Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Ballotpedia:Analysis of the 2018 local ballot measures in top cities by population

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Local ballot measure elections in 2018
2018 U.S. Local
Ballot Measures
2019 »
« 2017
Vote Poster.jpg
Overview
California
Election dates
Lawsuits
Analyses
Year-end California local measures
Year-end measures in the largest cities
California competing measures
The Big Picture
Local vs. State
National agendas
Have you subscribed yet?

Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
Click here to learn more.

December 19, 2018
By The Ballot Measures Team

In 2018, Ballotpedia covered a total of 301 local ballot measures in top U.S. cities by population outside of California. The 301 measures were on ballots in 29 states and the District of Columbia.

For more information on California, see our analysis of California measures.


Quick stats

Measures by election date

See also: Local ballot measure elections in 2018

Ballotpedia covered local ballot measures in top cities outside of California on 20 separate election dates throughout the year. Of the 301 measures covered, 199 (66 percent) were on ballots during the general election on November 6, 2018.

To view all election dates, click here.


Measures by outcome

Of the 301 local ballot measures in top U.S. cities, 263 measures (87 percent) were approved, and 35 measures (12 percent) were defeated. One measure in Washington, D.C., was approved and later repealed.

Results for two measures in Chicago were not counted due to a legal challenge.


Notable measures

Below is a sample of notable measures in top U.S. cities by population in 2018.

  • Portland, Oregon, Measure 26-201, Renewable Energy Initiative (November 2018) Approveda
    Voters in Portland, Oregon, decided in November on an initiative requiring certain local retailers to pay a 1 percent surcharge on retail sales within the city to fund renewable energy projects and job training. The measure summary included energy projects that do not use fossil fuels, nuclear power, or certain hydropower, among other projects. Measure 26-201 was approved with 65 percent of the vote.

Election policy

See also: Electoral system

Six measures asked voters to consider changes to their local voting procedures and campaign finance laws in November 2018. See below for more information on these measures in Fargo, North Dakota; Lane County, Oregon; Memphis, Tennessee; Baltimore, Maryland; and New York City.

Note: Ballotpedia's coverage of election policy measures went beyond cities with the largest populations to include smaller jurisdictions with notable ballot measures.

Voting procedures

Fargo

Lane County

Memphis

Voters in Memphis, Tennessee decided on two referendum measures regarding ranked-choice voting, also known as instant run-off elections.

  • Memphis, Tennessee, Referendum Ordinance No. 5677, Eliminate Run-Off Elections (November 2018) Defeatedd
    Referendum Ordinance No. 5677 asked voters whether or not to eliminate ranked-choice voting (or instant run-off elections), an electoral system that was approved by Memphis voters in 2008. Implementation of ranked-choice voting had been delayed by the Shelby County Election Commission, citing insufficient equipment as the cause for the delay. The commission announced in July 2017 that ranked-choice voting would begin in the city in October 2019. This measure would have blocked that implementation and would have established that the candidate with the highest number of votes in a local election be declared the winner. However, the referendum was defeated with 56 percent of voters in opposition.

Because both referendums were defeated in Memphis, ranked-choice voting was not eliminated.

Campaign finance

Baltimore

New York City

Every vote counts

Of the measures within the top 100 largest cities, Ballotpedia tracked 11 that were approved or defeated by a margin of less than 1 percentage point.

  • Voters in Mesa, Arizona, were close to evenly divided over three measures concerning taxes, bond revenue, and budgeting for the city and Mesa Public Schools.
    • Voters rejected Question 6, a proposed hotel tax increase, by a margin of 156 votes. A total of 74,137 voters were in favor, and 74,293 were opposed.
    • Voters in the Mesa Public Schools district approved a $300 million bond issue by a margin of one-third of a point. A total of 937 votes out of 143,077 votes cast separated approval from rejection.
    • Mesa Public Schools district voters rejected a measure to authorize a 15 percent budget override amounting to an estimated $61.4 million. The measure failed by a margin of nine-tenths of a percentage point.
  • In San Antonio, Texas, voters were narrowly divided over Proposition C, which amended the city charter to give the firefighters' union authority to require the city to participate in binding arbitration. It was approved by a margin of three-quarters of a point; 5,462 votes separated approval from rejection out of 363,732 total votes cast.
  • A general city charter revision was authorized in Detroit, Michigan, by the approval of Proposition R. There were 184 more voters in favor of charter revision than there were opposed to it out of 66,360 votes cast.

See also

Footnotes