.voterfind.com/public/ohseneca/results.htm ''Seneca County Board of Elections'', Current Election Results]</ref>
* '''NO''' 504 (43.11%)<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/2/http://www.voterfind.com/public/ohseneca/results.htm ''Seneca County Board of Elections'', Current Election Results]</ref>


This measure sought to renew a levy in the district which is set to expire.  The levy is set at a rate of 7.5 mills and would be renewed for a further five years. The money generated from this levy goes towards general school operational costs.<ref>[http://www.wfin.com/localnews201.asp?id=6231&storyno=6 ''WFIN'', "Two Area Schools Will Have Levies On May Ballot," January 12, 2011] ''([[dead link]])''</ref>
This measure sought to renew a levy in the district which is set to expire.  The levy is set at a rate of 7.5 mills and would be renewed for a further five years. The money generated from this levy goes towards general school operational costs.<ref>[http://www.wfin.com/localnews201.asp?id=6231&storyno=6 ''WFIN'', "Two Area Schools Will Have Levies On May Ballot," January 12, 2011] ''([[dead link]])''</ref>

Revision as of 10:27, 2 January 2015

A Fostoria School District Levy Renewal measure was on the May 3, 2011 ballot in the Fostoria school district area which is in Hancock, Wood and Seneca Counties.

This measure was approved
Hancock

  • YES 257 (55.63%)Approveda
  • NO 205 (44.37%)[1]

Wood

  • YES 233 (68.93%)Approveda
  • NO 105 (31.07%)[2]

Seneca

  • YES 665 (56.89%)Approveda
  • NO 504 (43.11%)[3]

This measure sought to renew a levy in the district which is set to expire. The levy is set at a rate of 7.5 mills and would be renewed for a further five years. The money generated from this levy goes towards general school operational costs.[4]

References