Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Beverly Armstrong

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Beverly Armstrong
Candidate, Texas 208th District Court
Texas 208th District Court
Tenure
2023 - Present
Term ends
2027
Years in position
3

Elections and appointments
Last election
November 8, 2022
Next election
March 3, 2026
Education
Bachelor's
Prairie View A&M University, 1990
Law
South Texas College of Law, 1996
Personal
Birthplace
Beaumont, TX
Religion
Christian-Methodist
Profession
First Assistant Criminal District Attorney
Contact

Beverly Armstrong (Democratic Party) is a judge of the Texas 208th District Court. She assumed office on January 1, 2023. Her current term ends on January 1, 2027.

Armstrong (Democratic Party) is running for re-election for judge of the Texas 208th District Court. She is on the ballot in the Democratic primary on March 3, 2026.[source]

Biography

Beverly Armstrong was born in Beaumont, Texas. She earned a bachelor's degree from Prairie View A&M University in 1990. She earned a law degree from the South Texas College of Law in 1996. Her career experience includes working as a first assistant criminal district attorney. Armstrong is affiliated with the Texas District and County's Association, the National Black Prosecutors Association, the Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., and the Harris County Democratic Party.[1]

Elections

2026

See also: Municipal elections in Harris County, Texas (2026)

General election

The primary will occur on March 3, 2026. The general election will occur on November 3, 2026. General election candidates will be added here following the primary.

Democratic primary

Democratic primary for Texas 208th District Court

Incumbent Beverly Armstrong (D) is running in the Democratic primary for Texas 208th District Court on March 3, 2026.


Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary

Republican primary for Texas 208th District Court

Stephen Driver (R) is running in the Republican primary for Texas 208th District Court on March 3, 2026.


Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.

2022

See also: Municipal elections in Harris County, Texas (2022)

General election

General election for Texas 208th District Court

Beverly Armstrong defeated Heather Hudson in the general election for Texas 208th District Court on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Beverly Armstrong
Beverly Armstrong (D) Candidate Connection
 
50.7
 
539,818
Image of Heather Hudson
Heather Hudson (R) Candidate Connection
 
49.3
 
525,314

Total votes: 1,065,132
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary runoff election

Democratic primary runoff for Texas 208th District Court

Beverly Armstrong defeated Kimberly McTorry in the Democratic primary runoff for Texas 208th District Court on May 24, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Beverly Armstrong
Beverly Armstrong Candidate Connection
 
52.4
 
35,832
Kimberly McTorry
 
47.6
 
32,586

Total votes: 68,418
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas 208th District Court

Beverly Armstrong and Kimberly McTorry advanced to a runoff. They defeated incumbent Greg Glass in the Democratic primary for Texas 208th District Court on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Beverly Armstrong
Beverly Armstrong Candidate Connection
 
44.9
 
66,239
Kimberly McTorry
 
38.8
 
57,186
Image of Greg Glass
Greg Glass
 
16.3
 
23,949

Total votes: 147,374
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas 208th District Court

Heather Hudson advanced from the Republican primary for Texas 208th District Court on March 1, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Heather Hudson
Heather Hudson Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
140,086

Total votes: 140,086
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2026

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Beverly Armstrong has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey. If you are Beverly Armstrong, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey.

Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?

Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for.  More than 25,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.

Help improve Ballotpedia - send us candidate contact info.


2022

Candidate Connection

Beverly Armstrong completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Armstrong's responses.

Expand all | Collapse all

25 year attorney, 15 year as Prosecutor. Currently, First Assistant DA in Polk County. Strong Public Servant with track record of keeping the community safe against habitual, violent offenders while also having record of compassion for those non-violent offenders.

Trusted by Defense Attorneys; Respected by Judges; Supported by Law Enforcement (Houston Police Officers Union endorsement).

Strong experience has seen me successfully argue in front o the 9th Court of Appeals.
  • Will stem the release of habitual, violent offenders thru the lowering of bonds.
  • Will Get back to holding trials so that people are not sitting for years waiting for justice, for their day in court.
  • A Fair and unbiased demeanor will rule my courtroom. Each voice will be given a chance to be heard in a fair and equitable way with decisions made by following the law, in consideration of the community at large.
Balanced bail reform.

Explicit Bias training by the entire Judicial System.

Fair treatment of indigent defendants so that their rights are not trampled upon by overzealous prosecutors and/or indifferent public defenders.
Beyond reproach Integrity is paramount. As an elected official with responsibility of governing, the people who fall under that jurisdiction must have trust that the right things are being done for the right reasons. The people may disagree with the decision made. But they should trust that the decision was made based in sound, fundamental principles that are in no way self-serving or biased for or against any particular group.
Adjudicate the stated responsibilities of the office that they seek/hold.

As a judge, criminal or otherwise, it is the core responsibility to call balls and strikes fairly, within the construct of the governing laws. Period. Personal concerns with the plaintiff's attorney or defendants attorney should have no bearing on decisions.

As a prosecutor, it's imperative that I present evidence in a timely (and full) manner that affords the defendant every possible chance to properly defend themselves. I hold this responsibility sacred and will continue to do so as judge, working well within the lines to ensure 100% of integrity is maintained in my courtroom by the bench.
A courtroom where EVERYONE feels like their voice/position was given a fair and ample opportunity to make their case; where EVERY person feels like they were treated with respect and dignity regardless of socio-economic status, race or any other characteristic. In the end, a legacy that the judge was fair and went strictly by the law.
My undergraduate degree from Prairie View A&M University was a B.S. in Civil Engineering.
I worked at Dow Chemical in Houston immediately after graduating. I worked there for 2 years.
A criminal judge has the ability to consider the impact towards the victim(s) and/or community at large when setting a bond or reviewing the request or a lower bond by the defendant. People should be aware of this power granted by the law when evaluating judges decisions.
Tailored justice.

Every convicted defendant must be held accountable for their actions towards the community at large.
Some are positioned to rehabilitate themselves and turn towards being a positive contributor to the community. Those people should be given every chance to make good on a "second chance."

I've also seen numerous defendants with a track record that refuse to turn around. There must be a tougher stance taken to ensure we safeguard the community at large as best we can, while not trampling on the rights of the defendant.
Empathy is part of a civilized society. As the arbiter of rules of law, judges too should embody a sense of empathy, for both the victim and a number of cases, the defendant.

A recent case shows a little girl was slain by a stray bullet from a person shooting at a person who'd just robbed them. The robber gets away and the shooter is now in jail for negligent homicide. There's a sense of tragedy and grief all around for the family of the deceased as well as the defendant who was victimized.
I'm running for this seat for two primary reasons.

The reason that initially caught my attention was the shooting of two police officers, one of whom was killed, by a defendant out on a lowered bond by the incumbent judge. Upon further review, there appeared to be a number of other felons out in a similar manner.

Additionally, there did not seem to be any cases moving. Stalled trials means justice cannot be served. For those sitting in jail, unable to make bond, their life is on hold. In many cases, they lose their jobs, their home and other possessions. And in some cases, their families who tire of waiting. How horrible, particularly in those cases where the defendant is exonerated.

Equally horrible are the number of criminals who were out on bond and then commit additional crimes because they had not yet been tried on prior offenses. The families of the victims are left without any sense of closure

So, I want to slow the release of the most violent defendants and get trials moving again.
Not necessarily. The most beneficial component is actual experience in the law, specifically the laws that govern the court in which they're serving as judge. There are very few things more aggravating than to have to take a recess due to the judge having to research rudimentary areas of law that should be known by all legal assets in the courtroom.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on February 23, 2022