Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Nevada Limit Contingency Fees in Civil Cases Initiative (2026)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nevada Limit Contingency Fees in Civil Cases Initiative
Flag of Nevada.png
Election date
November 3, 2026
Topic
Civil and criminal trials
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
State statute
Origin
Citizens

The Nevada Limit Contingency Fees in Civil Cases Initiative will not appear on the ballot in Nevada as an indirect initiated state statute on November 3, 2026.

This initiative would have limited the contingency fees attorneys can charge or receive in civil cases to 20% of any amounts recovered.[1]

Text of measure

Full text

The full text of the initiative is here.

Path to the ballot

Process in Nevada

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Nevada

In Nevada, the number of signatures required to qualify an indirect initiated state statute for the ballot is equal to 10 percent of the total votes cast in the most recent general election. Moreover, signature gathering must be distributed equally among each of the state's four congressional districts. The initial filing of an initiated state statute cannot be made before January 1 of the year preceding the next regular legislative session. Signature petitions must be filed with county officials by the second Tuesday in November of an even-numbered year—two years prior to the targeted election date. The final submission of signatures to the secretary of state must be made at least 30 days prior to the start of the next regular legislative session.

The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2026 ballot:

Signatures are verified by county clerks using a random sampling method if more than 500 signatures were submitted in that county. If enough signatures are submitted and verified, the initiative goes before the legislature. If the legislature approves and the governor signs the measure, there is no election. Otherwise, the initiative goes on the next general election ballot.

Stages of this ballot initiative

  • The measure was filed with the secretary of state by the Fair Recovery PAC on March 18, 2024.[1]
  • On September 11, 2024, the campaign submitted 206,313 signatures at multiple county offices.[2]

Lawsuit


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article contains a developing news story. Ballotpedia staff are checking for updates regularly. To inform us of new developments, email us at editor@ballotpedia.org.



Lawsuit overview
Issue: Was the "description of effect" insufficient or misleading?
Court: Nevada Supreme Court
Ruling: Description of effect was misleading
Plaintiff(s): Uber Sexual Assault Survivors for Legal Accountability and Nevada Justice AssociationDefendant(s): Uber Technologies Inc, et. al.

  Source: Nevada Supreme Court Ruling

On January 27, 2025, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the initiative summary or description of effect was misleading. The initial lawsuit was filed by the Nevada Justice Association in April. In May of 2024, a Carson City district judge dismissed the lawsuit. The decision by the Nevada Supreme Court reversed the lower court ruling.[3]

See also

  • Ballot measure lawsuits
  • Ballot measure readability
  • Ballot measure polls

External links

Footnotes