Nadine Deif

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 15:28, 12 August 2024 by Kirsten Corrao (contribs) (Add PersonCategories widget; remove some hard-coded categories)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Nadine Deif
Image of Nadine Deif
Elections and appointments
Last election

June 11, 2024

Education

Bachelor's

McGill University

Graduate

University of Quebec in Montreal

Personal
Profession
Business Management
Contact

Nadine Deif (Republican Party) ran for election to the South Carolina House of Representatives to represent District 112. She lost in the Republican primary on June 11, 2024.

Deif completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Nadine Deif earned a bachelor's degree from McGill University and a graduate degree from the University of Quebec in Montreal. Her career experience includes working in business management, finance, public education, and as a community college professor.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: South Carolina House of Representatives elections, 2024

General election

General election for South Carolina House of Representatives District 112

Incumbent Joe Bustos defeated Peter Brennan in the general election for South Carolina House of Representatives District 112 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Joe Bustos
Joe Bustos (R)
 
61.0
 
16,905
Image of Peter Brennan
Peter Brennan (D) Candidate Connection
 
38.9
 
10,765
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.1
 
23

Total votes: 27,693
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Peter Brennan advanced from the Democratic primary for South Carolina House of Representatives District 112.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for South Carolina House of Representatives District 112

Incumbent Joe Bustos defeated Nadine Deif in the Republican primary for South Carolina House of Representatives District 112 on June 11, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Joe Bustos
Joe Bustos
 
76.5
 
2,763
Image of Nadine Deif
Nadine Deif Candidate Connection
 
23.5
 
848

Total votes: 3,611
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign finance

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Deif in this election.

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Nadine Deif completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Deif's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I’m a conservative who doesn’t like the way my opponent voted on serval crucial bills. Medical freedom is of utmost importance given the threat of government overreach in our health. A bill H4927 passed in the House where all democrats voted for it and so did several republicans. It is to have a single person unelected as a health czar in SC. This is what happened in California during Covid and they had the most aggressive vaccine mandates and masking regulations that were legal because of the orders of the health czar. It is incomprehensible to me how any conservative would vote for this? This along with several other bills that my opponent voted for prompted me to run for house representative for district 112. I am also concerned about our government’s lack of transparency and accountability. I believe we need to take steps to protect our freedom from government interference in our lives and our rights. I am a strong believer in the constitution of the United States. The past 7 years, I was board chair and founding board member of a public charte high school for students that were failing or dropped out of traditional schools. The success of our mission was to help students achieve their goals in graduation and to assist them in seeking meaningful careers and employment. We were very successful but not without much turmoil with the authorizing district. Oceanside is dealing with similar issues at the moment. I have a BA Economics, MBA and currently working on a PhD.
  • Restricted government overreach- protect our rights and freedoms
  • Parental rights and school choice
  • Lower taxes and protections of our natural environment - development with infrastructure planning
Thomas Sowell - economist. The claim is often made that the only way to increase government revenue is to impose higher taxes on wealthy Americans. Sowell uses real-life data to demonstrate how lower taxes for people of all incomes leads to greater revenue for the government. This Trickle Down Theory should be understood by policymakers.
Integrity, honesty and grit. Being responsive to constituents concerns is the job of elected representatives. Ensuring that we fight for protections of privacy, personal freedom and stop any government overreach in our communities. Too often elected officials become complacent and fail to act on constituent matters and concerns. We live in times where we have to be careful and alert to bad bills being passed. It’s work to read lengthy bills and understand the consequences of those bills. Often times, they are not read properly or at all. I have a duty to do so if elected and vote wisely as a conservative a who will uphold the constitution.
First do no harm, then do everything to protect and improve the lives of our citizens. Prevent bad bills from passing and pass bills that will be aligned with the constitution and our freedoms. Lowering taxes is a priority. Eliminate frivolous taxes and spending. Bills to protect our waters, soil and ocean. Look at what other conservative states have passed as legislation. Prevent the little socialist bills from passing as that is how we end up with a socialist system over time. Socialist programs are bad bills.
Wendy’s- I was 15-16. Too long ago to remember how long
Censorship! We can’t have the government or private sector be able to decide what the truth is. It is the precursor to communism. We currently have poor planning for the unrelenting growth we are seeing, especially in districts 112 & chs. . If we don’t link building projects and permits with infrastructure planning, we will look like Atlanta in 10 years.
No-strong ethics and integrity is more important. The determination and ability to learn quickly and care is key. Would rather have less spineless politicians with experience than a caring strong politician with integrity, honesty and strong reasoning abilities- who is also well versed in policy matters and is educated and willing to work hard.
No and yes… Yes -to a very limited extent. To the extent there’s disagreements between parties but they can be respectful to each other and not bully them into submission. It’s important to keep a distance. You can not be impartial and dedicated to your beliefs if you’re opposing your colleagues and friends’ beliefs and opinions on legislations. It’s why I don’t mix friendships and business or money in my personal life.
The fear of losing Oceanside high school has made a lot of parents stressed for their children. I have a solution for that overreach by the district who voted to shut the school down. This is also a huge problem for the community. Another problem that has been completely ignored is the growing coyote population crisis. We can pass laws and follow Texas in the humane but highly effective actions they took. Crazy to keep repeating the same thing, trapping, when we know after a decade it’s done absolutely nothing and it’s never going to. No one cares enough to go to legislative body with a proposal/ bill to change the current law on coyote management. These are both the latest developments that need immediate action.
No - they essentially just did by voting for house bill H4927. Where only one unelected person can dictate everything regarding health- this was supposed to keep DHEC in check, but DHEC can’t force people to do anything. This ONE person can now because republicans like my opponent voted for it.
Dismantle H4927- the health czar bill. I would Sponsor bills to stop censorship of content, information, and news by government or social media- no exceptions. The hate bill my opponent voted for is also dangerous. A crime is a crime. Who’s going to define’hate’ and who’s in charge of changing its definition over the next decade? I’m in favor of bills that would ban chemical trails in SC. And remove illegal aliens with criminal records.
Education & judiciary
Both are absolutely crucial. How do we guarantee that we have transparency? By eliminating all conflicts of interest. Politicians can not profit from their position. Many legislators are attorneys. They get hired to represent a state agency against another agency- or a company against a state agency, in a court where either they or their peers have appointed that judge. However, they don’t recuse themselves. Unfortunately, they are not going to pass laws that restrict themselves. Other states have laws restricting this. This would be judicial reform.
Accountability: you can’t enforce accountability measures without having any oversight- a committee of people who are fully independent and competent to oversee each agency and prevent fraud and corruption. The inspector general is not enough because he/she only gets involved when the media prints it or the attorney general is involved. We need a new layer of oversight between all the public sector institutions and the attorney general/ inspector.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Nadine Deif campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* South Carolina House of Representatives District 112Lost primary$3,411 $3,411
Grand total$3,411 $3,411
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on May 6, 2024


Leadership
Speaker of the House:G. Murrell Smith
Majority Leader:Davey Hiott
Minority Leader:James Rutherford
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
JA Moore (D)
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
Vacant
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
Joe White (R)
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
John King (D)
District 50
District 51
J. Weeks (D)
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
Seth Rose (D)
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
Vacant
District 89
District 90
District 91
District 92
District 93
District 94
Gil Gatch (R)
District 95
District 96
D. McCabe (R)
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
Val Guest (R)
District 107
District 108
District 109
District 110
District 111
District 112
District 113
District 114
District 115
District 116
District 117
District 118
District 119
District 120
District 121
District 122
District 123
District 124
Republican Party (86)
Democratic Party (36)
Vacancies (2)