Voting policies in the United States

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Election Policy Banner 2024.png



Election Policy VNT Logo.png

Election Information
2025 election and voting dates
Voter registration
Early voting
Absentee/mail-in voting
All-mail voting
Voter ID laws
State poll opening and closing times
Time off work for voting

Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker

Select a state from the menu below to learn more about its voting policies.

Election and voting policies are enacted and enforced primarily at the state level. These rules dictate the manner in which elections are administered, as well as the conditions under which American citizens cast ballots in each individual state.[1][2]

This page provides an overview of notable election policies and directs to Ballotpedia's coverage of these issues in all 50 states. Also on this page are links to arguments supporting and opposing various election policies.

Find details on the following topics below:

Election administration and voting policies by state

Election administration policies are the rules and laws under which elections officials conduct elections in a given state. These include early and absentee voting provisions, voter identification requirements, voter registration and list maintenance methods, and more. Voting policies, while similar and sometimes overlapping with election administration policies, are the rules and laws under which a voter casts their ballot in a given state, and include election dates and deadlines, registration requirements, and more.

Each state's election administration and voting policies dictate who can vote and under what conditions.

Use the table below to read more about election administration and voting policies in each state.

Election administration and voting policies by state
State Election administration policies Voting policies
Alabama Election administration Voting
Alaska Election administration Voting
Arizona Election administration Voting
Arkansas Election administration Voting
California Election administration Voting
Colorado Election administration Voting
Connecticut Election administration Voting
Delaware Election administration Voting
Florida Election administration Voting
Georgia Election administration Voting
Hawaii Election administration Voting
Idaho Election administration Voting
Illinois Election administration Voting
Indiana Election administration Voting
Iowa Election administration Voting
Kansas Election administration Voting
Kentucky Election administration Voting
Louisiana Election administration Voting
Maine Election administration Voting
Maryland Election administration Voting
Massachusetts Election administration Voting
Michigan Election administration Voting
Minnesota Election administration Voting
Mississippi Election administration Voting
Missouri Election administration Voting
Montana Election administration Voting
Nebraska Election administration Voting
Nevada Election administration Voting
New Hampshire Election administration Voting
New Jersey Election administration Voting
New Mexico Election administration Voting
New York Election administration Voting
North Carolina Election administration Voting
North Dakota Election administration Voting
Ohio Election administration Voting
Oklahoma Election administration Voting
Oregon Election administration Voting
Pennsylvania Election administration Voting
Rhode Island Election administration Voting
South Carolina Election administration Voting
South Dakota Election administration Voting
Tennessee Election administration Voting
Texas Election administration Voting
Utah Election administration Voting
Vermont Election administration Voting
Virginia Election administration Voting
Washington Election administration Voting
West Virginia Election administration Voting
Wisconsin Election administration Voting
Wyoming Election administration Voting

Policies

Early voting

See also: Early voting

Early voting permits citizens to cast ballots in person at a polling place prior to an election. In states that permit no-excuse early voting, a voter does not have to provide an excuse for being unable to vote on Election Day. Some states allow voters to cast absentee ballots in person. States that allow in-person absentee voting without an excuse are counted below among no-excuse early voting states.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of February 2024, 47 states and the District of Columbia permitted no-excuse early voting. For a full list of these states, see here.[3]
  • Proponents argue that early voting opportunities make the voting process more convenient for citizens, thereby increasing turnout and diversifying the electorate.
  • Critics argue that citizens who vote early may be more likely to make ill-informed decisions.
  • No-excuse absentee voting

    See also: Absentee voting

    Absentee/mail-in voting is voting that does not happen in person on Election Day but instead occurs another way (generally by mail). All states allow for some form of absentee/mail-in balloting. Some states require voters to provide a valid excuse to vote absentee/by mail, while others allow any eligible voter to cast an absentee/mail-in ballot.[3][4]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Absentee/mail-in voting procedures can be divided into two categories: automatic mail-in ballot systems and request-required mail-in ballot systems.
  • Automatic mail-in ballot systems mandate that all eligible voters receive a mailed ballot by default. These are sometimes referred to as all-mail voting systems.
  • Request-required mail-in ballot systems require that eligible voters initiate the process for receiving, and casting, mail-in ballots. These have traditionally been described as absentee voting systems.
  • Returning absentee ballots

    See also: Ballot collection laws by state

    Most states have laws that govern who may return a voter's absentee/mail-in ballot. These laws vary by state.

    As of October 2024:

    • 20 states allowed anyone chosen by the voter to return a ballot on the voter's behalf, with certain exceptions.
    • 16 states allowed anyone with certain relationships to the voter to return the voter's ballot.
    • 4 states allowed only the voter to return the voter's ballot, with certain exceptions.
    • 2 states required voters to return their ballots by mail.
    • 8 states and D.C. did not specify who may return ballots.

    Voter ID

    See also: Voter identification laws by state

    These laws require voters to present some form of identification at the polls. In some cases, the required identification must include a photo.

    As of October 2025, 36 states required voters to present identification in order to vote at the polls on Election Day, but many states provide for exceptions to these rules. Of these states, 24 required voters to present identification containing a photograph, with certain exceptions, and 12 states did not explicitly require photo identification. The remaining 14 states did not require voters to present identification in order to vote at the polls on Election Day.

    The federal Help America Vote Act requires that individuals in all 50 states who register to vote by mail and who have not voted previously in a federal election in their state must provide either their driver's license or a paycheck, bank statement, current utility bill, or government document showing their name and address. Individuals voting by mail must include a copy of one of those documents with their absentee/mail-in ballot.[5]

    These requirements do not apply if an individual submitted a copy of their identification, their driver's license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number when registering to vote.

    In certain states that require voters to provide identification, there may be exceptions that allow some voters to cast a ballot without providing an ID. To see more about these exceptions, see details by state below.

    Valid forms of identification differ by state. Commonly accepted forms of ID include driver's licenses, state-issued identification cards, and military identification cards.

    Online voter registration

    See also: Online voter registration

    Traditionally, paper-based systems have been used by the states to register voters. Under these systems, a prospective voter completes a paper form and submits it to election officials. Officials then review the registration and, if appropriate, approve it, adding the name of the voter to the state's voter registration rolls. In an online registration system, "the voter fills out a form via an internet site, and that paperless form is submitted electronically to election officials." Proponents of online voter registration argue that such systems can lower costs and improve accessibility for voters. Some have raised concerns about the security of such systems in the wake of high-profile consumer data breaches; according to the National Conference of State Legislatures in January 2016, "there have been no known breaches of existing online voter registration systems in participating states."[6]

    As of April 2024, 42 states, Washington, D.C., and Guam allowed online voter registration.[6]

    Same-day voter registration

    See also: Same-day voter registration

    Same-day voter registration enables voters to register and vote at the same time. Same-day registration is sometimes referred to as Election Day registration.[7]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of June 2024, 22 states and the District of Columbia had same-day registration provisions enabling voters to register and vote at the same time.[7]
  • In 12 of these states, Democrats held a trifecta, Republicans held a trifecta in six, and four states had divided government.
  • In 21 of these states and the District of Columbia, same-day voter registration is available on Election Day (and often during the early voting period as well).
  • North Carolina is the only state that offered same-day registration during the early voting period, but not on Election Day.
  • Two states, Alaska and Rhode Island, allowed same-day registration to vote for president and vice-president.

  • In states that allow same-day registration, voters must generally provide proof of residency (e.g., utility bill, pay stub) and identity (e.g., driver's license) at the time of registration.

    Automatic voter registration

    See also: Automatic voter registration

    Under an automatic voter registration system, eligible voters are automatically registered to vote whenever they interact with certain government agencies, such as departments of motor vehicles. Eligible voters are registered by default, although they may request not to be registered.[7][8]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of June 2024, 24 states and the District of Columbia had enacted automatic voter registration policies.
  • In 2015, California and Oregon became the first states to enact automatic voter registration policies.
  • In 2016, Alaska became the first state to enact an automatic voter registration policy via ballot measure.
  • The most recent states to enact automatic voter registration policies were Delaware, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania in 2023.[9][10][11]
  • Voter registration list maintenance

    According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, "All states take steps to keep their voter registration rolls accurate and up-to-date. The goal of maintaining an accurate voter list is to prevent ineligible people from voting, prevent anyone from voting twice and, by reducing inaccuracies, speed up the voter check-in process at polling places." Election officials endeavor to ensure that the names of deceased persons, non-voting felons and former residents are not included on voter lists.[12]

    The states employ a variety of different methods and tools in this endeavor. States cross-check their voter lists against data from federal agencies, including the Social Security Administration, the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Postal Service. State election agencies also verify voter lists against information from other state agencies, including departments of vital statistics, motor vehicle registration agencies and departments of corrections.[12]

    In 2012, the Pew Charitable Trusts published a report on voter registration systems in the United States. The following were notable findings:[13]

    1. "Approximately 24 million—one of every eight—voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate."
    2. "More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters."
    3. "Approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state."
    4. "Researchers estimate that at least 51 million eligible U.S. citizens are unregistered, or more than 24 percent of the eligible population."

    The process of removing ineligible names from voter lists, sometimes referred to as "purging," can be contentious. In a 2008 report released by the Brennan Center for Justice, Myrna Pérez wrote, "Far too frequently ... eligible, registered citizens show up to vote and discover their names have been removed from the voter lists. States maintain voter rolls in an inconsistent and unaccountable manner. Officials strike voters from the rolls through a process that is shrouded in secrecy, prone to error and vulnerable to manipulation."[14]

    Recount laws

    See also: Election recount laws and procedures in the 50 states

    An election recount is a process by which votes cast in an election are re-tabulated to verify the accuracy of the original results. Recounts typically occur in the event of a close margin of victory, following accusations of election fraud, or due to the possibility of administrative errors. Recounts can either occur automatically or be requested by a candidate or voters. Recounts can happen in races at any level, from local offices up to presidential elections. In the case of presidential elections, however, recounts are carried out at the state level rather than nationally.

    State recount laws differ in three key ways: whether a recount is available and, if so, if it occurs automatically or must be requested, which party may request a recount, and who pays for a recount if it occurs.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • All but two states —Mississippi and Tennessee —allow for election recounts.
  • Automatic recounts, which occur if election results meet specific criteria outlined in state law, are possible in 28 states. Requested recounts, where an interested party must ask for votes to be counted again, are allowed in 43 states. 
  • In 21 states, an interested party can only request a recount if the vote difference is within a certain margin.
  • In 42 states, candidates are allowed to request a recount. In 35 states, voters can request recounts in at least some elections.
  • The person who requests the recount pays for it in 23 states. Seven states pay for recounts. In 11 states, who pays depends on the circumstances of the election or the recount.
  • In 27 states, a refund may be available for a requested recount. In four states, the possibility of a refund depends on the recount circumstances. In five states, no refund is available.
    • Recount availability by state
      A look at which states allow for automatic and requested recounts.
    • Who may request a recount by state
      A breakdown of who may request a recount in each state.
    • Who pays for a recount by state
      Each state's policies on who pays for a recount and if a refund is available to requesters.
    • State-specific summary of recount laws
      A state-by-state breakdown of recount laws and procedures.


    50-state overview of recount laws

    Recount availability by state

    As of September 2025, state law in 48 states included a recount provision, automatic recounts are possible in 28 states, and requested recounts are possible in 43 states.

    The map and table below outline the type of recount laws in each state.

    Recount laws by state
    State Does state law include a recount provision? Are automatic recounts possible? Are requested recounts possible? Citation
    Alabama Yes Yes Yes 16-20,21
    Alaska Yes Yes Yes 20.430-490
    Arizona Yes Yes No[15][16] 16-661,249
    Arkansas Yes No Yes 7-5-319
    California Yes No Yes 15620-15634
    Colorado Yes Yes Yes 1-10.5
    Connecticut Yes Yes No 9-445,6-311a
    Delaware Yes Yes Yes 5702(C,E)
    District of Columbia Yes Yes Yes 1-1001.11(a)
    Florida Yes Yes No 102.141,166
    Georgia Yes No Yes 21-2-495,499
    Hawaii Yes Yes No 11-158
    Idaho Yes No Yes 34-2301-2309
    Illinois Yes No Yes 5/22-9.1, 18
    Indiana Yes No Yes 3-12-11-1-10
    Iowa Yes No Yes 43.56 & 50.48
    Kansas Yes No Yes 25-3107
    Kentucky Yes Yes Yes 120.017,095,185,250,280
    Louisiana Yes No Yes 18-1451 & 1453
    Maine Yes Yes Yes 737-A
    Maryland Yes No Yes 12-101-107
    Massachusetts Yes No Yes 54:135,A,B
    Michigan Yes Yes Yes 168.879-894
    Minnesota Yes Yes Yes 204C.35-361
    Mississippi No No No N/A
    Missouri Yes No Yes 115.601
    Montana Yes Yes Yes 13-16-201-11
    Nebraska Yes Yes Yes 32-1119,1121
    Nevada Yes No Yes 293.403-405
    New Hampshire Yes No Yes 660:1-16
    New Jersey Yes No Yes 19:28-1,2,3
    New Mexico Yes Yes Yes 1-14-14 to 25
    New York Yes Yes Yes 9-208
    North Carolina Yes Yes Yes 163-182.7,182.7A
    North Dakota Yes Yes Yes 16.1-16-01
    Ohio Yes Yes Yes 3515.01-072
    Oklahoma Yes No Yes 26-8-109 to 117
    Oregon Yes Yes Yes 258.006-300
    Pennsylvania Yes Yes Yes 3154g,3261-3
    Rhode Island Yes No Yes 17-19-37.1
    South Carolina Yes Yes No 7-17-280
    South Dakota Yes Yes Yes 12-21-1 to 37
    Tennessee No No No 2-17,18
    Texas Yes Yes Yes 211 to 216
    Utah Yes Yes Yes 20A-4-401
    Vermont Yes Yes Yes 17-51-2601,2602
    Virginia Yes No Yes 8-24.2-800 to 802.3
    Washington Yes Yes Yes 29A.64
    West Virginia Yes No Yes 3-6-9
    Wisconsin Yes No Yes 9.01 & 5.90
    Wyoming Yes Yes Yes 22-16-109 to 114

    Automatic recounts

    Automatic recounts occur if election results meet certain criteria laid out in state law. Requirements for an automatic recount might differ based on the type or level of office.

    The most common cause for an automatic recount is when election results fall within a close vote margin. This margin might be either a percentage or a number of votes.

    In addition to close vote margins, states might require an automatic recount if election officials discover a discrepancy or error in the vote totals.[17]

    General election automatic recount close vote margin requirements by state
    State Recount required if the margin of victory is: Citation
    Alabama Less than or equal to 0.5% for any candidate election or a statewide ballot measure election. This only applies to the general election. AL Code § 17-16-20 (2024)
    Alaska Tie vote. AK Stat § 15.15.460 (2024)
    Arizona Less than or equal to 0.5% of the votes cast for that office or measure. AZ Rev Stat § 16-661 (2024)
    Arkansas No automatic recounts. N/A
    California No automatic recounts. N/A
    Colorado Less than or equal to 0.5% for a candidate or ballot measure. CO Rev Stat § 1-10.5-101 (2024)
    Connecticut Less than 0.5% but not more than 2,000 votes, or less than 20 votes. An automatic recount is also triggered if election officials discover a discrepancy in vote totals. CT Gen Stat § 9-311, 311a (2024)
    Delaware Less than 1,000 votes or 0.5%, whichever is less, for state legislative and county offices. Less than or equal to 0.5% for municipal offices. 15 DE Code § 5702, 3172, 7558 (2024)
    District of Columbia Less than 1% of the total votes cast for the office. DC Code § 1–1001.09a (2023)
    Florida Less than or equal to 0.5% FL Stat § 102.141 (2024)
    Georgia No automatic recounts.[18] N/A
    Hawaii Less than or equal to 100 votes or 0.5%, whichever is lesser. HI Rev Stat § 11-158 (2024)
    Idaho No automatic recounts. N/A
    Illinois No automatic recounts. N/A
    Indiana No automatic recounts. N/A
    Iowa No automatic recounts. N/A
    Kansas No automatic recounts. N/A
    Kentucky Less than 0.5% of all votes cast for General Assembly, U.S. congress, governor and lieutenant governor, treasurer, auditor of public accounts, commissioner of agriculture, labor and statistics, secretary of state, and attorney general. An automatic recount also occurs if election officials discover an administrative or clerical error during the election and vote-counting process. 2024 Ky. Acts ch. 120, sec. 17
    Louisiana No automatic recounts. N/A
    Maine Tie vote. 21-A MRS §732
    Maryland No automatic recounts. N/A
    Massachusetts No automatic recounts. N/A
    Michigan Less than or equal to 0.1% for statewide elections, 75 votes for state senate elections, and 25 votes for state house elections. This does not apply to offices where more than one candidate is elected in a single race. 168.879a (2024)
    Minnesota 0.25% for a statewide constitutional amendment election. An automatic recount also occurs if the post-election audit of a county or counties consisting of more than 10% of the total number of persons voting in the election shows that an error occurred. MN Stat § 206.89 (2024)
    Mississippi No automatic recounts. N/A
    Missouri No automatic recounts. N/A
    Montana Tie vote. MT Code § 13-16-203 (2024)
    Nebraska Less than or equal to 1% for candidates in elections where the turnout is more than 500 votes, or 2% for candidates in elections where the turnout is less than or equal to 500 votes. An automatic recount may also be triggered if election officials discover an obvious error during the canvass. NE Code § 32-1119, 1031 (2024)
    Nevada No automatic recounts. N/A
    New Hampshire No automatic recounts. N/A
    New Jersey No automatic recounts. N/A
    New Mexico Less than 0.25% in elections for federal or statewide office, statewide ballot measures, and supreme court or the court of appeals. Less than 0.5% in elections for public regulation commissioner, public education commissioner, district attorney, or any county office in a county with more than 150,000 registered voters, local ballot measures, district or metropolitan court. Less than 1% for elections to any other office. An automatic recount might also occur as an outcome of a post-election audit, the specific guidelines for which can be found here. NM Stat § 1-14-24, 1-14-13.2 (2024)
    New York When the margin of victory is less than 20 votes or less or 0.5% or less; or the margin of victory is less than 5,000 votes in a contest where one million or more ballots are cast. NY Elec L § 9-208 (2024)
    North Carolina Not triggered by a close vote margin. An automatic recount occurs if election officials discover a substantial error while conducting a random-sample partial recount as part of a requested recount. The specific circumstances can be found here. NC Gen Stat § 163-182.7A (2024)
    North Dakota Less than or equal to 0.5% in general and special elections and 0.25% in ballot measure elections. NDCC § 16.1-16-01 (2024)
    Ohio Less than or equal to 0.5% in county, municipal, and district elections and 0.25% in statewide elections. Ohio Rev Code § 3515.011 (2024)
    Oklahoma No automatic recounts. N/A
    Oregon Less than or equal to 0.2% for candidate and ballot measures. This does not apply to ballot measures that required participation from at least 50% of registered voters and failed to meet that threshold. OR Rev Stat § 258.280 (2023)
    Pennsylvania Less than or equal to 0.5% for statewide offices and statewide ballot measures. An automatic recount might also occur if election officials discover certain discrepancies described here. 25 P.S. § 3154
    Rhode Island No automatic recounts. N/A
    South Carolina Less than or equal to 1% for constitutional amendments or any candidate. SC Code § 7-17-280 (2024)
    South Dakota Tie vote. This does not apply to school or township elections. SD Codified L § 12-21-16 (2024)
    Tennessee No automatic recounts. N/A
    Texas Tie vote. TX Elec Code § 216.001 (2024)
    Utah Tie vote. Certain margins met in municipalities that have adopted ranked-choice voting also trigger an automatic recount. UT Code § 20A-4-603 (2024)
    Vermont Tie vote. This does not apply to local elections. 17 V.S.A. § 2592
    Virginia No automatic recounts. N/A
    Washington Less than 2,000 votes and less than 0.5% of votes cast for statewide ballot measures or any candidate. This does not apply to state advisory votes or local ballot measures. An automatic recount also occurs if a partial recount changes an election outcome. WA Rev Code § 29A.64.021, 29.A.64.050 (2024)
    West Virginia No automatic recounts. N/A
    Wisconsin No automatic recounts. N/A
    Wyoming Less than or equal to 1% of the votes cast in the particular race for ballot measure or any candidate. For constitutional amendments, the margin must be less than or equal to 1% of the total votes cast in the entire election. An automatic recount also occurs if election officials discover irregularities in the election of a candidate. WY Stat § 22-16-109, 22-16-111 (2024)

    Requested recounts

    Requested recounts require an interested party ask for a recount. Unlike automatic recounts, if a recount is not requested, it will not be held. Similar to automatic recounts, requirements for an requested recount, where they exist, might differ based on the type or level of office.

    Some states allow any interested party to request a recount. As of September 2025, 21 states require a specific close vote margin before a recount can be requested. In some states, election officials may also request a recount if they discover discrepancies in vote totals.

    Courts may be able to order a recount, but oftentimes only after another interested party requested a recount from the court.

    General election requested recount close vote margin requirements by state
    State Candidates and/or voters may request recounts if the margin of victory is:[19] Citation
    Alabama No margin required. AL Code § 17-16-21 (2024)
    Alaska No margin required. AK Stat § 15.20.430 (2024)
    Arizona No requested recounts.[20] N/A
    Arkansas No margin required. AR Code § 7-5-319 (2024)
    California No margin required. CA Elec Code § 15620 (2023)
    Colorado No margin required. CO Rev Stat § 1-10.5-106 (2024)
    Connecticut No requested recounts. N/A
    Delaware Less than 1,000 votes or 0.5% for statewide offices, whichever is less. Ten votes or 0.5% in school board, tax levies, and school bond elections, whichever is greater. 15 DE Code § 5702, 14 DE Code § 1083 (2024)
    District of Columbia No margin required. DC Code § 1–1001.11 (2023)
    Florida No requested recounts. N/A
    Georgia Less than or equal to 0.5%. GA Code § 21-2-495 (2024)
    Hawaii No requested recounts. N/A
    Idaho No margin required. ID Code § 34-2301 (2023)
    Illinois At least 95% of the vote of the winning candidate. 10 ILCS 5/22-9.1 (2024)
    Indiana No margin required. IN Code § 3-12-11-1 (2024)
    Iowa 0.15% in a federal or statewide race and the lesser of 1% or 50 votes in state legislative or local races. IA Code § 50.48, 50.49 (2024)
    Kansas No margin required. KS Stat § 25-3107 (2024)
    Kentucky No margin required. KY Rev Stat § 120.095, 120.185 (2024)
    Louisiana The number of outstanding absentee/mail-in ballots must be enough to change the election outcome. LA Rev Stat § 18:1313 (2024)
    Maine No margin required. In elections using ranked-choice voting, only the top-three finishers present in the second-to-last round may request a recount. 21-A ME Rev Stat § 737-A (2024)
    Maryland Less than 5% of the votes cast for the two candidates. MD Elec Law Code § 12-101 (2024)
    Massachusetts Less than or equal to 0.5% in statewide and district-wide elections. No margin required in municipal elections. MA Gen L ch 54 § 135 (2024)
    Michigan The recount must be able to reverse the result of the election. MI Comp L § 168.879 (2024)
    Minnesota No margin required. MN Stat § 204C.35, 204C.36 (2024)
    Mississippi No requested recounts. N/A
    Missouri 0.5% for offices filed with the secretary of state and 1% for offices filed with local election authorities. MO Rev Stat § 115.601 (2024)
    Montana Less than 0.5% in candidate elections and 0.25% in ballot measure elections. MT Code § 13-16-201, 13-16-211 (2024)
    Nebraska No margin required. NE Code § 32-1121 (2024)
    Nevada No margin required. NV Rev Stat § 293.403 (2024)
    New Hampshire Less than 20%. In village district, town, and school board elections, as well as ballot measure elections, no margin required. NH Rev Stat § 660-671 (2024)
    New Jersey No margin required. NJ Rev Stat § 19:28-1 (2024)
    New Mexico No margin required. NM Stat § 1-14-14, 60-5A-1 (2024)
    New York No margin required. NY Elec L § 15-126 (2024)
    North Carolina Less than or equal to 10,000 votes or 0.5%, whichever is less, in statewide elections and 1% in non-statewide elections. NC Gen Stat § 163-182.7 (2024)
    North Dakota Less than 2% for candidate elections. A recount cannot be requested for ballot measure elections. NDCC § 16.1-16-01 (2024)
    Ohio No margin required. Ohio Rev Code § 3515.01 (2024)
    Oklahoma No margin required for candidate election recounts. For ballot measures, when the vote total is greater than 15,000, the margin is less than or equal to 150 votes. When the vote total is less than 14,999 the margin is 1%. 26 OK Stat § 26-8-111 (2023)
    Oregon No margin required. OR Rev Stat § 258.016 (2024)
    Pennsylvania No margin required. 25 P.S. § 3154
    Rhode Island Click here for exact margins by office and election type. RI Gen L § 17-19-37.1, 17-19-37.3 (2024)
    South Carolina No requested recounts. N/A
    South Dakota Less than or equal to 0.25% for statewide and multi-county district elections, 2% for state legislative, county, and school board elections, five votes or 2% for municipal elections, and 2% for precinct-level voter-requested recounts. SD Codified L § 12-21-2 to 15 (2024)
    Tennessee In Tennessee, recounts cannot be requested directly, but they can occur as part of a contested election. There is no margin required to contest an election. N/A
    Texas Less than 10% for an initial recount. TX Elec Code § 212.022, 212.031 (2024)
    Utah Less than or equal to 0.25% if the vote total is greater than 400 or one vote if the vote total is 400 or less. UT Code § 20A-4-401 (2024)
    Vermont Less than or equal to 2% for federal, statewide, county, and state Senate elections and 5% for state house, local, and ballot measure elections. 17 VSA § 2601, 2683
    Virginia Less than or equal to 1% for candidates on the ballot, 0.5% for write-in candidates and 50 votes or 1%, whichever is greater, for ballot measure elections. VA Code § 24.2-800 (2024)
    Washington No margin required. WA Rev Code § 29A.64.011 (2024)
    West Virginia No margin required. WV Code § 3-6-9 (2024)
    Wisconsin Less than or equal to 40 votes if the vote total is 4,000 or less or 1% if the vote total is greater than 4,000. No margin required for ballot measure elections. WI Stat § 9.01 (2024)
    Wyoming No margin required. WY Stat § 22-16-110, 22-16-111 (2024)

    Who may request a recount by state

    Who can request a recount varies by state and by circumstances. In most states with requested recount procedures, an interested party is either a candidate requesting a recount of a race in which he or she participated or a voter requesting a recount of a ballot measure election.

    As of September 2025, 42 states allow candidates to request a recount. In four states, voters may request a recount for any election. In 31 states voters can request recounts in only some elections or just for ballot measures.

    Can a candidate or voter request a recount?
    State Can a candidate request a recount? Can a voter request a recount?
    Alabama Yes Any election
    Alaska Yes Any election
    Arizona[21] No No
    Arkansas Yes No
    California Yes Any election
    Colorado Yes No
    Connecticut No No
    Delaware Yes School board
    Florida No No
    Georgia Yes No
    Hawaii No No
    Idaho Yes Ballot measure only
    Illinois Yes No
    Indiana Yes Ballot measure only
    Iowa Yes Ballot measure only
    Kansas Yes Ballot measure only
    Kentucky Yes Ballot measure only
    Louisiana Yes Ballot measure only
    Maine Yes Ballot measure only
    Maryland Yes Ballot measure only
    Massachusetts Yes Ballot measure only
    Michigan Yes Ballot measure only
    Minnesota Yes Ballot measure only
    Mississippi No No
    Missouri Yes Ballot measure only
    Montana Yes Ballot measure only
    Nebraska Yes No
    Nevada Yes Ballot measure only
    New Hampshire Yes Ballot measure only
    New Jersey Yes Ballot measure only
    New Mexico Yes Ballot measure only
    New York Village elections only No
    North Carolina Yes No
    North Dakota Yes No
    Ohio Yes Ballot measure only
    Oklahoma Yes Ballot measure only
    Oregon Yes Ballot measure only
    Pennsylvania No Any election
    Rhode Island Yes Ballot measure only
    South Carolina No No
    South Dakota Yes Specific precinct in any election, or ballot measure only
    Tennessee No No
    Texas Yes Presidential primary, or ballot measure only
    Utah Yes Ballot measure only
    Vermont Yes Ballot measure only
    Virginia Yes Ballot measure only
    Washington Yes Ballot measure only
    West Virginia Yes Ballot measure only
    Wisconsin Yes Ballot measure only
    Wyoming Yes Ballot measure only

    Who pays for a recount by state

    As of September 2025, the requester of a recount pays for the recount in 23 states, the state pays in seven states, in 11 states it depends on the circumstances of the election or the recount, and in two states it is unclear which party pays for the recount. In 27 states a refund may be available for a requested recount, in four states a refund depends on the circumstances of the recount, and in five states no refund is available. The remaining 14 states have state-funded requested recounts or do not have requested recounts. In 27 states a partial recount may be requested.

    Who pays for requested recounts?
    State[22] Who pays for a requested recount? Refund available? Can candidates request a partial recount? Citation
    Alabama Requester Yes Yes 16-20,21
    Alaska State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes Yes 20.430-490
    Arizona No requested recounts N/A No 16-661,249
    Arkansas Requester Yes No 7-5-319
    California Requester Yes Yes 15620-15634
    Colorado Requester Yes No 10.5-101-109
    Connecticut No requested recounts N/A No 9-445,6-311a
    Delaware State N/A Yes 5702(C,E)
    District of Columbia Requester Yes Yes 1-1001.11(a)
    Florida No requested recounts N/A No 102.141,166
    Georgia State N/A Yes 21-2-495,499
    Hawaii No requested recounts N/A No 11-158
    Idaho State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes Yes 34-2301-2309
    Illinois Requester Maybe[23] Yes 5/22-9.1, 18
    Indiana Requester Yes Yes 3-12-11-1-10
    Iowa State N/A No 43.56 & 50.48
    Kansas State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes Yes 25-3107
    Kentucky Requester No Yes 120.017,095,185,250,280
    Louisiana Requester Yes Yes 18-1451 & 1453
    Maine State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes No 737-A
    Maryland State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes Yes 12-101-107
    Massachusetts State N/A Yes 54:135,A,B
    Michigan Requester Yes Yes 168.879-894
    Minnesota State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes Yes 204C.35-361
    Mississippi No requested recounts N/A No N/A
    Missouri Requester Maybe[24] No 115.601
    Montana State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Maybe[25] No 13-16-201-11
    Nebraska Requester Yes Yes 32-1119,1121
    Nevada Requester Yes No 293.403-405
    New Hampshire State/Requester
    Depends on election type[26]
    Varies[27] No 660:1-16
    New Jersey Requester Yes Yes 19:28-1,2,3
    New Mexico Requester Yes Yes 1-14-14 to 25
    New York Unclear[28] No No 9-208
    North Carolina State N/A No 163-182.7,182.7A
    North Dakota Requester No No 16.1-16-01
    Ohio Requester Yes Yes 3515.01-072
    Oklahoma Requester Yes Yes 26-8-109 to 117
    Oregon Requester Yes Yes 258.006-300
    Pennsylvania Requester Yes Yes 3154g,3261-3
    Rhode Island Unclear[29] No No 17-19-37.1
    South Carolina No requested recounts N/A No 7-17-280
    South Dakota State N/A Yes 12-21-1 to 37
    Tennessee No requested recounts N/A No 2-17,18
    Texas Requester Yes Yes 211 to 216
    Utah State/Requester
    Depends on requester[30]
    No No 20A-4-401
    Vermont State N/A No 17-51-2601,2602
    Virginia State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes No 8-24.2-800 to 802.3
    Washington Requester Yes Yes 29A.64
    West Virginia Requester Yes Yes 3-6-9
    Wisconsin State/Requester
    Depends on margin
    Yes Yes 9.01 & 5.90
    Wyoming Requester Yes No 22-16-109 to 114

    State-specific summary of recount laws

    See also: Recount laws in Alabama
    • Automatic recount procedures

    Alabama requires an automatic recount if a statewide ballot measure or candidate for any public office in a general election "is defeated by not more than one-half of one percent of the votes cast."[31]

    • Requested recount procedures

    Sections 17-16-21 and 17-16-40 of the Code of Alabama stipulate that any person with standing to contest an election may request a recount, even if the margin of victory falls outside the 0.5% trigger point for an automatic recount. The requester is responsible for costs associated with the recount unless the recount changes the election outcome, in which case any costs paid are refunded. The time period for requesting a recount begins "with the production of the certificate of result and ends 48 hours after the official canvass of county returns."[32][33]

    The relevant state statutes suggest recounts cannot be requested in elections for the U.S. Senate and U.S. House.[33]

    Requested recounts that show a change in the election outcome cannot officially change the election outcome, but they do constitute grounds to contest the election in court.[32]

    For more information about recount procedures in Alabama, click here.

    State legislation

    The table below includes bills related to recounts introduced during (or carried over to) each state's current legislative session. The following information is included for each bill:

    • State
    • Bill number
    • Official bill name or caption
    • Most recent action date
    • Legislative status
    • Sponsor party
    • Topics dealt with by the bill

    Bills are organized by state and then by most recent action. The table displays up to 100 results. To view more bills, use the arrows in the upper-right corner. Clicking on a bill will open its page on Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker, which includes bill details and a summary.

    See also

    Footnotes

    1. American Civil Liberties Union, "Voting Rights" accessed January 19, 2024
    2. The Heritage Foundation, "Does Your Vote Count? Ensuring Election Integrity and Making Sure Every Vote Counts," accessed January 19, 2024
    3. 3.0 3.1 National Conference of State Legislatures, "Early In-Person Voting," March 23, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "ncslabsentee" defined multiple times with different content
    4. We use the term "absentee/mail-in voting" to describe systems in which requests or applications are required. We use the term "all-mail voting" to denote systems where the ballots themselves are sent automatically to all voters. We use the hyphenate term for absentee voting because some states use “mail voting” (or a similar alternative) to describe what has traditionally been called "absentee voting."
    5. Congress, "H.R.3295 - Help America Vote Act of 2002," accessed September 30, 2025
    6. 6.0 6.1 National Conference of State Legislatures, "Online Voter Registration," accessed March 14, 2024 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "onlineregistration" defined multiple times with different content
    7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 NCSL, "Same-Day Voter Registration," January 31, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "ncsl" defined multiple times with different content
    8. Brennan Center for Justice, "Automatic Voter Registration," October 26, 2023
    9. State of Delaware, "Automatic Voter Registration at DMV," June 20, 2023
    10. Minnesota State Legislature, "House File 3," accessed June 6, 2023
    11. NBC, "Pennsylvania rolls out automatic voter registration," September 19, 2023
    12. 12.0 12.1 National Conference of State Legislatures, "Voter List Accuracy," February 11, 2014
    13. Pew Center on the States, "Inaccurate, Costly, and Inefficient: Evidence That America's Voter Registration System Needs an Upgrade," February 2012
    14. Brennan Center for Justice, "Voter Purges: Executive Summary," accessed March 14, 2024
    15. Verified Voting, "Arizona Recount Laws," accessed September 25, 2025
    16. A court may order a recount under Arizona law.
    17. Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota, "Recount Database Glossary," accessed April 24, 2024
    18. If a discrepancy or error is apparent in the returns, the secretary of state or, in certain circumstances, the county superintendent of elections may request a recount at his or her discretion. Ballotpedia categorizes this as a requested recount.
    19. 19.0 19.1 Some states allow an interested party other than a candidate or voter to request a recount. The most common example of this is states where an election official can request a recount. Typically, these types of requested recounts do not require a specified margin of victory. Instead, they can be requested at will or if an election official discovers a discrepancy in the vote totals. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "other" defined multiple times with different content
    20. A court may order a recount under Arizona law.
    21. A court may order a recount under Arizona law.
    22. This category encompasses instances where the state government pays for recounts and those states where counties pay.
    23. A recount alone cannot change the election results, but can be used to contest the election. At the end of that process, the court may choose not to levy costs against the prevailing party.
    24. Recounts occur as part of a contested election. A requester may be required to cover costs before the start of such an event. The court may choose to require the unsuccessful party in a contested election to cover the costs, which could involve a refund to the requester if he or she is the successful party.
    25. In the case of a court-ordered recount, candidates must pay, but will be refunded if the outcome changes. Regarding non-court-ordered recounts, state law does not mention whether the candidate is refunded in such a case.
    26. The state covers requested recounts of statewide constitutional amendments. The requester covers all other recounts.
    27. For local and county ballot measure elections, state law does not mention the possibility of a refund. For all other recounts, costs paid by the requester are refunded if the recount changes the election outcome.
    28. No mention in state law.
    29. No mention in state law.
    30. The state pays for candidate-requested recounts. The requester pays for voter-requested recounts of ballot measures.
    31. Casetext, "Ala. Code § 17-16-20," accessed September 16, 2025
    32. 32.0 32.1 17-16-21 Justia, "Ala. Code § 17-16-21," accessed September 16, 2025
    33. 33.0 33.1 Justia, "AL Code § 17-16-40 (2024)," accessed September 16, 2025
    34. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named one
    35. The Alaska State Legislature, "AS 15.20.430," accessed September 17, 2025
    36. The Alaska State Legislature, "AS 15.20.480," accessed September 17, 2025
    37. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named two
    38. Arizona State Legislature, "ARS 16-661" accessed September 17, 2025
    39. Verified Voting, "Arizona Recount Laws," accessed September 17, 2025
    40. A court may a recount under Arizona law.
    41. 41.00 41.01 41.02 41.03 41.04 41.05 41.06 41.07 41.08 41.09 41.10 41.11 41.12 41.13 41.14 41.15 41.16 41.17 41.18 41.19 41.20 41.21 41.22 41.23 41.24 41.25 Code of Arkansas Public Access, "A.C.A. § 7-5-319," accessed September 17, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "law" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "law" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "law" defined multiple times with different content
    42. Justia, "CA Elec Code § 15624," accessed September 18, 2025
    43. 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 43.4 Justia, "CA Elec Code § 15620," accessed September 18, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "request" defined multiple times with different content
    44. Justia, "CA Elec Code § 15640," accessed September 18, 2025
    45. Justia , "CA Elec Code § 15610," accessed September 18, 2025
    46. Justia, "CA Elec Code § 15645," accessed September 18, 2025
    47. The governor's ability to call a recount of the office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is subject to different requirements, which can be found here.
    48. Justia, "CA Elec Code § 15646," accessed September 18, 2025
    49. 49.00 49.01 49.02 49.03 49.04 49.05 49.06 49.07 49.08 49.09 49.10 49.11 49.12 49.13 49.14 49.15 49.16 49.17 49.18 49.19 49.20 49.21 49.22 49.23 49.24 49.25 49.26 49.27 49.28 49.29 49.30 49.31 49.32 49.33 49.34 49.35 49.36 49.37 49.38 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    50. Justia, "CO Rev Stat § 1-10.5-102," accessed September 18, 2025
    51. 51.0 51.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named reqlaw
    52. Connecticut General Assembly, "Sec. 9-445. Recanvass on close vote," accessed September 18, 2025
    53. 53.0 53.1 Connecticut General Assembly, "Sec. 9-311. Recanvass in case of discrepancy," accessed September 18, 2028 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "law1" defined multiple times with different content
    54. Florida Statutes, "Manual recounts of overvotes and undervotes," accessed September 18, 2025
    55. 55.0 55.1 Florida Division of Elections, "Recount Procedure Summary," accessed April 9, 2024
    56. Justia, "GA Code § 21-2-495 (2024)," accessed September 18, 2025
    57. Verified Voting, "Georgia," accessed September 18, 2025
    58. BillTrack50, "Hawaii SB 176," accessed September 18, 2025
    59. Idaho Statutes, "34-2301. Application for recount of ballots," accessed September 18, 2025
    60. Idaho Statutes, "34-2309. free recount," accessed September 18, 2025
    61. Idaho Statutes, "34-2306. Difference revealed by recount — Candidate relieved of costs," accessed September 18, 2025
    62. Idaho Statutes, "34-2304. Order for recount — Procedure — Notice," accessed September 18, 2025
    63. Justia, "10-10-5-23," accessed September 18, 2025
    64. Indiana General Assembly, "IC 3-12-11-2 Filing of verified petition," accessed September 18, 2025
    65. Indiana General Assembly, "IC 3-12-12-4 Signatures by voters; percentage," accessed September 18, 2025
    66. Indiana General Assembly, "IC 3-12-11-10 Cash deposit for payment of costs by petitioner; appointment of commission member proxy," accessed September 18, 2025
    67. Indiana General Assembly, "IC 3-12-11-21 Recount for legislative office; deadline; certification of results," accessed September 18, 2025
    68. Indiana General Assembly, "IC 3-12-6-21.9 Recount; date of completion; extension of deadline," accessed September 18, 2025
    69. 69.0 69.1 69.2 Iowa Legislature, "House File 928, Relating to the Recounting an Contesting of Elections, and Providing Penalties," accessed September 19, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "newlaw" defined multiple times with different content
    70. Iowa Legislature, "IA Code § 50.48," accessed September 19, 2025
    71. Iowa Legislature, "IA Code § 50.50," accessed September 19, 2025
    72. 72.00 72.01 72.02 72.03 72.04 72.05 72.06 72.07 72.08 72.09 72.10 72.11 Kentucky State Legislature, "120.017," accessed September 22, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "auto" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "auto" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "auto" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "auto" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "auto" defined multiple times with different content
    73. In these latter cases, candidates may contest an election outcome, which is a separate process but could include a recount.
    74. Kentucky State Legislature, "120.185," accessed September 22, 2025
    75. Kentucky State Legislature, "120.280," accessed September 22, 2025
    76. Kentucky State Legislature, "120.250," accessed September 22, 2025
    77. Justia, "Revised Statutes §18:1313. Tabulation and counting of absentee by mail and early voting ballots," accessed September 22, 2025
    78. Justia, "Revised Statutes §18.573. Evidence of election results," accessed September 22, 2025
    79. Justia, "Revised Statutes §18.1451. Recount of absentee by mail and early voting ballots authorized," accessed September 22, 2025
    80. Justia, "Revised Statutes §18.1452. Costs of recount," accessed September 22, 2025
    81. Maine Legislature, "An Act to Initiate Recounts in Tied Elections," accessed September 22, 2025
    82. Maine Revised Statutes, "§2531-B. Recount of an election for office," accessed September 22, 2025
    83. 83.0 83.1 Maine Revised Statutes, "§738. Statewide referendum ballots," accessed September 22, 2025
    84. Maine Legislature, "H.P. 1089," accessed September 22, 2025
    85. Maine Revised Statutes, "§2532. Referendum recount procedure," accessed September 22, 2025
    86. Justia, "MD Election Law Code § 12-101," accessed September 23, 2025
    87. Justia, "MD Election Law Code § 12-103," accessed September 23, 2025
    88. Justia, "MD Election Law Code § 12-107," accessed September 23, 2025
    89. Michigan Election Law, "Section 168.875," accessed September 25, 2025
    90. Michigan Election Law, "Section 168.879a," accessed September 25, 2025
    91. 91.0 91.1 Michigan Election Law, "Section 168.879," accessed September 25, 2025
    92. Michigan Election Law, "Section 168.862," accessed September 25, 2025
    93. Michigan Election Law, "Section 168.880," accessed September 25, 2025
    94. Michigan Election Law, "Section 168.867," accessed September 25, 2025
    95. 95.0 95.1 95.2 Michigan Election Law, "Section 168.875," accessed September 25, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content
    96. Minnesota State Legislature, "204C.35," accessed September 23, 2025
    97. 97.0 97.1 97.2 97.3 Office of the Revisor of Statutes, "204C.36 RECOUNTS IN COUNTY, SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS," accessed September 23, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "local" defined multiple times with different content
    98. Office of the Revisor of Statutes, "206.88 Partial Recounts on Electronic Voting Systems," accessed September 23, 2025
    99. Missouri State Legislature, "115.601," accessed September 23, 2025
    100. Montana State Legislature, "13-16-203," accessed September 23, 2025
    101. Montana State Legislature, "13-16-211," accessed September 23, 2025
    102. Montana State Legislature, "13-16-301," accessed September 23, 2025
    103. Montana State Legislature, "13-16-307," accessed September 23, 2025
    104. Montana Legislature, "SB LC2037: Revise county canvassing processes," accessed September 23, 2025
    105. Nebraska State Legislature, "32-1031," accessed September 23, 2025
    106. 106.0 106.1 Nebraska State Legislature, "32-1121," accessed September 23, 2025
    107. 107.0 107.1 Nebraska State Legislature, "32-1118," accessed September 23, 2025
    108. Nevada State Legislature, "293.403 Recount of vote: Demand; advance deposit of costs.," accessed September 23, 2025
    109. 109.0 109.1 Nevada Revisor of Statutes, "NRS 293.405  Costs of recount; commencement and completion of recount; limitation on additional recount.," accessed September 23, 2025
    110. New Hampshire Statutes, "NH Rev Stat § 660:6 (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    111. New Hampshire Statutes, "NH Rev Stat § 660:9 (2022)," accessed September 23, 2025
    112. New Hampshire Statutes, "NH Rev Stat § 660:9-a (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    113. The link here provides the citation for the governance of town recount elections. Statutes regarding village district and school board elections both cite this statute when it comes to procedure.
    114. New Hampshire Statutes, "NH Rev Stat § 669:31 (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    115. New Hampshire Statutes, "NH Rev Stat § 660:10 (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    116. New Hampshire Statutes, "NH Rev Stat § 660:12 (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    117. New Hampshire Statutes, "NH Rev Stat § 660:13 (2022)," accessed September 23, 2025
    118. NJ Rev Stat § 19:28-2 (2023)," accessed September 23, 2025
    119. The audit requirement is waived for any of the prescribed elections if a recount is to be conducted for that particular election The audit requirement is waived entirely if all of the prescribed elections have margins of victory greater than or equal to 15%.
    120. Justia, "NM Stat § 1-14-13.2 (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    121. Justia, "NM Stat § 60-5A-1 (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    122. Justia, "NM Stat § 1-14-15 (2024)," accessed September 23, 2025
    123. Justia, "NY Elec L § 9-211 (2024)," accessed September 24, 2025
    124. OFFICIAL COMPILATION OF CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, "TITLE 9. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT SUBTITLE V. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS PART 6210. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AND TESTING OF VOTING SYSTEMS, OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES, AND STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING VALID VOTES," accessed September 24, 2025
    125. Justia, "NY Elec L § 16-106 (2022)," accessed September 24, 2025
    126. Justia, "NY Elec L § 15-126 (2022)," accessed September 24, 2025
    127. North Carolina State Legislature, "163-182.7A," accessed September 24, 2025
    128. North Carolina State Legislature, "163-182.7," accessed September 24, 2025
    129. North Carolina State Board of Elections, "5 Facts About the Recount Process in North Carolina," November 19, 2020
    130. Ohio Revised Codes, "3515.011," accessed September 24, 2025
    131. 131.0 131.1 Ohio Revised Codes, "3515.041," accessed September 24, 2025
    132. Ohio Revised Codes, "3515.01," accessed September 24, 2025
    133. Ohio Revised Statutes, "3515.07," accessed September 24, 2025
    134. Ohio Revised Statutes, "3515.02," accessed September 24, 2025
    135. 135.0 135.1 Justia, "26 OK Stat § 26-8-109 (2024)," accessed September 24, 2025
    136. Justia, "26 OK Stat § 8-111 (2024)," accessed September 24, 2025
    137. Justia, "26 OK Stat § 8-117 (2024)," accessed September 24, 2025
    138. Justia, "26 OK Stat § 7-134.1," accessed September 24, 2025
    139. Legal Information Institute, "230:35-3-85.1. Election night recounts," accessed September 24, 2025
    140. Specifically, 26-8-111 to 26-8-117.
    141. Oregon Statutes, "ORS 258.290," accessed September 24, 2025
    142. Oregon Statutes, "ORS 258.171," accessed September 24, 2025
    143. Oregon Statutes, "ORS 258.250," accessed September 24, 2025
    144. 144.0 144.1 144.2 WestLaw, "25 P.S. § 3154," accessed September 24, 2025
    145. Specifically, subsections (b), (d)(1) & (5), (d)(4), and (e)
    146. 146.0 146.1 146.2 WestLaw, "25 P.S. § 3261," accessed September 24, 2025
    147. WestLaw, "25 P.S. § 3263," accessed September 24, 2025
    148. Rhode Island Statutes, "Section 17-19-37.1," accessed September 24, 2025
    149. Rhode Island Statutes, "Section 17-19-37.3," accessed September 24, 2025
    150. 150.0 150.1 Rhode Island Statutes, "Section 17-15-34," accessed September 24, 2025
    151. Rhode Island Statutes, "Section 17-22-5.1," accessed September 24, 2025
    152. Rhode Island Statutes, "Section 17-19-37," accessed September 24, 2025
    153. South Dakota Code, "12-21-16," accessed September 24, 2025
    154. Voter Verified, "South Dakota Recount Laws," accessed September 24, 2025
    155. South Dakota Codified Laws, "12-21-12," accessed September 24, 2025
    156. South Dakota Codified Laws, "12-21-15," accessed September 24, 2025
    157. South Dakota Codified Laws, "12-21-11," accessed September 24, 2025
    158. South Dakota Codified Laws, "12-21-10," accessed September 24, 2025
    159. South Dakota Codified Laws, "9-13-27.3," accessed September 24, 2025
    160. South Dakota Codified Laws, "13-7-19.2," accessed September 24, 2025
    161. South Dakota Codified Laws, "12-21-14," accessed September 24, 2025
    162. South Dakota Codified Laws, "9-13-27.4," accessed September 24, 2025
    163. South Dakota Codified Laws, "13-7-19.3," accessed September 24, 2025
    164. Justia, "2-17-105. Time for filing complaint," accessed September 24, 2025
    165. Justia, "Section 2-17-117 - Circumstances justifying recount - Determining procedure for recount," accessed September 24, 2025
    166. Texas State Legislature, "Chapter 216," accessed September 24, 2025
    167. Texas Statutes, "Sec. 212.0241," accessed April 24, 2024
    168. Texas Statutes, "Sec. 212.052," accessed September 24, 2025
    169. Texas Statutes, "Sec. 212.051," accessed September 24, 2025
    170. Texas Statutes, "Sec. 212.056," accessed September 24, 2025
    171. Texas Statutes, "Sec. 212.081," accessed September 24, 2025
    172. Texas Statutes, "Sec. 212.083," accessed September 24, 2025
    173. Texas Statutes, "Sec. 215.003," accessed September 24, 2025
    174. Utah Code, "20A-4-401(2)," accessed September 26, 2025
    175. Utah Code, "20A-4-401(6)," accessed September 26, 2025
    176. Utah Code, "20A-4-401(11)," accessed September 26, 2025
    177. Vermont State Legislature, "17 V.S.A. § 2592," accessed September 24, 2025
    178. Vermont State Legislature, "7 V.S.A. § 2602," accessed September 24, 2025
    179. 179.0 179.1 The Vermont Statutes Online, "§ 2601. Recount threshold," accessed September 24, 2025
    180. The Vermont Statutes Online, "§ 2688. Recount on question submitted," accessed September 24, 2025
    181. The Vermont Statutes Online, "§ 2602i. Costs," accessed September 24, 2025
    182. 182.0 182.1 Code of Virginia, "§ 24.2-800. Recounts in all elections," accessed September 24, 2025
    183. 183.0 183.1 Code of Virginia, "§ 24.2-802.3. Costs of the recount," accessed September 24, 2025
    184. Code of Virginia, "§ 24.2-801. Petition for recount; recount court," accessed September 24, 2025
    185. Code of Virginia, "§ 24.2-801.1. Petition for recount of election for presidential electors; recount court," accessed September 24, 2025
    186. Washington State Legislature, "RCW 29A.64.050," accessed September 24, 2025
    187. Washington Secretary of State, "Recount Elections," accessed September 24, 2025
    188. Washington State Legislature, "RCW 29A.64.081," accessed September 24, 2025
    189. Washington State Legislature, "29A.64.011," accessed September 24, 2025
    190. 190.0 190.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named manual
    191. Wisconsin State Legislature, "9.01(1)(ag)1," accessed September 25, 2025
    192. Wisconsin State Legislature, "9.01(1)(ag)3m," accessed September 25, 2025
    193. Wisconsin State Legislature, "9.01(1)(a)1," accessed September 25, 2025
    194. Wisconsin State Legislature, "9.01(1)(ar)3," accessed September 25, 2025
    195. 195.0 195.1 Justia, "§ 22-16-112. Precincts to be recounted; recount official result," accessed September 25, 2025
    196. Justia, "§ 22-16-113. Recount deposit; expense of recount," accessed September 25, 2025

    Electoral systems

    See also: Electoral systems

    The term electoral system can refer to the method by which elections are conducted (e.g., whether officials are elected in single-winner versus multi-winner systems) or the method by which votes are tallied to determine the outcome of an election (e.g., plurality systems, majority systems, ranked-choice voting systems, etc.). In the United States, most federal and state-level officials are elected via plurality vote in single-winner elections, although some jurisdictions (e.g., cities, school boards, etc.) employ alternative electoral systems.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • A total of 40 states conduct only single-winner contests for state legislative elections. The remaining 10 states utilize multi-winner contests in elections for at least one of their state legislative chambers.
  • All gubernatorial elections are, by nature of the office, single-winner elections. Of the 50 states, 45 determine the winners of gubernatorial elections via plurality vote. Three of the remaining five (Louisiana, Georgia, and Mississippi) determine winners via majority vote. Maine and Alaska used ranked-choice voting.
  • In every state, United States Senators and United States Representatives are elected in single-winner elections. Of the 50 states, 46 determine winners in congressional elections via plurality vote. Two of the remaining four (Louisiana and Georgia) determine winners via majority vote. Maine and Alaska used ranked-choice voting.
  • Primary types

    See also: Primary types

    Primary elections allow voters to determine which candidates compete in the general election and can be nonpartisan or partisan. In partisan primaries, voters choose the candidates they prefer for a political party to nominate in the general election.

    The laws governing primary elections vary from state to state and can even vary within states by locality and political party. For example, only registered party members are allowed to vote in closed primaries, while registered party members and unaffiliated voters are allowed to vote in semi-closed primaries, and all voters are allowed to vote in open primaries.

    Primary elections also vary by the way their outcomes are determined. Majority systems require the winning candidate to receive at least fifty percent of the votes cast, while plurality systems do not. In top-two primaries, top-four primaries, and blanket primaries, all candidates are listed on the same ballot, regardless of partisan affiliation.

    Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

    See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

    A ranked-choice voting system (RCV) is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates by preference on their ballots. There are multiple forms of ranked-choice voting, including instant-runoff voting, and single-transferable vote.

    As of November 2024, ranked-choice voting was used for regular statewide elections in two states, Alaska and Maine.[1][2] Hawaii also used ranked-choice voting for special congressional elections.[3] Fourteen other states used ranked-choice voting in some local elections, while 11 states had adopted laws banning or prohibiting the use of ranked-choice voting statewide.

    Voting rights for people convicted of a felony

    See also: Voting rights for people convicted of a felony

    Voting rights for people convicted of a felony vary substantially from state to state. As of April 2025, people convicted of a felony in Maine, Vermont, and Washington, D.C. retained the right to vote while incarcerated. In 38 other states, people convicted of a felony could not vote while incarcerated but automatically regained the right to vote upon their release or at some point thereafter. Ten states did not automatically restore voting rights for people convicted of a felony.[4][5][6]

    Generally, governors across the United States may exercise the executive authority to restore voting rights by pardon on an individual basis. However, the policies described in this article deal with automatic restoration of voting rights for people convicted of a felony.

    Since 2020, nine states have passed legislation that more quickly restored voting rights to certain individuals convicted of a felony, while voters in one state, California, approved a ballot measure that did so. Governors in two other states, Iowa and Virginia, took executive actions related to the restoration of voting rights. Read more below.

    Post-election auditing

    Post-election audits check that election results tallied by a state's voting system match results from paper records, such as paper ballots filled out by voters or the paper records produced by electronic voting machines. Post-election audits are classified into two categories: audits of election results—which include traditional post-election audits as well as risk-limiting audits—and procedural audits.[7][8]

    Typically, traditional post-election audits are done by recounting a portion of ballots, either electronically or by hand, and comparing the results to those produced by the state's voting system. In contrast, risk-limiting audits use statistical methods to compare a random sample of votes cast to election results instead of reviewing every ballot. The scope of procedural audits varies by state, but they typically include a systematic review of voting equipment, performance of the voting system, vote totals, duties of election officials and workers, ballot chain of custody, and more.

    Forty-six states and the District of Columbia require some form of post-election audit by law, excluding states with pilot programs. Of these, 39 states and the District of Columbia require traditional post-election audits, while three states require risk-limiting post-election audits, and three states require some other form of post-election audit, including procedural post-election audits.[9][7]

    Private funding of election administration

    See also: Laws governing the private funding of elections

    The private funding of elections refers to the practice of nonprofits, private organizations, or individuals providing funding or other resources to election administrators for the purpose of conducting or administering an election. As of July 2025, 29 states enacted laws banning or otherwise restricting the use of private donations for election administration purposes. Twenty-one of these states had a Republican trifecta when the law was adopted; five states had divided governments at the time. Two states, Louisiana and Wisconsin, adopted their bans through a ballot measure. No states banned or restricted private election funding prior to 2021.

    Arguments for and against election policies

    See the following pages for an in-depth look at the debate into various topics related to voting policy and election administration.

    State legislation

    The table below includes bills related to elections that have been introduced during (or carried over to) the current legislative session. The following information is included for each bill:

    • State
    • Bill number
    • Official bill name or caption
    • Most recent action date
    • Legislative status
    • Sponsor party
    • Topics dealt with by the bill

    Bills are organized by most recent action. The table displays up to 100 results. To view more bills, use the arrows in the upper-right corner. Clicking on a bill will open its page on Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker, which includes bill details and a summary.

    Explore election legislation with Ballotpedia

    • Try Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker
      Try Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker
      Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker provides daily updates on legislative activity related to election policy in all 50 states.

      Our election policy experts translate complex bill text into easy-to-understand summaries. And because it's from Ballotpedia, our legislation tracker is guaranteed to be neutral, unbiased, and nonpartisan.
    • Read Ballotpedia's State of Election Administration Legislation Reports
      Read Ballotpedia's State of Election Administration Legislation Reports
      Ballotpedia publishes regular analysis of election administration legislation, including three full reports per year, providing ongoing coverage of legislative activity affecting election policy in each state.

      These reports deliver insights into partisan priorities, dive deep into notable trends, and highlight activity in key states.
    • Subscribe to The Ballot Bulletin

      Subscribe to The Ballot Bulletin
      The Ballot Bulletin is a weekly email that delivers the latest updates on election policy.

      The newsletter tracks developments in election policy around the country, including legislative activity, big-picture trends, and recent news. Each email contains in-depth data from our Election Administration Legislation Tracker.


    See also

    External links

    Additional reading

    Footnotes

    1. Department of the Secretary of State; Bureau of Corporations, , "Ranked-choice Voting (RCV)," accessed November 29, 2023. In Maine, all statewide primaries and federal elections use ranked-choice voting. Other statewide elections such as for governor or the legislature do not. This is because of a 2017 ruling by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court concluding that "the Maine Constitution requires the winners of those offices in a general election to be decided by a plurality. Primary elections in Maine and elections for federal offices are governed by statute and not by the Maine Constitution."
    2. State of Alaska, Division of Elections, "Election Information," accessed November 29, 2023. In Alaska, all statewide general elections, except retention elections for state supreme court, use ranked-choice voting.
    3. State of Hawaii, Office of Elections, "Voting in Hawaii," accessed November 29, 2023.
    4. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Felon Voting Rights," March 7, 2023
    5. American Civil Liberties Union, "State Criminal Re-enfranchisement Laws," accessed March 20, 2023
    6. Brennan Center for Justice, "Restoring the Right to Vote by State," accessed March 20, 2023
    7. 7.0 7.1 National Conference of State Legislatures, "Post-Election Audits," accessed July 2, 2025
    8. Election Assistance Commission, "Election Audits Across the United States," accessed July 2, 2025
    9. Ballotpedia research conducted in October 2024, researching and analyzing various state websites and codes.