Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Arizona Proposition 109, Hospital Revenue Limits Amendment (1984)
Arizona Proposition 109 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Administration of government and Healthcare |
|
Status |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Arizona Proposition 109 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Arizona on November 6, 1984. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported providing the legislature with the authority to impose limits on hospital revenues from rates. |
A "no" vote opposed providing the legislature with the authority to impose limits on hospital revenues from rates. |
Election results
Arizona Proposition 109 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 385,724 | 43.01% | ||
511,013 | 56.99% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 109 was as follows:
“ | A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA PROVIDING FOR LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE REVENUE LIMITS ON HOSPITALS, AND AMENDING ARTICLE XXVII, CONSTITUTION OF ARIONZA, BY ADDING SECTION 2. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ | AMENDING ARIZONA CONSTITUTION BY GIVING THE LEGISLATURE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE REVENUE (RATE) LIMITS ON HOSPITALS. THIS PROVISION WOULD EXPIRE FROM AND AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1990. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Arizona Constitution
A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the Arizona State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |