Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

James Burgess recall, Randolph, Massachusetts (2018)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 02:54, 5 November 2024 by Sara Reynolds (contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Randolph City Council recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
James Burgess
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2018
Recalls in Massachusetts
Massachusetts recall laws
City council recalls
Recall reports

An effort in Randolph, Massachusetts, to recall City Councilor James Burgess was initiated in May 2018. Petitioners were required to submit about 5,000 signatures by August 1 in order to move the recall election forward.[1]


As of October 16, 2018, there was no indication that petitioners were successful in putting the recall on the ballot.

Recall supporters

Petitioners initiated the recall effort after Burgess was arrested in February 2018 on charges of possession of methamphetamine and conspiracy to distribute.[1]

Recall opponents

Burgess offered the following response to the recall effort:

First, let me say that I understand there are honest, well-intentioned people in Randolph who have questions and are disappointed in me – I understand that. All I have asked is that you examine all the evidence that will be presented in the court before you pass judgment on me. I have pled innocent to the charges and there is no basis for me to refrain from doing my council business, which I was elected to do.[1][2]

—James Burgess (2018)

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in Massachusetts

Petitioners were required to submit nearly 5,000 signatures by August 1. The 5,000 signatures amounted to 20 percent of all registered voters in Randolph.[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Wicked Local, "Effort begins to recall Randolph town councilor," May 5, 2018
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.