News and analysis right to your inbox. Click to get Ballotpedia’s newsletters!

Michigan State Senate District 37 candidate surveys, 2022

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 18:00, 29 September 2022 by Matt Latourelle (contribs) (survey breakoff 2022)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


This article shows responses from candidates in the 2022 election for Michigan State Senate District 37 who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey.

Candidates and election results

General election

General election for Michigan State Senate District 37

John Damoose defeated Barbara Conley and Zachary Dean in the general election for Michigan State Senate District 37 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of John Damoose
John Damoose (R)
 
55.5
 
79,125
Image of Barbara Conley
Barbara Conley (D) Candidate Connection
 
42.8
 
61,069
Zachary Dean (L)
 
1.7
 
2,468

Total votes: 142,662
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses

Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Survey responses from candidates in this race

Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Expand all | Collapse all

Good paying year round jobs: We must attract new business and support current businesses that provide year round, good-paying jobs. This required investment in broadband for all areas, and good education to prepare workers for those jobs

Affordable housing: In our beautiful area many existing homes have been acquired by well off retirees or those investing in rental to tourists and homes and rentals are now priced out of reach for our workers. This impacts our ability to attract workers, including teachers, emergency medical personnel and others. We need to invest as a state in helping build affordable homes and keep them affordable for future generations

Accessible healthcare: too many of our residents cannot even afford health insurance on the marketplace; and, even if they did, we have too few primary care and even specialist providers. This is most acutely felt in the mental health care field currently. We must recruit and retain health care providers in this area if we are to envision a secure future and good quality of life
Empowering people to attain their best selves: programs that assist with education costs, health costs and housing costs

Promoting creative business: policies that help businesses get started and thrive Promoting technology to solve current problems: such as clean energy, transportation, disruptive advances in healthcare

My late mother. She was a nurse, and a get-it-done kind of person, who also managed to be kind and caring while raising 5 children
Honesty and integrity

Actual care for people's issues Ability to listen Ability to work with others Ability to make a point clearly, without being disagreeable Willing to learn , know where to get help Being on time Ability to work hard

I believe I have the determination to understand and find ways to make life better for the residents of northern Michigan. I do work well with others, and seek to understand the reasons behind problems. I enjoy problem-solving. I enjoy having discussions with people about their issues.
Listen to constituents; elicit constituents opinions

Represent those opinions by proposing legislation and opposing legislation

Be honest and transparent
I would like to leave a legacy of working with others to empower Michiganders to be their best, to encourage Michiganders to think of societal progress, and to promote Michigan as a great place to live and to start and grow a business.
My first job was babysitting. This happened on and off during high school and college to earn money for extra expenses
My life has been very blessed in general. However, I did struggle early in my career to prove myself as a person, a woman, who can excel in medicine and science, and raise a child. I do understand this dilemma well. I am pleased to see a little progress being made here, but am keenly aware that parents, both fathers and mothers, feel the need to be best both at their jobs and at raising the next generation. I feel that society benefits when children get what they need to succeed, but that parents are not the only ones who need to be concerned about that.
I believe the ideal relationship is one of respect, but also checks and balances. The job of legislator and governor are different, and both are important.
I think we have several challenges. The greatest is to invest in our people so that the entire state can thrive. We will also need to fix and develop quite a bit of infrastructure to support the economy of the future. For example, roads and bridges and locks do need to be maintained, But we also need infrastructure for electric economy, high speed internet universally; we need clean water and to be sure wastewater and septic tanks do not contaminate the environment.
Benefits: This body can work on legislation and the work is done is the most obvious. It is probably more efficient and less expensive. There may not be as much rivalry between legislators Drawbacks: there may not be enough legislators for good representation. There is a risk of all thinking alike, less debate on bills.
I think it may be beneficial. However, there is room for those without previous political or legislative experience; such legislators may bring personal experience lacking in those who focus only on government and politics .
I definitely believe it is beneficial to build relationships with other legislators. Getting to know other legislators will inform as to how their opinions may be formed and what they think is important as life guides. Relationships will assist those with differing views to work together better in crafting new legislation, without allowing differences to become something that leads to acrimony.
I favor an independent body for redistricting, that includes some partisan members but a majority of non-partisan members if possible
The committees on Education and Career Readiness, Economic and Small Business Development, and Health Policy and Human Services as well as Appropriations are committees I hope to be a member of.
Several national legislators are models of working together "across the aisle" to get meaningful legislation passed. I would hope to be one of those
Recently I saw a patient with a newly diagnosed lung cancer who was being evicted. She had lost her job due to the pandemic; the job was barely enough for her to survive. She had no reliable transportation and no family who could help her. Several stories of people with medical diagnoses have had to start GO FUND ME campaigns to address their care. Many young people here tell me they cannot make a living that would allow them to afford their own rental.
I do think there are times when emergency powers are needed - which is why they are called emergency powers - the need is fast action before there is time for deliberation. Those types. of powers need to be discussed in the legislature before there is a need for them and to be sure that emergency powers are necessary.
Compromise is definitely necessary and desirable for policymaking. However, it does not have to be winner and loser type of compromise. The pie can be made bigger. One must assume good intentions and understand the viewpoint of those who don't agree with you to understand how both parties can be satisfied with a single solution



See also

More about these elections:

Select a district below to read responses from candidates in those races: