Louisiana Orleans Parish Tax for Fire and Police Protection, Amendment 6 (2014)
The Louisiana Orleans Parish Tax for Fire and Police Protection, Amendment 6 was on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Louisiana as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure authorized Orleans Parish to increase the annual ad valorem tax levied for fire and police protection and required that the revenue from the fire and police millages be used for fire and police protection service enhancements. It did this by raising the special millage caps for police and fire protection from five to ten mills. The measure also required a separate vote on the increase by constituents of Orleans Parish.[1][2]
The proposed amendment was introduced into the Louisiana Legislature by State Representative Walt Leger, III (D-91) as House Bill 111. Mayor Mitch Landrieu (D) of New Orleans proposed the amendment.[3]
Election results
| Louisiana Amendment 6 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
 Yes | 672,431 | 51.15% | ||
| No | 642,097 | 48.85% | ||
Election results via: Louisiana Secretary of State
Text of measure
Ballot title
The proposed ballot text read as follows:[1]
| “ | Do you support an amendment to authorize the governing authority of Orleans Parish to increase the annual millage rate levied for fire and police protection, to require that the revenue from the fire and police millages be used for fire and police protection service enhancements, and to require that any increase be approved by the voters of Orleans Parish? (Amends Article VI, Section 26(E)) (Effective January 1, 2015) (Amends Article IX, Section 7(A))[4] |
” |
Constitutional changes
The measure amended Section 26(E) of Article VI of the Constitution of Louisiana:[1]
(E) Additional Taxes for Orleans Parish.
- (1) In addition to any millage authorized by Paragraph (A) of this Section, the governing authority of Orleans Parish may levy annually
, for the year 1991 and thereafter,an additional ad valorem tax for fire protection not to exceedfivesix mills on the dollar of assessed valuation and an additional ad valorem tax for police protection not to exceedfivesix mills on the dollar of assessed valuation.The millage rates for such additional ad valorem taxes may not be increased.Notwithstanding the provisions of Article VII, Section 20(A), the homestead exemption shall not extend to such additional ad valorem taxes.Provided, however, that theThe additional revenues generated by these fire and police millages shall not displace, replace, or supplant funding by the city of New Orleans for fire and police protection for calendar year19902013 nor shall the level of funding for such purposes by the city for that calendar year be decreased below such level in any subsequent calendar yearhereafter. Furthermore, the revenues generated by these fire and police millages shall be used solely for fire and police protection service enhancements, respectively, that directly contribute to the safety of the residents of Orleans Parish. In the event of either of the above, the authorization for such fire and police millages herein shall be null, void, and of no effect. This provision shall mean that no appropriation for any calendar year from such additional revenues shall be made for any purpose for which a city appropriation was made in the previous year unless the total appropriations for that calendar year from the city for such purpose exceed city appropriations for the previous year. This provision shall in no way limit city appropriations in excess of the minimum amounts herein established.
- (2) Any additional ad valorem tax authorized by the amendment of Subparagraph (1) of this Paragraph as approved by the voters in 2014 shall be levied only if approved by a majority of the electors of Orleans Parish who vote on a proposition authorizing the additional tax at an election held for that purpose.[4]
Support
New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu (D) originally proposed the amendment. Rep. Walt Leger, III (D-91) sponsored the amendment in the Louisiana Legislature.[3]
A full list of legislators by how they voted on the amendment can be found here.
Arguments
The Public Affairs Research Council provided arguments for and against the constitutional amendment. The following was the council's argument in support:
| “ | The city of New Orleans has a crying need for better public services to help protect residents from crime, contribute to rebuilding after the tragic effects of Katrina and foster citywide economic development. Because New Orleans has been so constrained by the old millage cap, raising it would allow for desperately needed funds to help New Orleans decide its own destiny. The parish has faced unexpected expenditures stemming from police and sheriff consent decrees along with firefighter retirement settlements. The amendment could raise proceeds for public safety initia- tives. This change would affect only owners of property in Orleans Parish. Other parishes across the state would not face any changes to their millage caps or rates as a result of this amendment. | ” |
| —Public Affairs Research Council[2] | ||
Opposition
A full list of legislators by how they voted on the amendment can be found here.
Arguments
The Public Affairs Research Council provided arguments for and against the constitutional amendment. The following was the council's argument against:
| “ | Orleans already has the highest general and special millage caps of any parish in the state. Doubling the special millage cap would open the door for the New Orleans City Council to raise taxes. While the amendment itself does not raise taxes, a current or future City Council or mayor, sooner or later, is sure to press for higher millages. Once the cap is raised, New Orleans prospectively will become a more expensive and less competitive city for business development and home ownership. Higher taxes are not the best path to post-Katrina recovery. The city would do better to constrain spending and waste. | ” |
| —Public Affairs Research Council[2] | ||
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Louisiana Constitution
A two-thirds majority vote was required in both chambers of the Louisiana Legislature in order to place the constitutional amendment on the ballot. House Bill 111 was approved by the Louisiana Senate on May 27, 2014. The measure was approved by the Louisiana House on May 29, 2014. The amendment was approved unanimously in both chambers.[5]
Senate vote
May 27, 2014 Senate vote
| Louisiana HB 111 Senate Vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 35 | 100.00% | ||
| No | 0 | 0.00% | ||
House vote
May 29, 2014 House vote
| Louisiana HB 111 House Vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 85 | 100.00% | ||
| No | 0 | 0.00% | ||
See also
External links
Additional reading
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Louisiana Legislature, "House Bill No. 111," accessed April 9, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Public Affairs Research Council, "Guide to the 2014 Constitutional Amendments," accessed September 12, 2014
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 The Lens, "Legislature approves property tax hike for New Orleans police & fire; now heads to voters," May 29, 2014
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Louisiana Legislature, "HB111 Status," accessed May 30, 2014
| ||||||||||||||||
 |
State of Louisiana Baton Rouge (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
