Public policy made simple. Dive into our information hub today!

California Proposition 105, Disclosure Requirements to Consumers, Voters, and Investors Initiative (1988)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California Proposition 105
Flag of California.png
Election date
November 8, 1988
Topic
Business regulation and Campaign finance
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
State statute
Origin
Citizens

California Proposition 105 was on the ballot as an initiated state statute in California on November 8, 1988. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported enacting disclosure requirements for the following: 

  • Household toxic products, 
  • Coverage limits on insurance policies to supplement Medicare Nursing home contracts,
  • Donors to statewide ballot measures, and
  • Corporations in California that are selling stock or doing business in South Africa.

A "no" vote opposed the initiative to enact disclosure requirements for consumers, voters, and investors.


Election results

California Proposition 105

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

4,864,674 54.59%
No 4,046,654 45.41%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 105 was as follows:

Disclosures to Consumers, Voters, Investors. Initiative Statute.

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

Measure requires, as specified, the following disclosures: (1) advertisers' warnings regarding disposal of toxic household products with exceptions; (2) notices regarding coverage limits and insurance offeror's identity on insurance policies to supplement Medicare; (3) disclosures in nursing home contracts and advertisements regarding access to State Ombudsman and facility violation information; (4) disclosures by initiative and referendum campaign committees as to contributors; and (5) disclosures by corporations selling stocks in state whether or not they are doing business in South Africa or with any person or group located there.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.

Fiscal impact

The fiscal estimate provided by the California Legislative Analyst's Office said, "The adoption of this measure would result in costs to various state agencies to operate toll-free telephone lines, develop regulations, and keep records. The net annual costs could be up to $550,000 when the measure is fully implemented. These costs would be partially offset by unknown revenues from fines charged to people or companies who violate the disclosure requirements."[1]

Path to the ballot

See also: Signature requirements for ballot measures in California

In California, the number of signatures required for an initiated state statute is equal to 5 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election. For initiated statutes filed in 1988, at least 372,178 valid signatures were required.


See also


External links

Footnotes