Indiana's 4th Congressional District election, 2026

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



2024
Indiana's 4th Congressional District
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
General election
Election details
Filing deadline: February 6, 2026
Primary: May 5, 2026
General: November 3, 2026
How to vote
Poll times:

6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Voting in Indiana

Race ratings
Cook Political Report: Solid Republican
DDHQ and The Hill: Pending
Inside Elections: Solid Republican
Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Republican
Ballotpedia analysis
U.S. Senate battlegrounds
U.S. House battlegrounds
Federal and state primary competitiveness
Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2026
See also
Indiana's 4th Congressional District
1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th
Indiana elections, 2026
U.S. Congress elections, 2026
U.S. Senate elections, 2026
U.S. House elections, 2026

All U.S. House districts, including the 4th Congressional District of Indiana, are holding elections in 2026. The general election is November 3, 2026. To learn more about other elections on the ballot, click here.

Candidates and election results

Note: The following list includes official candidates only. Ballotpedia defines official candidates as people who:

  • Register with a federal or state campaign finance agency before the candidate filing deadline
  • Appear on candidate lists released by government election agencies

Note: At this time, Ballotpedia is combining all declared candidates for this election into one list under a general election heading. As primary election dates are published, this information will be updated to separate general election candidates from primary candidates as appropriate.

General election

The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.

General election for U.S. House Indiana District 4

The following candidates are running in the general election for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on November 3, 2026.


Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Candidate profiles

This section includes candidate profiles that may be created in one of two ways: either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey, or Ballotpedia staff may compile a profile based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements after identifying the candidate as noteworthy. For more on how we select candidates to include, click here.

Image of Anthony Hustedt-Mai

WebsiteFacebookTwitterYouTube

Party: Republican Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "Anthony Hustedt-Mai is a veteran, scholar, educator, and dedicated public servant. He offers a rare fusion of real-world military leadership and deep academic expertise. Now actively campaigning to represent Indiana District 4, he’s ready to bring integrity, service, and results to Washington. Raised with strong Midwestern values of hard work, integrity, and service, Anthony brings a lifetime of experience and leadership to his run for Congress. With a background spanning military service, security, community service, small business, and agriculture, he is committed to putting people over politics and ensuring every citizen’s voice is heard."


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


Restore Constitutional Principles: Put the U.S. Constitution back at the center of policymaking, ensuring that every law and decision respects the founding principles of liberty, limited government, and individual rights.


Protect American Families and Communities: Prioritize public safety, border security, strong education, and support for law enforcement, veterans, and working families to build stronger, safer communities.


End Career Politics and Restore Accountability: Support term limits, demand transparency in government spending, and ensure elected officials remain accountable to the people, not special interests or party elites.

Voting information

See also: Voting in Indiana

Ballotpedia will publish the dates and deadlines related to this election as they are made available.

Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses

Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Survey responses from candidates in this race

Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Expand all | Collapse all

Restore Constitutional Principles: Put the U.S. Constitution back at the center of policymaking, ensuring that every law and decision respects the founding principles of liberty, limited government, and individual rights.

Protect American Families and Communities: Prioritize public safety, border security, strong education, and support for law enforcement, veterans, and working families to build stronger, safer communities.

End Career Politics and Restore Accountability: Support term limits, demand transparency in government spending, and ensure elected officials remain accountable to the people, not special interests or party elites.
National Security: I’m deeply committed to protecting Americans at home and abroad. That includes securing our borders, defending against foreign threats, and supporting law enforcement and emergency preparedness.

Mental Health: Working with veterans, groups like Mental Health America, and everyday constituents, I’ve seen how we need to improve access to mental health care, strengthen community-based support systems, and address causal mechanisms that impacted the wellbeing of Americans.

Education: I’m committed to empowering families and educators to teach practical skills and the values of American democracy. Investment in education and research is imperative to ensure America remains the leader in global innovation.
The list would be far too long; there are so many people that I look up to for many reasons.

I look up to leaders who have shown unwavering integrity, courage under pressure, and a commitment to doing what’s right, even when it’s not popular. I look up to those who I have served with, those who work hard every day to better their community, those who dedicate their lives to others; essentially anyone who serves a greater purpose than themselves.

I draw inspiration from the many veterans, teachers, first responders, and everyday citizens I’ve met, people who lead by example, serve quietly, and uphold their responsibilities without recognition or reward. That kind of grounded, service-minded leadership is exactly what we need more of in Washington, and it's the standard I aim to uphold.
First and foremost, the U.S. Constitution; this is the foundation of our nation, and all governing and political philosophy should be anchored in this Text. The Declaration of Independence and The Federalist Papers, as well as some of the initial legislation and court rulings, provide clarification for the specifics on the Constitution. These are essential to understanding the principles of limited government, checks and balances, and individual liberty. They remain the best guide for how our republic was designed to function.

“Democracy in America” by Alexis de Tocqueville, examines the United States as it transitioned from a fledgling nation into a power of its own, and places our history within the greater trend of humanity fighting for the liberty and the rights of man, the birth of democracy. Just about anything from Abraham Lincoln, particularly his “House Divided” Speech. This speech captures the importance of moral clarity, national unity, and leadership grounded in principle, values that I strive to carry forward in public service.

Each of these speaks to my core belief: that government exists to protect liberty, serve the people, and stay within its constitutional bounds.
The most important characteristics and principles for an elected official are integrity, accountability, and a commitment to service over self. An official must be guided by strong morals, staying true to their promises and values even when it’s inconvenient or unpopular. Transparency and honesty are equally critical. Leaders should communicate openly with their constituents, make decisions based on facts and principles, and accept responsibility for their actions. Finally, a true public servant must have the courage to put the needs of the people above party politics, special interests, or personal ambition, always remembering that the office is a position of trust, not entitlement.
I bring a combination of leadership experience, integrity, and a deep commitment to service. My background in the U.S. Navy, both as an enlisted submariner and as a Surface Warfare Officer, taught me the importance of discipline, accountability, and making tough decisions under pressure. I’m also grounded in constitutional principles and have spent years studying and teaching issues like national security, terrorism, and American governance. I’m not running to build a career in politics, I’m running to serve, to listen, and to fight for the people of my district with honesty, courage, and resolve. I believe in doing what’s right, not what’s easy, and I’ll carry that mindset with me to Washington
The core responsibilities of a member of the U.S. House of Representatives are to represent the people of their district, uphold the Constitution, and ensure that the federal government remains accountable and effective. That means listening to constituents, introducing and voting on legislation that reflects their needs and values, and maintaining oversight of federal agencies and spending. It also involves being a strong advocate for local and regional concerns on the national stage, working to secure resources, support, and solutions for the communities you serve. Above all, the role requires constant vigilance to preserve liberty, protect the public, and ensure that every action taken aligns with the principles on which this nation was founded.
I want to leave a legacy of service, integrity, and constitutional leadership, one that proves politics doesn’t have to be about power, but about purpose. I hope to be remembered as someone who stood firm in principle, fought for the people, and helped restore faith in government by making it more transparent, accountable, and responsive. If I can help renew a sense of unity, strengthen the foundation of our republic, and inspire others to lead with courage and conviction, then I’ll consider my time in office a success. Ultimately, I want my children, and all future generations, to inherit a freer, stronger, and more honest America.
I can vividly remember the Oklahoma City bombing. I was living in Muskogee, Oklahoma and would have been about 10 years old. I showed up to school late, after a dentist appointment, and all of the teachers were huddled around a tv in the hallway. While the other kids were in their classrooms, I stood behind the teachers, staring at news coverage of the smoldering ruble and the frantic response for several minutes, before being rushed off to my classroom.
I delivered newspapers for most of my childhood and detasseled corn for several summers. My first traditional job was at Jimmy John’s, where I worked for almost two years, from right after my 16th birthday until I shipped out for boot camp.
One of my favorite books is Accessory to War by Neil deGrasse Tyson. It explores the deep and often overlooked relationship between science, particularly space exploration, and military power. What I find most compelling is how the book connects scientific advancement with national security, strategy, and global influence, showing that the pursuit of knowledge is never entirely separate from matters of power and defense. As someone with a background in the military and a passion for national security, this book resonated deeply with me. It reinforces the idea that science, innovation, and strategic thinking must go hand-in-hand if we’re serious about securing America’s future. It also highlights the importance of ethical leadership when applying advanced technologies in both war and peace. Plus, I’m really a nerd at heart.
I’d honestly rather be myself, facing real-world challenges head-on and working to make a tangible difference in the lives of others. I believe leadership isn’t about fantasy or perfection; it’s about showing up, staying grounded, and doing the hard work of solving real problems.

That said, I’d choose Captain America. He represents timeless values like courage, integrity, and selfless service, always standing up for what’s right, even when it’s difficult or unpopular. He doesn’t seek power for himself but uses his strength to protect others and defend freedom. What I admire most is that Captain America isn’t just a soldier and a hero, he’s a symbol of principle. He believes in the Constitution, in the people, and in doing the right thing no matter what the cost.

When the U.S. Navy switched to the Navy Working Uniform, many of my blue undershirts were emblazoned with the Captain America shield.
Other than answering all of these questions…

One of the greatest struggles in my life has been balancing a deep commitment to service with the demands it places on family and personal well-being. Serving in the military, especially in high-stakes roles focused on national security and counterterrorism, required long hours, constant readiness, and time away from loved ones. It was an incredible honor, but it came with sacrifice.

That experience taught me resilience, perspective, and the importance of priorities. It also gave me a profound respect for the struggles everyday Americans face, balancing work, service, and family under real pressure. That personal understanding drives me to be a leader who listens, serves with empathy, and always remembers the human side of public policy.
The U.S. House of Representatives is unique because of its close connection to the people. With shorter office terms and smaller districts, members of the House are designed to be the most responsive to their constituents. This frequent accountability should help to ensure that representatives stay in touch with the needs, values, and voices of the communities they serve. The House also plays a critical role in bringing local and regional concerns to the national stage. When crafting federal policy, it’s essential to understand how decisions will impact families, businesses, and communities on the ground. House members are positioned to provide that vital perspective, making sure national legislation is informed by local concerns.
It is certainly beneficial for representatives to have previous experience, not just in government or politics, but in a wide range of fields like business, law, military, education, and emergency planning. These experiences help prepare leaders to navigate the complexities of policy, understand the impact of legislation, and make informed decisions for the country. Good governance depends on a consensus of experts with diverse backgrounds. When the House includes individuals with firsthand knowledge of how laws affect everyday life, whether it’s in the classroom, on the battlefield, or in the boardroom, it leads to more practical, balanced, and effective policymaking.
One of the greatest challenges facing the United States over the next decade is the deepening national divide. Political polarization has reached a point where party identity often matters more than national unity. We must remember that we are Americans first, and its past time we start acting like it.

I truly believe that people are good (just ask Luke Bryan). There are some who have no business in leadership positions, but most of us are good people trying to do good things for others. As elected representatives, we need to engage in productive debates about how best to serve the American people. We all want to live a happy life with jobs that allow us to support our families and accomplish something meaningful, while enjoying a sense of security without being burdened by unnecessary government controls and obstructions.

Another serious challenge is the erosion of checks and balances. Administrations going back several decades, from both parties, have increasingly relied on executive orders and policy directives to bypass the legislative process. This is not how our system was designed to work. Major policies should go through the Legislative Branch, be debated, voted on, and passed into law, to ensure transparency, accountability, and the consent of the governed.
I believe the two-year term length for representatives serves an important purpose. It keeps members of the House closely tied to the people they represent, requiring them to remain responsive and accountable. The regular campaign check-in with voters helps ensure that their voices are heard and reflected in Washington. The short term can also pose challenges for long-term planning and sustained policy implementation. Some initiatives require more time to gain traction and show results. While the two-year cycle encourages responsiveness, it also creates pressure to focus on short-term wins rather than long-term solutions. That’s a balance every representative must carefully manage.
I strongly believe term limits are imperative to better governance and have signed a pledge to support their implementation. Just as in the military, where leaders regularly rotate through commands to prevent complacency and broaden their experience, our elected officials should not become permanent fixtures in office. Fresh leadership brings accountability, new energy, and a stronger connection to the people they represent. I also believe we should consider age limits. Leadership requires not only wisdom but also the ability to adapt, engage, and respond to fast-moving challenges. Our government works best when it reflects both experience and vitality, not when it’s dominated by career politicians who’ve lost touch with their constituents.
While his later work is more notable, Abraham Lincoln served in the U.S. House of Representatives. Even then, he demonstrated a strong moral compass, principled leadership, and a deep respect for the Constitution. Lincoln held firm to his values and wasn’t afraid to take a stand when it mattered. He supported the idea of citizen legislators, individuals who serve their country, then return to private life. That same mindset informs my views on term limits and public service. Like Lincoln, I believe elected office should be about duty, not personal power.
It’s impossible to choose just one, I’ve been deeply moved by veterans who have quietly borne the weight of their service, farmers working tirelessly to preserve their land and way of life, police officers and educators who show up every day to serve their communities with integrity and dedication. These are the stories that ground my campaign and remind me of who I’m fighting for. Some of the most impactful conversations have been with the team from Mental Health America. Their passion, experience, and tireless advocacy for those experiencing a mental health crisis is inspiring. Their voices are a powerful reminder that good policy starts by listening to the people doing the work on the front lines.
Any knock-knock joke told by a three-year-old.
I believe compromise is essential for effective policymaking. A functioning republic depends on the ability of leaders to listen, negotiate, and find common ground, not just to win political points, but to serve the people. Rarely will there be governing policies that can cleanly address the differences between urban and rural or coastal and inland areas, or any of the other differences between American across our nation. Legislators must engage in conversations of learning and compromise in order to avoid enacting laws that are inadvertently harmful to sections of the American populus. Transparency and full disclosure are critical to this process. Voting on freshly written legislation, without time for Representatives to review and assess the potential second and third order effects on their constituents, is an unacceptable practice. Final versions of bills should be provided to elected officials and their staff at least 72 hours before a vote and made available to the general public at least 48 hours in advance. Rushed legislation benefits special interests, not the American people.
This responsibility is rooted in our nation’s founding principles. From the very beginning, the Founders intended the people’s chamber to be directly accountable for how government extracts funds from the population and economy in order to fund operations and services. That’s not just a formality; it’s a core function of our republic.

I take this responsibility seriously. Our system of checks and balances only works when each branch fulfills its role, and the House must lead when it comes to fiscal policy. That means ensuring transparency, discipline, and fairness in how revenue is raised and how it aligns with spending.

More importantly, it means knowing our constituents and representing their priorities in Washington. Revenue decisions affect every American, from the price of goods to the strength of our economy. I will work to ensure that tax policy reflects the values, needs, and expectations of the people I serve, not the interests of a distant bureaucracy.
The U.S. House should use its investigative powers to provide strong oversight that drives the effectiveness and efficiency of government programs and spending. These powers are essential tools for ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that government agencies are serving the public as intended. Oversight should not be just pointing fingers, rather it should be about identifying problems, demanding honest answers, and improving results. Transparency and accountability must be the foundation of this process. Investigations should be fair, thorough, and focused on rooting out corruption and the exploitation of public office or government contracts, regardless of political party. Holding weak or dishonest officials accountable should not divide us; it strengthens our institutions and makes our party, and our country, more credible and trustworthy.
There is a wide range of committees where I can best serve my constituents and nation. Additionally, I believe my experience would provide added value to many of the committees: Agriculture, Appropriations, Armed Services, Education and Workforce, Ethics, Foreign Affairs, Homeland Security, Intelligence, Oversight and Government Reform, Science, Space, and Technology, and Veterans’ Affairs. Knowing I won’t be able to do it all, Agriculture, Education and Workforce, and Veterans’ Affairs I where I could provide the greatest impact.
I believe financial transparency and government accountability are non-negotiable. The American people have every right to know how their tax dollars are being spent and to expect honesty, efficiency, and integrity from their elected officials and public institutions. Accountability starts with clear oversight and continues with regular, accessible reporting on government spending and decision-making. I support strict transparency requirements for federal budgets, agency performance, and legislative processes. That includes giving both Congress and the public ample time to review bills before votes are cast. When government operates in the open, corruption is exposed, trust is restored, and the system works as it was meant to, for the people.


You can ask candidates in this race to fill out the survey by clicking their names below:

Campaign finance

Name Party Receipts* Disbursements** Cash on hand Date
Jim Baird Republican Party $68,336 $143,230 $139,715 As of June 30, 2025
Drew Cox Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Thomas D. Hall Jr. Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
John Whetstone Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Chad Elwartowski Republican Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Craig Haggard Republican Party $49,360 $26,303 $83,700 As of June 30, 2025
Anthony Hustedt-Mai Republican Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***

Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2026. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee."
** According to the FEC, a disbursement "is a purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or anything of value to influence a federal election," plus other kinds of payments not made to influence a federal election.
*** Candidate either did not report any receipts or disbursements to the FEC, or Ballotpedia did not find an FEC candidate ID.

General election race ratings

See also: Race rating definitions and methods

Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:

  • Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
  • Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
  • Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[1]
  • Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.

Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[2][3][4]

Race ratings: Indiana's 4th Congressional District election, 2026
Race trackerRace ratings
9/30/20259/23/20259/16/20259/9/2025
The Cook Political Report with Amy WalterSolid RepublicanSolid RepublicanSolid RepublicanSolid Republican
Decision Desk HQ and The HillPendingPendingPendingPending
Inside Elections with Nathan L. GonzalesSolid RepublicanSolid RepublicanSolid RepublicanSolid Republican
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal BallSafe RepublicanSafe RepublicanSafe RepublicanSafe Republican
Note: Ballotpedia reviews external race ratings every week throughout the election season and posts weekly updates even if the media outlets have not revised their ratings during that week.

Ballot access

This section will contain information on ballot access related to this state's elections when it is available.

District history

The section below details election results for this office in elections dating back to 2020.

2024

See also: Indiana's 4th Congressional District election, 2024

Indiana's 4th Congressional District election, 2024 (May 7 Democratic primary)

Indiana's 4th Congressional District election, 2024 (May 7 Republican primary)

General election

General election for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Incumbent Jim Baird defeated Derrick Holder and Ashley Groff in the general election for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jim Baird
Jim Baird (R)
 
64.8
 
209,794
Image of Derrick Holder
Derrick Holder (D) Candidate Connection
 
30.9
 
100,091
Ashley Groff (L)
 
4.2
 
13,710

Total votes: 323,595
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Derrick Holder defeated Rimpi Girn in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on May 7, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Derrick Holder
Derrick Holder Candidate Connection
 
63.5
 
7,709
Image of Rimpi Girn
Rimpi Girn
 
36.5
 
4,436

Total votes: 12,145
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Incumbent Jim Baird defeated Charles Bookwalter and John Piper in the Republican primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on May 7, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jim Baird
Jim Baird
 
64.7
 
48,723
Image of Charles Bookwalter
Charles Bookwalter
 
27.2
 
20,505
Image of John Piper
John Piper
 
8.0
 
6,052

Total votes: 75,280
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2022

See also: Indiana's 4th Congressional District election, 2022

General election

General election for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Incumbent Jim Baird defeated Roger Day in the general election for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jim Baird
Jim Baird (R)
 
68.2
 
134,864
Roger Day (D)
 
31.8
 
62,834

Total votes: 197,698
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Roger Day defeated Howard Pollchik in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on May 3, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Roger Day
 
68.2
 
5,680
Howard Pollchik
 
31.8
 
2,648

Total votes: 8,328
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Incumbent Jim Baird advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on May 3, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jim Baird
Jim Baird
 
100.0
 
50,342

Total votes: 50,342
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2020

See also: Indiana's 4th Congressional District election, 2020

General election

General election for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Incumbent Jim Baird defeated Joe Mackey in the general election for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jim Baird
Jim Baird (R)
 
66.6
 
225,531
Image of Joe Mackey
Joe Mackey (D)
 
33.4
 
112,984

Total votes: 338,515
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Joe Mackey defeated Veronikka Ziol, Benjamin Frederick, and Howard Pollchik in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on June 2, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Joe Mackey
Joe Mackey
 
53.9
 
18,086
Veronikka Ziol
 
28.7
 
9,630
Benjamin Frederick
 
13.4
 
4,484
Howard Pollchik
 
4.0
 
1,328

Total votes: 33,528
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4

Incumbent Jim Baird advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Indiana District 4 on June 2, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jim Baird
Jim Baird
 
100.0
 
65,806

Total votes: 65,806
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates



District analysis

This section will contain facts and figures related to this district's elections when those are available.

See also

Indiana 2026 primaries 2026 U.S. Congress elections
Seal of Indiana.png
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
CongressLogosmall.png
Indiana congressional delegation
Voting in Indiana
Indiana elections:
202620252024202320222021202020192018
Democratic primary battlegrounds
Republican primary battlegrounds
U.S. Senate Democratic primaries
U.S. Senate Republican primaries
U.S. House Democratic primaries
U.S. House Republican primaries
U.S. Congress elections
U.S. Senate elections
U.S. House elections
Special elections
Ballot access

External links

Footnotes

  1. Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
  2. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
  3. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
  4. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Jim Baird (R)
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
Republican Party (9)
Democratic Party (2)