Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Melena Siebert

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Melena Siebert

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals
Tenure

2025 - Present

Term ends

2031

Years in position

0

Predecessor
Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 5, 2024

Education

Bachelor's

University of Cincinnati, 1991

Law

University of Cincinnati College of Law, 2017

Personal
Birthplace
Xenia, Ohio
Religion
Christian
Profession
Attorney
Contact

Melena Siebert (Republican Party) is a judge of the Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals. She assumed office on February 9, 2025. Her current term ends on February 8, 2031.

Siebert (Republican Party) ran for election for judge of the Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals. She won in the general election on November 5, 2024.

Siebert completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Melena Siebert was born in Xenia, Ohio. Siebert's professional experience includes working as an attorney and saleswoman. She earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Cincinnati in 1991 and a J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2017.[1]

Siebert has been affiliated with Family Promise of Butler County and Center Pointe Christian Church.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: Ohio intermediate appellate court elections, 2024

General election

General election for Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals

Melena Siebert won election in the general election for Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Melena Siebert (R) Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
389,980

Total votes: 389,980
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals

Melena Siebert defeated Barbara Schneider Carter in the Republican primary for Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals on March 19, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Melena Siebert Candidate Connection
 
50.4
 
53,082
Image of Barbara Schneider Carter
Barbara Schneider Carter
 
49.6
 
52,198

Total votes: 105,280
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign finance

Endorsements

To view Siebert's endorsements as published by their campaign, click here. Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Siebert in this election.

Campaign themes

2024

Video for Ballotpedia

Video submitted to Ballotpedia
Released February 12, 2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Melena Siebert completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Siebert's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I currently work as an attorney with one of the most conservative law firms in the country with a national practice. Our firm focuses on constitutional and election law, with special emphasis on the First Amendment, election integrity, and right-to-life litigation. Virtually every case I litigate requires a complex analysis of the underlying statute or constitutional provision in question. I have litigated in trial and appellate courts all over the country, including the Supreme Court of the United States.

My husband and I settled in Butler County 30 years ago. I have been an active, contributing member of the community for years.

I came to the law as a third career. After growing up in Jamestown, in rural Greene County, I went to UC and earned a marketing degree. Although I had always been interested in law and politics and thought about law school after undergrad but ultimately decided to pursue a sales career instead. I had a successful sales career for eight years, selling to a broad spectrum of businesses in the region. Then I stayed home for 15 years and raised two incredible kids. After the kids started growing up, I decided to fulfill a lifelong dream and began law school at the age of 46.

What all of this means to you is that I would bring not only a great deal of legal appellate experience to the bench, but also a a variety of life experiences that enable me to understand different perspectives and will serve you well on the bench.
  • I believe judicial philosophy matters. Because you vote for judges in Ohio, you have a direct say in the type of judicial philosophy those judges support. My experience proves that I have the strongest, most conservative judicial philosophy of anyone running for this position, and that I will serve the district well.
  • Judges at the appellate level must be able to interpret law using solid reasoning while understanding their job is NOT to write new law. We have all seen the impact of judges in both federal and state courts who believe they can make law based upon their personal policy beliefs - that’s why judicial philosophy matters. In courts in Ohio and across the country, I advocate for my clients by interpreting and analyzing statutes and constitutions, using the type of solid reasoning that will serve the district well when I’m elected to the bench.
  • Judges must exercise judicial restraint and have respect for the separation of powers – judges don’t write law and they are not supposed to make it up from the bench. As I’ve heard Chief Justice Sharon Kennedy put it, the first question should be, “where is my authority to do what you’re asking me to do?” My experience proves that I understand and respect these principles of judicial restraint and separation of powers because I argue for that on behalf of my clients regularly.
I am passionate about approaching the interpretation of law from an originalist and textualist perspective.

I have many areas of public policy I am passionate about, including: the right to life, promoting a more limited, proper role for the federal and state governments, and protecting individual rights so fundamental to our society.

When elected, I understand that I must interpret the law fairly and accurately, despite what my personal policy preferences might be.
My mother. I lost my mother last year, but she was an extraordinary woman. She loved me and my sisters fiercely, and she always taught me to stand up for what I believe. She also taught me "there is no such thing as a stupid question!" Her constant love and support made me believe I could achieve anything I set my mind to.
An elected official must have a strong set of guiding principles and must represent and serve her constituents with integrity.
Most importantly, I have the skills to analyze, interpret, and write about the law, developed through my litigation work. I have the strong principles and judicial philosophy that will serve this district well.
An appellate judge must have a strong skill set in analyzing and writing about law. In my current practice focusing on constitutional an election law, virtually every case I litigate requires the same sort of complex statutory and constitutional analysis that I would use on the appellate bench.
I would like to leave a legacy of people who know and follow Jesus.
I distinctly remember when President Reagan was shot. I was a great admirer of President Reagan, even though I was fairly young.
My first job was working at the concession stand at "Blue Jacket: The Epic Outdoor Drama" in Xenia, Ohio! I worked there for two summers.
I have two:

1. To Kill a Mockingbird because it speaks to justice and the struggle to achieve it so well.

2. The Harry Potter series (I know that's technically 7 books!) because my son struggled with dyslexia. These were the first books that sparked his interest (I read all 7 books out loud to him), and they inspired him to continue working on his reading skills.
Virtually any song by Billy Joel, my favorite artist.
I struggled with infertility for several years. But through this struggle, I grew closer to God.
People should be aware that an appellate judge and a trial court judge serve much different roles in our system of government and therefore require different skills. An appellate judge focuses on analyzing the legal decisions made by the trial court judge. Therefore, it is critical that an appellate judge have a strong judicial philosophy to guide and direct the type of analysis she does. An appellate judge must understand that her role is to interpret law, not write it.
I have a conservative judicial philosophy, focused on an originalist and textualist interpretation of the law.
Justice Antonin Scalia is my judicial hero. Not just because of the strength of his intellect, but because he strengthened the judiciary and largely changed (and improved) the way law was interpreted.
Of course empathy is important. But at the appellate level, empathy for any particular party cannot interfere with or change the judge's legal analysis. A strong, consistent legal analysis is critical for our system of government. An appellate judge must begin and end with the proper legal analysis, regardless of the outcome that results from that analysis. A judge should not base her legal analysis on a preferred outcome -- instead, she should focus on interpreting and applying the law using strong interpretative methods of textualism and originalism.
I love advocating for my clients. But I want to serve the 12th District because I want to be an advocate for the law itself and its correct interpretation.
I believe it is important for an appellate judge to have experience that demonstrates her judicial philosophy. That experience can come in a variety of forms, including, like mine, experience in litigating at the appellate level.
We need to ensure that Ohio's appellate judges accurately interpret law. The best way to do so is by electing judges with a strong, developed judicial philosophy that includes an originalist and textualist approach to the law.
I think our legal system will be greatly benefited by electing judges at all levels with a strong, proven, conservative judicial philosophy.

Administratively, our legal system will be strengthened by implementing technology and more streamlined systems for litigators who practice in the courts.
I love to laugh. I can't recall a singular favorite joke, but I really enjoyed seeing Nate Bargatze's show recently!
Warren County Republican Party

Brown County Republican Party
Right to Life of Butler County
Conservative Republican Leadership Committee
State Representative Rodney Creech
Warren County Right to Life
Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell

State Board of Education Member Sue Hackett
Accountability and financial transparency is critical in our system of government. "The consent of the governed" requires both.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Melena Siebert campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* Ohio Twelfth District Court of AppealsWon general$33,631 $139,164
Grand total$33,631 $139,164
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on February 21, 2024

Political offices
Preceded by
Stephen Powell (R)
Ohio Twelfth District Court of Appeals
2025-Present
Succeeded by
-