Multnomah County, Oregon, Measure 26-232, Ranked-Choice Voting for County Elections Amendment (November 2022)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 14:53, 24 October 2023 by Victoria Antram (contribs) (→‎Background)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Multnomah County Measure 26-232

Flag of Oregon.png

Election date

November 8, 2022

Topic
Local charter amendments and Local electoral systems
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Referral

Multnomah County Measure 26-232 was on the ballot as a referral in Multnomah County on November 8, 2022. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the county charter to implement ranked-choice voting for county offices.

A "no" vote opposed amending the county charter to implement ranked-choice voting for county offices.


A simple majority was required for the approval of Measure 26-232.

Election results

Multnomah County Measure 26-232

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

235,774 69.09%
No 105,505 30.91%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

Measure 26-232 enacted ranked-choice voting (RCV) for countywide offices, including chair, commissioners, audit, and sheriff.

Prior to Measure 26-232, candidates for county offices appeared on the ballot during the May primary election and electors voted for one candidate per office. Under that system, a candidate that received a simple majority (50% + 1) of the votes was elected. If no candidate received a majority, the top two candidates competed in a runoff election at the November general election.


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Measure 26-232 was as follows:

Should elections for county offices give voters option of ranking candidates in preferred order, with instant-runoff vote-counting process determining results?

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

Currently, candidates for county offices appear on the May primary election ballot. Voters may vote for one candidate per office; any candidate receiving a majority (more than fifty percent) of votes is elected. If no candidate receives a majority, the top two candidates compete in a runoff election in the November general election. Vacancies during a term of office are filled at the next regular election or a special election.

Under the Charter Review Committee's recommended amendment, county officials (Chair, Commissioners, Auditor, Sheriff) would be elected in one election using an 'instant runoff ranked choice voting' process. This process gives voters the option of ranking multiple candidates in order of preference instead of casting a single vote for each office. Votes are counted in rounds, starting with all voters' highest ranked candidate. If no candidate receives a majority in the first round, the candidate receiving the fewest votes is eliminated, and that candidate's votes are reassigned to those voter's next-highest ranked candidate. The process continues until there is a majority winner. Runoff elections are eliminated.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Support

Supporters

  • Coalition of Communities of Color[1]

Arguments

  • Coalition of Communities of Color said, "With RCV, Multnomah County voters get: More Voices. Young or old, renter or homeowner, Black, white, or brown, every voter in Multnomah County has the right to vote for leaders who represent our communities. RCV tends to attract more diverse candidates, giving voters more opportunity to cast a vote for someone who represents their community. More Choices. By ranking candidates, voters no longer have to worry about wasted votes or feeling pressure to choose between a candidate you like and a candidate that “can win.” RCV reduces barriers to new candidates and brings new voices by allowing people to run without being “spoilers.” This means voters have more meaningful choices and more reasons to vote. Better Representation. Every voter’s voice matters. RCV elects candidates that represent the whole county, and not just a few powerful neighborhoods. Positive, Issue-Driven Campaigns. Voters want to support candidates who align with their values. RCV reduces incentives for candidates to attack their opponents and instead focus on civil, issue-oriented platforms that more fully represent the views and experiences of their constituents."[2]
  • Richard Clucas, a politics professor at Portland State University, said, "No election system is a panacea, problems can occur in any type of system, but ranked choice voting is a much better system than what we have to both improve and provide representation. It does a much better job ensuring that all votes count."[3]

Opposition

Opponents

Arguments

  • Oregon Live wrote, "Proponents of ranked choice note that it offers voters greater representation. And the method is an interesting one that deserves more attention and public education. But our current system actually works well in terms of ensuring that the candidate with the broadest support wins. Voters can decide among multiple candidates in the May primary and if no one garners more than 50% of the vote, the top two vote-getters advance to the November runoff election. So if voters’ preferred candidate fails to advance, they can still mark their choice for one of the two other candidates. But we also like our current system because it gives the public more time to vet the top candidates and watch how candidates’ campaigns evolve between May and November. Ranked-choice may be a system worth adopting in the future, but voters deserve to hear a lot more about it first."[5]

Background

Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures
Pages:
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
History of RCV ballot measures
Electoral systems on the ballot
Local electoral systems on the ballot
Electoral systems by state
See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.

Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.

RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.

Local RCV ballot measures

See also: History of ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures

Between 1965 and October 2025, 80 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 59 jurisdictions in 19 states.

  • Ballotpedia has located 72 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 57 (79.2%) and rejected 15 (20.8%).
  • There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
  • The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
  • The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.


The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by policy direction.

Local ranked-choice vote measures by policy direction and outcome, 1965 - October 2025
DirectionTotalApprovedApproved (%)DefeatedDefeated (%)
Adopt RCV725779.2%1520.8%
Repeal RCV8450.0%450.0%
Total806176.3%1923.7%


Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Oregon

This measure was recommended by the Multnomah County Charter Review Committee and placed on the ballot by a vote of the Multnomah County Board. The Multnomah County Home Rule Charter provides for a Charter Review Committee to meet every six years to study the charter and submit charter amendments to county voters. The review committee first met on September 28, 2021 and finished meeting on July 20, 2022. Its final report was presented on August 2, 2022.[6]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Oregon

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Oregon.

How to vote in Oregon

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Coalition of Communities of Color, "Measure 26-231," accessed October 27, 2022
  2. Coalition of Communities of Color," YES on Measure 26-232 :: Ranked Choice Voting," accessed October 27, 2022
  3. Oregon Live, "Multnomah County ballot measure: How would ranked-choice voting work?" accessed October 28, 2022
  4. OregonLive, "Editorial endorsement November 2022: On Multnomah County ballot measures, a mix of recommendations," accessed October 27, 2022
  5. OregonLive, "Editorial endorsement November 2022: On Multnomah County ballot measures, a mix of recommendations," accessed October 27, 2022
  6. Multnomah County, "Charter Review Committee Final Report," August 2, 2022
  7. Oregon Secretary of State, “Voting in Oregon,” accessed March 18, 2026
  8. Deschutes County Oregon, “Voting in Oregon FAQ,” accessed March 18, 2026
  9. Oregon Laws, "Or. Rev. Stat. § 246.270," accessed March 18, 2026
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon Online Voter Registration," accessed March 18, 2026
  11. Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon Motor Voter Act FAQ," accessed March 18, 2026
  12. Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon Voter Registration Card," accessed March 18, 2026
  13. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  14. Congress, "H.R.3295 - Help America Vote Act of 2002," accessed September 30, 2025
  15. Oregon Secretary of State, "Oregon Voter Registration Card," accessed March 18, 2026
  16. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.