It’s the 12 Days of Ballotpedia! Your gift powers the trusted, unbiased information voters need heading into 2026. Donate now!

David Maas (Waukesha County Circuit Court Branch 4, Wisconsin, candidate 2025)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

State executive offices • Supreme court • Appellate courts • State ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • Recalls • All local elections by county • How to run for office
Flag of Wisconsin.png


David Maas

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Candidate, Waukesha County Circuit Court Branch 4

Elections and appointments
Last election

April 1, 2025

Education

High school

Marquette University High School

Bachelor's

Rice University, 1995

Personal
Profession
Prosecutor
Contact

David Maas ran for election to the Waukesha County Circuit Court Branch 4 in Wisconsin. He was on the ballot in the general election on April 1, 2025.

Maas completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. Click here to read the survey answers.

[1]

Biography

David Maas provided the following biographical information via Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey on March 25, 2025:

Elections

General election

General election for Waukesha County Circuit Court Branch 4

David Maas and Bridget Schoenborn ran in the general election for Waukesha County Circuit Court Branch 4 on April 1, 2025.

Candidate
David Maas (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
Bridget Schoenborn (Nonpartisan)

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Election results

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Maas in this election.

Campaign themes

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

David Maas completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Maas' responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

For the past 25 years, I have been a state prosecutor here in Wisconsin. The bulk of my career was spent as an Assistant Attorney General where I specialized in Internet Crimes Against Children cases. I was Deputy Director of the Complex Criminal Litigation Unit and supervised our statewide prosecutor training for all ADAs in Wisconsin. My extensive courtroom experience (well over 100 cases tried to jury) have prepared me to run an efficient, effective, and fair courtroom. I have a conservative judicial philosophy, I respect the law, and I believe the Constitution should be the foundation for legal analysis.
  • Public safety is a key issue in Waukesha County. That's why we need to elect a judge who spent a quarter century fighting crime and standing up for the rights of victims. With my extensive experience, it is no wonder why the major law enforcement agencies in the county have endorsed me.
  • I have a deep respect for the rule of law, the Constitution, and separation of powers. Judges should not make laws. While judges decide facts and apply the law, the role of making law is left to the legislature and should be respected. I believe the Constitution should be the foundation of legal analysis and that legal precedent, if consistent with the Constitution, should be respected.
  • Increased technology and the power of cell phones have opened up a wide range of investigative techniques that can lead to the arrest and prosecution of otherwise unknown suspects. I have a lot of experience with 4th Amendment law and technology, and have even trained state judges in this area. Wisconsin needs judges on the bench who understand these issues, who can protect privacy interests while at the same time granting authority to law enforcement to use this technology in its investigations. I will be that judge.
I want to be careful in answering this question, because while judges are individuals who have passions and interests, those personal passions should not affect judicial decisions. The judge must be the neutral and detached magistrate who decides issues based solely upon the law and the facts. That said, the public policy issues that I could help advance as a judge are judicial/court efficiency and public awareness and education about the judicial system.
A judge should be a hard worker, must listen to litigants, and must be prepared and ready for the issues in the case. A judge should run an efficient courtroom and respect the time and professionalism of the litigants, the attorneys, the staff, and the jury.
I am a hard worker and I am used to a huge caseload. It is not unusual for an Assistant District Attorney to handle more than 500 cases at one time. I am used to that workload and know that a heavy caseload as a judge would not prevent me from handling cases in a fair and efficient manner.
Apply the rule of law, decide facts, and provide decisions to issues presented by litigants.
Judges have incredible authority, even at the circuit court level. They can incarcerate people, terminate parental rights, interpret contractual language, and take away or grant property.
I have deep respect for the Constitution and the Separation of Powers doctrine. I think the roles of the three branches should be adhered to, and it should not be the role of the judicial branch to interfere with executive policy making or legislative law making, unless the Constitution requires it.
I admire Justice Scalia and the philosophy of originalism. Having worked in high tech crimes and seen the difficulty of squaring the 4th Amendment with things like cell phones, cloud computing, and GPS location information, I have a deep respect for the idea that while our technology has far outpaced anything our framers had in mind when drafting the Constitution, their will and their intent should still be respected.
I think empathy should be a consideration for any judge. But decisions must be made without passion, prejudice, or bias.
I am passionate about making a positive impact on the legal system and Waukesha. Judges must apply the law consistently and justly while respecting the legislative process and precedent. My 25 years in state courtrooms have shown the importance of a fair, respectful court environment, upholding the highest ethical standards and prioritizing public safety. I will ensure victims’ rights are respected, offenders are held accountable, and decisions are made with community safety in mind. A firm but fair approach to justice will protect Waukesha families while maintaining the integrity of our courts.
Efficiency, access to defense attorneys for indigent defendants, time to disposition.
State Supreme Court Candidate Brad Schimel

State Court of Appeals Judge Shelley Grogan
Circuit Court Judge Jack Melvin
Waukesha County Police Chiefs Association
Waukesha Deputy Sheriffs Labor Union
Milwaukee Police Association
Fond du Lac District Attorney Eric Toney (R)

Waukesha District Attorney Sue Opper (R) retired
I think the public should have a clear understanding of where their tax dollars go and how courts operate.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. [Email with Wisconsin Secretary of State Election office, "Candidate list," March 12, 2025]